X Close

The Tory playboy who toppled the toffs Iain Macleod was destined to be PM — and then fate caught up with him

When told that Macleod was too young to be eligible, Churchill shot back that he was too eligible to be too young. Credit: Reg Lancaster/Express/Hulton Archive/Getty Images

When told that Macleod was too young to be eligible, Churchill shot back that he was too eligible to be too young. Credit: Reg Lancaster/Express/Hulton Archive/Getty Images


April 7, 2021   6 mins

Iain Macleod was the last Chancellor to die in office. He lasted 30 days, 17 of which were spent in recovery from a stomach operation. When he had his fatal heart attack, at 23:35 on July 20, 1970, it cast a dark omen over the already fragile Edward Heath government.

“At the graveside, I felt an orphan,” recalled Patrick Jenkin, economic secretary to the Treasury. With no wife to share his grief, his political companion now gone, Heath retreated into Number 10 to heave his great shoulders into his beloved piano. The sudden emptiness of the stage was palpable.

A playboy and a gambler, intellectually nimble, emotionally available, the best orator of his intake, decisive, demotic, and definitely not for U-turning, Macleod was everything Heath was not. He made his mark within two years of arriving in the Commons, in 1952, facing off against Nye Bevan. To have a debate on the National Health Service without the right hon. Gentleman,” he told Labour’s Health Secretary, “would be like putting on Hamlet with no one in the part of the First Gravedigger.”

 

Amid the laughter, watching from the front bench, Churchill leaned over to an aide: “Who is that man? Put him in the government.” When he was told that Macleod was too young to be eligible, Churchill shot back that he was too eligible to be too young. Macleod was immediately made Minister of Health.

By 1959, Harold Macmillan came calling with an even bigger job: Colonial Secretary. Macleod must have seemed perfectly suited — after all, hed never set foot in a single British colony. Indeed, his pre-war life had consisted mainly of playing bridge. At university, hed only skated by, preferring to play cards for money, winning staggering sums. In 1932, while holding down a full-time job as a rep for a playing cards manufacturer, he won eight times his annual salary on the tables. Years later, he wrote a book, Bridge Is An Easy Game, which popularised a bidding system called Acol, still in use today.

Today, though, we live in a world where 77% of British politicians flunked the most basic test of coin-toss statistical logic. Most of them as the debate about the race report has most recently shown — continually mistake correlation for causation. Macleod was that rarest of things: a politician who could not only add up, but discern noise from signal. The kind who might have started an inquiry into social inequality by asking the most obvious question, And what other variables have you controlled for?”

But leadership is more than calculation — it is character, and foresight. Macleod showed he had both during his short but significant stint in the Colonial office. In 1959, the winds of change were whispering through Africa. Soon, they would blow. The tide of black nationalism could not be held back, Macleod quickly concluded. There were two options: go slowly, listening to the mitherings of the Tory Right, and end up fighting endless, bloody rear-guard actions, or: get out cleanly, quickly and on Her Majesty’s own terms. Summing up the situation, he thus resolved to make himself “the last Colonial Secretary. He failed — but not for want of trying.

Cutting loose the absent-minded baggage of Empire was not as simple as getting a few signatures. West Africa, perhaps; but over in East Africa, the situation was complicated by the existence of large white and Indian minorities, fearful of what black majority rule would mean for them. One by one, Macleod pulled the thorns from the bears’ paws, deploying all his bridge-building and -playing skills to skirt round the tyranny of the majority. To take one example, in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), Macleods plan was, by his own lights, incredibly devious and tortuous”. It involved:

a Legislative Council with 16 African members to 14 Europeans, and a legislative council of 45 members, 15 of whom would be elected by a largely African electoral roll, 15 by a largely European roll, 14 by both rolls jointly (with a further stipulation that successful candidates had to gain at least 10 per cent of the African votes and 10 per cent of the European ones).”

By such devices, Britain avoided the consequences endured by a neighbouring de-colonising power. France invested blood and treasure in an Algerian conflict often called “its Vietnam” (it also sunk blood and treasure in Vietnam — French Indo-China — culminating in national embarrassment at the battle of Dien Bien Phu.) In our country, there was no equivalent of the retaliatory Paris Massacre of 1961, nor an OAS-style colonial terror campaign on our doorstep. This is the tale we now tell, but it was hardly inevitable. History is full of politicians whose frog boiled. The one unsolved case in Macleod’s inbox — Rhodesia — is the paradigm for what happens if you continue to drive with the handbrake on.

As with F. W. de Klerk — the last of Africa’s colonial liberators — it was often not the freedom fighters on the far side of the table who formed Macleod’s real opposition: it was his own team. In the early 1960s, the Conservatives were still run by the grouse moors gang of Macmillan. Many were horrified by Macleod’s hastehe endured whispering campaigns, and open sniping. The Marquess of Salisbury famously called him too clever by precisely half”. Macleods decisive speed seems to have out-flanked them for a while. Until, in 1961, a panicked Macmillan replaced him with the more emollient Reginald Maudling.

Macmillan was not entirely wrong in his decisionAny Greatest PM Who Never Was list must first contend with why they never was, and it was not only his propensity for fatal heart attacks that kept Macleod out. A bit like his one-time friend Enoch Powell, Macleod never could wait till he saw the whites of their eyes. Often hailed as “the cleverest Tory of his generation”, the list of fools he would not suffer gladly went on and on. His offhand manner climaxed with a disastrous stint as Party chairman, where he alienated the party’s many unpaid volunteers by stipulating that local constituency workers would have to switch roles every few years. Yet it was precisely this steely sense of principle that also marked him out.

Two years on, when Macmillan was in turn sent packing, for health reasons, Macleod again showed a depth of character required in the top job — while rendering those heights beyond his grasp. He pointblank refused to serve under Alec Douglas-Hume, whom he considered too reactionary. Then, in 1964, almost absent-mindedly, he blew the gaff on his own party, in a 4000-word book review for The Spectator. Douglas-Humes election had been a stitch-up, Macleod wrote: with no process existing for a leadership election, bar informal “soundings”, all the Earls and Lords and posh nobs had seen to it that one of their own took over.

Macleods piece detonated the era of the squires from the shires. Amid the smoke, the coming meritocracy began to peep through. A year later the informal “magic circle” system was dead, proper elections were held, and the grammar schoolboy Heath was put in charge, with grammar schoolgirl Thatcher charging along behind. This was central to Macleodism. The state was responsible, in his eyes, for bringing everyone up to the starting line, but never averaging out their talents. Young people should have more equal opportunities of proving themselves unequal,” as he put it, and he was intellectually prepared for all downsides such a definition brings.

Today, we are led by safetyists on both sides of the House, who refuse to choose between equality justice and equity justice — between corona and the economy, between house prices and housing — a maddening mobius strip of directly contradictory promises. We could do with a mind that has mapped the sharpest edges of its own political compass.

In truth, Macleods failing health — partly a consequence of war wounds that left him with a gammy leg and physically unable to turn his head — meant he could never have taken over at Number 10. Despite being only 56, he was circling the plughole. In private, hed told colleagues hed do perhaps three years as Chancellor, then retire to the Lords.

But the prospect of a charismatic challenger to that flesh tombstone, Heath, is a tantalising counterfactual at a pivotal moment. In 1956, Macleod had been put in charge of the Department of Labour by Anthony Eden, who reckoned that negotiating with union bosses would be excellent training, should he ever arrive at the top. By 1974 and the Three-Day Week, that skill set had come to eclipse the whole of British politics. Had his health held, there’s a decent chance Macleod could have overthrown his boss, and brought a more civil, more nimble pax to the class war — avoiding the brutal endgames of the Thatcher era, moderating the pain of the monetarist project.

Fifty years later, his message to the 2019 intake is that a bit of vision — getting out ahead of events — is what real leadership is about. After all, the devil you know can easily be the worst devil of all.


Gavin Haynes is a journalist and former editor-at-large at Vice.

@gavhaynes

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
G Harris
G Harris
3 years ago

‘discern noise from signal.’

That’s a keeper.

Enjoyed this piece. Thank you very much.

Andrew Raiment
Andrew Raiment
3 years ago

A very interesting and enjoyable article, thanks.

David McKee
David McKee
3 years ago

Excellent piece! In 10 minutes, it told me the highs and lows of Macleod’s career, his background, character, achievements and legacy. It’s a masterpiece of the mini-biography: balanced, factual and without Mr. Haynes’ opinions obtruding too much. He misses out though, Macleod’s editorship of the Spectator, which is odd.
I wonder if he would like to work this up to a series of profiles of the editors of the Spectator. I wonder what light that would shed on British history?

Derek M
Derek M
3 years ago

Best PM we never had, an amusing if ultimately futile game, not least because you can never tell how someone seemingly suitable performs in office (Anthony Eden anyone?) but for what it’s worth Enoch Powell would be my choice and on the Labour side Hugh Gaitskell or Peter Shore

mark taha
mark taha
3 years ago
Reply to  Derek M

I’D say Joseph Chamberlain. If MacLeod ‘s health had matched Heath’s – but I still agree with Lord Salisbury about Africa! We should have given Southern Rhodesia independence- she should have been the role model for the entire continent.

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago

Very informative and well written. When, a few weeks ago, we were all counting up the the number of Chancellors since whenever it was, none of us included McLeod.

Alexander D Macmillan
Alexander D Macmillan
3 years ago

BBC Alba has a a good programme on Iain Macleod and his family background on the Isle of Lewis. It compares and contrasts him with the traitor Donald Maclean, a contemporary also of Hebridean extraction. You can catch it on BBC iplayer and there are good English subtitles.

Peter de Barra
Peter de Barra
3 years ago

… a blood relationship with the late Mrs McLeod Trump, originally of Tong, Stornaway would be an interesting linkage.

Stewart Ware
Stewart Ware
3 years ago

It’s not Alec Douglas-Hume, it’s Alec Douglas-Home. Look it up.

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago
Reply to  Stewart Ware

According to John Lennon in A Spaniard In The Works it was Alec Doubtless-Whom.

Basil Chamberlain
Basil Chamberlain
3 years ago
Reply to  Stewart Ware

When the former Lord Home became Prime Minister, Harold Wilson (then Leader of the Opposition) complained that “This is a counter-revolution. After half a century of democratic advance, of social revolution, of rising expectations, the whole process has ground to a halt with a fourteenth Earl.”
I’ve always loved Douglas-Home’s retort: “I suppose, Mr Wilson, when you come to think of it, is the fourteenth Mr Wilson.”

Dominic Rudman
Dominic Rudman
3 years ago
Reply to  Stewart Ware

I remember reading a comment about that elsewhere, when Douglas-Home was speaking to Robert Menzies, then Australian PM:
“During post prandial cognacs , ADH started to tease RM about the Australian pronunciation of “Menzies” , and suggested that as they were both of Scots provenance , the Aussie PM should pronounce his name in the Scottish way, i.e., Mingies.
RM considered this for a nanosecond and said : “I’ll look into it when I get Hume”.”

Last edited 3 years ago by Dominic Rudman
Jon Read
Jon Read
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic Rudman

This is so funny. Thank you for giving me a hearty chuckle this afternoon. Sincerely.

Ferrusian Gambit
Ferrusian Gambit
3 years ago
Reply to  Stewart Ware

I do wonder whether the articles on this site are edited by a congress of Gibraltarian apes.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ferrusian Gambit
William Johnston
William Johnston
3 years ago
Reply to  Stewart Ware

And according to the Aberdeen Evening Express it’s Baillie Vass.

George Bruce
George Bruce
3 years ago

Today, though, we live in a world where 77% of British politicians flunked the most basic test of coin-toss statistical logic.
Worth following the link -although it is 9 years old and it is Labour MPs rather than politicians in general (so no marks for accuracy for the author.)
It is interesting that so many more Labour politicians could not answer compared to the Tories. I had not really thought there would be such a difference. More women (weaker in maths in general)? More black people in there as affirmative action?

Jos Haynes
Jos Haynes
3 years ago
Reply to  George Bruce

I am sure Johnson, Gove and Hancock would not even understand the question, let alone have a stab at the answer. They’re all innumerate, the whole stupid pack of ’em.

Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago
Reply to  Jos Haynes

Gove might have a chance. Hancock no chance. Boris would simply steal the coin.

Judy Johnson
Judy Johnson
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Bailey

. . . and then deny it had been him! (he)

John Williams
John Williams
3 years ago
Reply to  Judy Johnson

And that’s what makes him the best PM we’ve got (to borrow a Rab Butler one-liner)

Judy Johnson
Judy Johnson
3 years ago
Reply to  John Williams

John, you don’t ask much of a PM!

David Morley
David Morley
3 years ago
Reply to  George Bruce

I guess we are all wondering if Diane Abbott was among the number.
it’s actually so shocking, that once you hear that more than 5% failed the test, it hardly matters whether it was 50% or 80%.
can they all read and write?

Tom Jennings
Tom Jennings
3 years ago
Reply to  David Morley

Agree completely. Here in the States our Democrats claim to be the “party of science”. No one has claimed the “party of mathematics” mantle.

David Brown
David Brown
3 years ago
Reply to  George Bruce

Well, I sat here and worked out in my head that the chance of one toss coming up heads is 50%, and the chance of a second is 50% of that, thus arriving at the correct answer of 25%. My niece (a woman, you may be surprised to read) is not only vastly superior to me at mathematics, but she read the subject at a good university, and now teaches it.
Averages are useful, but not necessarily a a good predictor of individual performance.

Michael Whittock
Michael Whittock
3 years ago

Iain Macleod was a tragic loss to the Heath government before it had really started. The chances are that his management of the economy in a politically very volatile period would have been more effective and sure-footed than his successor’s – Anthony Barber. He would have been a wise counsellor and calming influence in the 73-74 conflict with the unions. Although Edward Heath did not want to surrender the leadership of the Conservatives after the election defeats of 1974, I think he could have been persuaded to give way to McLeod. Maybe the main reason for doing so was that he was not Margaret Thatcher. Iain Macleod would definitely have won the 79 election and, I agree would have avoided the “brutal endgames of the Thatcher era”.
I think it’s fascinating to consider what might have been for one of Macleod’s contemporaries if death had not likewise intervened. Anthony Crosland died very suddenly in 1977, aged 58. At the time he was Foreign Secretary in the Callaghan government. Like Macleod he did not suffer fools gladly, and was not particularly keen on developing political relationships and would therefore never have become Leader of the Labour Party.
Crosland will go down in the annals as the author of “The Future of Socialism”1956. Its influence has been deep and long-lasting. It’s an attempt to reformulate Labour’s political philosophy. It shows the need to revise traditional socialist thinking taking into account the changes in British society. Therefore Crosland downplayed nationalisation and class conflict, and emphasised equality, social welfare and personal liberty and the encouragement of a mixed economy and entrepreneurship. This would not have gone down withe Party in the 80s, so I wonder if Crosland would have joined the SDP and his good friends Roy Jenkins and Shirley Williams. It would have finished him politically and perhaps he may have returned to academia with a seat in the Lords.

John Hughes
John Hughes
3 years ago

Anthony Crosland’s sudden death in 1977 while serving as Foreign Secretary was what gave Dr David Owen his political prominence and his status as a politician in the 1980s, albeit in opposition. David Owen was the Minister of State at the FO under Crosland, having been put there by Jim Callaghan in 1976. Very unusually, the Foreign Secretaryship was not handed to one of the ‘big beasts’ in Callaghan’s cabinet; as one of the ‘three great offices of state’, a Minister already with Cabinet experience would normally fill it. On the death of Crosland, Callaghan instead promoted the Minister of State from outside the Cabinet, only 39, over the heads of his colleagues, to the third most important cabinet post after PM and Chancellor. Had this not happened, David Owen might not have made the Labour Cabinet at all before 1979, and would not have had the status that the FO post gave him or the confidence to push for the creation of the SDP as one of the ‘Gang of Four’.

Last edited 3 years ago by John Hughes
williamfrancishamilton
williamfrancishamilton
3 years ago

This essay is flagrantly plagarised from Vernon Bogdanor’s lecture given at Gresham college:
Iain Macleod and Decolonisation – Professor Vernon Bogdanor – YouTube

Last edited 3 years ago by williamfrancishamilton
Fraser Bailey
Fraser Bailey
3 years ago

Ah, so that’s why it was so well written and interesting. I wondered why the standard of Haynes’ writing had suddenly improved so dramatically. And it seemed a very strange subject for him to be interested in.

Pierre Pendre
Pierre Pendre
3 years ago

Maudling’s problem before corruption caught up with him was narcolepsy. When Bernadette Devlin whopped him in the Commons in 1972 Jak drew a cartoon of the incident for the Evening standard. He showed Maudling sprawled on the front bench with a black eye and had one Tory saying to another: “By jove, that almost woke Reggie up.”

J Bryant
J Bryant
3 years ago

As others have said, an excellent piece of biography. Very readable and entertaining. It certainly makes you think about the role of chance in who makes it to the top of the greasy political pole and who doesn’t.

Frederick B
Frederick B
3 years ago

McLeod may have been a Tory but he was no conservative. I remember, at the age of 17 in 1962 or 63, being unpleasantly surprised by reports of a speech given by McLeod to Young Conservatives on race relations. Even today – even today – it was a speech more likely to come from the left of the Labour Party than from a Conservative.

dunnmalcolm966
dunnmalcolm966
3 years ago

A far more charitable evaluation of Macleod’s career than he deserved. He enhanced his reoutation most by dying prematurely. The truth is he was not a nice man at all.

Jorge Espinha
Jorge Espinha
3 years ago

He must have been quite a character. If you’re correct, we need people like him. However, there’s a catch. Do we have the electorate to elect people like him? I don’t think so.
Regarding the empire, I understand the will and need to get out of there quickly. France achieved nothing in Algeria. It betrayed the overall population of Algeria, it betrayed the European population of the colony and finally it betrayed the loyal Algerian muslins. The same can be said about my country Portugal and its 3 colonial wars in the 60’s and 70’s in Africa.
But, getting out quickly isn’t the same as getting out cleanly. Like it or not, Europeans had a responsibility. The people of Africa didn’t ask to be colonized and didn’t ask to be arranged inside arbitrary borders that disregarded history and ethnicity. So Mr Mcleod wanted to tell Africans “sorry, my bad” and scamper off? Most of Africans in the 60’s had little contact with the colonial administration, to a greatextent, Africa remained quite African. But Europeans had changed things irreversibly , the countries were dysfunctional, the local administration and technical elites were almost non-existent. And the “freedom fighters” were financed by the soviet union. The Empires in Africa started badly and were finished in a hasty and irresponsible way. And Africans still pay the price. McLeod wasn’t a visionary in that aspect, he was just another callous European that didn’t care.
PS: I was born in Angola from Portuguese parents

Last edited 3 years ago by Jorge Espinha
Stephen Follows
Stephen Follows
3 years ago

If that photo’s anything to go by, he faked his own death and came back disguised as Leon Brittan.