X Close

How the Diddy Conspiracy duped America Satanic hysteria has gone mainstream

P. Diddy's debauchery was like something out of The Great Gatsby. Noam Galai/Getty Images for MTV

P. Diddy's debauchery was like something out of The Great Gatsby. Noam Galai/Getty Images for MTV


October 5, 2024   7 mins

First the facts, then the alternative facts. Sean Combs — aka Diddy, Puff Daddy, and P. Diddy — no longer resides in his $19 million Star Island Miami mansion, but at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where the 54-year-old music mogul presently shares meals and sleeping quarters with crypto fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried among other assorted felons. According to his Federal indictment, the founder of Bad Boy Records has been arrested for “creating a criminal enterprise whose members and associates engaged in… sex trafficking, forced labour, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice”. The tabloids have revelled in the story of days-long orgies, fuelled by alcohol, drugs and those 1,000 bottles of baby oil discovered on the premises.

The debauchery was like something out of The Great Gatsby, recalled Elisabeth Ovesen, best-selling author of Confessions of a Video Vixen: “Men in tuxedos, topless women in angel wings, champagne and synchronized swimmers on the outside, with group sex in the bathrooms, trays of hors d’oeuvres and drug pills being passed around on the inside.” One Diddy party allegedly took place on a private jet that flew around the world for days — an innovation which would have tickled the imagination of Fitzgerald.

While the rags blabber on about the sexual shenanigans, the international set of A, B, C and D-listers — from Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lopez to Derek Jeter and Nicole Richie — have all grown eerily quiet, petrified of what might come out as details of the “freak off” sessions come to light at what promises to be the most sensational trial since Johnny Depp and Amber Heard debated whose faecal matter stained the sheets. That’s not to mention the scores of ex-Diddy friends and relations on tenterhooks in anticipation of the upcoming Diddy Abuse Netflix Docuseries — “A Complex Narrative Spanning Decades”, according to the headline of a Variety exclusive. Already, the tentacles of the scandal have touched some of the most powerful names in the music industry — from Def Jam Recordings co-founder Russell Simmons to the legendary Clive Davis.

The unseemly circus has led comedian Bill Maher to conclude that “the music industry is this open cesspool of misogyny, and frankly, rape and sexual harassment, and somehow, the Angel of Death has flown over them”. And, as usual, Maher is onto something — albeit something unsettling. Traditional media may be well equipped to cover sex, drugs and celebrity downfall. But their training in what their professors deemed “verifiable truth” doesn’t help them much when it comes to supernatural evil dating back to the Knights Templars, much less the angel of death and his earthly consorts.

By contrast, the scandal has sent the far-Right conspiratorial crowd into a tizzy of “I-told-you-so” Satanic hysteria. The truthers now possess what they believe is positive proof that what they have been saying all along is true: there is a cabal of subversive elites whose stock in trade is trafficked children. The age-old idea has been given fresh life within the imagination of those individuals that FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver and Ipsos can never quite manage to get their minds around, the men and women who’ve suspected all along that Doja Cat, Megan Thee Stallion and every other rock star who has ever dressed in red are members of the diabolical Illuminati — along with Tom Hanks, Beyoncé and the British Royals.

Facts are facts: the Illuminati were a real thing. Its first meeting was on 1 May 1776, in the tiny Bavarian town of Ingolstadt, led by an obscure university professor of law named Adam Weishaupt. Within a matter of years, he would become one of the most reviled men in Europe, accused of adultery, murder, rape and conspiracy to overthrow the government.

Unlike Diddy, Weishaupt wasn’t much of a criminal. He created the Illuminati because he couldn’t afford the dues to be a Freemason. He kept his society a secret because the Enlightenment ideas he professed were unpopular among the Jesuits then in power: that women might possess intelligence equal to men; that a human from Africa might be as human as one from Europe; that there might not be an orthodox Catholic god.

“Facts are facts: the Illuminati were a real thing.”

These were not only widely palatable but popular liberal ideals, and in a few years the ranks of the Illuminati would expand to more than 2,000 members of the social elite — aristocrats, bankers, barons, diplomats, doctors, writers and wits. Had Adam Weishaupt lived in America, we might revere his name alongside Adams, Jefferson and Madison. Instead, the Jesuits convinced Karl Theodor, the Duke of Bavaria, to declare the Illuminati a subversive organisation. A tranche of government-sponsored pamphlets proliferated, declaring that the Illuminati were debauched sodomites, that they ran prostitution rings, that they drank the blood of trafficked children and were working under the auspices of the Angel of Death.

The barrage of sensational media horrified the reading public of Germany, France and Britain, then crossed the Atlantic to the United States, where Illuminati hysteria soon ignited waves of political fear and eventually energised Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s presidential campaign. None of which is news to anyone who’s been following conspiratorial social media accounts dedicated to the Omniwar, the Clinton murders, the goings on at Epstein Island, or raw milk. Clearly, Diddy had joined the ranks of the Diabolicals who populate the IMF and World Economic Forum. This is obvious to everyone.

Everyone, that is, except the so-called “mainstream media” who continue to ignore the salient fact of the alternative facts:

Exhibit A: The memoirs of Diddy’s ex-wife, Kim Porter, recently salvaged from the dung heap of discarded digi-trash, which recently topped the Amazon charts — despite concerns that they are fake, and despite the fact that Porter is dead. Discovering the hidden logic and rhetoric of conspiracy within these pages is a no-brainer for the inflamed wingnuts poring over subreddits and Parler.

Exhibit B: Ashton Kutcher, darling of the tech entrepreneurs and erstwhile bosom buddy of the notorious Did, who has been widely quoted as saying he can’t be quoted about some of the things that went on. Which leads the red-pilled crowd to believe that the freaks offs delivered something far freakier than the run-of-the-mill Wall Street launch-the-midget-from-a-cannon bacchanal.

Exhibits C, D, E, and F: Snaps of Kamala and Diddy, Oprah and Diddy, Taylor Swift and Diddy, Prince Harry and Diddy…

Then there’s the unsettling matter of Justin Bieber, images of whom crowd the postings of the Q crowd. Here he is shirtless, more than likely wasted, clearly subservient to Diddy, who holds the since-traumatised star in what can only be described as a loved-up headlock. In the years since, Bieber has retreated to the manifold comforts of Jesus, although he did emerge tearfully seeking to “protect” Billie Eilish from evil. Nothing to see here, nor in the ever-creepier videos that have been surfacing on a daily basis, such as the long-neglected 10-year-old segment of Keeping Up featuring Khloé Kardashian bubbling about the Biebs at a naked Freak Off — although Khloe, too, has decided to say no more about it and simply hope the whole thing will go away. Which it won’t.

Typical of the feverish response among the theorists has been the feed of the infamous American celebrity journalist, O’Reilly Factor alumni and shit-poster, Liz Crokin, who took the opportunity to amplify Vladimir Putin’s accusation of cannibalism among American elites: “Putin has been calling out the elite Satanic pedophile cabal for years,” she wrote on X.

“I wonder if Hunter ever went to [a] Diddy party,” posted Jake Angeli-Chansley, the Viking-horned Q-Anon Shaman who stormed the Capitol on January 6.

To be sure, Diddy’s lawyer, Marc Agnifilo (whose previous clients include a bevy of convicted Satanic cabal members, such as sex trafficking NXIVM cult leader Keith Raniere) has promised that Combs will take the stand and tell his side of the story (“It’s a human story. It’s a story of love.”), which of course will do nothing to convince anyone of anything, as the narrative has metastasised to the point that the public at large now accepts the man who insists we call him “Ye” as a reliable witness to the fact that Diddy was, among other things, a Fed — thus bringing the Illuminati to the highest echelons of power.

Still, the editors scratch their heads, wondering who, what, when, where, and how such fictions could ever be embraced. Aside from personal tragedy and triage, what’s sad is that the rumblings of the Diddy Conspiracy present the last, best opportunity for traditional network television and the print establishment to help to save their industry from extinction, not to mention democracy itself, by admitting to the prevalence and power of conspiracy theory.

If they haven’t learned from Donald Trump, QAnon and January 6, conspiracy theory possesses a powerful and persuasive logic and rhetoric. On the strictly empirical level, the tale of Diddy’s malfeasance has been delivering to the purveyors of conspiracy theory precisely what the philosophers call “objective reality”. The critique of conspiracy theory falters here, as inductive and deductive reasoning both lead the sober “independent researcher” (aka, digital bottom feeder) to the same conclusion: it’s the Illuminati. And people believe it. Lots of people believe it.

Instead of ignoring the Diddy Conspiracy, the mainstream media should admit its power and presence as an artefact of our suspicious and sorry moment. It should examine its history, consider its reasoning, count its adherents. The editors will be shocked to discover that the story of the story is somewhat different to rock and roll’s “Me Too moment”, as The New York Times recently concluded. They will have to admit how mainstream conspiracy has become.

Of course, for establishment media to face up to the Illuminati version of the story would not only mean dragging themselves through the mud of popular mythology, but entail a great deal of discomfort for Hollywood and the music industry, not to mention walking the tightrope of the morass of racial and sexual politics that helped to enable Diddy in the first place. But to do otherwise at this fraught moment would be political malpractice. The Diddy Conspiracy explains a great deal about the way the world outside the mainstream media bubble thinks. The New York Times and the Washington Post and the Atlantic and the New Yorker and CNN and MSNBC and all the rest can ignore the siren song of conspiracy for as long as they like — but then they should not wonder where all those Trump votes come from.

We liberals like to shake our heads at the unfortunate circumstance, sigh, and leave it at that. Which is a mistake we’ve made before. For if there’s one thing the last few centuries should have taught us, it’s that what we refuse to acknowledge can bite us in the ass. That said, traditional outlets will no doubt remain content to stand above the fray and ignore the rustlings of the conspiracists — which is yet another reason why Donald Trump will most likely re-settle into the Oval Office, nuclear codes nestled between his Diet Coke and McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish, phone in hand, poised to post.


Frederick Kaufman is a contributing editor at Harper’s magazine and a professor of English and Journalism at the College of Staten Island. His next project is a book about the world’s first political reactionary.

FredericKaufman

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

29 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
13 hours ago

Yet another trash essay from this Kaufman clown. Let’s take the latest scandal and somehow magically make it about MAGA. What conspiracy theories is he talking about? I’m sure there’s a lot of wild speculation right now, because the scandal is two minutes old and it likely implicates some important members of the glitterati.

Not-so bold prediction. Virtually none of the people implicated in this scandal will be Republicans. Virtually all of them will be Democrats, and many will be donors. But ya, let’s throw shade on MAGA for being degenerates.

Jack Robertson
Jack Robertson
9 hours ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Yeah, there’s a kind of hysterical decadence in play among the liberal chattering classes now. With every new piece of accumulated evidence that the cosy ‘progressive consensus’ of the post-WW2 West was destructive, self-serving and full of sh*t all along, those most implicated in it and who continue to benefit most from it are now adopting an evermore contrived air of nonplussed, ironic befuddlement. It’s like catching redhanded some a*sehole ransacking your house at 2.00 am, only to have them chuckle sorrowfully and lament the dishonest times you both must live in.
It would have been useful and honest if this essay had simply part-quoted Maher – the music industry is this open cesspool of misogyny, and frankly, rape and sexual harassment – and left it at that. That it just can’t bring itself to do so goes a long way to explaining why so many Americans will choose to vote for a man who barely reads anything at all, rather than a woman whose entire public persona has been constructed from too-smart, too-smug wordplay like this.

Last edited 9 hours ago by Jack Robertson
Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
5 hours ago
Reply to  Jack Robertson

TBF Christopher Lasch was writing about the hollowness of these people forty years ago.

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
5 hours ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

as usual, Maher is onto something
‘As usual’? My impression of Maher is that he’s as credulous as everyone else on the left who thinks Kamala Harris is capable of being a competent president.

Dylan B
Dylan B
8 hours ago

News flash.
Obscenely wealthy people often do some weird and crazy sh*t!
And get away with it.
Oh. And in other news.
Hollywood (and showbiz more broadly) has more than its fair share of degenerates.
None of this is news. Why?
Because it’s always been this way.
Yes, they should be investigated and sent to prison if found guilty, but this is not a new satanist phenomena. It’s just over indulged creepy people doing the same weird stuff they have always done.

Mark Royster
Mark Royster
3 hours ago
Reply to  Dylan B

And we are the ones who make them rich. In return we get their “art” and lascivious titillating scandals every now and then as a bonus. Then there are the parasites who make their living talking about them either exposing /condemning or defending. Amazing. This goose lays golden eggs for everyone. What if we just ignored them all even for a month?

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 hours ago
Reply to  Dylan B

True but the longer that bad behavior is indulged, the worse it becomes. This is true of anything that is tolerated from a child acting out to criminals getting a pass for theft up to a certain monetary value to wealthy people engaged in debauchery.

Pete Marsh
Pete Marsh
6 hours ago

So there’s ‘liberals’ on one side (the right side) and ‘far right conspiracy theorists’ (the nutters, obvs) on the other. Interesting framing.

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
5 hours ago

We liberals like to shake our heads at the unfortunate circumstance, sigh, and leave it at that.
… or invent some utterly spurious narrative that deflects attention from the degeneracy of our class onto some other group as you’ve just done here, eh?

Mark V
Mark V
8 hours ago

Some definitional clarifications:

Conspiracy: when people conspire
Conspiracy theory: a theory a conspiracy is occurring
Conspirators: those who conspire
Conspiratorial: in the manner of those who conspire
Conspiracist: one who (perhaps obsessively) suspects conspiracies are occurring

Editorial should take note.

Last edited 8 hours ago by Mark V
Judy Englander
Judy Englander
3 hours ago

A professor of English should write with more clarity than this unintelligible purple prose.

Phillip De Vous
Phillip De Vous
3 hours ago

I read this odd essay twice. What does it even mean?

Francisco Menezes
Francisco Menezes
14 hours ago

“creating a criminal enterprise whose members and associates engaged in… sex trafficking, forced labour, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice”. sounds like a US federal employee.

Studio Largo
Studio Largo
13 hours ago

Once again, all roads lead to DJT, which is its own type of conspiracy theory. Also, Doja Cat, Cardi B and Diddy are not ‘rock stars’.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 hours ago

As usual, Kaufman’s writing is garbage. Fun-to-read garbage, but garbage nonetheless.

Mark Royster
Mark Royster
3 hours ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

I think it was AI generated. If not it could be. Utterly predictable as we slide from one paragraph to the next. Slicker than baby oil! Right to the sweet finish an AI generated caricature of Mr Twump.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 hours ago

I was expecting better writing from my new unHerd sub. This is supercilious and self indulgent. I see the author is a professor of English. My goodness! It is neither informative nor entertaining. Shame on the author. He has no regard for the content or the story. He is not clever.

Mark Royster
Mark Royster
4 hours ago

Last paragraph is a real treat!
1 it’s a conspiracy, that is, not true. 2 the left better take it seriously as such or 3 Trump will be elected and 4 Trump is a Diet Coke drinking moron or worse.
Note: take serious the power of conspiracies in general, not the possibility that there may be some truth in this one at least. Circle the wagons!

Francis Turner
Francis Turner
5 hours ago

A tedious, insignificant, inconsequential non- entity, not worthy of interest on this medium

blue 0
blue 0
2 hours ago

BlueAnon Kaufman, calling out QAnon is a trip through a conspiracy dark hole.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
2 hours ago

there is a cabal of subversive elites whose stock in trade is trafficked children. 
Well, yes, there is such a group. Child trafficking is a monster business in the US alone, without even factoring in other parts of the world. There was a film made about the trafficking, a movie that Disney sat on for years until it reached theaters under a different label, and not one person has disputed the claims it made. This cabal is hardly a myth. Whether Puffy was part of it or not is a separate matter.

Malcolm Knott
Malcolm Knott
5 hours ago

Never mind the orgies. Concentrate on the fraud.

Francis Turner
Francis Turner
5 hours ago

Ahh Sir Puffington Diddy, sure I shot with him on a Norfolk partridge day.. or maybe out with the Quorn?..

Francis Turner
Francis Turner
4 hours ago
Reply to  Francis Turner

no.. I was wrong.. it was at The Tower Hamlets and Brixton Hunt point to point…

Kelly Madden
Kelly Madden
38 minutes ago

“[Weishaupt] kept his society a secret because the Enlightenment ideas he professed were unpopular among the Jesuits then in power: that women might possess intelligence equal to men; that a human from Africa might be as human as one from Europe…”
Since we’re discussing facts and alt-facts, I asked ChapGPT for an analysis of the above:

The quote you provided reflects a commonly held view of the Enlightenment as a period championing equality and individual rights, contrasted with religious institutions (in this case, the Jesuits) often seen as conservative or suppressive of progressive ideas. However, this portrayal can be oversimplified or even misleading when examined in detail.

Enlightenment and Gender Equality

The Enlightenment is often celebrated for its promotion of reason, individualism, and human rights. However, the actual status of women during this period was complex. While some Enlightenment thinkers, such as Mary Wollstonecraft, argued for the equality of women, many prominent Enlightenment figures—such as Rousseau, Kant, and Voltaire—either ignored women’s rights or maintained traditional views on gender roles. Rousseau, for example, argued that women’s primary role was domestic, and Kant viewed women as inherently inferior in reason.

Thus, while Enlightenment ideas could support the notion of gender equality, the majority of Enlightenment philosophers did not actually advocate for it in practice. The claim that the Enlightenment broadly upheld the idea that “women might possess intelligence equal to men” is, at best, selective in its representation of the movement.

Enlightenment and Racial Equality

Similarly, the Enlightenment’s stance on race is more complicated than the quote suggests. While there were Enlightenment figures who opposed slavery and argued for the equality of all humans, including those from Africa (e.g., the abolitionist movement), there were also prominent Enlightenment thinkers who propagated racial hierarchies. For example, Kant, in his Anthropology, and Voltaire held views that suggested a belief in the superiority of Europeans over other races.

Thus, while the Enlightenment contained ideas that could support racial equality, many of its major figures also contributed to the development of racial science and racist ideologies. The view that the Enlightenment universally supported racial equality is, again, overly simplistic.

Jesuits and Gender

The Jesuits, as a religious order of the Catholic Church, had their own complexities. While traditionally hierarchical and male-dominated, the Jesuits’ intellectual tradition was not inherently opposed to the idea of female intelligence. They contributed significantly to education, including the education of women, especially in the later centuries. Many Jesuit institutions and educators recognized and supported the intellectual potential of women, even if they didn’t advocate for outright social or political equality.

Therefore, the suggestion that the Jesuits uniformly opposed the notion of gender equality oversimplifies their historical role. While the order did not actively push for the kind of gender equality championed by some Enlightenment thinkers, it was not universally against the idea that women could be intelligent or educated.

Jesuits and Racial Equality

The Jesuits also had a complex relationship with issues of race. In the context of European colonization, Jesuit missionaries often worked to protect the rights and dignity of indigenous peoples. For example, in Latin America, Jesuit missions sought to defend indigenous peoples from exploitation by European settlers and colonial authorities. Jesuits such as Bartolomé de las Casas advocated for the humane treatment of Africans and indigenous people, though this did not always translate into a modern understanding of racial equality.

However, like many other religious and secular institutions, the Jesuits were part of a broader social and cultural context that often accepted the subjugation of non-Europeans. But to claim that the Jesuits were universally opposed to the idea that Africans were as “human” as Europeans does not capture the nuanced role they played in both defending and, at times, perpetuating colonial practices.

Conclusion

The Enlightenment and the Jesuits cannot be easily categorized as progressive or regressive in terms of gender and racial equality. Many Enlightenment thinkers upheld traditional views on gender and race, while some Jesuits defended the dignity of marginalized peoples. Both movements had internal diversity, and any sweeping generalization about either group is likely to misrepresent historical reality. The Enlightenment was not a monolithic force for equality, nor were the Jesuits uniformly opposed to progressive ideas.

Kelly Madden
Kelly Madden
33 minutes ago
Reply to  Kelly Madden

Two of the greatest minds in church history said their sister was smarter:

Both Saints Gregory of Nyssa and Basil the Great expressed high admiration for their sister, Saint Macrina, and suggested that she had greater wisdom and intelligence than they did, especially in spiritual matters.

Saint Gregory of Nyssa, in his work Life of Macrina, speaks of her profound influence on him and acknowledges her superior spiritual insight and wisdom. Macrina is depicted as a model of Christian virtue and theological understanding, and Gregory portrays her as a teacher who profoundly shaped his spiritual and intellectual development.

Saint Basil the Great also held Macrina in high esteem. While there are fewer direct records from Basil about Macrina, it is clear from Gregory’s account and other sources that Basil considered her a significant influence, particularly on his monastic and ascetic practices.

Both brothers viewed their sister as a spiritual guide and mentor, reflecting a deep respect for her intellectual and theological contributions, even acknowledging her as superior in wisdom. This veneration of Macrina was unusual for the time and reflects the Cappadocian Fathers’ recognition of her spiritual authority.

Right-Wing Hippie
Right-Wing Hippie
14 hours ago

The affinities of nativism and antislavery are striking, even apart from the fact that both drew their strength from the same religious and social constituencies. Both, for instance, reflected psychologically a highly dramatized fear of a powerful force which sought by conspiratorial means to subvert the values of the republic: in one case this was the slavocracy, with its ‘lords of the lash’, in the other, the Church of Rome with its crafty priests and subtle Jesuits. Both reflected in their propaganda a prurient fascination with the alleged sexual excesses of slaveholders and priests. In an age when sexual repression was widespread and sex as a theme in most branches of literature was taboo, the ‘exposure’ of evil provided a sanction for the salacious description of sexual transgressions. In the lurid and sensational literature of the two movements, the lecheries of the priests and the miscegenation of the slaveholders were favorite themes. Endangered chastity–whether of lovely octoroon girls or of virginal nuns–was a vital part of the message of reform. If the escape of a mulatto girl was the high point of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, the escape of a nun from the convent was the high point of The Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk. If Uncle Tom outsold Maria, Maria outsold everything else, and was called, with perhaps more significance than was intended, ‘the Uncle Tom’s Cabin of Know-Nothingism.’ If Wendell Phillips said that the slaveholders had made the entire South ‘one great brothel,’ the American Protestant Vindicator said that an unmarried priesthood had converted whole nations into ‘one vast brothel’.

–David M. Potter, The Impending Crisis, 1848-1861 (1976)

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
3 hours ago

Great article! I agree that the media should take “conspiracy” seriously, and that it is hard for them to do so. And that is because of the history of their collusion with the state. I am thinking of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, actual CIA agents on newspaper staffs, actual spies on cable new shows. How would you go about this remediation, practically?

Vidar Bøe
Vidar Bøe
8 hours ago

How this world’s dark powers love to make gods of humans just to tear them down and expose the evil at their core. And for what? That you and I may stand around and gloat, telling ourselves that we are not like that. But the truth is that we are all the same. As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one.”