X Close

MAGA Republicans are nothing new They are heirs to America's Anti-Masons

(Credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)


July 20, 2024   9 mins

Just in case you haven’t spent the last week gripped by the question of who the Republicans would choose to nominate as their candidate for President of the United States, here’s the news: it was him. But it wasn’t exactly the same old same old from Donald Trump.

In the aftermath of the assassination attempt that left his right ear wrapped in a Van Gogh of white rectangular gauze, the former president declared it was time to tone down the rhetoric and to lower the political temperature. Perhaps, as he contemplated a country boiling with hatred and fear, he realised that we might at long last resolve our differences without violence.

So it was with visions of peace, love and understanding that the faithful Trumplicans descended upon the nominating convention in Milwaukee this week, transforming the Fiserv Arena into 714,000 Trump-branded square-feet. The promised kumbaya lasted approximately half a second, as the first chant from the audience — “Fight! Fight! Fight!” — became a recurring refrain.

At one point, as the house band belted out groovy lyrics worthy of the Summer of Love — people everywhere just gotta be free — the crowd rapturously waved signs plastered with the mantra, “MASS DEPORTATION”. The newly minted Christ-like aura of the Prince of Peace included such paraphernalia as an image of Trump’s saintly head taped to a cardboard cutout of a Rambo-style figure holding an assault rifle. Never had such cheers followed the phrase, “razor-wire barriers”. The apotheosis of all this was the bland and passionless narrative delivered by Vice Presidential nominee J.D. Vance, whose ancestors hailed from the backwoods of Appalachia (don’t mention Yale Law School), as he described how after his beloved “Mamaw” had passed to the great beyond, his hillbilly family discovered she had secreted 19 loaded handguns around the house.

“That’s the American spirit,” Vance said.

It’s no news that violence is as American as baseball and hot dogs. It should surprise absolutely no one that Vance’s sweet Mamaw was a cold-blooded champion of what Montana Senator Steve Daines called her “precious right to keep and bear arms” — no matter the bloody shadow of 15 direct assaults on United States presidents, presidents-elect and presidential candidate (five of them resulting in deaths), including JFK in 1963, RFK in 1968, George Wallace in 1972 and Reagan in 1981. Gerald Ford holds a record of sorts, having survived two assassination attempts in one particularly nasty month in 1975.

This week’s convention was spiked with fears of violence not only from an assassin’s bullet, but from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, EV batteries, spy balloons and robots. North Dakota Governor (and last-minute Trump VP reject), Doug Burgum, added to the general sense of alarm his terrifying vision of rotten refrigerator lettuce, the result of looming “Biden brownouts”. But the greatest fear of all was reserved for global elites, an anxiety that can be traced to the first American presidential nominating convention, which happened just about a century ago, when a man named William Morgan came to personify the same sort of anger and fear as Peter Navarro, Trump’s former United States Trade and Manufacturing Policy Director, who emerged from federal prison Wednesday morning to appear at the convention that same evening.

“The greatest fear of all was reserved for global elites, an anxiety that can be traced to the first American presidential nominating convention.”

“I went to prison so you won’t have to,” Navarro reminded the chanting crowd (“Fight! Fight! Fight!”). Then, a bit more ominously: “If we don’t control their government, they will control us.”

Over the past several days, it was that they that kept coming up. “They’ve attacked his reputation, they impeached him, they tried to bankrupt him and they unjustly prosecuted him,” cried South Dakota Governor and dog assassin Kristi Noem. (“Fight! Fight! Fight!”) “They’re after all of us,” said Eric Trump. “They have failed. They will not win.” (“Fight! Fight! Fight!”) “When they took a shot at my hero,” Hulk Hogan cried, slowly ripping off his shirt, “and they tried to kill the next president of the United States — enough was enough.”

As it turns out, concerns about the they people reached a peak of sorts way back in 1832, when the country was massacring natives on its way to establishing an empire larger than all of Europe, at the forefront of which lay an inexorably expanding frontier inhabited by barely literate devil-fearing bible-thumping bumpkins armed to the teeth. Back then, the they people were, as a general rule, Freemasons. Among the 16,000 Americans who then belonged to the secret society were politicians, judges and wealthy businessmen. Founded 100 years earlier in Europe by one of Sir Isaac Newton’s students, the Masonic goal was to establish an international cohort of intellectual and cosmopolitan free-thinkers. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson would have described them as the first avatars of “the radical woke progressive Left” who dreamed of a “borderless” utopia. No doubt, the Masons were globalists. They aspired to what has become the three scariest words in the English language for reactionaries before and since: new world order. All of which brings us back to William Morgan.

Like J.D. Vance, Morgan began life as a hillbilly in Culpeper, Virginia. As a young man he moved to Richmond and opened a general store, which promptly failed. Then, once again like Vance, he headed north to settle not too far from Milwaukee — where he anticipated Brew City’s fabled residents Valentin Blatz, Frederick Pabst and Joseph Schlitz, and opened a brewery, which promptly failed. Ever the optimist, Morgan and his wife moved to Genesee County in upstate New York where he was lucky enough to be initiated as a Freemason. Unfortunately, his well-heeled brethren soon caught on to the fact that much like Vance’s mother, Morgan suffered from chronic substance abuse. A drunk and a gambler who could not feed his family of four, he soon found himself banished from the society.

Like many other desperate people before and after (and again, just like Vance), Morgan concluded that the quickest path out of his predicament was literary fame. He would revenge himself against the Masons by revealing all their ceremonies, codes and secrets. Besieged by former fellows who pleaded with him not to publish his compendia of anti-Christian evils practised by the secret secular elite, Morgan wrote steadily until 11 September 1826 — when he was arrested on a trumped-up charge and thrown in jail. The next night he was abducted and never heard from again.

To be sure, there were those who denied that William Morgan had actually been kidnapped, much less murdered. There were rumours he had abandoned his wife and kids for the reaches of the north. There were sightings off the coast of Greece — or perhaps it was the Cayman Islands. There was hearsay Morgan had become an Indian chief in Canada. There were reports he had joined Jean Lafitte and his band of buccaneers. But the most likely denouement was that somewhere in the middle of Lake Ontario his captors had wound a weighted rope around his waist and tossed him off the side of a canoe.

Despite a special prosecutor, 20 grand juries and untold dozens of subpoenas, no murder charges would ever be brought. Kidnapping was then considered a misdemeanour, so the jail sentences that eventually were handed down ranged from one month to two years. When all was said and done, the only indisputable facts were that Morgan had disappeared, and that his abductors had been Freemasons.

At which point, the floodgates of fake news opened and thousands of Masons were thrown off juries, forbidden to preach, barred from communion, denounced as members of a godless gang and made the scapegoats of any act of lawlessness, any murder anywhere. It is no coincidence that precisely the same kind of laws were passed against Freemasons in fascist Vichy France, 100 years later.

The moral of the story is that nothing changes.

On the second evening of the Republican convention, David McCormick, candidate for United States Senate from Pennsylvania, warned against “pro-criminal judges”. Trump lawyer Alina Habba implicated “sham indictments and baseless allegations”. Elise Stefanik, New York Republican Conference Chair, noted the “corrupt democratic prosecutors and judges” of the “Department of Injustice”.

In the wake of the Morgan Affair, the first incarnations of X and Truth Social sprung forth as hundreds of Anti-Masonic broadsheets popped up along the western frontier and the “burned-over” regions of New York State. For every owner of a set of chipped fonts understood the potential: here was an indisputable display of unholy wickedness practised by the privileged classes — the they people. Here was a real-life horror story — that hidden in their midst was an invisible coterie who smiled and shook hands at noon, but swore secret oaths at midnight, held bloodcurdling initiation ceremonies and guzzled diabolical libations from human skulls.

Hashtag Pizzagate.

It is perhaps regrettable that the language of the pundits and political operatives of the 1830s was not all that dissimilar from the rhetoric heard in Milwaukee when Senator Tim Scott observed, “On Saturday, the devil came to Pennsylvania, holding a rifle”. Masonic hands “reek with the blood of human victims offered in sacrifice to devils”, was the message of New Jersey’s Palladium of Liberty. Not to be outdone, The Middlebury Free Press presented a dialogue among the demons Belphegor and Beelzebub, in which Freemasonry featured as Satan’s “empire on earth”.

And just as MAGA appeared to explode out of nowhere, within a year of William Morgan’s disappearance, dozens of Anti-Masonic governors took over state houses. Scores of newly elected Anti-Masonic senators and congressmen made their way to Washington. At which point the Anti-Masons decided to nominate one of their own to the highest office in the land.

In the summer of 1832, stagecoach after stagecoach carried more than 100 delegates from 24 states from the steamboat landing in Fells Point to downtown Baltimore. And much like Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, co-chair of the Republican National Committee, those who organised the Anti-Masonic presidential nominating convention understood the value of making the spectacle as public as possible. For the first time, they invited the press to witness the decision making, going so far as to assign them seats.

The Anti-Masonic presidential nominee was William Wirt, who had served for a dozen years as United States Attorney General and been Thomas Jefferson’s personal lawyer and adviser, much as Kellyanne Conway is to Trump. Like Conway, Wirt was a gifted rhetorician and fabulist. In fits of grandiloquence arguing before the Supreme Court, he had conjured the sons of Atreus, the House of Priam and the fierce Achilles. And that was for a case about waterway rights between New York and New Jersey.

Wirt’s many detractors insulted his verbal genius by dismissing his ostentatious oratory as “whipped syllabub” (a great insult at the time), but advanced vocabulary brought him what money couldn’t, starting with two excellent marriages. The first came with ownership of a plantation near Charlottesville, dozens of slaves and family connection with Virginia’s aristocracy — men who would soon make good use of his high-flown language and penchant for hero worship.

The parallels with J.D. Vance’s career are uncanny. Wirt, an orphan, had humble beginnings. Like Vance, he became a famous writer and, eventually, a jewel in establishment’s crown. At which point he decided on his grandest project yet. He would create his own version of American history, one in which the slaveholders and whiskey manufacturers were epic heroes like those he had discovered in Homer and Virgil. And just as Marjorie Taylor Greene declared at the convention that Trump was the “founding father of the America First movement”, Wirt would also create a new founding father by writing the now classic biography of Patrick Henry — someone Wirt had never met, never seen and never heard speak.

No matter.

Wirt described Patrick Henry’s voice as a fountain, a river, the ocean itself. Much like Trump — described this past week as having the heart of a lion, the soul of a warrior and the man who would stand at the gates of hell to defend our great country — Patrick Henry was Samson, Demosthenes and Charles the Fifth wrapped into one. He was a noble savage, a miracle, a prodigy. He had cared nothing for education, but was the smartest man in the room. He had cared nothing for money, but riches flowed his way. And that was how Henry — the ignorant, rapacious, slaveholding drunk — came to inhabit the American imagination as a paragon of moral perfection. Wirt had not only created the hero but his rallying cry for the new nation: “Give me liberty, or give me death!”

Had he ever said such a thing? It’s doubtful.

John Tyler, tenth President of the United States, called Wirt’s biography “a great novel”. Jefferson kept the book in the fiction section of his library. John Adams read Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry and said: “If I could go back to the age of thirty-five, Mr. Wirt, I would endeavor to become your rival, — not in elegance of composition, but in a simple narration of facts.”

Thus the genealogy of fake news can be traced from Wirt’s biography to Kellyanne Conway’s interview on “Meet the Press” in January 2017, when she defended Trump’s erstwhile Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s lies about the number of people who had attended Trump’s first inauguration. At long last, Conway was able to articulate what Wirt and the Anti-Masons had discovered long ago: the power of alternative facts.

Wirt knew full well the they people of 1832 were harmless. He himself had been a Freemason — along with Franklin, Voltaire, George Washington and the great Andrew Jackson, who had been Masonic Grand Master of Tennessee. But that did not stop Wirt from standing before the Anti-Masonic convention and vowing that the cult was involved in a “wicked conspiracy against the laws of God and man, which ought to be put down”. Nor did it matter much that Donald Trump’s political idol — again, Andrew Jackson — would soon destroy Wirt and Henry Clay and every other political opponent in the electoral college landslide of 1832, which cemented Jackson’s second term. What mattered was that fear of the they people had reached the centre of American politics — those who had since time immemorial, to quote Tucker Carlson’s strange speech on the final night of the convention, delivered “a middle-finger in the face of every American”.

“Wirt knew full well the they people of 1832 were harmless — but that did not stop him from vowing that the cult was involved in a wicked conspiracy.”

As the echoes of Kid Rock’s off-kilter lip-synced rap faded in the stale arena air on that last night of the convention, so did every pretence of the peace-loving flower-child MAGA drag. “They plunder our nation,” Trump declared in his climactic address to the assembly. “They wipe out our people.” “They took over our country.” “They’re emptying out their insane asylums.” “They used Covid to cheat.” “They think we’re stupid.”

And on and on. Just after midnight the red, white and blue — and, of course, gold — balloons began to fall, and it was clear that soon it would be time for the conventioneers to return to the sticks and provinces to rally the masses. There were only a few hours left for the slots at the Potawatomi casino, at the most one last lazy afternoon to kayak down the Milwaukee River beerline and envision the rebirth of MAGAmerica while drinking Wisconsibly, as they say.

It had been a glorious four days in Brew City. Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, Joe Biden tested positive for Covid and had to go home.


Frederick Kaufman is a contributing editor at Harper’s magazine and a professor of English and Journalism at the College of Staten Island. His next project is a book about the world’s first political reactionary.

FredericKaufman

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

78 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T Bone
T Bone
5 months ago

Bravo Mr. Kaufman. Narrative Fiction at it’s finest. However, I’m having a bit of trouble squaring the circle with the fact that Trump’s idol is the Free Mason, Andrew Jackson yet he appears to be playing the role of the defector, William Morgan.

There’s some plot holes here but I think there was a former actor from the hit show Empire that can probably help you tie up the inconsistency in the script.

Matt Hindman
Matt Hindman
5 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

Do you think we could get some Nigerians yelling “this is MAGA country” in the script?

Eric Mader
Eric Mader
5 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

Indeed. His main fictional move is his assertion that MAGA is somehow identical to anti-Mason hysteria in the 19th c.

The parallel breaks under the merest scrutiny. If, as Kaufman writes, Wirt and others knew the Masons to be harmless, a shadowy bogeyman, can the same be said for the managerial elite Trump supporters and the patriots in Europe now fight against? Hardly. We have an increasingly illiberal entrenched elite making very tangible moves to thwart democracy and censor public discourse. That elite is in power both in the EU bureaucracy and in Washington.

Kaufman’s main argument—that our present is just a repeat of past excesses, “nothing to see here”—is thus hollow. It’s mere gesturing. And all he has to hold this argument together is boilerplate virtue signalling. For his peers, of course.

When are these people going to realize how very obsolete this particular genre of fiction is?

Benedict Waterson
Benedict Waterson
5 months ago
Reply to  Eric Mader

He admits that the Masons probably abducted and murdered William Morgan, in which case they are not really ‘harmless.’
If the comparison with the current MAGA movement is meant to show how both are just part of a mundane continuum of conspiracist ‘populist’ cults in the US, then it’s an incoherent comparison if the 19thC. Masons were involved in a literally murderous conspiracy. Not really a good illustration of ‘Pizzagate’/QAnon hysteria or overblown reactions to globalist elitism then is it Frederick?

Eric Mader
Eric Mader
5 months ago

Yes. There’s incoherence even in his own terms. But the main fiction is his grand gesture, which depends on him ignoring the elephant in the room.

Tens of millions of Europeans and Americans reject what current elites are doing. Kaufman’s response comes down to: “Look at all these QAnon dummies.”

That most of these angry citizens have never followed QAnon or Pizzagate doesn’t matter to Kaufman. Writing his kind of fiction depends precisely on *not knowing* why citizens are angry. With each passing year, the relation with reality is increasingly strained. At this late date it comes off as almost painfully ridiculous.

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
5 months ago
Reply to  Eric Mader

Why are citizens angry? What are the current elites doing to make them so angry?
To me ‘the current elite’ seem to be the same as ‘they’!

RR D
RR D
5 months ago
Reply to  T Bone

You (and almost every other poster on this thread) are absolutely right about the incredible absurdity of this article. However, I am going to be gentle with the poor guy – he must be in a lot of pain. When you contort yourself and overstretch as much as this guy had to when writing this diatribe, it can’t leave you with a functional disc in your body.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
5 months ago

What an effing clown. Condescension and contempt drip from every word of bile in this essay. The hatred for Trump is par for the course, especially for a journalism prof who went to Yale. Really, it’s the expected opinion from the credentialed class.

The contempt for JD Vance, his grandma and hillbillies in general was offensive. Hacks like this are so predictable. They are intellectual cowards so they have to shout the loudest.

America will be so much stronger when power shifts from incompetent, credentialed hacks like this to people like JD Vance.

I could only stomach reading about a third of this. Unherd is playing a dangerous game here. No doubt essays like this generate a lot of clicks, but after awhile it will turn off subscribers.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
5 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

You are so right. When the wef elites start to lead by example rather than as an imposition of their will on the deplorables, then maybe I’ll listen.
Conspiracy theories have been right in the past and I will not be patronised by a left wing conventional snob who is covering his own backside.

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
5 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

I think you are being unjustly hard on the author. The ‘deplorables’ are deplorable not because someone says they are deplorable, but because they would rather, as Vance amply demonstrates, load up with guns and drugs than with pencils to ensure that their children can have more than a deprived childhood, perhaps in the belief that the gun is mightier than the pencil.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

I was blessed not to be born in Appalachia, or the south side of Chicago, or a native reserve. I give thanks for that. The vast majority of people born to those circumstances cannot escape. A little understanding goes a long way.

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
5 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Rather enjoyed it. Found it amusing and enlightening – opened up a bit of US history to me which had hitherto lain hidden from me. The parallel with the present is uncanny. But then what do I know? I think Trump is a fraudster and a petty criminal and I am not willing to follow him even if he led me to Valhalla. If you know better, you are welcome to come back with why you think the author is wrong. But, remember, invectives are not a good substitute for reasoned arguments.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

Well said.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
5 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

I agree. Too bad this author doesn’t. The article is basically a string of poorly disguised invectives, only a degree or two more sophisticated than schoolyard taunting. His tone drips with conceit and condescension. Everything he utters shows his contemp for the other side, for the democratic process, for free expression, and for anybody who won’t kneel at the altar of progressivism. This is not an attempt to persuade the undecided. It is a Sunday morning sermon whose sole purpose is to rile the faithful into a frenzy, so I suppose it worked. I’ll stop short of calling it “hate”, but to me, it’s indistinguishable from what Trump does and he’s regularly accused of hate, so make of that what you will

This is no better, and no different, than what Trump does, and let’s be honest, he’s doing it better than this author and the rest of the left wing. What does the rise of populist movements all over Europe say to you? A smart strategic mind might think he’s getting his butt kicked and it might be time to change tactics, but no, haters gotta hate, preachers gotta preach. I realize you think your view is morally right and scientifically justified. Here’s a news flash. So does everyone else. We are not gods. None of us has a monopoly on moral truth, and ultimately it doesn’t even matter. Even if you ARE right, it won’t matter if your message turns people off and nobody wants to listen to it. It sure looks like a whole lot of folks are tired of being lectured about racism, xenophobia, and all the other progressive causes

Further, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. When you belittle and condescend to people who disagree, don’t act so shocked when they reapond in kind. If you’re looking for reasons why we all have to put up with the Trump clown show, let me direct you to the nearest mirror. Trump and populism are a reaction to the globalist crusade to unite humanity on one planet under diversity, equity, and inclusion. It’s basic physics. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Trump is a reflection of you, and you’re a reflection of him. I’m sorry you don’t like what you see. What I see is a bunch of fools fighting over nothing l, but then I never will understand religious warfare.

If you paid more attention, you would know that Jim is one of the most fair minded people on this board and you would know he has no love foer one Donald J. Trump, but then it’s always easier to get tribal and have a jihad than it is to think ad an individual and treat others as unique individuals as well. Both you and the Trumpists are well on your way to setting humanity back to the dark ages in terms of politics

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
5 months ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

This is in response to several of your recent posts, not just this one:

So just to clarify: You oppose the globalist universalism you identify in just about everyone who is vocally opposed to Trump–is that at least close to accurate?

And your response or counter-narrative is to promote a return to greater insularity if not outright tribalism. If for no other reason than your belief that those who cannot face the mirror in the unflinching way that you think you do deserve to have shards of glass thrown in their faces. Not that you pretend to truly understand the motives of the neurotypical, of course.

I doubt you’ll receive this as a fair characterization but I wonder how far off you think it is, and why.

I agree that this author sinks into invective throughout, his contempt and hatred ruining what might have been a more interesting historical tie-in.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
5 months ago
Reply to  AJ Mac

Your characterization is not far off the mark. Yes, I oppose globalism. It’s pure pie in the sky nonsense. It’s based on silly headed notions that I trace back to the poisonous tree of romanticism. Yes, most of Trump’s opponents are globalists but not all of them, and there are plenty of good reasons to dislike Trump not related to the ongoing struggle between local traditional cultures and the bland swarmism pushed by wealthy elites for self interest. I can cite many.

I think the primary goal of nations ought to be to reestablish national sovereignty and impose some checks and conditions on international trade, immigration, and investment to restore some semblance of self determination because I think most of the wars in the past several hundred years, and most of the world’s current conflicts are a result of people’s natural resentment towards people who look different, speak different, believe different, and so on. This is how people are. I can’t fault them for doing it.

The sad thing to me is, this article is tribalism. We haven’t gotten rid of it. Its just ideological instead of racial and national. I am of the opinion that wars of religion are singularly stupid myself. It’s just a religious conflict that one side won’t admit to fighting. It’s just shifting the conflicts from being betwenn nations to being within them. Instead of wars, there’s crime, terrorism, political violence. It’s just exchanging a few gigantic conflicts for hundreds of small conflicts.

My basic point is that external tribalism managed by sane and representative government os preferable to internal tribalism and civil conflict. The internal tribalism makes it all but impossible to solve national issues with any kind of consensus. Both sides try to achieve total victory. The existential conflicts are internal, and the USA, presently and historically, shows what that looks like. The author isn’t wrong when he characterizes the US as violent. He’s just only seeing half the reason. It’s not xenophobic hillbillies or anti-masons It’s xenophobic hillbillies trying to live in one country with deluded pie in the sky globalists. It’s trying to mix water and oil for the sake of either money or misguided idealism.

I don’t have an ideal solution for you. I don’t believe in ideal solutions. I’m just picking the least bad option. To me, populism vs. progressivism is the same old pragmatism vs. moralism, so I say live and let live. I don’t have an opinion on the right way to live or the right way to think or the right things to believe. I don’t much care for debates about morality because nobody ever agrees and there’s nobody to arbitrate that’s any less biased, political, or flawed than anyone else. It’s just talking in circles. I would rather advocate for people accepting and tolerating dissenting viewpoints. Calling people who want to limit immigration xenophobic and racist is definitely not what I would call tolerant, or an argument.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
5 months ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

I respect your honesty and directness, though I’m in serious disagreement with you on multiple points.

Kaufman’s article is sneering and self-satisfied, fueled by anger in large part. It’s indefensible on the whole, and adds to the negativity and vilification it purports to combat. On this it seems we can agree.

“My basic point is that external tribalism managed by sane and representative government is preferable to internal tribalism and civil conflict”. Sure, but those are far from the only options. Despite your insistent pessimism–or, from a more favorable angle: “hard realism”–being less motivated by tribalism or other forms of selfishness is not out of reach or destructive in and of itself–much less proven to be so.

Are you referring to the Romantic movement or romantic thinking of any kind as a “poisonous tree”? Certainly the Romantic poets and writers such as Wordsworth, Blake, and Emerson (called a Transcendentalist but under a similar canopy) had naive excesses and fond wishes. Yet they were not a bunch of fools, not in my book. Look at the change, on balance for the better I’d say, that Emerson witnessed in the younger United States during his lifetime (1803-82). Observe J.S. Mill’s influential mid-19th advocacy for women, in a society that was far more tribalized and unequal according to sex (“gender” in modish parlance). Or William Blake’s calling out of the “dark Satanic Mills” of early-Industrial England.

Do you view NATO and organizations like it as mere pie-in-the-sky foolishness? What about global humanitarian and climate goals–as a concept and a practical reality–putting aside or even factoring in their instances of overreach and excess?

One step further: Should we love our actual neighbors, even when they don’t look or sound like us? I’m not in favor of the pace and scale of immigration that’s happening now. But a continent that was “discovered” when already peopled by a few million people, followed by the importation of millions of “human assets” to fuel expansion and profit, neither can nor should be able to maintain its ethnic and cultural homogeneity forever. It never had it to begin with!

If every self-described libertarian or detached realist were as reasonable and unemotional-in-a-good-way as you are, I’d be a lot happier with the results and implications of the perspective you advocate. But they are not, far from it.

I don’t think it’s honest for you to claim, if you are, that your posts contain no moral dimension, or no appeal that extends beyond your own orbit. Those, including me, who don’t want immigration like we’ve seen under several recent presidents should indeed not be tarred and feathered with labels (“xenophobe! racist!”). Nor should anyone who believes that some level of social and individual improvement (including increased cooperation across historically shifting and largely artificial borders) is possible be called idealistic fools–at least not if you want the more reasonable among them to listen.

Have a good Sunday, Steve.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
5 months ago
Reply to  Steve Jolly

Nailed it yet again Steve. People treat Trump like he’s some kind of singular, magical phenomenon, yet there’s a dozen Trumps across the globe – in Argentina, the Netherlands, Britain, El Salvador, Italy, Germany, France and more. There’s a reason for this.

PS. Thanks for the shout out. I appreciate that.

laura m
laura m
5 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

Start with the author’s first error, he misrepresents MAGA, just look at the numbers of disaffected Dems registered Independent. I’m in the SF bay area and will vote MAGA.

0 0
0 0
4 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

Trump’s been a conman and a bulzly since his golfer fleecing days at Wharton..But is that the worst the US has to offer? Not that clear.

Obadiah B Long
Obadiah B Long
4 months ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

I will not defend Trump in the face of overwhelming evidence. But I will say two things: First, in a struggle for survival, when there are no rules or the rules are being routinely violated, I will follow a fraudster who wins, and never gives up. Second, I have known several billionaires through business, and dozens of CEOs, and a whole raft of alpha males, and few of them got where they are without at least pushing the boundaries of rules, and flagrantly violating some peoples’ ethics.
Both of these observations are pertinent to Trump and our current situation. I recognize that some people would rather go down on principle, and God bless them. Not me.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

It depends on who the subscribers are. JD Vance is no rags-to-riches innocent. He’s been bought and paid for by Peter Theil.

0 0
0 0
4 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Right on the money. MAGA and the other so called right wing populisms are just tactics to manipulate those unable not to be manipulated. By people like Thiel, Musk, Sterin, Koch etc. Today the populists are being turned thisaway but tomorrow it could be thataway.

Nick Faulks
Nick Faulks
5 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Agree with every word.

Benedict Waterson
Benedict Waterson
5 months ago

According to this writer, is there any rags-to-riches 19th C. political figure who *doesn’t* have astonishing parallels with J.D. Vance?
And maybe (if the comparison between modern Dems & 19th C. free-masons is not fanciful) then democratic reactions against elites trying to operate an ideological closed-shop would be fairly understandable?
Anyway, while he manages to maintain the expected tone of snobbish, smug condescension, I’m not sure that the comparison between Dems and a murderous secret cult really performs the rhetorical function he wants it to.

0 0
0 0
4 months ago

You don’t seem to appreciate that MAGA and the other ‘populisms’ are the biggest example today of elite-imposed ideological closed shops. Designed to be irresistible to the unsuspecting while offering those behind the scenes freedom of maneuver. Compared to that, Woke is a self- indulgent joke notable mainly for its naivety.

Zaph Mann
Zaph Mann
5 months ago

Is it reassuring or not?… to know that these opportunists and con-men have been infiltrating and influencing the corridors of power and still do so on both sides. I had been looking forward to a coherent Trump, but like Biden he showed that he’s also on the decline – just not as far down the slope.

T Bone
T Bone
5 months ago
Reply to  Zaph Mann

Just because he spoke too long doesn’t mean he wasn’t perfectly coherent. He had a lot of content to work with.

Eric Mader
Eric Mader
5 months ago

Never has this kind of smug superiority been so utterly undeserved. What, Mr. Kaufman, do you propose as alternative? Business as usual? The “peaceful”, “unifying” message of US coastal elites? Of unelected EU censors?

You stand on nothing but ruin and decline and demagoguery. Lawfare and censorship and cheap identity politics. To the point it’s gotten painful to read trash like this. Tropes and gestures that refer to nothing but themselves.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
5 months ago
Reply to  Eric Mader

You stand on nothing but ruin and decline and demagoguery.
But he and his get to rule over the ashes, and isn’t that what is really important.
/sarc

Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh
5 months ago

God knows what you were smoking when you wrote this ….

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
5 months ago

But the greatest fear of all was reserved for global elites
Entirely justifiably. Still, an original peg on which to hang yet another outpouring of anti-democratic snobbery and bile.

Catherine Conroy
Catherine Conroy
5 months ago

Stop insulting Republicans en masse

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
5 months ago

Trump has been insulting the Republicans on an industrial scale for years!

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago

Why? What about the insults to Democrats, en masse, here?

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Why is it that the Democrats have a problem attracting blue collar manual workers when they are meant to represent this group ?

Victor James
Victor James
5 months ago

Yes, the attempt to get him impeached and Trump thrown out of elected office with a pack of blatant lies.

The hysterical, pathetic 8 years of spittle flecked ranting and screaming that Trump is Hitler, inciting violence against Trump and all white people.

The FBI raiding Trump’s house, unprecedented act of tyranny it was, because of now thrown out charges.

The use of the ‘law’ to try and put Trump in jail and prevent him from running in 2024.

The assassination attempt, either a lone leftists whipped up into a frenzy by the Democratic hate machine, which includes the ‘media’, or an organised deep state, Antifa led operation.

The ‘elites’ really are evil. This has happened before in history, and that’s why revolution is always needed to kick them out.

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
5 months ago
Reply to  Victor James

If you feel the US judicial system is faulty or for some other reason cannot be relied on, then the best thing to do is to mount an effort to reform it, instead of packing it with partisan and biased judges.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago
Reply to  Victor James

The assassin was just another depressed, geeky, white male projecting his self-hatred outwards. He was looking for where there would be a handy crowd and the bonus for infamy would have been Trump. No doubt he would have gone on shooting into the crowd if he had the chance, It was, unfortunately, the the best thing that could have happened to Trump.

Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
5 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

You seem pretty adept at projecting hate outwards, too, Clare.

laura m
laura m
5 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Disgusting. You have zero evidence for your “theory” yet have no problem expressing your racism.

RA Znayder
RA Znayder
5 months ago

So I think it’s always a bit tricky to look at the past and find events that rhyme with the present. If you look for parallels, you will find them.
That said, as far as I know, the Masonic lodges had become places to discuss enlightenment ideas after the age of reason (along with some esoteric stuff). Enlightenment ideas, of course, were actually very much anti-elitist ideas as they argued against the actual elites of the time: the aristocracy and the clergy. Basically they wanted the overthrow the current eroding feudal world and of course those bourgeois revolutions actually took place. Pretty soon, romanticism criticized the rigid focus on reason and revolutionary tendencies of the enlightenment (i.e. Edmund Burke). A discussion that has gone back and forth since then. In the present day I would suggest postmodernism is actually more or less the latest incarnation romanticism. This is pretty clear in the work of Lyotard, for example. Since the “the radical woke progressive Left” is strongly influenced by postmodern ways of thinking, I think it is therefore not a continuation of enlightenment and liberalism but, indeed, a new form of romanticism, sometimes actually bordering on reactionary counter-enlightenment thoughts. Although I would also consider Trump and many others on the “populist right” are more or less the postmodern-right; the other side of the same coin. None of it is black and white of course; a lot of actual progressive, liberal and emancipatory ideas can still be found within postmodern currents.
Those who still recognize their ideology in the ideas of Voltaire, Locke and Stuart Mill can be found all the way from classical liberals to anarchists and socialists. And yes, many of them would like to envision some borderless utopia at some point. However, it is hard to see the current order of neo-feudal globalists, postmodernity and crony neoliberalism as an incarnation of that dream.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago

The Democrats who run New York since the late 19th century ignore the Cosa Nostra and organised crime. Organised crime originates in cities largely run by Democrats, it is not a product of the rural Mid West. How many members of the Democratic Party went to school with people who ended up in organised crime gangs ? After all the Mafia had massive influence if not control of unions who support the Democrats.
What has the author done to stop organised crime using violence ? He chose to be a writer: he could have joined a Law Enforcement Agency and spent his life arresting members of organised crime gangs who are the main cause of violence in the USA.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
5 months ago
Reply to  Charles Hedges

The main perpetrators, especially if street and prison gangs fit in the “organized” tent. But we might look more closely, both from a conservative or liberal point of view:

1) Individuals still choose to commit crime, even if they are more pressured or tempted because they live in rough neighborhoods or come from bad families. Their moral abandon, greed, and lack of good purpose is not forced upon them.

2) The relatively high poverty and sense of shallow materialism that pervades US culture creates many more POTENTIAL gangsters. A focus on profit over purpose and community makes our society meaner, even if we disavow any connection to the meanness of that teenager from the broken home.

(Some validity on both sides I’d say).

With his negative attitude: Do you really think this author could have been an effective cop or detective? Should all people who write about social issues give it a rest and build bridges, or more prisons?

I think we can agree it’d be better if more of them had done some hard, practical work at some point in their lives. This from a former carpenter and longtime college dropout (went back to school around age 40) you once labeled a “leftist intellectual”.

Allison Barrows
Allison Barrows
5 months ago

I just can’t stomach yet another of these over-the-top bullsh*t screeds from academics who can’t and won’t be honest about the disaster that is the Democrat party. The party of slavery, civil war, KKK, segregation, racial division, degeneracy, and destruction of a great nation – all excused or ignored. Nope, gotta have an Emmanuel Goldstein on whom to project guilt.

The quality of intellectual rigor at UnHerd has declined precipitously. I wonder what has happened? Is Trump really that terrifying to them? Why? And now Vance?
Or are these articles just reliable click bait? If the latter is the case, then UnHerd is just another sheep in a packed flock, and not worth my time or my dime.

Ian Wray
Ian Wray
5 months ago

I am beginning to ask myself whether I should no longer subscribe to Unherd, due to articles such as this. Perhaps readers could develop guidance for Unherd’s editors on what articles not to publish. For example, if the author of an article shows an inability to understand the people he is writing about, displays poor self-awareness (accompanied by an evident sense of his own moral and/or intellectual superiority), and portrays people with whom he disagrees in a condescending, stereotypical fashion, then I would advise the editors not to publish the article.

AJ Mac
AJ Mac
5 months ago

Just a ludicrous blurring of the pre and post 1950-1965 major parties. Who do the K K K vote for since 1960? How about the Boys, Proud or Boo galoo now?

Bored Writer
Bored Writer
5 months ago

Just thank providence that the author of this rambling, childish, polemic only possessed the cognitive ability to enter the Liberal Arts. Had he somehow found his way into the Sciences his monumental inability to think objectively could have been truly catastrophic.

Brian Matthews
Brian Matthews
5 months ago

Same bullshit as yesterday’s article. What is wrong with this publication?

Again, no one said that politics has to be kind and gentle now. Unherd is proving itself hopeless.

Walter Lantz
Walter Lantz
5 months ago

Perhaps the issue may be Trump’s use of MAGA – Make America Great Again. It would be more accurate – albeit not as catchy and a little ovine-sounding – to use MAAA – Make America American Again. America really never stopped being Great but Trump has struck a chord with many who see an America that has become less American.
One of the greatest features and curses of the US is the level of personal freedom. It’s often messy. Other, more genteel democracies wince at the level of crime and poverty. Some seethe at their bully boy tactics on the international stage before enjoying a good night’s sleep knowing that America is the only real ‘arsenal of democracy’ left.
Whatever you choose to blame: neo-liberalism, globalism, technocracy, warmed-over socialism; many feel that what makes America uniquely American has been under assault. The boundaries of freedom are wider than any other country on earth. The opportunity that every American has to achieve spectacular rise or suffer a horrendous fall is unheard of anywhere else in the free world. No other society is such a contradictory stew of features and bugs. Other countries have tighter leashes on the wealthy, sturdier welfare nets for the less fortunate and safer streets but nobody else has the American Spirit.
Trump has a long list of well-documented faults but he’s sure not short of spirit. “America, love it or leave it” may sound like tired nationalistic jingo-ism but only in places where national pride has been shame-washed away. Trump has tapped into a feeling that American Spirit still matters and right now it looks like that will put him back in the White House.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
5 months ago

“…(Vance’s Mamaw’s) ‘precious right to keep and bear arms’ — no matter the bloody shadow of 15 direct assaults on United States presidents, presidents-elect and presidential candidate (five of them resulting in deaths), including JFK in 1963, RFK in 1968, George Wallace in 1972 and Reagan in 1981. Gerald Ford holds a record of sorts, having survived two assassination attempts in one particularly nasty month in 1975.”
The concept of personal responsibility is so difficult for people on the Left.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago
Reply to  Daniel Lee

The left is the party of the collective. People who are willing surrender what little individuality they have to become part of the collective, hence in the 1920s and 1930s Marxist became Fascists ( Mussolini ) and Nazis – National Socialists or Islamicist .
The pioneers who founded the USA were individuals who risked death, of the first ten thousand, eight thousand died. Those who criticise the founder of the USA lack their fortitude and ingenuity and feel inadequate in comparison.Therefore to feel good about themselves they denigrate the founders.
Can one imagine Hilary Clinton in a pioneer settlement of the 1620s or any Democrat? J D Vance could survive and Trump would be good at organising construction projects.

Penny NG
Penny NG
5 months ago

Mr. Kaufman, you may be surprised to know that in the environs of “barely literate devil-fearing bible-thumping bumpkins armed to the teeth” many are masons and J.D. Vance is not the first Yale grad with roots there. BTW, Culpepper, VA and Breathitt County, KY are very different places in the region of Appalachia and all who will choose to vote for Mr. Trump in November will not be the “MAGAs” you describe. Your parallels are forced and show a great deal of ignorance of the culture and region you malign.

George Scipio
George Scipio
5 months ago

MAGA pinheads always forget the one great truth: Trump and Vance are themselves just another face of the elite ruling class. Like other gutter politicians, they harness the fear and anger of the moral underclass in order to win power, but as soon as they hold it, up goes the drawbridge to keep out the people they conned. They may toss the MAGA savages a piece of meat from time to time, but then it’s back to their lives of luxury, entitlement and power games. Or reframe it: Trump is the antichrist, laughing as he slams the door in the face of the faithful.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
5 months ago
Reply to  George Scipio

A health republic would have no place for a Trump candidacy. But we do not have a healthy republic, which makes him viable and electable. Those “MAGA savages” of your condescension are Americans who feel betrayed by many of the people they elected. They see their country trashed, their young taught to despise the place, their history and traditions misrepresented. Well, this is the pendulum reversing course. When your avenue of first resort is ad hominem, there is no reason to take you seriously and every reason to believe you are okay with the conditions that made Trump possible, even if you fail to realize it.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago
Reply to  George Scipio

Exactly, very well said. It’s sad that MAGAS are being duped.

F J
F J
5 months ago

So full of contempt and envy, and devoid of self-awareness.
If the best revenge is to not become like the one you hate, such individuals are rushing to become the villains of their own projections.
Happy to cancel my subscription, Mr. Kaufman may use my pro-rated subscription balance to buy himself a clue.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
5 months ago

It’s no news that violence is as American as baseball and hot dogs. — except that it isn’t. Violence exists in much of the world. The American version is concentrated in certain areas of certain cities involving certain populations. Of course, we’re not supposed to say this out loud. Because that would mean not being able to blame random gun owners for the actions of a criminal and psychotic class.
to quote Tucker Carlson’s strange speech on the final night of the convention, delivered “a middle-finger in the face of every American”. — was Tucker wrong? The political class has elevated the illegal over the citizen and the criminal over the law-abiding. It’s more interested in subsidizing the killing of even more Ukrainians than in stopping the killings of its own citizens.
Instead of this meandering word salad, it would have been easier and more to the point had the author simply said, “I hate Trump and Vance and all of the people who cheered them at the convention or from home.”

Angus Douglas
Angus Douglas
5 months ago

They will hate you on Unherd, which is rather Trumpest, for writing this. But it’s true. THE Trump cult is rather mad and somewhat scary.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
5 months ago
Reply to  Angus Douglas

Unlike the anti-Trump cult whose predictions of the horrible things he would do the first time around fell flat, leaving them to resort to half-baked allegations and lawfare. And last weekend, because you can’t have “our democracy” without targeting opponents for jail or worse.

Clare Knight
Clare Knight
5 months ago
Reply to  Angus Douglas

Indeed it is, and not just somewhat but very scary.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago
Reply to  Clare Knight

Compared to the life of Odette Hallows GC in occupied France or the other women agents such as Khan GC and Szabo GC for instance?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7oN6xSnG4Y

Carissa Pavlica
Carissa Pavlica
5 months ago

What has become of the UnHerd I loved with thoughtful and nuanced takes speaking to the souls of readers? We’ve now moved past TDS to just plain deranged, as the far left tries every trick in the book to tear down their “enemy” aka anybody who doesn’t think like them. I’m over it. The other side is over it. Half of their side is over this division. Hatred of customs and morals and values and hard work and hope is just sad. And it’s incredibly embarrassing that UnHerd keeps promoting these pitiful, soulless creatures.

Andrew Holmes
Andrew Holmes
5 months ago

Hooray for Unherd! Publishing this and other like essays opens, for me, a windows into a deranged faculty lounge. The biased analogy to past derangement displays the same blindness as the rants of the far right.

G M
G M
5 months ago

The author sounds like one of the elitists talking down to the ‘peasants’.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago
Reply to  G M

The problem he is not an elitist. The true Elitist is a Renaissance person: soldier, poet, musician, diplomat,

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
5 months ago

Well this comment section is becoming tiresomely predictable. The pro Trump piece attracted numerous comments of adulation about how it was the best piece on UnHerd for ages, now this one that’s slightly critical is lambasted as being poorly written and not worth the time to read.
It’s a shame but any nuance has long since disappeared, it’s now just an echo chamber like all the others. Perhaps it’s the fate of every message board to end up this way. The moderates and minority get driven away, leaving those that are left to simply have their beliefs reaffirmed

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
5 months ago
Reply to  Billy Bob

What is moderate ? What is nuanced ? When Hilary Clinton described people as deplorables; when the Secret Service personnel said she treated them with contempt; when B Obama treated people with the God and Guns jibe, where is respect? JFK earned respect.
What is moderate when affluent Democrats treat those who undertake dirty, dangerous and technical jobs needed for civilisation with contempt, the absurd has been achieved. Clinton et al are looking like Marie Antoinette, not political representatives for blue collar workers. Winston churchill when he built the brick wall at Chartwell undertook more skilled manual work than Clinton and he was cousin of a duke ! Churchill was given honorary member of the Bricklayers Union.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
5 months ago
Reply to  Charles Hedges

I mean the board wasn’t as partisan. The comments always had conservative leanings, but they’d discuss that in the actual context of the points raised in the article and many didn’t blindly believe everything their favoured party said, rather than just shouting Libs Grrr into the void.
Most of the comments now just start whining and threatening to cancel their subscription with any article that’s vaguely critical of Trump, who despite being shabbily treated is still undoubtedly a deeply flawed individual.

Christopher Chantrill
Christopher Chantrill
5 months ago

Back in the 1830s the rising yahoos who had “headed out to the territory” had been governed for 30 years straight by Presidents from the Democratic-Republican Party. When a single party rules for so long the natives tend to get restless, old chap. Gotta be the Masons!
So, in our era, the deplorables are conscious of having been deplorable in the eyes of its ruling class since the day after the passage of the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s. So the natives are restless, old chap. Gotta be the globalists!
And your point is?

Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
5 months ago

Zzzzzzzzz. Zzzzzzzzz. Zzzzzzzzz. Ooops, I got bored and fell asleep.

Mark Royster
Mark Royster
5 months ago

Very Herd, this!

Neil Ross
Neil Ross
5 months ago

Is this writer serious? Freemasonry has been and is a completely benign and harmless organisation and its members have never helped each other to advance their positions. How about looking at the 1920s links with the KKK? What planet is he living on?

Sisyphus Jones
Sisyphus Jones
5 months ago

Yeehaw! Another effete English academic lost in the sociology department wilderness.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
5 months ago

Strange read. As well as Trump derangement syndrome, he suffers from Vance derangement syndrome.
These are easy to observe if you look at Washington Post or NYT where every day the columnist and commenting readers find historic parallels with Hitler and the SS. Kaufman bringing the Masons into the mix is a new twist, you have to admit.
I guess Kaufman will not be writing for Unherd again but as I say – you can find stuff like this in the WP or NYT any day if you want to get annoyed.

David Yetter
David Yetter
5 months ago

I’m not sure I’d list “the great” Andrew Jackson in a list attempting to prove any group he belonged to was harmless. He was the instigator of the Trail of Tears, the near-genocidal deportation of the Five Civilized Tribes from the south-eastern United States to Oklahoma. That name — the Five Civilized Tribes — is deprecated among the woke, but is a reminder that the Indians (that’s what their descendants in Oklahoma like to be called) who were force-marched into the wastes were not savages, but were competing successfully with European-Americans in terms of the then-modern economy. Incidentally, the Indians’ African slaves were force-marched away with them. Lots of places in Oklahoma will not accept $20 bills as they bear his portrait. Jackson’s vaunted military prowess consisted of winning a battle after the treaty ending the war had been signed, and he was in many ways, himself a precursor of Trump, a populist with rude manners who horrified the establishment of his day.

0 0
0 0
5 months ago

Fun bits of history, for sure. But surely the main point is how the anti Hamilton anti- Federalists handed money creation over to commercial banks, bringing to an end the nation’s credit création investment in its infant industries. (Fortunately for them, China and now Russia revived Federalist finance, however.)

This sort of political manipulation is happening again today. The people who actually control rust belt MAGA revolt now are rich kids who keep the dispossessed running around in circles. It’s the Vance of today not the Vance of yesteryear that we need to fear.

John Hughes
John Hughes
4 months ago

“But the greatest fear of all was reserved for global elites, an anxiety that can be traced to the first American presidential nominating convention, which happened just about a century ago.. ” (seventh paragraph of article). Editor, please change this to ‘just about two centuries ago’. The story is about what happened in the 1820s and 30s, not the era of Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover.