Cruelty was not an aside or a by-product in Simon Cowell’s genre of television — from which he has now retired, exiting his new show Walk the Line. It was the whole point of it. It was all predicted by the great film about television, Network (1976), in which a mentally ill man is offered up as both prophet and sacrifice on the nightly news. This man — Howard Beale — was subject to ratings — to whim — and a more general emotional desensitisation and de-intellectualisation, as the viewer, beset by the anxiety of Seventies America, seeks an outlet for its powerlessness and rage.
The newsman prophet begged viewers to turn off the TV and save their souls. Thrilled by their cruelty and new agency — Beale was their broken toy — they didn’t, and Beale was murdered live on air. There could be no other ending. Network’s writer, Paddy Chayefsky, knew where we were heading. He didn’t live long enough to see the X-Factor, Pop Idol and Britain’s Got Talent but he would have recognised them.
Cowell didn’t sell music. He sold souls. Serious musicians, who hated his work, knowing that it deprived them of attention, autonomy and the space to develop, said so. “You wouldn’t find a Joni Mitchell on X Factor,” said Annie Lennox. “It’s a factory, you know, and it’s owned and stitched-up by puppet masters”.
He collected the vulnerable and the credulous — those longing for an affirmation previously denied them — and subjected them to a public audition process he called authentic, but which was nothing of the kind. For those who tempted him, he invented the thrilling and awful concept of the personal journey, to be consumed week by week by his audience: drama, but with real people, and higher emotional stakes.
Cowell called himself honest, as much a victim as anyone of the swelling genre, but he denied his own agency in this: his own skill. I think he was devoured by greed. I met him in his pomp, and he was charming. It was business. If people would buy it, he sold it. I wondered if he was a kind man trying to escape his own creation of himself; he does a lot for charity. There are rumours, too, that he inspired a sub-genre of porn in which middle-aged men shout at people while nude, which I believe. For those seeking more “family-friendly” entertainment he offered a dog called Pudsey that walked on two legs.
There were multiple acts and softer judges than Cowell — usually doll-women, scenery that could flirt — but he was the big event, a demon in high-waisted trousers. He was the one seeking the vulnerable to raise up and cast aside according to his whim, though the audience was allowed the fantasy of control. He was his greatest product and his greatest success; his personal journey was the most successful in the entire genre and watching the promise of fame afflict his contestants was, entirely, the game. What would they hand over for our attention? Their dignity? Their privacy? Their sanity? Could Susan Boyle hack it? That was the question.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“The talent show supremo made voyeurs of us all”
Not all of us. We are not compelled to watch. And so I don’t.
Wow. I have nothing to say about Cowell but Tanya Gold is a seriously good (and scathing) reviewer. If she turned to the dark side she’d be a heck of a judge on X Factor.
I agree, except to say I cannot stand the man.
Did you see her latest restaurant review for the spectator (The Whitcomb)? A masterclass.
Cowell is just one of the many products the real monsters pump out into society to make us less moral, less mentally healthy, less educated, less family oriented, worse citizens, Nihilist, stupid consumers. The writer is merely blaming the messenger.
The real monsters being the Entertainment Industry. I have tried my free Netflix and Prime – they are just evil Cra*. Degenerate, depraved, sadistic, twisted, sickos. Some good stuff – but not much in those huge catalogues of unhealthy, soulless, corruption.
This is one of the best articles I’ve read in a long time, well done Tanya. Brilliant, spot on, brave and totally compelling. I just hope you don’t bump into SC on a dark night somewhere!
I have never watched a second of any program with Cowell in it. Not one second.
So you can’t have any insight about him then? Enjoy the cave, or rock.
X-factor probably attracted elderly viewers in their …. millions (in GB) who liked to see “stage singing performances”, a form of variety entertainment and broadcast live. The camera lingered, on X-factor. This was certainly not the way with Eurovision post-Millennium where each performance on that annual TV extravaganza is like watching a rap video: flashing multiple shots from all angles. The sense of Eurovision having become a young persons’ exclusive house party probably shunted fed-up elderly pensioners to steer towards X-factor as the musical highlight of the year on TV. And they could talk about it with their grandchildren. (Though moving it into Sunday also probably taxed their patience). Even songs prior to the 1970s were sung. Was X-factor (and Pop Idol) the last big communal TV event, involving the viewership of both the very young and the elderly? I think so. It’s now ten years since it last caught the public’s imagination. Perhaps attention may be a better word, though.
Would today’s TV audiences have the patience to watch X-factor? Probably not.
What would have happened had Pop Idol and X-Factor not ever materialised on TV? Well, the fact of its existence I believe had a hand in encouraging people to sing for the first time in their lives when they went to a karaoke bar or party, having been inspired by X-factor. Before TV, before radio, the working-classes, correct me if I’m wrong, sang together occasionally in each other’s homes, perhaps round a piano. And if not there, then at church. Not for a jolly knees-up there, mind you. And I believe that only the live performance of popular song can give people belief in a good and cheerful future. So I don’t want everything to be an ephemera on TV. But now even in churches, singing is sometimes verboten.
“ There are rumours, too, that he inspired a sub-genre of porn in which middle-aged men shout at people while nude “
Should I ever participate in my own car crash TV guilty pleasure of Come Dine With Me, I have my pre-dessert entertainment nailed then.
I feel the same way about Zoom calls.
No, a misinterpretation of the chicken and egg scenario – the public wanted this type of ‘entertainment’ so it was inevitably going to happen. He was just very good at making it.
Cowell may have tampered with the pop music business, but the record industry has a long track record of abusing performers. Whether it was through churning out pop acts that were flavour of the month – how many one hit wonders thought at the time they’d made it big? Or the songwriters like George Michael who were ripped off for royalties? George could afford to sue, but how many thousands of others lost out?
And let’s not get started on the film business and its abuse of ‘stars’ – or was Weinstein a one off?
Speak for yourself. I’ve never been that vacuous.
“The talent show supremo made voyeurs of us all”
Au conbleedin’traire. Never have, never will.
Don’t try to socialise your own “guilty pleasures”.
The rest of us have something called “lives” to lead.
Cowell has not made voyeurs of us all. I never watch rubbish like this. I did not bother to progress beyond this fatuous headline.