Moreover, any stigma still attached to the Lib Dems for their time in bed with the Tories would disappear if you let them climb into bed with you. Of course, tactical voting could help at the next election, but keep it covert – black ops, not photo ops .
The worse case scenario is a ‘government of national unity’. Just imagine being sat around the Cabinet table with Jo Swinson, Ian Blackford, Chuka Umunna, Anna Soubry and Ken Clarke – especially with the latter in the Prime Minister’s chair! Have you gone through the last four years of trench warfare just to become the Ramsay MacDonald of the 21st century?
4) Remember why you (nearly) won in 2017
Never forget the 8th June, 2017. I certainly won’t. They said you couldn’t do it – even Owen Jones thought so – but you did (almost). In 2015, Ed Miliband got 30.5% of the vote, you got 40.0%: a remarkable achievement.
Admittedly you had some help. The Lib Dems were still on the floor and Ukip was imploding. Then there were your ‘assets’ inside Tory high command. Just how you guys got so many expert saboteurs into so many high ranking positions I’ll never know. One of them, let’s call her ‘Agent Tracey’, did an especially good job.
It won’t be so easy next time. Tracey’s gone, the Lib Dems are back and so is Farage. Nevertheless, your basic strategy – to inspire support by offering a meaningful choice – is still valid. After all, Ed Miliband didn’t fail because he was too radical, but because he wasn’t radical enough – you proved that in 2017, despite what the Blairites said.
In retrospect, it all seems so obvious. In every general election since the financial crash, the change candidates have done spectacularly well. In 2010, that was partly obscured by Cameron and Clegg cancelling each other out – still, Cameron made a net gain of 108 seats. In 2015, the change candidates were Nicola Sturgeon north of the border and Nigel Farage south of it. Sturgeon swept the board in Scotland – and Farage increased UKIP’s vote share from 3% to 13%. In 2017, the change candidate was you, Jeremy. It could have been your main opponent, but with maximum muppetry the Tories went with the anti-change message of “strong and stable”.
This time, the ‘change space’ will be heavily contested: no one expects stasis from Boris Johnson; Jo Swinson is the new face; Nigel Farage will be making trouble; and you’re in danger of looking like yesterday’s man. With Labour plotting a middle course on Brexit, you’ll need a fresh, radical agenda on the other big issues.
But simply dusting-off the 2017 manifesto isn’t good enough. The whole commie hipster thing is already moving on. As this year’s Euro-elections showed, the red wave has been swallowed up by a green wave. The young and young-ish voters who swung behind you two years ago may be radical in their politics, but they’re bourgeois to their fingertips. A return to 1970s socialism just won’t do it for them.
That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t promise to spend shed-loads of money. But you need something much smarter than a crude giveaway (especially now the Tories are splashing the cash). Fortunately, one of your economic advisors – Ann Pettifor – has got a plan for a Green New Deal. Apparently, she was into it long before Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Greta Thunberg made it cool.
It’s just the ticket for your next manifesto – plenty of stuff that can be sold both to your new supporters (like action on climate change and anti-neoliberalism) and to your traditional supporters (green manufacturing jobs and public transport for traffic-choked northern cities).
Furthermore, unlike a free-stuff-for-everyone-and-let’s-nationalise-Facebook agenda, a Labour Green New Deal would allow you to push back on questions of affordability. After all, a higher level of investment in productivity-enhancing projects might pay for itself if it’s done right. Indeed, you could accuse the Tories of running up an ‘infrastructure deficit’ by running down the public realm.
And as for the charge of ‘crowding out’ private sector investment, you only need ask: ‘what private sector investment?’
5) Localism not Leninism
A promise to re-nationalise the odd utility won’t do you any harm. But an across-the-board policy of nationalisation? If you pay full price for the companies, voters won’t believe you’ll have the money. If you enforce a discount – i.e. expropriate a private business – you’ll kill the economy. Anyone with any assets will worry they’re next.
In the 21st century, the Left should champion radical localisation not centralisation. Preston council is the exemplar of Labour local governance in this regard – a model of how the public realm can be regenerated in a co-operative, community-led manner.
Remember what people hate about capitalism right now is not markets and competition, but monopolies and cronyism. They want you to return power to the people, not hoard it for yourself. Ignore your more doctrinaire colleagues, ‘democratic centralism‘ is a fraud and always has been.
Anyway, that’s enough unsolicited advice from the class enemy. I genuinely wish you (and your opponents) good luck in the forthcoming general election. It will be brutal.
Best regards,
Peter
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe