'I, Tonya.' Credit: IMDB

This addition to our series examining different cultural representations of flyover country takes a look at the film industry.
What struck me about the 2018 Oscars ceremony wasn’t so much the still simmering rage and smattering of black dresses. The first Academy Awards ceremony since the Harvey Weinstein scandal engulfed Hollywood was always going to feature numerous A-listers – men and women alike – condemning the mistreatment of female actors.
They were right to do so, of course. Such abuse has existed for years, hidden in plain sight. And it no doubt still exists – extending way beyond the previously rarified circle of a once powerful film mogul with a predilection for black t-shirts and greeting his guests in a bathrobe.
No, what I found particularly interesting about this Oscar season, the first of the Trump era, was that it featured two major movies set in blue-collar middle America, the kind of ‘flyover’ country that rich, liberal coast-dwellers so often fail to understand.
The first, and most celebrated, was Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, a fictional story about rape, violence and racial tensions in the US ‘heartland’. It won Best Picture, with leading actors Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell also recognised as Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor respectively – a feat they first achieved at the Golden Globes.
The second blue-collar movie was I, Tonya, the real-life, world-famous story of the rise and fall of Tonya Harding, American figure skating’s best-known, self-confessed “redneck”. Less critically acclaimed, it still won an Oscar, with Allison Janney, who plays Harding’s ghastly, embittered mother, taking Best Supporting Actress.
Even though they were released a year into his presidency, these movies would have started to take life long before Donald Trump’s 2016 Presidential election victory, before he had even declared as a candidate for the Republican nomination.
Both of these films, though, two of the biggest of 2017, can reasonably be characterised as portraits of Trump country. The worlds depicted in Three Billboards and I, Tonya are a very long way from the lives of middle-class Americans who tend to watch the kind of films that vie for Oscars and Golden Globes.

Both films describe the ‘wrong side’ of America’s cultural divide; they tell the stories of the white working class, of the Trump supporters that Hillary Clinton so disgracefully described as “deplorables”. Alongside Hillbilly Elegy by JD Vance and Amy Goldstein’s Janesville, both factual literary accounts from America’s blue-collar school of hard knocks, these films are set in places where Trump’s election victories were forged.
I, Tonya, though, like the books by Vance and Goldstein1 is ultimately uplifting: a real-life story of an under-privileged person who, despite suffering poverty, alienation and class contempt, achieves a greatness of sorts.
Three Billboards is not only less authentic, but risks being patronising and condescending. The characters are typecast – whether racist, lazy, bull-headed or plain stupid. Despite superb individual performances by McDormand and Rockwell, the story seemed contrived to promote all the clanking stereotypes, showing ordinary working people in the worst possible light.
Tonya Harding, on the other hand, is portrayed as a complex individual. To anyone over 40, her story is well known. From Portland, Oregon, Harding was the squat, snub-nosed ‘white trash’ competitor that the US skating establishment never learned to love. Their choice was the lithe, almost impossibly beautiful Bostonian Nancy Kerrigan. So when a thug whacked Kerrigan’s knees with a crowbar head of the 1994 Olympic qualifier, apparently paid by Harding’s deranged ex-husband, it seemed that the whole of America – the entire world – held Harding in contempt.
What emerges in I, Tonya is that Harding was not only an incredibly gifted skater – she was the first American woman to land the famously tough “triple-axel” in competition – but also that she was a grafter. Yes, she swears and smokes and eats bad food, but she is up at 5am to train, then waiting tables all day, then back at the rink, and all the time dealing with a heartlessly cruel mother and a husband who seems to take pleasure in hitting her.
Shackled to these ghastly people, lacking the financial or emotional resources to strike out alone, Harding perseveres, nurturing her talent, not only dreaming of greatness, fame and riches, but getting out of bed every day to take and make them real, pushing a body not built for skating to its limits and beyond.
“I can do a triple-axel, so fuck you,” Harding says to camera, after getting knocked back yet again by the snooty skating establishment. “Am I ever going to get a fair hearing?” she says to a row of judges, as the crowd slow handclaps her. “I mean, I am clearly out-skating everyone. What do I have to do?”
I found I, Tonya extremely moving. Of course Harding is flawed – and, while she denies ever knowing about the planned “hit on Kerrigan”, she did plead guilty to hindering the subsequent investigation, resulting in a lifetime ban from professional skating.
These are the grievances and hardships that Trump has understood and, whatever you think of him, exploited so successfully to propel himself to power. These are the issues that US Democrats, having lost the support of their traditional working class base, pitching themselves against low-income workers in America’s escalating culture wars, will need to recognise if they are to regain the White House.

Three Billboards is, by any standard, a very good film. I wouldn’t want to discourage anyone from seeing it. But for all its moral seriousness, it is deeply contrived. From the bigoted rural policemen, to the bandana-wearing leading lady (channeling Rambo) who firebombs their police department, the story seemed unreal. Coincidences abound – the point seemingly always to create another moral dilemma that can be resolved so as to please a liberal, well-heeled audience. Pretty much all the working-class characters are, if not outwardly violent, then spoiling for a fight.
Yes, there is a sense of tragedy, memorable cinematography and spell-binding performances (did I mention that McDormand is great?). But Three Billboards, to this viewer anyway, for all the air-punching moments, ultimately reinforces middle-class prejudice, mocking the inhabitants of Trump-country, doing nothing to bridge America’s fast-growing cultural divide.
I, Tonya, in contrast, is an attempt, long overdue, by wealthy, well-connected Hollywood filmmakers to empathise and understand.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis is the kind of article for which I subscribe to Unherd. Thoughtful, deep, well-written, unrushed in its manner and form – a work of art all its own. My thanks to the author and to Unherd. More of such would be most welcome!
True, but so painful to read.
My suggestion is don’t go to university, don’t rely on an art gallery to legitimise your art, don’t bother with the arts community, stop believing in the idea of being an artist. They are not savants, they’re merely entertainers. If you think you’re something special and you want to live off it then you’re going to have to play the game. You don’t need them to create, but you do to make money. Art is the ultimate elite game. This story just confirms it. The arts community talk about AIs destroying art because it’s not human. There’s nothing human about the arts today. It’s a closed, suffocating shop ticking off the boxes and bending everything into some shape that satisfies their warped egos, including antisemitism, the latest “trend”.
Having spent a professional life encouraging students to develop their thinking skills and knowledge by attending university, previously known as institutes of higher learning (but no longer deserving of that title), I would counsel any youngster possessed of an independent spirit and a modicum of intelligence to avoid these conformist echo chambers like the plague.
I entirely agree. And the world of contemporary literature is fast behind it: despite having an even bigger claim to being a medium meant to make us think, see other perspectives and empathise.
We have a number of tax-funded literary presses in the UK pumping out anti-western propaganda on a daily basis. 87 press is one of the most pernicious. Its editor is also studying for a tax-funded PhD in [whatever], while denying anyone was raped and any ‘innocents’ were harmed on October 7th.
It’s funny that art schools preach transgression but oddly seem to produce conformism.
I guess this is what happens when the traditional battle grounds of sexuality and politics have effectively been conquered.
I’m trying to remember my own art school days and what agitated us back then. As I remember it was ban the bomb, anti Thatcher and the after shock of the AIDS epidemic. I genuinely think we still had boundaries that needed to be crossed.
What we have now, some 35 years later, is a borderless, valueless society where everything is relative and nothing is sacred.
Maybe we are doomed to repeat cycles of hate and conflict. All that remains is for the people to decide which group of others to go to war against.
Yes, herdish transgression is the new “plat du jour” and relativism the latest absolute
The reoccurring theme here with the artists mentioned isn’t that they’re Jewish, it’s that they’re Israeli, which isn’t the same thing. Of course no one should blame each and every Israeli citizen for the actions of their government, that’s absurd, but assuming all criticism of the Israeli state is motivated by hostility to Jewish people is also absurd, especially when many of Israel’s staunchest critics are themselves Jewish.
Sorry but as a British Jew I can tell you that while you think this to be the case, it isn’t. If you are Jewish there are parts of this country that will shun you unless you are on ‘their’ side. We are guilty by association unless we denounce – sounds eerily familiar.
You missed his point.
He was speaking of the references in the article, not of your (alleged) personal experience.
With respect I didn’t miss his point and although most of the artists quoted were Israeli there is one that isn’t, and undoubtedly more that didn’t want to be named as suggested in the article. My point is that we as British Jews cannot disassociate or indeed are not allowed to disassociate ourselves from the conflict. People consistently try to separate the two, but it is impossible without us denoucing what is going on. When doors were kicked in on my brother’s road a few years ago it wasn’t because those houses all had Israeli flags, it’s because they displayed symbols of Judaism and were automatically associated with Israel. This is what people do not understand when they make comments like the above. It applies to any religion/religious conflict but is most pronounced with respect to Jews and Israel.
Answered as a new comment
Just to be clear, it is eerily familiar of the authoritarian left (Stalin,etc). A Jewish artist who is explicitly and resolutely anti-Zionists and denounces Israel will be lauded by the art world which is overwhelmingly dominated by the left.
This is exemplified by the open letter published in July 24 by Artists for Palestine UK, the signatories, including more than 100 Jewish creatives, decrying as “shameful” the Royal Academy’s removal of a photograph of a protestor holding a placard that reads, “Jews Say Stop Genocide on Palestinians. Not In Our Name.
More than ever, the West’s art world is a leftist propagandas machine. Jews and non-Jews alike will be exhibited if they keep to the left.
assuming all criticism of the Israeli state is motivated by hostility to Jewish people is also absurd,
did you read the article? Did you get to the part where the author speaks to a particular piece and is told “how could any country promote an artist like her?”
Hi Chris, it’s the same. Israel is not just a Jewish state, but the land of the Jews (the Jewish people), and its name is Israel. It’s easier to say “Israeli” than “Jew” to cover up hate, and people use “social justice” arguments to denounce one country. Go check the number of deaths and refugees in Ukraine/Russia. Where is the venom there? You start calling the Jews “Semite,” then kill them all and start saying “antisemitism.” And the Jews start using this to explain the hate. So what do you do? Start saying “Zionist” – a movement that ended 75 years ago. I’m waiting for the next name.
how could any country promote an artist like her?
Ah, the ever-present desire to silence, stigmatize, and scapegoat people of a certain identity. What are the odds of the woman quoted saying the same of a black artist, a Latino, a gay, or anyone else from the congregation within the church of the aggrieved and offended?
Art has become another word for another institution paralyzed by mind-numbing groupthink that mistakes itself for wisdom. Voltaire was right in saying that the people who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit (or accept) atrocities.
It’s appalling this antisemitism is allowed to continue. There’s a post on another forum from a concerned Jewish mother whose child is being subjected to anti-semitic bullying at her school which has 30% Muslim pupils. Quite a few posters have either disbelieved her or asked ‘why are you surprised?’
Zionists like talking about ‘light’ while obscuring it as much as possible. When they talk about art, it is invariably about the artifice of conflating Judaism with zionism and Jews with zionists. Such subversion of language is not artistic.
As ever, _what_ are you talking about. Zionism= believing the Jewish people should return to their historic homeland. What do you know about art anyway? Your religion only permits shapes.
When left to their own devices, Jews create Israel, whilst Muslims create Daesh. By their works ye shall know them.
The zionist state was created by the Brits, not the zionists, like Northern Ireland. And much like NI, it created a trail of misery stretching to, but not ending in, the present day.
Historically illiterate. It was _recommended_ by the Brits as only fair that the Jews should have a state and the Muslims too: Transjordan, which they got. The UN voted in favour of Israel’s creation & the trail of misery has been the abject refusal of all the surrounding Islamic countries refusing to live alongside a single Jewish one ever since.
Some day historians will write about this time the same way they described Europe in the 1930s and 40s: the Jew-haters who wanted to kill us Jews because we’re Jewish, and those who fought that medieval barbarity. We live in such a time again.
100% solidarity with the innocent victims of the hypocritical anti-jewish, leftist arts world.
“Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.”
More Levites and priests around nowadays than Good Samaritans. Pious hypocrisy is much in vogue. Not much mercy.
The Sokal Affair last century showed what the art world has become. A propaganda machine for leftist nonsense.
This article points out the real threat from the far left, socialist anti west ideology which threatens our way of life. Cancel culture which attacks free speech, free expression and liberty writ large, is a baked into the cake principle of Marxism. It would be a good idea for everyone to brush up on Lenin, Stalin and Mao tactics of implementing Marxist Communism and Socialism with regards to those who did not get in line with their doctrines. Over 75 million people were murdered or died from starvation in those regimes, and freedom of the people did not exist. It is not alarmist to say we need to be very alarmed and fight back against this scourge to Western Civilization values. Antisemitism as described in this article is just the beginning. We are all at risk.