When Hamas attacked Israel, analogies to the 1973 Yom Kippur War were quickly raised. But while the military and intelligence failures that preceded this war brought back bitter memories of the complacency that preceded the earlier conflict, the comparisons don’t stretch to the economy.
The 1973 war triggered a global recession that devastated Western economies, ending the quarter century-long golden age of rapid growth and rising incomes. But today, to judge from the price action in the markets, war in Israel has barely moved the needle.
Immediately after the Hamas atrocities, government bonds rallied as investors rushed to the safety of US Treasury paper. But the rally didn’t last the week, interest rates resuming their relentless upward march. Meanwhile other haven assets that normally rise during periods of global anxiety, like the yen and gold, have barely budged. Even oil prices, which rose a few dollars due to supply concerns, are still well off the highs they set late last month.
It would seem investors are saying, “nothing to see here folks.” That’s partly down to the changed geopolitics of the Middle East. The region’s governments are expressing public fury at Israel’s response, but in large measure this is simply a way to tamp down the anger of their publics. Several of them have improved relations with Israel, have no interest in war, and in private would be just as happy to see the tail end of Hamas.
Not the Iranians, of course, who sponsor Hamas and the Lebanese Hezbollah militia. But while Iran makes noises about joining the war, it doesn’t have an obvious interest in doing so. The current situation, with Israel unsettled, suits it just fine. War with Israel and its US ally, on the other hand, would devastate Iran at a time the Islamic regime is already battling internal disorder.
Barring a massive escalation of Israel’s operation, such as a wholesale occupation of Gaza, this tense stability will likely endure. It’s precisely to forestall such an operation that Western leaders, led by Joe Biden, have been taking turns tying up Benjamin Netanyahu with their visits.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThe biggest threat to our economies is Net Zero.
I agree, when energy prices are low the economy grows faster, when oil prices are higher we are all just sending money to OPEC
Efficiency +Nuclear energy is the way
“Between the reduced energy intensity of our economies and the progress of decarbonisation, household and corporate budgets are much less sensitive to energy prices”. Ha! The cost of electricity, heat and transport dictates how competitively economies can make things, and much money consumers have left to buy other stuff. The price of renewable energy, on which, thanks to “decarbonisation” mandates the West increasingly depends, is highly correlated to the price of gas and oil.
Yes we know that… but the author was making a comparison with the situation in the early 70s. It would’ve been useful for him to have provided some supporting facts and figures, but he may well right.
Yes, too many undocumented generalities.
Well, for example, the UK government has just procured 3.7GW of renewable electricity capacity at a wholesale price of £72/MWh, index linked and guaranteed for 15 years. But the offshore wind sector failed to bid and is lobbying for prices £20 – 30 / MWh higher than this. These prices would have been unimaginably high before the era of “cheap and abundant”green energy, but it is what UK consumers and businesses will be committed to pay – on top of the price for upgrading the electricity system for more renewables and for expensive back up generation capacity when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow. Western economies may have “decarbonised” since the 1970s by outsourcing manufacturing and steel production, but are still exposed to higher energy prices to the extent that these are absorbed in the cost of products they now import back.
Much worse than the 70s. 70s inflation and 40s debt levels. Fiscal dominance as governments hurtle towards sovereign debt crisis. Financial repression dead ahead.
err… gold rose 10% in two weeks. Inconvenient to your thesis, I know, but that is a massive move.
Things are just getting started.