It probably won’t be clear for a day or two whether or not this week’s Conservative Party conference actually shook up what has so far been a long but unexciting contest. Triumphs and tribulations that seem significant on the inside may not filter out to the rest of the country — or even to the Tory membership.
One candidate who had a trying few days was Kemi Badenoch, embroiled in a row over maternity pay and with polling suggesting Robert Jenrick is closing the gap with her among members.
Yet on Wednesday afternoon it was she who received the loudest early cheer when the four leadership hopefuls delivered their speeches in the main hall. The enthusiasm of her grassroots supporters seems undimmed, even as a torrid media cycle reinforced the concerns of some MPs about how she would perform as leader of the Opposition.
That gap between members and MPs is the central problem of Badenoch’s campaign. Nearly all available polling forecasts her to win the final round, which is decided by membership votes. Yet it isn’t clear that she can reach that stage. Jenrick currently leads the pack for MP nominations, and there are more than enough votes on the One Nation side of the party to put either James Cleverly or Tom Tugendhat in the final.
Should that happen, it will be Badenoch’s responsibility. The MP rounds are a vital round of the process, ensuring that the leader is acceptable to the Parliamentary party and insulating the Tories against their own version of Jeremy Corbyn.
But they could still provide a dilemma for the new leader. Whoever wins is going to inherit an incredibly difficult brief, and getting the Conservative Party fit to contend for office in 2029 is going to involve confronting some unpleasant realities. The mood might have been oddly buoyant in Birmingham, but the membership’s appetite for unpleasant medicine has not yet been tested.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI understand why the author did it, but to see mention of the corrupt, arrogant, smug and talentless snake-oil selling Cameron – in the same sentence as Badenoch’s name – was horrible.
I attended both the set piece sessions with the candidates. In the interviews with Christopher Hope James Cleverly was the star performer, which was a surprise. I think he also came top in the set piece speeches but was matched by Kemi who has the best vision for what the Party needs to do and what issues are facing the country. Jenrick is polished but for me at least, uninspiring and would be the wrong choice for leader.
Tom Tugenhat is another polished performer and would make a great Foreign Secretary but lacks the ability to excite an audience and by extension the electorate.
On balance I am backing Kemi who would be a fresh face for a tired and damaged Conservative brand. She is not the finished article but has the next few years to grow into the role. I also think the left would struggle with how to deal with her.
I do hope the MP’s give the membership the chance to vote for her.
We definitely don’t want polished which is another word for ‘more of the same’. The Tories have to realise that people will no longer vote for polished. Action is perhaps the real word.
If they don’t (your last point); my dream scenario is that she leaves for Reform! Fat chance I know, but one must entertain some hope.
I think Mr Hill is probably right with the hunch that Badenoch is expecting the next opposition leader to fail to get the Tories electable by 2028, so not offering hostages (or should I say “sausages”) to fortune at this time makes perfect sense.
Badenoch is a reminder that “diversity” was always a trojan horse for left-liberal politics to weave itself into every part of society. Here we have potentially the first black Briton with a shot of becoming PM and the diversity grifters in the media and Tory HQ are silent.
That the diversity grifters are not lionising Badenoch suggests one of two things:
1. Badenoch really is not of the left-liberal set, or
2. Badenoch is an unknown quantity to herself and others and has stayed aloof of embrace the party machine in Tory HQ.
The more right-leaning of the selectorate are mindful of the Liz Truss example. PMs are easily removed these days if the establishment decide so. There’s no point associating with and choosing a candidate that the political machine will work to eject, so there is absolutely no chance of a consensus-disrupting candidate being elected leader of the Tory Party. That makes this election an irrelevance. And the complete lack of public interest in the election shows it is an irrelevance.
Badenoch would do well to sit this one out and win next time.
Will Kemi Badenoch be a chaotic, priapic, anarcho-bohemian libertine?
Errr…
No.
Kemi Bad Enough
Do I perceive the wit of a Frenchman by any chance ?