November 15, 2023 - 4:00pm
In order to win a game of chess, one doesn’t have to be a grandmaster, only better than one’s opponent. While Vladimir Putin is by no means a geopolitical genius, it would appear that he understands commodity markets better than his Western counterparts.
As Moscow’s economy shows no sign of collapsing under the weight of sanctions, the Financial Times reported this week that Western officials are now admitting almost no Russian oil is sold below the $60 US-led price cap. The cap had been imposed in an attempt to curb revenues from Russia’s oil exports, enacted by the G7 nations so as to ensure a stable global supply while limiting Putin’s capacity to continue his war in Ukraine. Today it was reported that the EU, unhappy with the results, has proposed further tightening of the cap.
Really, the countries behind the initial restriction were far from unified in their approach. Soon after the price cap came into effect, Japan asked for an exception to buy from Russia above the $60 threshold in order to keep its economy running. There can be little doubt that Putin knew notoriously inelastic products like oil and gas would make a price cap toothless.
Russia is responsible for 13% of global exports in crude oil and 11% of exports in refined products in a world which is hungry for energy. Had the international community gone along with an almost total boycott of Russian oil, it would likely have collapsed not just Moscow’s economy, but the global economy too.
It was delusional from the beginning to believe that the G7 could instruct the rest of the world how much to pay for a commodity that the G7 does not itself own. India, China, and even Saudi Arabia happily bought Russian crude at a discount, refined it, and then resold it to Europe and the US. This also created a new boom in the black market for oil, proving once again that nations are not easily deprived of access to the world’s most important resource.
Other approaches could have been taken to damaging Putin’s energy-funded war machine. Inelasticity works both ways, and the commodity analysts at Doomberg have pointed out that “it does not take significant undersupply for prices to skyrocket, nor does it take significant oversupply for prices to crash.” At the height of the Covid pandemic, for example, US crude oil futures plummeted to minus $37 per barrel.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAlas, this would have meant going against the wishes of the environmentalist lobby, an entity apparently more feared than Russia in Western capitals.
I take it you haven’t seen Greta Thunberg on a bad day. She gets more enraged than the Hulk and twice as green.
Well one silver lining is that the oil is still there to be pumped at a later date
Ideology trumps common sense yet again. Eastern Canada imported $3 billion in oil from Saudia Arabia in 2022. This could be replaced by domestic oil simply by building a pipeline from the west to the east. This would reduce CO2 emissions associated with transport, reduce prices and increase energy security. Will never happen under the current Trudeau regime.
Rumors said that some anti-nuclear environmentalist groups were subsidized by Rosneft.