January 2, 2024 - 10:00am
Global markets ended 2023 at peak optimism. With stock markets recording their strongest year since 2019, the US was a particular standout, the S&P 500 index closing the year nearly 25% higher than it started. Reflecting the outsized contribution that a handful of high-tech companies made to this startling performance, the Nasdaq index did even better, rising by nearly half on the year — beer money next to Bitcoin’s near-tripling.
But lest one read too much into all this and start prophesying a new Roaring Twenties, it’s worth noting that bond prices in particular can be quite volatile around the start of a new year. Besides, the simple fact is that despite all the talk of the extraordinary tightening carried out by central banks this past year, there’s still a massive amount of money in global markets — the accumulation of years of unprecedentedly loose monetary policy. With all this cash around, the burst of buying was just awaiting an opportunity to break out. The Powell pivot duly provided it.
But that points to the paradox of this optimism. If the economy stays out of recession and all that money starts coming back into circulation, it seems improbable that inflation will stay down. In that case, interest rates will not be headed to the low levels suggested by current market pricing. But if inflation does come down because the economy sinks into recession, the heady optimism on earnings justified by current prices seems misplaced.
Given how little we know of what lies ahead, and given how badly wrong most Wall Street forecasters got 2023 when they started the year predicting a recession that never came, it shouldn’t surprise us that their forecasts for the stock market this year range from crashes in the order of 30% to double-digit rallies. It might be a good time to call in the proverbial dart-throwing monkey.
Adding to the uncertainty is that 2024 will see volatility in both politics and geopolitics. Between the risks of an escalation in the Middle East and the unpredictable course of the war in Ukraine, the possibility of some event upending global markets is higher than usual.
Then there’s the American election, about which the only certain thing that can be said is that it will provide plenty of uncertainty. The presidential campaign, already bound to be ugly and divisive, will be made worse by Donald Trump’s various court cases. Moreover, the prospect of a Trump re-election could rattle markets, not because investors dislike what he proposes but because they can’t be sure what it will be. The plans that Trump is making are a great deal more radical than his first term, which will again fuel the uncertainty leading into the November election.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWe had massive money creation for ten years without inflation. The recent surge was caused by (1) supply disruptions and (2) giving free money to people who actually spend it on real things. The author is right that there is still way too much money floating about but, based on our experience in the 2010s, the stock market, crypto and housing market (…) are probably the best places for it if we’re seeking to limit inflation.
It is a tricky paradox that can only be solved by an examination of the hard numbers. Any bad economic news leads people to liquidate their gains to have cash on hand, they realise they’re wealthier than they thought and spend their way out of the bad news then that boosts the numbers and stock prices again. This pattern will repeat and repeat with decreasing amplitude until all the QE money dissolves into the real economy.
The stock market is an illusion, presenting an economic picture that the power brokers want to show. Underneath, the economy is a mess, from the shipping industry to banking to looming layoffs across multiple sectors. Our FED is poised to lower interest rates, which historically triggers higher unemployment. Eggs and omelets, you know.
Is it though? There are lots of jobs up for grabs and people seem to have plenty of money.
Do they have plenty of money? Our record credit card would say otherwise. Millions have voluntarily dropped out of the labor force, skewing the jobless rate. Rate cuts historically trigger increased unemployment. I’d say, yes, it is. I could, of course, be wrong.
They are still spending plenty of money. There was so much talk about high debt levels and how higher interest rates would collapse the whole system. So far that has failed to materialise. Maybe it is just a matter of time but so far everything keeps chugging along.