Jesse Powell is the CEO of Kraken, one of the largest crypto currency exchanges in the world.
He has been in the headlines this week for publishing a decidedly libertarian memo about his company’s working culture that challenged any workers claiming offence on topics such as pronoun policies or racial diversity targets to find work elsewhere.
Kraken’s list of values includes the right to bear arms, bodily autonomy on vaccines and a moratorium on enquiring about or advertising gender pronouns in the workplace, amongst other ‘anti-woke’ measures.
He spoke exclusively to Freddie Sayers from San Francisco.
On how woke workers are bad for business:
“You have a few people that get really upset about something. They manage to affect say ten, twenty people around them, who are well-intentioned people who want their co-workers to be comfortable and feel safe at work and not be offended at work. But those people become distracted by the feelings of the small group. And then those people who are distracted catering to these people are then not getting the work done, and then it affects another layer of people around them who are just like, “We got to do something about this, because people aren’t getting work done anymore.” They might be completely apolitical.”
On the gender disparity in crypto:
“The male to female interest in Bitcoin or knowledge of Bitcoin seems to differ by geography. So it might just be a local, cultural, familiarity with dealing with money. In the United States, it’s way heavy on male knowledge above female knowledge and I think in the United States, in general, as well, if you look at things like car accidents, 16-year-olds dying in car accidents is like 95% male in the United States. So, I think there’s some evidence to say whether it’s nature or nurture, that at least in many cultures, men are much more risk-taking than women are.”
On his commitment to ‘bodily autonomy’ and vaccines:
“I think a company like ours, which is fully remote, we have no reason to mandate a vaccine on people, even for something even more severe than COVID. I think as a society to mandate a vaccine, in the absence of – especially one that seems like it’s very experimental, so far. We don’t have a lot of long term (obviously) studies on the effects of it. I think to roll out something like that broadly, to make it mandatory, is just very dangerous. I think it’s immoral to impose such a thing on on a population broadly. I think people cannot give informed consent when they don’t understand what all the risks are. So, certainly inside the company, we have no vaccine mandate and in fact, for corporate retreats when we do all get together, we do them in places where you can be vaccinated or not, and there’s no problem and we don’t ask about your vaccination status.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeCould he give West Point the results of his findings. They need a boot in the backside right now.
First Thiel, then Musk, then Coinbase and now Kraken. It’s maybe not surprising that the libertarian pushback in Silicon Valley is coming from people with close ties to (or in) the crypto space. It has always been the part of the industry most committed to individual freedoms and letting people say or explore unpopular ideas, for obvious reasons.
As someone in the tech industry, I am very happy to see this. Powell’s answers are sensible and moderate. I’d consider these firms as future employers.
Fascinating to hear directly from an active proponent for digital currencies being used for everyday transactions and savings. What he did not explain was how a fixed number of bitcoins can be held by an ever increasing proportion of the population. Mathematically it can only be by them owning ever smaller units of bitcoins, which means an ever increasing price. That means the bitcoin of everyday goods has to go down as the currency goes up. Meanwhile all those savings of fiat money transferred into bitcoins get paid to the sellers who retire super rich. Then when there is a contraction in savings and people want to cash out who pays them? There is no investment to liquidate so they have to hope a fool comes along to buy their number in a blockchain. Without buyers the price will plummet. The sooner that happens the less the pain or ordinary investors.
Its a Ponzi scheme and really only a vehicle for speculation by the wealthy or foolhardy. A currency it is not.