X Close

Rishi Sunak has caved on ‘conversion therapy’

The Prime Minister's statements about standing up for women now ring hollow. Credit: Getty

October 19, 2023 - 2:50pm

So Rishi Sunak has given in. Faced with a backlash to his mild remarks about biological sex at the Conservative Party Conference, it looks as though the Government intends to go ahead with a complete ban on “conversion therapy”. According to the Times, legislation to introduce a ban will be included in the King’s Speech, even though ministers have been warned repeatedly not to lump together “gay conversion therapy” and thoughtful attempts to counsel individuals with gender dysphoria.

Trans activists are up in arms about the Prime Minister’s speech, however, and the general rule of politics these days is that they get what they want. Sunak’s statement that “we shouldn’t get bullied into believing that people can be any sex they want to be” caused uproar. Ironically, he appears to have been bullied into going along with exactly that nonsense — and agreeing to criminalise parents and teachers who believe that a “wait and see” approach is sensible for individuals with gender dysphoria.

Sunak’s volte face flies in the face of advice from NHS England, which recommends “watchful waiting” for minors rather than a rush into “social transitioning” or medical intervention. In October last year, it warned that most young people with gender dysphoria are going through a “transient phase”, based on “evidence that in most cases gender incongruence does not persist into adolescence”. 

Yet our politics are so febrile these days that we could soon be in an absurd situation where doctors and therapists find themselves in serious trouble for following NHS England’s advice. It could also lead to more young people being rushed into “changing sex”, something the Prime Minister didn’t believe was possible earlier this month.

Has he changed his mind? I very much doubt it. But every time it looks as though this muddled ideology is in retreat, trans activists flex their muscles. Leading politicians from all parties seem to be terrified of them, recoiling from accusations of “transphobia” as though they’ve been caught expressing sympathy with people who mistreat animals or steal from charity boxes. 

Sir Keir Starmer’s recent conversion to the view that women are “adult females” feels like a diversionary tactic, designed to throw feminists and other annoying women off the scent. The Party has just asked Iain Anderson (“he/him”), until recently Chair of Trustees at Stonewall, to carry out an inquiry into small business on its behalf. In a new interview with the Standard, Starmer is still using trans activist language, talking about the need to find “a fairer way” to deal with people “who don’t identify with the gender they were born into”. 

His deputy, Angela Rayner, is even more open about where her priorities lie. On Wednesday evening, speaking at the PinkNews awards ceremony, she talked about the need to “modernise” the law on gender recognition, something many women see as a coded reference to a move towards self-ID. She condemned the Prime Minister’s “inaction on LGBTQ+ policy” and promised to introduce a trans-inclusive ban on conversion therapy — thus putting herself on the same page as Sunak. 

Both main parties are now committed to unnecessary and unethical legislation, it seems — one for ideological reasons, the other from cowardice. It’s an object lesson about the continuing influence of gender ideology. Don’t let anyone tell you British politics is no longer Stonewalled. 


Joan Smith is a novelist and columnist. She was previously Chair of the Mayor of London’s Violence Against Women and Girls Board. Her book Unfortunately, She Was A Nymphomaniac: A New History of Rome’s Imperial Women will be published in November 2024.

polblonde

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ewen Mac
Ewen Mac
11 months ago

“Leading politicians from all parties seem to be terrified of them…”
They are, and I’d really like to know why. Every single poll shows that the majority of the public – which means most voters – are rationalists who understand that men can’t be women (or vice versa). So why not align with the majority on this issue?
Why are all leading politicians terrified of those few people whose ideas only resonate with an electoral minority?

Steve Murray
Steve Murray
11 months ago
Reply to  Ewen Mac

I agree, but can a Prime Minister be “cancelled”?* It’s a huge shame that he doesn’t have the cojones to find out.
*other than by electoral means.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
11 months ago
Reply to  Ewen Mac

We’ve created this vast swamp of NGOs and activist orgs that have an outsized influence on politicians. I can only speculate that elected leaders simply don’t interact enough with everyday people – that even their social circles are dominated by people with divergent opinions.

R Wright
R Wright
11 months ago
Reply to  Ewen Mac

“Why are all leading politicians terrified of those few people whose ideas only resonate with an electoral minority?”
It’s very simple. Leading politicians are ruled not by their voters, but by powerful financial interests. Wealthy NGOs and corporations have a vested interest in backing the trans lobby, making it disproportionately powerful compared to its constituent base. Despite being a supposedly oppressed minority trans rights activists are backed by some of the wealthiest and powerful organisations on Earth, such as Soros’ Open Society Foundation, the Bill Gates Foundation, the Tides Foundation, Arcus Foundation etc. etc. Rishi Sunak fears them over you.
See https://archive.ph/9vaRd – the now deleted from Medium article ‘Inauthentic Selves: The modern LGBTQ+ Movement Is Run By Philanthropic Astroturf And Based On Junk Science’ from 2018 which gives a great overview of how fake all of this nonsense is.

Tina Miller
Tina Miller
11 months ago
Reply to  R Wright

Thanks for the link! Another aspect of this madness is that it provides an opportunity for intra-elite vetting and selection of “useful idiots” and a way for elites to compete and weed out people who may not be “loyal” to the cause of the .1%.

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago

Conversion is changing one set of beliefs for another. The vast majority of people don’t care what others believe as long as the beliefs do not negatively impact on their lives. People generally tend to be live and let live. They have busy lives and don’t have time to stay up to date on current trends. It is the trans activists who have been infiltrating the government, the civil service, schools, not for profits, businesses, etc. to spread their doctrine and are using the power of the law to force their beliefs on the majority and silence objections by having all objections classified as hate speech. Using the power of the law to attempt to force beliefs upon the people should be illegal.

Last edited 11 months ago by Aphrodite Rises
janecampaign
janecampaign
11 months ago

Yes, quite. The ‘infiltration’ has been cleverly orchestrated. Everyone has paid Stonewall to ‘train’ them (with our money, tbh) and to give them brownie points for being good, inclusive organisations. One way to comply was to bring in EDI experts (trans advocates – has anyone heard them advocating loudly for disabled employees?) Jobs for the boys – all those ‘gender’ graduates, with one world view, brought in at management level to devastate women’s rights in industry and government. There aren’t that many of them, but they punch above their weight, because they’re not brought in as office juniors.
Quite an effective tactic, it turns out, and massively difficult to undo.

Julian Farrows
Julian Farrows
11 months ago

Transgenderism is an occult movement with billions of dollars behind it. It’s a Trojan horse for those with nefarious intentions toward children and provides a convenient path through which the state can circumnavigate parental protections in order to indoctrinate children.
Politicians are not scared of trans activists but those financially backing them.

Arthur G
Arthur G
11 months ago

Do the Tories ever actually want to win again? Being 5% less radical than the radical left seems like a strategy for party annihilation. At what point do the actual conservatives and moderates in the party jump ship?

Stephen Walsh
Stephen Walsh
11 months ago
Reply to  Arthur G

Who would they vote for? Increasingly moderate and conservative views are being literally banned. Rishi Sunak doesn’t care about women, doesn’t care about children, doesn’t care about the Conservative Party, and doesn’t care about the next election, because he knows he will lose anyway. He’s just focussed on his own employability after that happens.

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago
Reply to  Stephen Walsh

Rishi Sunak just fancied being prime minister of a country. He had no loyalty to the U.K. as demonstrated by the US green card scandal. The position will have profited him greatly and enhanced his global profile.

Last edited 11 months ago by Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago

In fact, that probably explains why Rishi Sunak has crumbled. He cares most about his position amongst the global elites, especially if he does not expect to win the next election, and they are mostly behind the the indoctrination of the masses with woke ideology.

Last edited 11 months ago by Aphrodite Rises
Arthur G
Arthur G
11 months ago
Reply to  Stephen Walsh

How about Farage?

Mike Michaels
Mike Michaels
11 months ago
Reply to  Arthur G

I don’t think they want to be elected and I don’t blame them. The next administration will only be issuing WEF directives to usher in Agenda 2030. This is why we are about to have a member of the Trilateral Commission installed. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see several members of the next parliament assassinated as people finally wake up to what’s been done to them.

Glyn R
Glyn R
11 months ago
Reply to  Arthur G

I think the current Tory ‘elite’ are not Conservatives and have no interest whatsoever in those who elected them.

Andrew Buckley
Andrew Buckley
11 months ago

I do wonder if some of the problem here is the tortuous language used by the radical trans lot.
Is conversion therapy what the GIDS at the Tavistock were doing or is conversion therapy talking to a worried teen about their feelings?

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
11 months ago

If the NHS gives clinical advice on child development, then why are these politicians contradicting medical experts?
They are all, without exception, sinister ideologues pursuing the same neoliberal transhuman creed.

Shrunken Genepool
Shrunken Genepool
11 months ago

It’s crazy. The Tories might even win against the odds if they went full berserker against gender bullish*t – and in fact the whole DEI. They are not conservatives basically. Woke-LITE.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
11 months ago

Have you considered running for leadership of the Tory party? I’m pretty sure “full beserker” is exactly what they are going for now!
Bonne chance, cherie!

Peter Kwasi-Modo
Peter Kwasi-Modo
11 months ago

Politics in the UK are getting increasingly surreal. For Mr. Sunak ‘it looks as though the Government intends to go ahead with a complete ban on “conversion therapy”. Presumably this is election jitters, not wanting to disturb the trans lobby wasps’ nest.
Meanwhile, here in Scotland, Mr Youseless plans to SCRAP the current conversion therapy ban, not because Mr Youseless thinks this is a good thing, but in order to save the SNP’s skin at the next election.
So both Mr Sunak and Mr Youseless are doing synchronised volte-faces, but in the opposite direction, both hoping to avoid political oblivion.

Last edited 11 months ago by Peter Kwasi-Modo
Colorado UnHerd
Colorado UnHerd
11 months ago

People can never change sexes. But it seems politicians will always change positions, if it’s perceived to serve their interests.
It’s maddening that — at a time when popular sentiment (even in the United States!) seems to slowly be awakening to the delusion of gender ideology — spineless politicians still kow-tow to transactivism rather than standing for the real and pressing needs of women.

Last edited 11 months ago by Colorado UnHerd
David Lindsay
David Lindsay
11 months ago

Keir Starmer has been having another of his moments about gender self-identification. But who cares what this creature thinks? It is a war crime to aid or abet a war crime, so that without ever having been a Minister, or even an MP for the governing party, Starmer is already a war criminal, thereby matching his foreign policies to his domestic policies. He is the Kid Starver of Gaza and Gospel Oak, and his White Phosphorus Party would privatise the hospitals at home having already bombed them abroad.

More broadly, with its concept of the self-made man or the self-made woman, Thatcherism has inevitably ended up as gender self-identification, which was unknown in 2010, and which has therefore arisen entirely under a Conservative Government. Margaret Thatcher was last depicted on British television, for the first time in quite a while, in December’s Prince Andrew: The Musical, the title of which spoke for itself, and in which she was played by one Baga Chipz, a drag queen. Well, of course. A figure comparable to Thatcher, emerging in the Britain of the 2020s, would be assumed to be a transwoman, just as Thatcher herself emerged in the Britain of everything from Danny La Rue and d**k Emery to David Bowie and The Rocky Horror Show.

Hence Thatcher’s destruction of the stockades of male employment, which were the economic basis of paternal authority in the family and in the wider community, an authority that cannot be restored before the restoration of that basis. Thatcher created the modern Labour Party, the party of middle-class women who used the power of the State to control everyone else, but especially working-class men. Truly, as she herself said, her greatest achievement was New Labour. Leo Abse, who had had the measure of the milk-snatcher, also had the measure of Tony Blair’s androgyny.

And if this is a culture war, then where is the culture on our side? At 46, I had always assumed that we would win this one in my lifetime. But I am less and less certain. The other side enjoys the full force of the State and of a cultural sector that the State very largely funds. That double force was what turned the England of 1530, an extravagantly Catholic country of many centuries’ standing, into the England of 1560, a country that would define itself as fundamentally anti-Catholic for the next 400 years. Again I say that that State is the Tory State, there having been no other for as long as the notion of gender self-identification has existed. There is no suggestion of a Government Bill or amendment to give statutory effect to the rhetoric of Kemi Badenoch or Suella Braverman, which is pointedly never quite echoed by Rishi Sunak, whose choice of words to the Conservative Party Conference was very careful indeed.

David Lindsay
David Lindsay
11 months ago

Does everyone get put into moderation, or is it just me? I pay for this. Do you?

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lindsay

I do. Every time. Sometimes it takes hours for my comments to appear. I have emailed numerous times and asked for an explanation but have never received one.

Last edited 11 months ago by Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago

This comment took about ten minutes to appear.

David Lindsay
David Lindsay
11 months ago

My latest has now been waiting an hour.

Aphrodite Rises
Aphrodite Rises
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lindsay

You must be considered more threatening/ dangerous than I am.

David Lindsay
David Lindsay
11 months ago

It no longer even appears as “awaiting for approval”. Hey, ho. See here.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
11 months ago
Reply to  David Lindsay

Happens way too often.

David Lindsay
David Lindsay
11 months ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

“Awaiting for approval.” Pidgin English.

Gerald Arcuri
Gerald Arcuri
11 months ago

“People pride themselves on “speaking truth to power” – leaders, big shots. In a democracy, this is easy to do. Usually, you get nothing but applause for it. What is hard is speaking truth to “the people” – for in a democracy, that’s where the power lies.”
Jay Nordlinger in the current issue of National Review, “Cooper’s Union”

“The constant appeals to public opinion in a democracy… induce private hypocrisy, causing men to conceal their own opinions when opposed to those of the mass… A want of national manliness is a vice to be guarded against, for the man who would dare to resist a monarch shrinks from opposing an entire community.”
James Fenimore Cooper in “The American Democrat” c. 1835

Last edited 11 months ago by Gerald Arcuri
Glyn R
Glyn R
11 months ago

We no longer have proper political representation we have a uni party interested only in promoting the globalist agenda. US is exactly the same.