March 22, 2024 - 7:00am

Yesterday, Owen Jones dramatically stormed out of the party he said was in his blood, urging people to vote for Green and independent candidates in the upcoming election. In his video message, the Left-wing activist claimed his “political red line”, the reason he was handing in his membership card, had been crossed because the current Labour leadership is “backing war crimes and mass slaughter”. It seems unlikely the people of Gaza will be aware of his noble gesture of solidarity, but it has provoked comment here in the UK.

It is tempting to imagine those in the Labour leadership will be experiencing a sort of giddy excitement at the loss of Jones. But the Tories must also be delighted by the news, because to coincide with his resignation the Guardian columnist launched the “We Deserve Better” campaign, which will give financial support to Green and independent candidates.

Jones didn’t only trumpet his resignation in his podcast: in a 1,300-word whinge for the Guardian he complained that the party had become a “hostile environment” for those on the Left, and that he and his comrades felt like “pariahs”. This is a dizzying double standard.

To make such a claim, when Jones has supported the hounding of female journalists such as Suzanne Moore and Hadley Freeman from the paper for which he is still paid to write, takes some adamantine neck. And as a champion of Jeremy Corbyn, the Left-winger has failed to reflect on his own part in tolerating a hostile environment for Jewish politicians such as Luciana Berger, who left Labour following the former leadership’s failure to take claims of antisemitism seriously.

Jones also seems fairly sanguine about the monstering of those who know that biological sex is real, regularly deriding them as “Terfs” and “transphobes”. Gender-critical people who’ve hung on in the Labour Party have more experience than Jones of being treated as pariahs.

The first wave of resignations over the trans divide happened in 2017, after the executive committee of the Bexhill and Battle Labour Party handed in their cards en masse in support of women’s officer Anne Ruzylo. Ruzylo, a lesbian trade unionist of 30 years, says she was prevented from raising her concerns about gender self-identification and that she suffered harassment by trans activists within the party. In the years that have followed, thousands of former members have used the #labourlosingwomen hashtag on social media to signal their frustration at the party’s refusal to listen to them.

Grassroots groups, including Lesbian Labour, Women’s Place UK and Labour Women’s Declaration, have been shut out of meetings, refused stalls at conferences and smeared and harassed by fellow members. Lists have even been made on social media identifying gender wrong-thinkers. Meanwhile, openly gender-critical feminists such as Rosie Duffield MP have been given the cold shoulder by Starmer for years.

But there is one point Jones was entirely correct to raise. With surprising astuteness, he pointed out Starmer’s slippery stance on vital matters from how the party deals with accusations of racism to Israel’s attack on Gaza. And it is true: the Labour leader has the impressive lawyerly ability to speak out of both sides of his mouth at once: he is a consummate “flip-flopper”.

Starmer’s approach to the “woman question” also illustrates this. He has variously claimed that “it’s not right” to say that only women have a cervix, that “trans women are women” and that “99% of women don’t have a penis.” He has promised to protect sex-based rights, yet has pledged to introduce gender self-identification and failed to define “woman”. He has also not honoured his commitment to meet with Rosie Duffield MP.

Clearly, Starmer’s principles depend upon who is asking the question. To quote my fellow ex-Labour member Jones, this is “a sure sign of moral bankruptcy”.


Josephine Bartosch is assistant editor at The Critic and co-author of the forthcoming book Pornocracy.

jo_bartosch