November 10, 2023 - 8:00pm
Generation Z is going to therapy far more than any other age cohort, a new study has found.
Among American Gen Z adults, over a quarter (27%) reported having gone to therapy in their teenage years, including 31% of Gen Z women, a survey from the American Enterprise Institute found. Only 4% of boomers and 10% of Generation X attended therapy as teens, along with 20% of millennials.
The survey delved into the formative experiences of Gen Z, who were less likely than previous generations of teens to have part-time jobs, attend religious services, have a boyfriend or girlfriend, or drink or smoke, according to the survey. They were, however, much more likely to have experienced frequent loneliness.
These findings support claims of a youth mental health crisis spreading across the West, but it’s less apparent whether therapy is actually helping. Therapy methods long touted as universal interventions have been found to not only not help teens, but to actually exacerbate their problems and worsen their relationships with their parents, according to a recent report from the Atlantic analysing several studies on the subject.
In one study from Australia, researchers taught mental health improvement techniques that are commonly used in therapy to teenagers, expecting to see an improvement in psychological and social outcomes. Instead, the treatment group’s anxiety, depression and quality of life all declined compared to the control group, and their relationships to their parents worsened.
The uninspiring results of such studies seems to be having no impact on the popularity of mental health services. Behavioural therapy is a growth industry, and it’s expected to double over the coming decade as mental health disorders become more common and awareness of corresponding treatments continues to grow. Patients are now seeking out therapy through telehealth services, and a number of online companies have popped up to cater this market. One example is Hers and Hims, which offer mental health services including drug prescriptions and advertise their services relentlessly on digital streaming platforms.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeSocial media plays a huge role but broken homes, the loss of family structure and community, the atomisation of society, and too many anxiety raising issues taught to school age children are also driving this epidemic.
We have to take responsibility.
As a divorced mother I feel a lot of shame for the failure of my marriage and the impact it had on my children. They’re doing well but I do not kid myself that they didn’t suffer terribly, that it didn’t affect them negatively.
I look back from my present vantage point and I regret the fact that I didn’t fight harder for my marriage but I gave up and threw in the towel. That I had imbibed the bs that children are ‘resilient’ and will ‘adapt’ so long as there is no acrimony.
All too easy to get a divorce and now its easier than ever. While I think it definitely should be a right for anyone, I do so wish there was far more information available out there as to the damage it really does to children, and that it was culturally acceptable to make a strong case for keeping the marriage and the family intact.
Thank you for a very reflective and honest post.
Thank you.
Very courageous post. Thank you.
Very honest and ballsy post.
You know, you’re not the only one to have been taken in by the ‘it’s my life’ cum ‘follow your dream’ mantra. We were all spoon-fed it and it seemed so self-evident as to be hardly worth questioning at the time.
But the data in this case doesn’t lie and we’ve all known for aeons now that the worst thing for kids is divorce. But how do you square that with our desire to please ourselves and have it all ? We were sold a big lie and the chickens are now coming home to roost.
Very brave post. This is a societal failure, not just an individual one. As a civilization we no longer value sacrifice for your family.
Your expression of regret and self-awareness — which imply great care for your children — suggests you were, and are, a better parent than you think. Hardship is an unavoidable part of human experience, and some hardship occurs in childhood, caused by well-intentioned but imperfect parents. Working through that residue — and/or just making peace with it — is part of what makes resilient adults.
I’ve received very gracious responses to this post. Thank you so much.
I agree with you that broken homes and the lack of community play a huge role, but when it comes to marriage, to any relationship, it always takes two to make it work. If you were the only one who fought for your marriage, and your husband had already given up, you should not feel any shame. My own parents divorced in the mid-1990s when my sister and I were older teenagers, and we knew that our father had wanted out of the marriage. There wasn’t anything our mum could have done to keep the relationship going. It had only existed on paper for a number of years prior. We both turned out alright if I may say so myself. We are married, and have children of our own.
Yes, thank you, there are times when there simply is no other answer and that’s why I said it must be a right. I had reasons aplenty believe me but my children were at a young and tender age, they simply could not possibly have understood why their lives so suddenly and irrevocably changed even though we tried to explain. That must have been traumatic for them. At the time I didn’t fully comprehend that, I suppose I wanted/needed to believe the usual platitudes. I feel shame regarding my own lack of conscious awareness around the issue, of putting my own happiness before theirs. No one made that point to me and I certainly didn’t see it like that at the time. Had I done so I honestly believe it might well have made me re-consider. Who knows.
I am simply advocating for more caution and much, much more sober thought and understanding as to both the short and long term impacts before taking such a major step as divorce. There needs to be better support and far more open discussion about divorce and its impacts.
Thank you for being honest.
This can’t be true. I’ve seen them all on instagram and they are all really happy and living their best lives!
Psychiatry and Psychology are a huge fraud perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. They prescribe mass quantities of psychotropic drugs that have no proven benefit, and practice “therapy” based on long discredited theories. 90% of these kids would be better off with a kick in the ass, and an admonition to count their blessings vis a vis people with real problems.
Clearly we have got something very, very wrong with the way we raise our children. We’d better find out what it is and do something about it.
How can it be that children can grow up during war time, in poverty, even living in slums – and apparently be less messed up?
Hi David, there’s no, or maybe an inverse, relationship between material wealth and being ‘messed up’. Far more important are stuff like family, community, identity, goals, employment. My own experience, coming from a pretty malfunctioning family, living rough in my teens etc. – work gave me stability and direction.
It would be good to have stats on who is suffering most by social class, urban/rural, ethnicity etc as well as by gender.
By ‘gender’, perhaps you mean ‘sex’, i.e. males and females?
At this point, who knows! But yes, I’m using it as synonym for sex – one of its uses in common parlance.
Feels like a straight lift from Jonathan Haidht.
The correlation between mental health difficulties increasing in the young and smart technology/social media v strong and the evidence just growing. Haidht charts the trend commencing c2010-12.
Heard him give a talk a couple wks back (Unherd funders actually put it on) – no smart technology until 14 and no social media until 16 his advice; to be aware Instagram and TikTok particularly damaging, esp to young girls. He also links this with over protective parenting. Kids got to get out of their bedroom etc.
He refers to something that may be going on in the neuronal wiring development in young brains. The wiring is not developing as it had done for millennia because of these technologies.
Interestingly he thinks Govt will need to help set rules and parental decisions/choice alone may be insufficient here – point being if your kid is the only one without a smart phone it’s v difficult to say ‘no’ to them, but if you can get to a tipping point of c50%…And that 50% is not going to happen now without Policy maker intervention. He also praised UK for banning phones in schools, but said it was not enough. (CCP has introduced smart tech maximum time for kids – not the best example perhaps but clearly they’ve seen a problem).
Lockdowns won’t have helped, but as Haidht shows this started well before.
In UK nothing in Kings Speech on this. Perhaps too early for Policy Makers to fully grasp we may well have to intervene here – we have a legal age for alcohol, smoking etc, so perhaps it’s just a matter of time?
Thank you very much for referencing Jonathan Haidt. Is there a link to his talk? I am only familiar with this one organised by the Aspen Ideas Festival entitled “Uniquely Stupid Decade”: https://www.aspenideas.org/sessions/our-uniquely-stupid-decade?&utm_source=s&utm_medium=adgrant&utm_campaign=content&utm_source=google&utm_medium=adgrant&utm_campaign=&utm_term=jonathan%20haidt&gad=1&gclid=CjwKCAiA6byqBhAWEiwAnGCA4NP9KUcPhvTcnmIoXBvZEoRFNjndnkkgGc3Kb8IXmSEykdHl66RHzRoCNlwQAvD_BwE
Covid inquiry farce & Jonathan Haidt on why phones hurt kids – The Week in 60 Minutes | SpectatorTV – YouTube
Part of it towards the end of the above Podcast
Parents who don’t parent bear substantial responsibility here. It’s easier to let technology babysit than get kids outside and active. It’s easier to seek an exculpatory diagnosis and medication than change screen, diet, exercise and other lifestyle factors. Easier to see one’s child as special and in need of delicate handling than to enforce discipline and permit struggle through ordinary hardships that instill what we used to call character. Easier to continue financially supporting a long-coddled adult child than require independence. Even easier, these days, to validate a child’s belief that he or she is the opposite sex than to hold the line against socially mediated delusion.
It’s easier and less disruptive to parents’ own lives to make such choices — to avoid emotional friction and hard, sustained effort — than to fulfill their responsibility to genuinely love and steward children to capable adulthood.
Good parenting is among the most difficult of human endeavors — perhaps the most difficult, especially in today’s society. Despite all the handwringing over lowered birth rate in Western nations, it’s more responsible to forgo children if one is not committed to making the necessary sacrifices and enduring the necessary difficulties.
No surprise, considering that the schools have been telling them for their entire lives that they’re unhappy and need their (the schools’) intervention, usually to save them from their parents or the culture at large.
The mental health manufacturing industry is the new woke.
“Therapy methods long touted as universal interventions have been found to not only not help teens, but to actually exacerbate their problems and worsen their relationships with their parents, according to a recent report from the Atlantic analysing several studies on the subject.”
Oh, indeed? This has been my stance for many years, and I vividly remember being torn to shreds over it. I was called every name in the book by so-called experts and the parents of Gen Z. A part of me wants to send them the link to rub it in; another part thinks that it will be an utter waste of time; and a third part wonders if reading an analysis by an independent source may actually do some good for the parents and their offspring.
Doesn’t seem to be doing them much good.
First iphone introduced in 2007. By 2010 large (and growing) numbers of tweens/teens had their own phones. Same year the mental health problem stats started to climb. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Snowflakes!!
Feminism.
I really dislike the arbitrary terms used to identify specific age bands of the population. GenZ, Boomer, Millennials, etc mean absolutely nothing to me.
I refuse to memorise them or to look them up. I therefore have no idea what this article is about because I skipped straight here to communicate my displeasure.
What is wrong with using years or dates? I’m a child of the seventies.