Main Edition
US
FR
January 3, 2025 - 10:00pm
If Kevin McCarthy was elected House Speaker after a marathon of ballots in 2023, Mike Johnson’s single-ballot Speakership reelection was a 5K of bated breaths. As Republicans control the House by only four votes (219 to Democrats’ 215), even a few defections could have cost Johnson the Speakership or led to a second ballot. Six Republicans at first refused to cast their votes for the Speaker’s race, and three more supported other candidates. Yet those six eventually voted for Johnson, and two of the other three anti-Johnson Republicans switched their votes to him after some backroom arm-twisting. Friday afternoon’s spectacle offers a prelude to the challenges awaiting Republican leadership in the months ahead.
Compared to McCarthy two years ago, Johnson occupied a more favourable strategic position in the political landscape. Back then, McCarthy faced major defections from the House Freedom Caucus, and grassroots activists often applauded dissenter Republicans who tilt against the GOP “establishment” or the “uniparty.” This time around, Johnson was viewed as a surrogate for Donald Trump, a beloved figure among those very same activists. The President-elect worked the phones to bring House holdouts around and publicly championed Johnson.
With Republican margins so tight in the House, Johnson’s political survival depends on staying in Trump’s good graces. But those narrow margins also make him reliant upon other Republican stakeholders in the House, too. Tellingly, nine Republicans either were silent when their names were first called or voted for someone other than Johnson. That’s the exact number needed to initiate a motion to vacate the chair under the new House rules package. To dodge Kevin McCarthy’s fate, Johnson offered bureaucratic olive-branches, such as non-binding “working groups” to identify potential government cuts.
Even if Johnson is able to keep the Speaker’s gavel, that doesn’t mean he’ll have the easiest time corralling his fractious caucus on an ambitious legislative agenda. Republicans’ current 219 seats could be temporarily reduced to 217 seats if Trump’s cabinet nominees from the House get approved. That would mean that only a few Republican defections could kill a party-line bill. Last month, dozens of House Republicans voted against a Trump-endorsed continuing resolution that would have kept the government open and raised the debt ceiling. A Tea Party rebellion over spending bills could very well become a major political constraint on the new Republican trifecta.
And Republicans have a very narrow margin of error. Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie refused to budge on his opposition to Johnson and defied Trump on spending and other issues when he was last president. In 2020, Trump vented his displeasure with Massie and said he should be thrown “out of the Republican Party.” Yet, despite the opposition of both Trump and Liz Cheney, Massie handily won his primary that year. This take-all-comers iconoclast is unlikely to bend, and one or two other Republicans joining Massie could immediately put a bill in limbo.
Last Congress, divisions within the House GOP effectively elevated Democrats into governing partners. Because Johnson was unable to muster party-line majorities on issues ranging from spending to foreign aid, he often had to turn to a grand coalition of Republicans and Democrats to pass legislation. Maximal-purity intransigence served the interests of performative outrage on social media, but undermined populist policies.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI don’t think so. Johnson wouldn’t make any deals to secure the speakership and Trump spanked the two Repubs that were holding out, and they changed their votes. There is an entirely new vibe in DC and the Republicans. The great majority of the, er, media are as clueless as they were before the election.
We’ll see ME. Extending the 2017 tax cuts requires c£4 trillion over 10 yrs. How’s he funding that? It’s poss the 38 Reps who couple of wks back blocked an extension of the debt ceiling all flip, but how likely do you think that is? Trump wanted the decision to raise the ceiling to be on Biden’s record not his, and yet he couldn’t get it done.
The DOGE work won’t balance this, if it delivers much at all, and besides it won’t have a detailed plan in time.
So where are the balancing cuts and which sectors bear that brunt? And which Senators and Congressmen and Women have to explain that to their electors when it wasn’t outlined in the campaign?
Alot of promises are going to go. And remember Trump and the Tech Bros aren’t MAGA. They just went along with some of the MAGA stuff to gain power.
Johnson got it over the line, just. But McCarthy aside this was unique. Traditionally Speakers do not have these sort of problems. Their election would hardly be news. Just a foretaste.
It just gets much more difficult for him from hereon. Two people can derail everything. 9 and he’s out. In 3mths they have to vote on funding the Govt and the debt ceiling again. Then they have to vote on Trump’s tax changes – which favour the v rich and not the Michigan Blue collar worker. Getting elected Speaker was thus the easy one. It’s not a vote with real policy substance and Daddy had to chip in repeatedly to just make sure his Inauguration can go ahead.
The proper knife fight will be the reauthorisation of Trump’s tax cuts for the rich and it’s links to the debt ceiling and how they fund all the Deportation promises etc. Which programmes are they going to cut to balance things? Who’s base will that hit? And 38 Republicans voted against lifting the debt ceiling only last month. What trade-offs will they look to extract in any deals? Daddy’s going to be making alot more calls from the Golf course.