March 15, 2024 - 11:50am

One overlooked aspect of international politics is the difference between winning an election and winning a majority. This becomes especially clear in the ongoing debate as to whether Europe’s Right-wing populists are succeeding or falling short of expectations. Among a new generation of Right-leaning intellectuals, the likes of Giorgia Meloni in Italy or Geert Wilders in the Netherlands are now seen as a “disappointment” against what their electoral platform promised.

A closer look, however, reveals a somewhat different picture. In Italy, Meloni’s Brothers of Italy (FI) party has maintained its lead in the polls with numbers consistently around 30%. As 30% isn’t enough to govern alone, Meloni was forced to form a coalition with two other parties — the Matteo Salvini’s Lega and Forza Italia, led by another populist, Silvio Berlusconi, who died last year.

Despite this combination of big personalities, Meloni not only formed a government in record time but has kept it together ever since with no obvious signs of cracking. In a country that has had 69 governments since 1945, this is no small accomplishment.

Despite the FI’s recent defeat in a regional election in Sardinia, support for the party remains relatively high, and Meloni’s premiership secure. She may not be the Right-wing revolutionary some initially hoped for, but even the centrist publication Politico has conceded that Italy is subtly shifting Europe to the Right. From softening climate goals to pushing for a continental equivalent of the Rwanda scheme, Meloni is delivering in small steps what many Right-leaning voters in other European countries are hoping for.

Her detractors do not seem to understand that in order to make changes, Meloni needs to remain in power within the notoriously fragile and crisis-prone Italian political system, and so far she is succeeding. Which brings us to the second female populist who has serious chances of leading a major country in the coming years: Marine Le Pen.

The leader of the Right-wing Rassemblement National first ran for the presidency in 2012, but her party has never been as strong as it is now. The RN currently holds a national lead with around 28% (similar to Meloni’s FI in Italy), and Le Pen has a chance of becoming France’s next president in 2027. The differences between a Meloni premiership and a Le Pen presidency, however, would be significant.

Contrary to the Italian system, the French invest significant power in the office of the president, meaning that Le Pen could govern less restrained by backroom deals with coalition partners than her Italian counterpart. There are already voices proclaiming that Le Pen will “go soft” just as Meloni has supposedly done, especially due to both politicians’ criticism of Russia’s war against Ukraine.

This misses the point, however. The people of both France and Italy do not wish for a revolution or an upending of the political system, but instead a change in direction on issues that the Right has been campaigning on for decades: cultural cohesion and more restrictive migration policies. Politically speaking, these are winning propositions, while siding with Putin is not.

If Meloni and Le Pen have learned one thing from the political Left, it is that lasting change can be best achieved by a slow and steady march through the institutions, not a few flash-in-the-pan election victories. There is a difference between being in office and being in power, and Meloni and Le Pen appear to have understood this, certainly more than their critics.


Ralph Schoellhammer is assistant professor of International Relations at Webster University, Vienna.

Raphfel