Since 7 October Benyamin Netanyahu has had one overriding political objective: avoid facing the electorate. He has long been a divisive figure, arousing hatred and admiration in roughly equal measure, but the events of the last six months have tilted Israeli public opinion decisively against Bibi.
Netanyahu knows full well that the next election will conclude his long dominance of national politics. To postpone this fate, since October he had been playing an awkward balancing game to maintain the support of various partners in his âemergency coalitionâ, from Benny Gantz of the centrist National Unity opposition party to Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir from the religious settler parties. This has put Bibi in an increasingly difficult position, with his centrist coalition partners and the United States applying pressure in one direction, and Ben-Gvir and Smotrich pushing him down an alternative route.
And so last nightâs resignation of Minister without Portfolio Gideon Saâar, alongside his fellow New Hope Party minister Yifat Shasha Biton, suggests that tensions within the coalition may yet bring an early end to Netanyahuâs time in power.
On Palestinian issues Saâar is just as Right-wing as Bibi, but he broke with the Likud party after criticising the PMâs corruption. Two weeks ago, he demanded a seat in the three-man War Cabinet, which was understood by the Israeli public as an overture to get back into Likud and repair his relationship with Bibi. Yet if Netanyahu had accepted him into the War Cabinet, he would have had to include Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, and so Saâar was unsuccessful.
He then used his resignation from the emergency coalition to criticise the direction of the war, saying it is not âclose to achieving its goalsâ, and lambasting the recent âslowing down of military progressâ, which he denounced as âcontrary to the national interestâ. In lowering this pressure, he argued, Israel âlost significant leverage to arrive at a new hostage planâ. Saâar concluded by stating that while the general public âsympathises with the goals of the war, [it] understands that a change of direction is required to achieve themâ.
Saarâs resignation shows how the tensions in Netanyahu’s coalition are starting to tell. In particular, the continuing need to placate the far-Right is alienating other important groups, whether due to ideological or policy differences, allegations of incompetence, political positioning, or all three.
It is a sign that the emergency government in place since 11 October may be coming to an end. Bibiâs reckoning, perhaps, is more imminent than he thinks.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe