Whatever the Israeli retaliation for Iran’s ballistic missile barrage might be, attacking Tehran’s oil industry would be a bad idea. More than that, it reveals once again an inability to understand commodity markets among Western leaders.
As we have seen in recent days, the mere rumour that such an attack might be imminent was enough to drive oil prices up. Demand for oil is notoriously inelastic, meaning that “it does not take significant undersupply for prices to skyrocket, nor does it take significant oversupply for prices to crash,” as the energy experts at Doomberg have pointed out. During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, for example, US crude oil futures plummeted to a negative $37 per barrel, meaning that suppliers were basically paying anyone who was willing to take their oil.
The plan to destroy Iran’s oil industry would certainly do massive economic harm to the country, but the fallout would not be limited to Iran. Any conflagration that drives up international prices for energy will hit the EU hard. The bloc consumes approximately 11% of the world’s oil and 8% of its natural gas while only producing 0.5% of the former and 0.9% of the latter. The major European economies are already either in a recession (Germany and Austria) or on the brink of a financial crisis (France). If you throw in oil prices of over $100 per barrel, there is no credible scenario for an economic recovery.
And then there’s the US. America is swimming in oil and gas, but it is unlikely that it has the export capacities to compensate for a complete withdrawal of every last Iranian barrel from the market. To make matters worse, China has been one of Iran’s major customers, so any Israeli attack that appears to be backed by Washington would be interpreted as a hostile act by Beijing.
To make matters worse, someone else would actually profit from such a scenario: Vladimir Putin. Surging oil prices would spill additional billions of revenue into Moscow’s war chest, something that no G7 price cap would be able to prevent. What this means is that any attack on Iranian production would have to be immediately compensated by additional supply from somewhere else.
Saudi Arabia could potentially play that role, but the Biden administration has often antagonised Riyadh and it is not clear whether Mohammed bin Salman would be willing to help out, especially since he would profit from higher oil prices. What’s more, despite the pragmatic approach of the Saudi elite to relations with the state of Israel, the Saudi public is less enthusiastic, and appearing to do the “Zionist entity’s” bidding could cause domestic problems for the Kingdom.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeAstonishing that there are still some people who think we should rejoin this dysfunctional shambles. More astonishing still that quite a few of them are in the government.
I thought net zero was supposed to protect Europe from authoritarian fossil fuel providers.
Iran could theoretically block the Strait of Hormuz, hurting other oil & gas suppliers too ?
The Iranians have said in the past that if they can’t sell oil they will block the Straits and nobody else will sell oil either, but that was before they sat down with the Saudis and are now on better terms, so who knows
At this point does anyone doubt they can block the S of H, they also have the ability to hit any air, or military base in the region, they could also sink a US Aircraft Carrier. Attacking them would be madness at this point
Make peace and do a deal, its the only thing that makes sense
The worrying thing is that over the past five years, so many policies were pursued with a vengeance, even though decades of experience told us that they would not work and on top of that cause mayhem and disaster.