Is Hooters just what America needs? Nick Valinote / FilmMagic

It was just last spring when a viral video of a bouncing, scantily clad Sydney Sweeney was heralded by the Right-wing internet as an early harbinger of the coming vibe shift. “Wokeness is dead,” declared commentator Richard Hanania, in an X post that racked up more than 62 million views.
This was, perhaps, a bit premature; wokeness certainly laboured along for a few months longer, wheezing and shuffling through Brat Summer, before finally collapsing into dust with the reelection of Donald J. Trump. But if that video of Sweeney’s breasts was the beginning of the end for the phenomenon known as woke, this week has been all about dancing on its grave — in a pair of electric orange hotpants.
I’m referring, of course, to Hooters, which is back in the news and, if not better, then certainly more British than ever. The raunchy restaurant chain has been in protracted decline in the US since 2018. It’s been plagued by labour lawsuits, discrimination complaints, and a general sense that its baldly woman-objectifying business model had no place in a post-MeToo world. But that was then. Now it’s a new year, with a new vibe, one powerful enough to reach all the way across the Atlantic — to Newcastle, where Hooters recently announced that it would open its third UK location. The new restaurant, with a capacity of 200, is set to employ at least 50 “Hooters Girls”, with some reportedly as young as 17.
The reaction to this news has been predictable, insofar as all the usual suspects are raising the usual objections to a restaurant where every dish comes with a side of female objectification. Hooters holds its all-female waitstaff to strict appearance standards, and while the infamous “nose test” (in which aspiring employees are told to stand against a wall to ensure that their breasts protrude further forward than their nose) isn’t a real thing, everything else — from hairstyle and makeup to manicure colours and bodyweight — is tightly regulated. A report on the Newcastle opening features the expected complaints from feminist academics and non-profiters against what one charity director called “a chain that treats women as objects to be served up alongside chicken wings and fries”.
And yet, the grumbling feels a bit obligatory, a little phoned-in, a bit stemming from a sense of duty rather than one of genuine outrage. One wonders if this battle over the breastaurant represents a final, futile skirmish in a fruitless war against human nature, one that even feminists understand they were always going to lose.
There’s something absurdly self-defeating in the notion that we shouldn’t celebrate the female form, when humans have been doing nothing but this since the first enterprising cave artist carved a figure with a great pair of bazongas into a limestone wall. A tour through human history reveals a continuous obsession with breasts, one that transcends time, geography, religion, and culture alike. There’s the 30,000-year-old Venus of Willendorf, sporting a pair of stupendous, pendulous big naturals; there’s the Hindu fertility goddess Parvati, with a perfect hourglass figure topped by perky B-cups. There’s Titian’s Venus of Urbino, clasping a small posy of roses the same delicate pink shade as her exposed nipples — or Jean Fouquet’s 15th-century Mary, offering a perfectly spherical alabaster breast to the baby Jesus. How dare we objectify these bodies?
I mean, how can we not, for God’s sake? Just look at them!
The conscription of the breast into the 21st-century culture wars could only have happened in a world where everything — from issues to institutions, aesthetics to ideas — was being obsessively politicised in ways that didn’t always make sense. In this paradigm, breasts were good for just two things: feeding babies, and titillating men. They were the stuff of Playboy spreads, Victoria’s Secret runway shows, and Baywatch babes running in slow motion on a beach; they were the vestiges of a culture that was analogue and heteronormative and unabashedly male-gazey. And while it would be an oversimplification to say that breasts themselves became wholly Right-coded, it’s also not a coincidence that the progressive movement, at this same moment, was increasingly focused on both queer sexuality and gender nonconformity in a way that made it impossible to embrace something so traditional, so conservative, as a pair of terrific tits. There was even a period, which lasted for a few brief and very weird years, in which progressives were more likely to celebrate a female chest bearing the twin scars of a gender-affirming mastectomy than one with its original anatomy intact.
In hindsight, this was untenable; it should surprise no one that it has come to an end. And if a few diehards still wearing “White Dudes for Kamala” t-shirts remain unconvinced as to the durability of both the human appreciation for breasts and the 2025 vibe shift, mainstream American media and culture appears to agree both that woke is dead and that boobs are back. The most recent demonstration of this came at the Super Bowl, whose significance as a sporting event pales in comparison to what it reveals about the culture. Before the game even began, commentators were abuzz over the removal of the words “End Racism” from the end zones, a relic of the 2020 reckoning kicked off by the death of George Floyd. (The new slogan, painted earlier that week, was the benign and notably apolitical “Unity Through Sport”.) But the real, best evidence came during a commercial break, when viewers were treated to an advertisement featuring a furiously catchy pop-song soundtrack and a 30-second smash cut montage of boobs. Lifted, separated, bouncing boobs; boobs of all shapes, shades, and sizes. There was a twist, of course — what seemed like a gratuitous cleavage-fest was actually just the attention-getting lead-in to a Novartis ad for breast cancer screenings — but this doesn’t mitigate the first half of the commercial so much as create a permission structure for it. Go ahead and leer, fellas — it’s for a good cause!
In a culture where this commercial can air during the biggest, most-viewed sporting event of the year, complaints about objectification ring hollow. If a montage of bouncing boobs can be used to promote cancer awareness, you can hardly turn around and claim that using them to sell beer and wings is a bridge too far.
But maybe more to the point, those who do want to argue this will find their audience both smaller and substantially less engaged than they were during the peak years of cancel culture, or the pandemic-era reckoning during which we had nothing better to do than freak out about people sexually objectifying the green M&M.
Most folks on the Left, exhausted from a decade of performative resistance liberalism and perceiving (not incorrectly) that progressives’ shrillness was at least partly to blame for their staggering losses in the recent election, are disengaging from battles like this one — lest they alienate the last three heterosexual men who still identify as Democrats. Meanwhile the political Right, formerly the last bastion of the kind of conservatism that disliked raunchy ads or breasty restaurants on the grounds that they were too sexy, has been fully overtaken by a new breed of Republican whose idea of “family values” is a horny beer calendar featuring MAGA babes in bikinis. In just a few short decades, the modal American conservative has somehow transformed from a pearl-clutching moral majoritarian to a pro-natalist, pro-tech, America First social libertine. On both sides, the age of the prude is over.
Perhaps this is as it should be. Let the battlefields of the culture wars stand empty, and on them, let a thousand flowers bloom — while the exhausted warriors, Left and Right alike, broker a peace that begins by recognising all the things that unite rather than divide us. Things like family, and friends, and food, and art, and beauty of all kinds. Who knows: if we can agree on that, maybe we can agree on some other things, too?
And maybe the reemergence of Hooters is, perversely, exactly what we need to usher in this brave new world: a return to, if not tradition, then to the embodied and universal pleasures of gathering together, in person, to joke and chat and watch sports and drink beer — served to us by a barmaid with a really nice rack.
Great article. Wokeness has immiserated every single thing that its prudish ‘progressive’ fingers have wagged at but worst of all has been its joyless attack on normal sexuality. No I shan’t be going to Hooters – thanks all the same – but if it is helping to bring the curtain down on wokeness’s “fruitless war against human nature” I wish it well. Of all the Orwellian Newspeak terms we have allowed to insinuate themselves into the language, ‘heteronormative’ must rank as one of the most poisonous – an insidious assault on what is likely the greatest joy in the average person’s life. In politically-correctthink the sexuality of the 95% has been relativised as ‘straight’ or prefixed with ‘cis’….. just one option in a woke ‘non-binary’ jamboree bag. These so called ‘straight persons’ are Mr & Mrs Ninety-Five-Percent of all known sexual activity.
To move on from the celebration of tits – and raise the tone a bit – https://grahamcunningham.substack.com/p/the-androgyny-syndrome “virtually the entirety of civilisation’s artistic expression of sexual love was – until these crass times – about these ‘straight persons’. Tristan and Isolde, Paris and Helen of Troy, Miss Bennett and Mr Darcy, John boy Walton and Jenny” – straight persons all. End of rant.
“virtually the entirety of civilisation’s artistic expression of sexual love was – until these crass times – about these ‘straight persons’.
I think the Greeks might have a word or two to say about that, not to mention some reasonably well known artists such as Michelangelo and Caravaggio and their patrons.
95% is not 100%. But for a long time society behaved as if it was, as if the 5% (or whatever the number is) didn’t exist. Or worse, *shouldn’t* exist.
The vast majority of civilisation’s artistic expression still is about the 95%. So is almost all of the back catalogue.
As a member of the 95%, I am very happy to see some representation of the 5%.
Given the advent of OnlyFans, the general ubiquity of porn, and various young women enriching and ’empowering’ themselves by taking on dozens or even hundreds of men at a time, Hooters is positively wholesome by comparison. This new branch, with 50 waitresses for a 200-seat restaurant, sounds like it will have excellent service. What’s not to like?
re The part about it being a paradigm that breasts are for titillating (I suppose the clue’s there in the word itself) men and feeding babies – is that not exactly what they are in fact for?
Came here to say exactly this! Compared to only fans hooters seems harmless
Equally natural is women enjoying men enjoying them.
And, of course, visa versa.
And yet…
Only a week ago, Eric Kaufmann informed us here on Unherd that UK universities were doubling down on DEI.
https://unherd.com/newsroom/british-universities-are-doubling-down-on-dei/
I’d love to see the immediate end of woke, but, to paraphrase Adam Smith, there’s a great deal of ruin in an ideology.
It may be a shocking idea, but I sense a day in the future when all this heckling over DEI subsides into another nasty shriveled wart on the ugly judgmental expression of humanity
Let adults make their own choices as their choices do not reflect on you or yours… If some individual women choose to work such a job why is that somehow a reflection on “women” at large – collective identity politics at its worst…
Inclined to agree, though I find the concept of Hooters (and the name) crass and infantile. Likewise women going to male strippers or middle aged women touching up topless young male waiters at a “girls do” (provided the men have been warned about this before taking the job). Unless there is genuine harm or coercion, it’s really up to the people involved. Shouldn’t whine if they get judged for it though.
Oh thank you. This happens all too often. A few – means all. This is for both sides.
If there was one term that seemed to epitomise the wooliness of woke, the prudery of progressives, it has to be: chest feeding.
Turning something that nurtures into gender-defying unnatural thought-policing was simply absurd and will elicit head-shaking pity for those who promulgated it for ever more.
Just a thought, but are we in the throes of a 21st century repeat of the Roaring Twenties?
Pregnant person?
The flaw in this argument of course is that the UK where the new Hooters ‘breastaurant’ (well done you) is to open is not the USA and we have a miserably Puritanical leftwing government and academia.
All this announcing of the death of woke may be premature. It’s died before, only to come staggering back more crazed than ever.
That aside, does the pendulum swing really have to take us to something quite as crass as hooters. Not a thing I say very often, but on things like hooters feminists really do have a point.
It’s not surprising KS delights in breasts and enjoys writing at length about them. For most women, breast are not erotic objects. I guess old style feminist lesbians objected to the exploitation of breasts by advertisers and businesses to sell to men. The hatred and removal of the breasts themselves was the objection to objectification taken to extremes. When the extreme has been reached then there is generally a return to a more central position: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
“thesis, ant*thesis, synthesis.” Very good, I saw what you did there.
titties, and titties, sin titties
Once I was sitting opposite my wife in a cafe when a very well endowed lady walked close by. My wife said, ” Did you see the tits on her?” Suprised at her blokey comment rather than slap me for what I might have been thinking, she explained she understands men perfectly well and that it’s alright to look providing I always behave and stay loyal to her. She enjoys a movie with some nice male eye candy. We’ve been happily married for 33 years. It’s all a case of celebrating the beautiful differences of looks and persona between males and females and knowing how to behave. I hope the author is correct in implying there’s a return to normality.
Next time get pics to share with the class.
If you see a “very well endowed lady” and your wife says, “Did you see the tits on her?” the only correct response is, “Didn’t notice.” Yeah, maybe your wife is the one woman in every half a million or so that really understands the nature of men, but most likely it’s a trap.
Do you actually expect people to believe this nonsense?
The upvotes would suggest that Unherd commenters are in large part actually that stupid. But I suspect they are just affirming your geriatric Carry On stupidity.
I know it’s 2025 but please, humour has not been cancelled!
My Dad’s take on this was “I don’t care where you get your appetite as long as you eat at home.”
I am mortal weary of society’s progressing down the road by slamming into the guardrails, first on the left and then on the right. The pavement is there for a reason, people. Let’s try to stay on it, the way we used to.
The way I think we used to. Didn’t we? I can barely remember.
You don’t have cornfields, quarterbacks, or cheerleaders, so all Hooters could possibly be anywhere but the good old USA is a boring discussion of the “politics of tits.” We are not the same.
“Most folks on the Left, exhausted from a decade of performative resistance liberalism and perceiving (not incorrectly) that progressives’ shrillness was at least partly to blame for their staggering losses in the recent election, are disengaging from battles like this one — lest they alienate the last three heterosexual men who still identify as Democrats.”
Genius.
“In just a few short decades, the modal American conservative has somehow transformed from a pearl-clutching moral majoritarian to a pro-natalist, pro-tech, America First social libertine.”
You’re confusing the culturally dominant Left’s false stereotype of conservatives for reality, which of course was always the Left’s intention.
In the US, Hooters has an excellent reputation in community service. Make fun all you want, I respect this.
Lust is not the answer. Why veer from one destructive approach to another?
Marriage is the answer. Everything else causes society to unravel. No one wants to admit that, however, because then we’ve got to confront our base desires to lust over strangers.
It’s hard, it kinda sucks in the short term, but it’s the right way. Our ancestors understood this. We’re absolute fools for rejecting it and finding ways to rationalise passions that lead to destruction.
“Anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” Matthew 5:28
Kathleen Stock, national Treasure. Made me laugh out loud. Plus I have a few new chest words in my vocabulary. I will certainly raise a glass to the death of woke.
Choose life. Choose unabashedly staring at the perfectly spherical, slightly-wobbling tits on your Hooters waitress who, dressed like a 1970s cheerleader, is bringing you another pitcher of mass-produced American piss with a plate of artery-clogging, deep fried Buffalo wings with a side of Ranch dressing and a garnish of crisp celery. Choose the slightly awkward, but invigorating, feeling as one of your mates – a pitcher in himself and unable to discern that he’s in a cheap chain restaurant and not a gentleman’s club – begins making untoward remarks towards this waitress culminating in him full-palming her ass as she goes by with a stack of plates smeared with guacamole and sour cream. In the background, Morgan Wallen warbles in a Tennessean drawl over the restaurant’s sound system and you notice on one of the 70″ flatscreens over the bar that Cleveland has failed to cover the spread. Choose life.
Very good. Are you a fan of “Deano” and his mates.
I don’t hold him or his mates in contempt by any means. Although I do find it a tad ironic that a place like Hooters which, let’s be honest, is one of the more tasteless and degrading American restaurant chains, is being used in this article as emblematic of a return to the good old days. Look, I’m not saying bar owners shouldn’t hire pretty bar maids with nice tits. They should by all means but to call your restaurant, essentially, Titties, and then have a costume is a bridge too far, perhaps. Maybe it invites roguish behavior. Just a suggestion.
This made me almost fall off of my chair in laughter. Great visual analogy. Appreciated.
You are going to want to avoid palming any Hooter asses as your are likely to find yourself heads down in the grease dumpster and sent there by the bartenders who consider the staff like sisters, not sex objects.
It surely feels utterly pointless to protest about objectification by Hooters in a world where young women enthusiastically publicise themselves having sex with dozens, hundreds and in one case over a thousand men live on the internet.
A thurough vetting evaluation of the level
Of absurdity in this article should have been made, noting that Orange Jesus is or claims to be the king of Evangelicals and definitely all three of those young women suspiciously look like Evangelicals
What exactly is “raunchy” about Hooters? No one is naked. Not even a little bit. The outfits are what they’ve always been. The place serves wings, burgers, and the like, not lap dances.
“a final, futile skirmish in a fruitless war against human nature”
Which is in fact part of the wider ‘war against human nature’ Left-wing ‘progressive’ il-liberals have fought for 50+ years. And are fortunately now losing, although at huge social and economic cost to the rest of us.
The issue with feminist prudery was its failure to distinguish between female nudity in art (say) and female nudity in the strip club. Or breasts in a moment of beauty in a movie and breasts in hooters.
All were just examples of the male gaze, to be protested equally. No nuance required. All just about oppression and objectification.
The infantile labelling “hooters” ought to be a bit of a giveaway.
You dimwits are really getting carried away by Trump winning by a point or so and carrying the swing states. It was only 4 years ago that Biden eviscerated Donny by almost 10 million votes.
Ands what does this mean for you? The freedom to ogle young women in restaurants and pretend that everyone thinks its cool? I mean, that’s what your sex offender cult leader does so why shouldn’t you? Just don’t forget that those girls despise you and that your sweaty, boozy leering is just what they put up with to make a living. But enjoy those chicken wings!
As for Sidney Sweeney, her appearance on SNL was an embarrassment for everyone concerned and I am sure she will come to regret it. One hopes that she has based her career on more than her cleavage. Still, I bet you old timers got pretty excited by it, didn’t you?
“universal pleasures of gathering together, in person, to joke and chat and watch sports and drink beer — served to us by a barmaid with a really nice rack“
I’d buy that for a dollar!
Also, is anyone else thinking ‘Prince Andrew’ regarding the accompanying photo of The Donald? While his arms appear to be in proportion, his right hand appears to be a rather darker Pantone colour even than his perma-tanned coupon.
This discussion is swashbuckling dither. Not one mention of the MAGA fanatics banning books or wanting to burn down libraries. Not one mention of the aggressive reinsertion of religion into schools nor the huge state shifts of funding to private schools with Christian academics
You have summed up my frustration with this tribal nonsense. As a frustrated old fashioned lefty the woke period was well meaning but ultimately alienating to many. That said the right anti woke brigade should be very careful what they wish for as you have outlined.
Worth my unheard sub fee just for “breastaurant”.
Men are biologically programmed to look at breasts. They are clocking whether the woman bearing them (?) can adequately feed a baby, thus protecting the security of the tribe. Heads out of the gutters people.
I find this essay, posted on February 19th, quite the counterpoint to any number of news reports, as recently as yesterday, asserting Hooters is on the verge of bankruptcy.
The choice to open a–dare I say–giant Hooters in Merry Old seems somewhat at odds with these reports of insolvency.
Then again, when it comes to the casual dining industry, I guess there’s no telling.
Great argument
Great point
Great fun
But… isn’t Hooters filing for bankruptcy???
I enjoyed this argument and while it has been a very long time, I have in fact, enjoyed Hooters in the past. But, didn’t I see a bunch of stories this week that Hooters is filing for bankruptcy?
How quickly do we choose to forget when Budweiser, in ill fated moment of revery, chose to celebrate Pride Month with a Trans guy perched on all those sacrosanct piles of beer. Who were the f…..ing prudes then???? Oh but wait, wrong tits, huh?? Prudishness is such a fickle endeavor.