data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/974c1/974c1f6322868bfee08b6036effbcc9f5aa1e3ca" alt=""
Storm Eowyn, apparently named after a character from Lord of the Rings, roared like an army of uruk-hai across Ireland last week. It brought down hundreds of trees, tore off a lot of roofs, and left 700,000 of us without electricity. Here in rural Galway the lights were out in the townlands for days. Many still are. The city lost its water supply. We lost all the things that happen when you press buttons without thinking about it. Silence came.
We have a box of candles, matches, batteries and hurricane lamps stored for just this kind of occasion. Big bottles of water too, because our well runs on electricity. So do our solar panels, which switch off when the grid does. The stove that heats our front room is connected to a back boiler, so we can’t allow that to get too hot either when the grid is down. We’ve been talking about getting ourselves a generator for years, but we never get round to it. So much for self-sufficiency.
This Is Happiness, by Niall Williams is a novel set in rural County Clare during the Fifties, during the electrification of the country. It’s beautifully written and funny and moving. It seems to have no agenda and yet it shows well enough the mixed emotions that the coming of the electric wires brought to the countryside here. What was gained (easy to measure), what was lost (hard or impossible to measure) — but also what was illuminated. Not just previously hidden bald spots and wrinkles and layers of dust that a darkened cottage would never reveal even in high summer, but a world that, once the switches came, could never come back again. An older, stiller, subtler world.
I won’t say it came back again for the 48 hours that we were wire-free in our house. But something came. Some other rhythm. I sat by the fire with a whisky and did nothing at all. We read books instead of websites. Teenagers had no choice but to emerge from their bedrooms. We’re a low-tech household compared to most, but let’s not fool ourselves — we live in the miasma created by the grid. We are the grid. Without it, everything changes.
For the first 24 hours, I dreamed of living forever without electric power, and I reminisced with my wife about how much better life was in the Eighties and Nineties, before the web emerged to trap us. But there is no going back, at least not until nature loses her patience. The net is being hauled in, and us with it. This may not be Progress, but it is some kind of teleology, some kind of march, some kind of forward motion. I loved the stillness, but two days in, I missed the electric shower. The house got very cold. We are puffy, modern creatures, unused to life without our miasmic carapace.
The stillness, though: I loved the stillness.
Before the power cut, I was struggling with my words. Maybe the storm came to save me. Two weeks ago, I made a pilgrimage to Mount Athos. Agion Oros — the Holy Mountain — is a thousand-year old Orthodox monastic republic in northern Greece. It is not easily accessible, and nothing happens there except prayer. This has been true for a millennia. Every time I go there, something happens to me, and it is never what I expect. I try not to expect anything, but Athos always manages to upset me. I don’t mean that it makes me unhappy: I mean that it upsets my apple cart. It knocks me off my rails. Like the words of Christ which it exists to make manifest, it is not possible to honestly engage with it and remain comfortable. This time, Agion Oros seems to have brought me silence.
When the power was out in our house, more was absent than just the lights and the internet. Some feeling evaporated. The electrical grid does not just allow us to wash our clothes easily or watch TV; it changes us in some way. Some indefinable way. It gives, but it also takes. It takes away the silence; alters our bodies and minds and spirits.
In his 2018 book, In the Shadow of the Machine, the philosopher Jeremy Naydler suggests that electricity is a spiritual force. He shows how ancient cultures in Mesopotamia and Egypt understood atmospheric electricity as “a destructive power wielded by the deities connected with violent storms”. The Egyptian God Seth, for example, with whom the power of electricity was associated, “was a desert god implacably opposed to the forces of life”. In ancient Greece, electricity was a secret guarded by the Mystery Religions. Hesiod wrote of three primeval Cyclopes who represented the electrical forces, all of whom dwelled in the deep underworld. Until at least the 7th century, knowledge of this power was taboo.
Now there is a button for everything, and here we are. “A new type of consciousness” has permeated the world, says Naydler. “We may have the uncomfortable sense of human consciousness succumbing increasingly to the domain of gravity, as it became more and more overshadowed by the mechanistic outlook.”
Maybe when the lights go out, even for a while, and the current withdraws, a certain lightness returns. The gears and the cogs are forced into retreat.
Early modern experiments with electricity in the 1800s, explains Naydler, demonstrated that “an electric current was also seen to have a disintegrating effect on a substance to which it was applied”. Humphry Davy and other early pioneers found that applying electric currents to existing substances both broke them down and revealed their constituents for the first time. Many new chemical elements were discovered through this process that would allow science to forge ahead with its project of understanding, and thus ultimately controlling, material reality. This we call Progress.
I like to complain about the Machine, but the Machine is in me, and is me. Electricity has done its work, and that “new type of consciousness” has colonised my mind. I have struggled against it all my life. The rationalising, controlling, argumentative, wordy, left-hemisphere thing. The thing that does not contemplate, but instead argues. The thing that does not sit still, but instead writes. It has made me what I am.
On the Holy Mountain it was winter. The snow was thick on the peak and the woodland trails. It is a remote place, but it has succumbed too. They have electricity and internet, and the old mule paths have been replaced by roads, cars, buses. It was a mistake, I think. They should have resisted: should have shown us that it is still possible, even in one small place, to live without the miasma, without the new consciousness.
I still came home with this stillness, though. With this gulf within. It was prayer, I think, that made it. Maybe prayer and electricity are fighting a war. Maybe they are two kinds of hidden spiritual power, two forces which cannot be seen and yet which affect at some radical level the fate of our species and our world.
You can aim towards God, I think now, or you can keep the doors closed. You can let the electrical current pull you down into the world. It’s noisy down there. The current is noisy. Once the rooms begin to be cleared out, though, the silence comes. It starts to creep up. When you least expect it, it comes and sits in you.
In his book Man or Matter, Ernst Lehr, according to Jeremy Naydler, refers to the scientific revolution as the Second Fall. The first time around, Adam and Eve “succumbed to the temptation to acquire knowledge prematurely. This led to a certain illumination of human consciousness, but at the devastating cost of a separation from the original state of participation in the divine world.” The Second Fall, on the other hand, happened as a result of “human action outrunning knowledge.” We came to grasp and use natural forces that we did not yet understand. Forces like electricity.
“Men were exploring the electrical realm as it were, in the dark,” wrote Lehr. “It was a realm foreign to their ordinary ideas and they had not developed the forms of thought necessary for understanding it.”
It was deeply dark outside when the grid was down. There was no glow in the sky, no lights from within the house falling in squares upon the hard grass. A frost came in and settled on the lawn and the rocks and the car windscreen. The sky was cloudless, the stars were hard and crystalline. There was not a sound. The electrical wire that passes over our garden, connecting our house to the main line, can usually be heard to hum gently on a still night. Not tonight. There was no humming. Venus was low and golden on the horizon. I saw a shooting star. I heard an owl. I went back inside. The room was dimly lit with candles and the fire was low.
I still don’t feel like writing any of my ideas down. But I suppose I will. I succumb to gravity every day. The underworld gods of the electric wires do their work. They bring me down into the caverns of ideas, arguments, battles and will. Prayer lifts me, though. It lifts all of us, if we let it, above all the humming and into another silence.
Now I glance over at the box on the wall and I see, even as I am typing away, that the internet has gone down again. The storm is over, but the consequences are not. The consequences of the storm will never be over. Perhaps I will never be able to send you these words, and maybe that won’t matter. Words all dissolve in this ether. None of the words remain.
Only the silence, if you let it.
***
A version of this article first appeared on Paul’s Substack, The Abbey of Misrule.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeElectricity is a natural force. It can be generated and distributed, but it’s also part of our own being, within us all and as essential to life as blood, or water.
I don’t agree with the dichotomies this author sets up; for instance, between electricity and prayer. I revel in silence, but don’t need to pray to induce it and it’s possible to be silent within whilst the world rampages around us.
I can see what he’s trying to get at, but somehow it seems as if he’s forcing it. He feels the need to go on pilgrimage (to Greece) to find something – “change” – when all the time, as before, it lies within us; within the stillness of our own spirit, if we allow it to just be.
5 feet away from his house the wifi won’t work.
The answer, as before, lies within.
(Closer to his router.)
Actual spit-take. Well played, sir.
Excellent comment. I was going to write something similar but you expressed these ideas better than I could.
I should add I greatly enjoy Paul Kingsnorth’s writing. He reminds us to be aware, and think about, the types of issues he describes in this essay. And he writes beautifully.
As for me, I’m privileged. I live in a place where I can walk out my front door and, over the course of ten miles or so, stroll beneath huge conifers then move onto the beach. I often like to walk early, before the busy, human part of life has begun, and stand by the ocean, eyes closed, and listen to the waves. It is a self-conscious retreat from civilization.Then I return home, have a hot shower, a hot breakfast, and switch on the internet.
Sometimes I struggle to square that circle, to reconcile the semi-mystical with the technological, but I recognize I’m engaging in different aspects of the same reality and it’s not readily apparent which aspect is the more profound.
Thanks JB.
I find the same peace on the Pennine moors which surround me, with its ancient pathways and signs of human habitation from long ago, now slowly returning to wilderness.
I have to deal with the taiga. As long as you don’t get eaten by beers or wolves a sense of isolation may be found.
A beer is a dangerous thing; many beers, more so.
More dangerous than bears. They are attracted to them like honey.
Funny!
Sounds beautiful.
Ten miles!
Well said. We take ourselves with us wherever we go.
This was a lovely article, by a lovely writer. My most sincere thanks to you!
(By the way, every Sabbath and Holiday, religious Jews turn off every electronic device [lights are on timers] and silence comes. No phones, no computers, no cars, no noise. No doing, no making, no moving, no changing. Just living, just being, just talking, just thinking.)
In his diaries, the clergyman Francis Kilvert described a world without electricity.
The silences he describes in the countryside cannot be replicated now, even if the grid fails.
Those silences carried voices. He hears a child being scolded by its mother from across the valley. One New Year’s morning he hears the bells of churches from a town 20 miles away.
Then there is the rawness of the world. One Winter’s morning he bathes in a tin bath after breaking the ice that covered the water.
The gravitational field is as natural as the electromagnetic field. Perhaps we should dispense with the former and float off up to heaven.
Perhaps the author is talking about deep silence.
Oh, i’m sure he is – although i think the term “profound” is more expressive.
The thing is… one can’t “go searching” for it (as per my earlier point). If you’re ready for it, it may find you.
I always appreciate your unconventional takes, but Paul Kingsnorth is offering us a profundity of greater depth than your anti-institutional bent. There exists a truth just over the horizon of the natural world.
There is another kind of silence that it would take generations of electricity deprivation to recover. Before the age of electricity-powered media, most people knew relatively little of the world beyond their direct experience but, what they did know, they knew more intimately. With the advent of radio and television this started to change. People began to pick up a mass-mediated bag of abstracted ‘knowledge’ and ‘opinions’ about the wider world…..great for those souls brimful of curiosity about things and toxic for those (the majority I think) who are too-easily morally and intellectually biddable. Now in the digital age the gigantic supply information/disinformation coming at each of us greatly exceeds both the demand for it and one’s ability to properly process it. Another kind of noise… (one that I discussed in this piece: https://grahamcunningham.substack.com/p/the-madness-of-intelligentsias)
I often fantasise about a world deprived of electricity. In my fantasy, there’s me in my own little House on the Prairie….making do, using my ingenuity to repair things, singing songs and telling tales to the children in the evening. Living a good, hard, stoical life. The fantasy unravels when some feral gang notices how well me and my family are coping….so come by to loot our little home nest and to murder us.
When I was little I speculated that there were little men living in the valve at the back of the television/radio
Really nice article. Thank you.
Wonderful article, beautifully written, one of the benefits of space and silence.
I just finished reading the new print of Robert Byron’s (not that one) The Station. Mount Athos was a little different then (1920’s), but only a little.
“a world that, once the switches came, could never come back again”
Don’t be too sure. That is where Labour and Ed Millipede are determine to take us.
Beautiful writing. Silence is one of the most breathtaking experiences—it’s like the moment before we are born.
But alas, here we are, all plugged into the electrical grid!
Thank you for stepping out of your silent retreat to whisper into our eyes.
“So do our solar panels, which switch off when the grid does”. I think a lot of people who have shelled out for solar panels snd batteries don’t realise that they don’t have an off-grid system. The batteries save money, they sre not backup. A true off-grid system is rather more expensive.
There’s really no good reason for this, just crap design! A few quid for an inverter would provide the mains power from the batteries to run whatever electronics is needed… and presumably these solar panel batteries have an inverter already!
“You can aim towards God, I think now, or you can keep the doors closed. You can let the electrical current pull you down into the world…Once the rooms begin to be cleared out, though, the silence comes.”
You can aim towards God, and I’ve tried it, but I’ve found it’s only possible in a kind of vague, deistic sense. God doesn’t seem to intervene in the world in any predictable way. Prayer doesn’t seem to produce any obvious effects in the material world. You pray and you get no response – just silence. Sometimes a nice coincidence makes you warm and fuzzy because you associate it with your feelings about God but it’s transitory. There’s no real change to the external, physical, world to speak of. You’re chasing a phantasm, contextualizing quotidian events to mean something they can’t seem to mean.
Centuries of textual criticism has made it really impossible for a serious person to take the Bible literally. And, even if you take the Bible literally, there are verses like Matthew 16:28, among others, which stress the imminent return of the Son of Man which, two thousand years later, still hasn’t happened. We’d know if it happened, too; Paul stresses that this was definitely going to be a very public event. So, it seems to me the inescapable conclusion is that Jesus was not divine. He was a man who made predictions that didn’t come true and then his followers embellished stories about him that imbued his life with a purpose he never intended nor could have ever imagined.
Now, it’s possible to rationalize all of this – and rationalization is what modern Christian apologetics is – to make it so Jesus was never wrong about anything, explain away contradictions and embarrassing passages to preserve faith. If you’re a serious person who wants to know what the truth likely is, however, this isn’t going to cut it. So, let’s say you’re a person like me. You think the most likely explanation for why things exist is a transcendent creative consciousness – God, if you’d like. But Jesus pretty clearly wasn’t this consciousness or the son of this consciousness, whatever that would mean. Even the idea that this consciousness is a personality that a human being can have a relationship with is kind of silly. I do admit I find it hard to know how to approach this God I think exists without the framework offered by Christianity. I can’t believe it and I feel that other religious traditions are foreign to me and forever beyond my reach in a practical sense. However, the kind of mysticism that Kingsnorth offers doesn’t do the trick either. The silence coming when the electricity goes out doesn’t seem like evidence that we’ve been pulled away from divine participation in the world and the silence is the return of that participation. The silence implies something else I doubt Kingsnorth would like to admit.
That’s a great comment.
I don’t think there is a creator, a “transcendent creative consciousness”, but i can admire the way you’re thinking about being alive and conscious.
Thanks. Where the universe came from, where life came from, what consciousness is, we don’t know. We may never know. I think it’s alright to guess considering we’ll likely never know the answers to these questions in our lifetimes. What I think we can’t do is discard rationality because we know it’s not going to take us across the finish line. You have to stick to it as far as it can take you. Kingsnorth likes to romanticize pre-scientific life but I think he’s not seriously considering what life was like when it was ruled by the whims of superstition. What it was like when disease and earthquake and storm were seen as punishments for sin and there were moral panics about things like witchcraft. We’ve certainly lost something through scientific materialism but I don’t think he’s right when he describes things like electricity as us wielding powers we’re unprepared to wield. Who, or what, would have prepared us for it? Kingsnorth’s ending sounds more like nihilism than religious exaltation. If the only thing we have when the world we’ve built shuts down is silence, I’m not sure that’s better.
I agree with much of that.
What comes across to me in his writing is a sense of loss. It results in some lovely-sounding prose but that seems to reflect his effort to regain something rather than being illuminating.
I’m not sure he’ll find what he’s looking for (a bit like Bono!) but as i’ve suggested, the search starts and ends within us.
I agree with you. I’m trying to imagine what it’s like to be Kingsnorth. Can you imagine being the type of person that, whenever a transformer blows, immediately thinks about the spirits that are no longer propitiated by humans because the refrigerator was invented and food poisoning is no longer a constant threat? Everybody experiences anemoia, a feeling of longing for a time we never lived in, when we see old houses or churches. We imagine the people that inhabited these buildings lived in simpler, better times than ours where peace was possible. But the people living in those times were beset by frightening changes too. The mature thing to do is to accept that every human being longs for a golden age that never existed. And you’re right to say that the search begins and ends within us. If any human being has ever experienced peace, it wasn’t because the world around him was any less threatening and incomprehensible, or life any less ephemeral, than we find it now.
The Future is religious.
Science-worship and Modernity are the Wave of the Past.
In which case, the search is a road to nowhere.
For many people, the search ends up within God.
“We don’t know.” Actually, we do – but the enemies of Christianity don’t want to know.
The only certain thing is that the Modernity you admire is on its last legs.
And if Christ doesn’t conquer, Mohammed will.
I’m not going to dignify your first sentence with a response.
As for your second one, reports of the death of science-based modernity have been greatly exaggerated. The churches are still empty. We are products of “Enlightenment” ideas and, no matter how we may dislike the outcome of those ideas brought to their logical conclusion in the form of scientific materialism, we still live in a world where information is too easily available to allow for genuine faith in Christianity to return at scale. The moment the Vulgate Bible was printed by Gutenberg in 1455, it was the beginning of the end. People could read what it said for themselves and the Bible cannot stand up to scrutiny as a reliable historical document, never mind the inerrant word of the creator of the universe.
For your third point, your concern that Islam is going to conquer if Christianity doesn’t return to its former eminence in the West is a reasonable one. Unfortunately, faith doesn’t work that way. Nobody is going to be willing to die for a Christianity they hope will act as a political counterpoint to Islam but they have doubts about. I see no evidence that genuine belief in Christianity is meaningfully increasing in Western countries and it’s definitely not at the point where Islam is today where young men are willing to martyr themselves for it. As frightening as Islam is, I think you’re overrating the risk it poses because you think of things in religious terms. If Christianity is done, then some other aggressive world religion will take it’s place. Well, something else has taken Christianity’s place in the West which isn’t Islam never will be. That thing is more powerful than Islam and it’s more likely to destroy us.
Reading the Bible made people fanatical Protestants. It didn’t make them opponents of the Bible – something that rarely happened before about 1680; that is (not coincidentally) when Europe became master of the world and growingly affluent.
Now Western power and wealth are slipping away quite rapidly. Scientific modernity will disappear from the West soon after. China is too tyrannical, and too politically insecure, to be a guardian for it.
Christianity is a growing religion even in the West. London is becoming a more religious city. It’s secular Westerners, not Christianity, who are dying out. The secular West will of course die with them. Contraception has destroyed the secular West.
No new religion will arise. But in many parts of the world, Christians are being persecuted and killed by Islamists. Those martyrs don’t share your lamentably blinkered and outdated view of the Bible.
I can’t tell the future, my friend, but something tells me Christianity isn’t making the kind of comeback you think it is. My view of the Bible isn’t “blinkered and outdated” as you say. There are people today, like Jordan Peterson, making a lot of money off of talking about the Bible in vague ways that avoid the thorny issue of its historicity. And that’s the problem for me. I don’t care about the narrative underpinnings of Western culture or a force capable of protecting us from Islam. I want to know if what the Bible claims literally happened. That’s obviously the way the writers of the books of the Bible wanted us to read them. They openly say that they want to tell us what literally happened so that we may believe. To me, that forecloses a symbolic reading of the Gospels.
Biblical scholars have credibly shown that Jesus’s original message was that the Son of Man, a cosmic judge foretold in Daniel, would return immanently in Jesus’s time to bring about a new heavenly kingdom on Earth. Jesus’s ministry was to make way for the Son of Man by warning Jews to repent before it was too late. Jesus also seems to have thought he was going to be the king of this new realm, which makes it unlikely he knew he was going to be executed upon his arrival in Jerusalem. Significantly, Jesus never says he’s the Son of man – later writers such as whoever wrote the Gospel of John begin saying that nearly a century after Jesus’s death. Jesus also never says that his death is a necessary sacrifice to purchase a reprieve for mankind’s sin with God. Remember, Jesus almost certainly didn’t go to Jerusalem with the goal of being crucified so he couldn’t have known that was going to be the outcome. It’s very difficult to synthesize what seem to be Jesus’s actual statements (he would be the king in the kingdom the Son of Man would usher in) with later Christian belief (Jesus’s real mission was that he had to be crucified to buy a reprieve for mankind’s sins). Finally, Jesus says several times, and Paul clearly believed, that the kingdom of the Son of Man would come before the deaths of the people he was addressing in Matthew. That hasn’t happened. Now, you can rationalize these points away all you’d like, but if Biblical scholars, who’ve dedicated their lives to the study of these books and many of whom can read the manuscripts in the original Aramaic and Greek, are wrong about this, then who’s right? You?
Christianity doesn’t need to make a comeback, it never went away. The only people who think it’s dead are those who only see the world in a western view. That’s a rather out of date idea.
We trade arguments all day, but there are now more Christians in a couple of countries in Africa thna the whole of Europe & THE US put together
Interestingly although its not a race, Christ is well in the lead
If you don’t want to believe in God, as revealed in Jesus Christ, He won’t force you to. So you get silence.
If you want an answer, believe – take the gamble of having Faith.
The absence of a reply from God is an argument against yourself, not against Christianity.
Jesus said He had no idea when His second coming would be.
As for textual critics supposedly having destroyed the credibility of the Bible – only people who hate the Bible anyway, or extremely credulous people, believe that.
Lovely essay. Although, I wonder what relationship this worldly and noisy electricity bears towards the electricity coursing through our own nerves and brain. Even that animates that part of us which contemplates.
What relationship does the metal that cures people of tumours, have with the metal that tears people apart in warfare ?
Welcome reflections. However strong the current, we still choose, in some essential measure, whether to resist or succumb to the electrical pull. Many of us have such digitized habits that some kind of major disruption is needed to even wake us up to this choice. Me included, on most days.
I’m interested to see how Mr. Kingsnorth’s newfound Christian faith interacts or collides with his defense of the natural world. I doubt he will adopt anything a like a primarily otherworldly or abstract focus. I hope not.
Nostalgia is a wonderful thing.