The assassination of a prominent figure in America always ends up being a riddle on the order of the enigma the Sphinx poses to Oedipus: “What creature walks on four legs in the morning, two in the afternoon, and three in the evening?” The national attempt to understand the assassin’s motives instantly becomes an attempt to understand America itself. In a country whose original promise was the “shining city on a hill”, the search for meaning unfailingly plunges toward the nation’s darkest recesses. What is the American meaning of this American creature who you will find, in Saul Bellow’s words, “lying down to copulate, and standing up to kill”?
The apprehension of 26-year-old Luigi Mangione in a Pennsylvania McDonald’s on Monday offered the uncanny feeling of American murder adapting to the latest American moment, the way music or fashion update themselves as society and culture change. Just over a month after Donald Trump stunned liberals by sweeping the White House and the Senate, thus proclaiming the triumph of “regular” Americans over “elites”, here comes this scion of a wealthy Baltimore real-estate family. Mangione is the product, as both The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal declared in banner headlines, of an “Ivy League” school, as well as having been the valedictorian of an exclusive prep school. His victim, Brian Thompson, UnitedHealthcare’s CEO, was, on the other hand, a regular guy, the product of a public high school — where he was also a valedictorian, but to the media’s indifference — and a state university. Depending on your perspective, the moral advantage goes either to the Elites — Mangione struck a blow for the common man — or to the Regulars — a decent-seeming father of two was cut down by the misguided morality of an addled Elite.
That Mangione was caught in a working-class Pennsylvania town, sitting in a McDonald’s, where he was recognised by a customer and reported to the police by an employee, seems the stuff of well-rounded tragedy. Both Harris and Trump, if you recall, laid claim to working at McDonald’s, Harris solemnly, Trump archly, in order to (absurdly) demonstrate their working-class bona fides. And here was a rogue Elite doing the folk-hero work of Regulars, turned in by a Regular, as if to remind the Elites — not to mention the burgeoning new elite of vindictive Regulars — of good old-fashioned law and human decency.
“Senseless” is an epithet almost invariably attached to “murder”, but not in the case of an assassination, which is, by definition, not senseless. The victim of an assassination is a public figure whose public status rests on a public significance. Still American presidents have often been assassinated, or attempts have been made to assassinate them, by proverbial “loners” and “outsiders” who don’t seem guided by a coherent purpose, à la Oswald, Sirhan, and Hinckley. Indeed, the template for the insoluble enigma of an American assassination remains the murder of JFK, an event that encompassed the Mafia, Fidel Castro, the CIA, the KGB, the Dallas underworld and, well, you name it.
Mangione’s alleged murder of Brian Thompson seems, on the surface, to be perhaps the most rational assassination in American history. To the extent that Mangione is now, ghoulishly, being celebrated as a folk hero, the motive for his killing, declared by Mangione himself, seems to be simple and, in the manner of a folk hero, humane. In this view, Thompson presided over a healthcare company that denied life-saving, or at least, precious life-enabling care to thousands of people. As Mangione put it in a Goodreads review — a first; an American assassin writes book reviews — of a book by Ted Kaczynski, the so-called Unabomber: “When all other forms of communication fail, violence is necessary to survive.”
You recall the finale of The Insider, that dazzling movie about Jeffrey Wigand, the whistleblower who brought down American’s tobacco companies. Wigand’s vindication, his triumph over both the tobacco companies and the craven corporate captains at CBS who wanted to suppress the airing of his story, is portrayed as happening just as the FBI is moving in to arrest Kaczynski in his remote cabin in the Montana wilderness. The movie’s implied message seems to be: either you permit people like Wigand to speak the truth or, not allowing that form of communication to prevail, violence will come.
I’m disappointed you didn’t find the space to include references to Musk taking over twitter and pontifications the health of Prince Harry’s marriage as you seemed to include every other major news story since COVID as subtext to the killing.
More or less. Instead of UnHerd, it’s “Herd, with Sophocles allusions.”
You try to tap dance atop the headlines and make sense. It’s hard work and Lee earns every ha’penny for this job.
“No one seems to be in charge in America. So Penny takes charge. Mangione takes charge. As for the rest of us, we assert our own control by telling ourselves, and each other, conflicting stories about who is responsible for what.”
This is, sadly, the reality of America today and the rest of The West, a wild West indeed. After years of identity/DEI/gender politics, the chickens are coming home to roost. If one still doesn’t understand why Trump wins a second term, one must have lost all senses.
Not much in common between Penny and Mangione’s ways of ‘taking control’ actually. One charging around making victims of those he imagines blameworthy, the other seeking to protect others classic vigilante style. Which sort is our dear Donald?
The incoming Scapegoater-in-chief?
You are correct. However public sentiment lies in between the lines and behind the words. When the elites completely lose touch with the ordinary people and the ordinary people will start taking things into their own hands. Welcome to the wild west!
Your comment doesn’t make sense. Edit or delete.
“No one seems to be in charge in America. So Penny takes charge. Mangione takes charge. As for the rest of us, we assert our own control by telling ourselves, and each other, conflicting stories about who is responsible for what.”
This is, sadly, the reality of America today and perhaps the rest of The West, a wild West indeed. After years of identity/DEI/gender politics, the chickens are coming home to roost. If one still doesn’t understand why Trump wins a second term, one must have lost all senses.
So now using DEI/gender politics to justify murder. “The West” made me do it? But boy, it felt so good!
Just an elite looking for support of his social class. Pretty funny the target. Likely inspired by Israel dismantling of hzbolah.
Bret. Rereading your post shows you actually make an excellent point. The lack of moral compass that the murderer demonstrates also leads to hating Israel for responding strongly to those who attack the Israeli people and nation.
Probably shouldn’t have used the word funny. Perhaps inappropriate would have been better. Government is literally taking everyone’s labour and giving it to their friends, but a guy you do t need to buy services from deserves to be murdered?
And yes the implication is that people will blame Israel, convenient I guess forgetting things like 911.
‘Israel’ sounds good and pure as the driven snow. Try saying the ‘zionist state’ and take note of phrases like terrorism, massacres, extra judicial killings at home and abroad that it conjures up and you will no longer feel so good about condemning others. All depends on what stories you are fed.
Reason has a good analysis of the economics of healthcare today. That some feel this guy deserved to be murdered for organizing health services makes you understand how governments which depend upon bread and circuses can devolve into mob violence.
And of course progressives are all about bread and circuses. I think gender services as public ally funded healthcare is in the third tent on the right.
You need a “spell” check on your witches because you’ve committed the “cardinal” sin of confusing East & West.
Good catch, with clever
spellingwording.Well I read that, but I’m none the wiser. Perhaps it’s too early, and we know too little, for this kind of speculation.
0% insight in this one. Clearly joining the throng turned on by Mangione.
Did the writer forget to do his homework until the last minute and therefore had twenty minutes to throw out this nonsense of a word salad?
Thought the same. Mr. Siegel apparently likes to write with a sense of false profundity and most likely lives to listen to himslef speak. You know the type.
To compare the Penny story to the Mangione story is an example of journalistic malpractice
If you found if hard to get the message it’s not necessarily the writer’s fault, you know.
The article was a bad argument badly made. If you wish to create some deeper message from it that is of course a matter for you.
There. You’re beginning to see where Siegel is coming from. You just came at it from the other side.
Too smart for me
*
If one is referencing films, or indeed, books, it’s good to get things right. The witch crushed by the falling house is near the beginning of the film. The witch at the end was dissolved with water.
Just following the tide, Siegel drops his poop on us again.
Trying to tell us that murders / assassinations (make your mind up, Lee) sometimes happen for complex and unknowable reasons in itself isn’t revelatory, so he tries to invoke some kind of American complex, as if eating a MacDonalds is a political act.
Neither is comparing the mind/brain conundrum with media speculation of any value; just an overblown rhetorical device. Seems to me like an “elite” trying to be a “regular”.
Weird non-article.
Presumably Mangione will try to explain what he has done at his trial.
Also the trial of the Southport killer is up soon. But what are the odds he will stay silent, so we will never know what happened?
That would be a story.
To lump together the brave,spontaneous, civic action against a threatening, serial, recidivist criminal with a craven, planned and unjustified assassination of an innocent man as both symptomatic of societal unravelling in the US is totally inappropriate and redolent of typical academic pseudo-analysis
And yet, that is precisely what a variety of left-wing commentators in the media are doing, calling Penny a racist vigilante because he accidentally killed a homeless black man, while lauding Mangione as a folk hero for intentionally murdering a faceless executive who is just trying to keep his company solvent so it can continue to insure people.
Could the MSM be any more evil? The mask has been off since Trump entered the fray, but this incident – and the blatant antisemitism by the same people – starkly defines them as pure evil.
He kept the company solvent by denying claims. He made himself solvent the same way.
He didn’t write the rules though. Those were already there. Your logic would accept the murder of any landlord because people need to pay rent to live in. Deranged.
“…Just trying to keep his company solvent so he can continue to insure people.” The Disney version!
Good article. Mangione, like all folk heros is not, when it comes to fact, perfect. Robin Hood, Guy Fawkes or Jesse James were not the good guys we mythologise them, but Mangione is for now an absolute hero to millions for slaying someone rightfully understood as having, as a CEO, brought early death and suffering on 100s of 1000s of Americans.
So, you are publicly displaying your own evil nature. And the fact that you are ignorant of the causes of problems in the healthcare system.
To start getting a clue, read Allysia Finley’s Dec 8 WSJ piece: “UnitedHealthcare and the ObamaCare Con: The law’s mandates and regulations have given rise to myriad insurance-market grievances.
An absolute hero to millions????
God, I hope you’re wrong. Mangione is nothing…. just another garden-variety sociopath who committed a horrific, homicidal act, annihilating one human life and destroying countless others. He is a coward and a killer whose cruelty was defined purely by his utter, egotistic indifference to anyone other than himself….and any pain, other than his own. He’s as much a hero as Bundy, Gacy, or Richard Speck….and equally covered in innocent blood. God save us if millions of idiots find that somehow heroic.
As for Brian Thompson being “rightfully understood as having brought early death & suffering on hundreds and thousands of Americans”….how, in God’s name, did he do this? By earning a living as the 3 year CEO of an insurance company?
Did Brian infect ‘hundreds and thousands of Americans’ with disease? Is he the one who gave them the disabilities & dysfunctions which marred their lives? Did he cause their cancers, or break their bones? Did he weaken the walls of their hearts? Did he build the tumors which filled their bodies? Of course not; he did none of those things. Life does; chance does; we do. Brian didn’t.
Rather he worked for a company that employed 400K people and generated revenues of $370B selling healthcare insurance to all of us. He was hired to do exactly that; to make it profitable; to make it successful; to increase shareholder value. And he did.
The fact that Health Insurance Companies sell Health Insurance, and — by definition — have to make calls as to what is and is not covered by any particular policy is a fact of life. That is what they’re supposed to do. They would cease to exist if they didn’t. And what that means is that very sick people are sometimes denied coverage for certain treatments or therapies that are not officially recognized as being effective. This is a cold truth, but it is the truth.
Does the patient, with a treatment denied, then die? Sometimes. Sometimes another therapy is pursued which is more effective. Or less. In the end, we all die, don’t we? And who’s to say what’s an early death? All deaths are early, given our own expectations. All deaths are cruel. Nor is there any guarantee that the therapy denied would have done anything at all. In many cases that I personally know, incremental therapies were successful only in driving incremental pain.
We ourselves, of course, feel as though our lives, and the lives of our loved ones are of infinite value. They aren’t. We may give everything we have to save them….but we cannot expect everyone else to give everything they have. Nor can we expect, unless we’re clueless children, any insurance company to spend ‘whatever it takes’ on even the dimmest of chances to prolong our lives just one minute more than our disease might otherwise allow.
Tragically, when we say that a ‘denial of coverage’ is the same as actually killing the patient who suffers from the dysfunction which triggered the request for coverage, we are making a horrible & incredibly grave error. It is that error that led to the assassination of Brian Thompson on a NY city street…and caused the perverse joy we find celebrated in the dark corners of the web.
What have we become that the murder of an innocent makes us laugh?
Hero to millions? He got a bunch of lefty social justice warriors cheering for him. Mangione was a cold assassin of an innocent man, whom he tried to blame for his own bad fortune, being born with a back ailment and a self inflicted surfing accident.
He didn’t pay a penny for his back operation having rich parents, who very likely paid for it. He is a sociopath and should be treated like one.
Penny and Mangione are moral opposites. Penny is the moral everyman who in saving a train load of innocents was falsely accused of murder by powerful racists. Mangione is a spoiled elite sociopath who coldly murdered a man who posed no immediate threat and had done nothing to him or anyone around him. Penny selflessly imposed minimal violence to save people under immediate threat. Mangione used maximum violence deployed in a cold blooded, cowardly ambush on a victim simply walking by.
So of course woke culture falsely accused Penny of racist murder. And equally disgusting woke culture makes the cowardly murderer Mangione a hero.
Mangione had a serious back condition and was presumably denied insurance by the company who’s CEO he shot, a company which has the highest denial rate in the industry. The CEO definitely killed more people than Mangione but did it legally and with documents making it all good of course. This is a fairly comprehensible assassination and honestly, it’s to be expected if you a) run a company which has responsibility over life and death and b) run it in such a way as to cause more death than you should.
Oh, please! Following your logic, are we supposed to kill off everyone who has wronged us? Including rude waiters, not very competent dentists or sloppy hairdressers?
Yes, I am aware that there’s a difference between the health insurance sector and the professions I mentioned. But this was just to illustrate that your logic seems to be highly flawed.
Btw, on a personal note : I have had very serious problems with a major US health insurance company. Still, I do not share the apologies for Mangioni. His plight could be viewed as attenuating circumstances, but not justification of a premeditated, cold-blooded murder.
So the President of United Healthcare is personally responsible for the alleged back pain of a guy who lives an athletic lifestyle on Hawaii. And not only responsible, but subject to being ambushed and murdered. What a sleazy defense of cold blooded murder.
He made the company significantly more profitable, in large part due to denying significantly more claims than before. Statistically speaking, if you serve 80 million people or so, with a 30% denial rate, even with a one in ten million chance of denying the claim of a real fanatic, you’d have more than 3 people out there gunning for you, a number large enough to result in murder. If he’d kept the denial rates to the industry standard of 17%, that would be about 1 person which is significantly less. Like the French revolution, the outcome was entirely predictable. The lesson here should be:”if you’re a health insurance ceo, don’t let your denial rates get out of control, it’s personally dangerous and bad for consumers”
Actually he had successful back surgery and wasn’t insured by this company. The only think comprehensive is your sheep bleating
Hard pass
I don’t think the Thompson murder has anything to do with class. It has everything to do with the nature of 21st century Western society, where the human being is largely faced with dealing with massive corporate entities to obtain the necessities of life, entities that are utterly faceless. They literally do not exist, in that they are legal fictions, and all the people who work for them are only very rarely held responsible for their actions. The people who ultimately own them (the shareholders) are given no responsibility for their actions, beyond the loss of their investment. Thus in many areas of life its one human being vs a monolith (which may be a private entity or a State owned one).
Its no surprise (to me at least) that someone could snap and want to murder someone, if they feel they have been screwed over by one of these companies, with no opportunity to gain any redress.
And I think the public reaction to the murder tells us something very significant as to the public’s underlying feelings – they are NOT happy about how things are. Sometimes an event happens that shines a spotlight onto some part of the public consciousness that had been entirely hidden from view. This is one of those moments.
IMO its high time that massive corporations were broken up into far more human scale entities. Where the gap between the management at the top and the customer at the bottom is far smaller. Otherwise you are literally creating the conditions where a violent revolution can spontaneously come into being.
No. The problems are mainly caused by interventions such as Obamacare. You are putting the blame in the wrong place, like Mangione. Read Allysia Finley’s Dec 8 WSJ piece: “UnitedHealthcare and the ObamaCare Con: The law’s mandates and regulations have given rise to myriad insurance-market grievances. That’s a good brief summary of the source of problems.
You are right about faceless bureaucracies but the problem is the biggest and most monopolistic bureaucracy of all, the government.
You are not happy so go out and murder someone. You are the nature of the 21st century that you bemoan and use to justify murder.
Or the alternative is the NHS, which has been getting some knocks over the last couple of decades.
Pay for your own goddamned healthcare, then. You don’t get everything for such a cheap price. Go out and pay cash in the market for healthcare.
What you are implying is that Mangione was a kid, who couldn’t get the help/operation from his Healthcare provider and snapped. But you are overlooking, that he came from a wealthy background and his parents very likely paid for his Healthcare and the top up. So there was no snapping… The real story is of a guy , who was frustrated with his admittedly bad fortune of having been born with a bad back, which got worse after a self inflicted surfing accident and the physical consequence of an operation afterwards.
I see it as a twisted intellectual blame game with people hooking on to it, making it all about a hero, who took on the big “faceless” health industry, overlooking, that he was a killer of an innocent father of two young children.
Journalistic malpractice.
Lee Siegel is a real idiot. And one looking to write some “meaningful” essay about something truly meaningless. A tortuous attempt to write yet another hermeneutics of quantum gravity. The asshole is not a folk hero, he is a disturbed murderer that needs justice: and execution.
That anyone could adulate and praise this murderer and suggest it is a justifiable assassination is grotesque beyond belief.
5x down ticks! I can only assume these are people who condone murder. Shake on you!
Lee Siegel is insufferable. First, the parallel evocation of Penny and Mangione is distasteful, given the gulf between the two cases. Second, the claim that public attention to such events is somehow uniquely American, a kind of key to the violent American psyche, is nonsense, as anyone who follows any modern nation’s press will recognize. Finally, the title is abhorrent. There is no real folk that will make a hero of this mixed up, immature fellow Mangione. It’s only a marginal clicque of spoiled kids with internet access.
Why do UnHerd’s editors run such bilge water? Seriously asking.
Hellooo???
Expect no answer from AI.
Seconded
Some useful insights and certainly helpful to know that we seem to have free deranged toff entitlement here rather than anything like revenge of the dispossessed. Resolution by violence is such an established generic American trope that gratuitous acts appear banal even to the perpetrators. That’s a predicament in itself.
But there should have been room to address another, briefly raised: the increasingly fruitless hunt for anyone prepared to take responsibility, public or private. Deeply troubling anywhere but a dilemma of consequence for a society supposed to turn on personal responsibility.
Is this an attempt to valorize murder? Somehow there is a sense that the Ivy League malcontent is to be lauded for killing the State U kid who became a CEO. If he is America’s everyman, the nation is doomed.
Bull! You know nothing about the average ordinary person. “Everyman” is a literary creation. This is pure prooaganda.
This article was glib. Poor job.
Bull! “Everyman” is a literary fake idea about ordinary people. Ordinary people want safe streets to travel to and from work everyday – not revolutionaries gunning people down in the streets.
One of the reasons the legacy media may be losing credibility could be its old-fashioned way of communicating biases, which the internet makes too obvious to ignore. The author mentioned everyone’s name but not their race except for one homeless “Black” man, whose race was noted but not his name.
Though it may seem like a small detail, when such patterns accumulate, they speak volumes and ironically support the very biases the author is trying to critique.
MAY be losing credibility???
My take is that Mangiome succumbed to the exclusive elitist gospel of reform common to the late 60’s “revolutionaries” who too sought out celebrity influencers (Fonda, Hoffman, Hayden, Hearst) to spark their particular brand of radical reform. Make no mistake, having achieved their goal his recruiters have since returned to the tall grass of academia.
>L The truth is, no one will ever understand why Mangione killed Thompson. Least of all Mangione.
Nonsense. We know precisely why. They say his manifesto is quite articulate. Siegel is the sort of person who can’t discern the motives of an Arab who shouts ‘Allahu akbar’ as he commences a massacre.
I groaned when I saw the author of this article. No more from Mr. Siegel, please. Surely UnHerd can find authors who are both insightful and capable.
I assume that the social justice ‘be kind’ crew have already knocked up some Che style t-shirts featuring their latest photogenic murderer Mangione. Just in time for Christmas.
What an odd take on this story! The whole problem here is that Mangione is not the dad-with-a-cancerous-child that we were all expecting. This son of privilege had no problem getting medical care, no matter what his insurance situation.
The search for a Daniel Penny of the left will have to go on.
Heard enough about Mangione and the ongoing analysis of someone who is clearly deranged, but not enough about his victim!
The murder was certainly senseless in the sense that Mangione killed the wrong target. First of all, no health system can give everyone everything they want. More importantly, the problem with sometimes dubious denials results primarily from Obamacare and other interventions in the medical marketplace. (See Alicia Finley’s piece on this at the WSJ on Dec 9 for those who don’t understand this).
The people praising his murder are almost certainly also people who voted for these destructive and distorting laws and regulations.
Why do they keep publishing articles from this guy?
It is ludicrous to say Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan did not have a “coherent motive” when they murdered the brothers Kennedy. They were both pursuing plain political agendas
That was certainly worth saying twice.
It is ludicrous to state Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan did not have a “coherent motive” when they murdered John and Robert Kennedy
Crocodile tears of an article. Well written to boot
Depending on your perspective? Are you f***** daft? How about, “depending on whether or not you’re a morally mature, emotionally stable and intellectually capable person of respectable character.” Isn’t that better?
Lee Siegel is a featherweight. Please banish him to an echo chamber somewhere remote.
Assassination has never changed the history of the world.
I seem to recall that the assassination of an Austro-Hungarian Archduke plunged the world into war.
Wow: what a bunch of junk journalism by Lee Siegel. The author says:
OMG, Siegel fantasizing about being a murderer and UnHerd prints it. Talk about smut journalism.
Oh, he has back pain–that is why he rode away on a bike and was calmly eating at a McDonald. Siegel is totally lost from reality in his murder fantasy.
another Unhinged essay from Siegel, divorced from reality.
More pseudo-intellectual gobbledygook from Lee Siegel. Never have I seen such a mishmash of literary and historical allusions—plus the kitchen sink—that manages to say absolutely nothing about American culture as it pertains to a garden-variety murderer like Mangione.
Most people don’t like insurance hassles and don’t like assassinations. All the rest is intellectual gas and media hype. This is a somewhat interesting case but hardly a matter of great importance.
Like other commenters, I find this article absolutely abhorrent – and on many counts at that:
-the subtitle: nearly proclaiming that Mangione is a hero we need, not a hero we deserve is highly disturbing
-omitting, tendentiously or due to ignorance, that Mangione embraced anti-capitalist ideology that, apparently, along with his back injury, made him feel entitled to kill
-comparing D. Penny with L. Mangioni speaks volumes about the author’s sheer incompetence and lack of moral compass: D. Penny had no intention to kill; more so, as an ex-Marine he must have been trained to know to what extent the force he applied was suppression rather than “a lethal chokehold” – an expression wrongly wielded by the dominant narrative and parroted by the author;
-even more so, Neely was still alive when the police arrived and they did not perform mouth-to-mouth CPR because Neely was dirty, smelly, obviously under the influence, and on top of all that, the police officers were afraid to catch HIV. The fact that N. was still alive after being subdued by D. Penny shows that D. Penny, most pobably, did not use lethal force;
The stories of D. Penny and L. Mangione are worlds apart and no one with a shred of decency would even try to compare them: D. Penny protected fellow passengers from a disturbed individual who had been arrested 43 times before finding his death. D. Penny had no intention to kiil, while L. Mangione believed that he was entitled to killing and killed Brian Thompson in a premeditated and cold-blooded manner, later shouting in the court that his arrest was “unjust”.
What a cheaply manipulative and cringeworthy article this was!
Can you please, PLEASE, stop using the word ‘elite’ as if it meant ‘member of an elite’? Elite is a COLLECTIVE noun. One person can’t be an elite any more than one insect can be a swarm. Especially disappointing to find a supposedly quality publication like UnHerd following this silly illiterate trend.
That’s an awful lot of words to say, precisely, what?
Just skipped straight to the comments because I thought this would be more leftist, vampiric, bloodthirsty drivel. The left really is irredeemably evil and must be destroyed at some point. The whining about the poor is just fashionable posturing designed to put a moral veneer on what underneath is just genocidal, nihilistic Marxism.
Given the photo of him as an obvious bodybuilder, back pain seems odd.
This essay is for me more confusing than enlightening.
I’m of the belief that this young man has a damaged brain. Whether damaged at the liberal schools he attended for years, or damaged due to bad wiring in his head, is for experts to determine.
I’m so dismayed by the lack of opprobrium deserved by killing an innocent husband and father. How have so many lost all sense of right and wrong?
Finally, a minor correction: “… who don’t seem guided by a coherent purpose, à la Oswald, Sirhan, and Hinckley,” there was a coherent purpose. Sirhan was a Palestinian who murdered Robert Kennedy for a perceived bias by America toward Israel.
Let’s get this straight. This was not an assassination. True political assassinations are rare. They usually involve complicated long term political conflicts and leaders who actually have the power to influence such conflicts. They usually involve organized groups, resistance movements, etc. I suppose one person can be an assassin on their own, provided the person they target is important enough and powerful enough, like the leader of a government or a prominent politician. This was not that. This was a murder. Lots of people get murdered for lots of reasons. The most common motives are money, jealousy, hate, anger, drugs, and gangs. Most murders are among people who know each other, often intimately, just interpersonal quarrels that spiral out of control.
It is less common, as any police detective will tell you, for people to kill complete strangers, and such cases are typically a result of mental illness and/or the acts of serial killers. It is difficult to imagine the motives some of these people might have. I consider myself practiced in the art of trying to see things from other points of view, but even I find it difficult to conceive of wanting to deliberately kill someone I hate, let alone a stranger. An insurance executive might indeed qualify as a generic ‘someone I hate’, or at least ‘someone who has chosen to work for a system I consider to be exploitative and evil’, but I struggle to make the leap to wanting to kill the person. Kaczynski is a proper comparison to this guy because at the end of the day, they’re just serial killers, and serial killers all tend to have bizarre motives that make sense only to themselves.
There’s no rational basis to believe this murder will have any political impact. United Healthcare will just replace this CEO who prioritizes money over health with another just like him who will behave in the exact same way. If by some mistake the next CEO did prioritize health over profit, the company would not make as much money and that CEO would be replaced. Mangione’s act of violence accomplishes nothing. It doesn’t resolve any problem. The person he killed has no real power over any of the issues he claims to care about. The system is the problem. The companies are the problem. One cannot murder even one company, let alone an entire system of them, with a handgun, a hatred of the American healthcare system, and a desire to kill but the serial killer has these things at hand. The CEO is the closest thing he can find that he can murder to satisfy himself. He has a hammer and so finds something that looks like a nail if he squints hard enough. Lots of Americans have handguns of course, and as large as that number is, I’ll bet even more hate the healthcare system than own handguns. What separates Mr. Mangione is his desire and willingness to use murder as the means by which he expresses his dissatisfaction. Most of us would be content to vote for any politician who advocates for that issue, run for office, write books, start a blog, or even make inane comments on media websites. Serial killers, though, are not rational. Let’s all be thankful we caught this guy on his first attempt, or we’d be reading about him killing someone else somewhere down the road, probably another insurance executive. Almost all serial killers have a consistent m.o. and a criteria for choosing victims. There’s probably a reason he picked this executive rather than a different one, and some analyst will probably explain it to us in a true crime documentary five years from now. At any rate, he’s just a serial killer regardless of his or anyone else’s delusions to the contrary.
At any rate, this one murder has gotten a disproportionate amount of attention. I don’t see it as being any worse or better than any other murders. It is an example of how the expectations are different for the wealthy and how elitism subtly works. We don’t put every black kid gunned down on the street on the national news. Is this CEO’s life worth more than theirs because he makes more money or he looks like what we think of when we think of ‘an average person’? That’s the only intersection of this murder with ‘elitism’.
It sounds cynical and therefore closest to the truth. The only thing I can add is that this guy was too lucky in life, and that’s why he broke at the first serious test (I mean spinal injury). Those who were hit harder by life earlier usually show more resilience.
Just a quibble. The Wicked Witch in Oz dies – at the end – by being melted, watered down, as it were; all that remains is her hat. The witch who is crushed by the falling house leaving only her shoes is her sister, and it happens at the beginning. Thanks for coming to my Pedant Talk.
The Wizard of Oz, Wicked, Gatsby, Lee – you are writing about real life – so try doing it without the prop of fiction. Fiction can’t be used as an extension of real life – only to understand it.
Another despicable piece from an awful pseudo
Oh my, how desperate we are to elevate or devalue someone’s actions and put a label on them. As if doing so goes some way to explaining America.
I find the haughty aspiration in the writings of Siegel to educate us in how we should think, especially since he has such good quotes, to be irritating and insincere.
How about we try this. There is good and evil in the world. What Penny did, regardless of the tragic outcome, was essentially good. What Mangione did, due to the tragic outcome, was essentially evil.
By the way, if some can claim Jordan Neely’s family have a right to retribution and remuneration, can we not apply the same to Brian Thompson’s family. Or are they the wrong color?
When the State is attacked by an individual, the State is ferocious in its response, usually inflicting life-destroying prison sentences. We should not be surprised if this encourages similarly ferocious efforts from individuals.
‘…….Trump archly, in order to (absurdly) demonstrate their working-class bona fides…..’
Well, oil beef hooked, you just don’t get it do you?