X Close

Trump’s plan to drain the swamp Washington's vested interests are rattled

All the President's men - and women. (Credit: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty)

All the President's men - and women. (Credit: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty)


November 27, 2024   5 mins

You would be hard pressed to find a bar in Washington D.C. where you’d find a group of people as ideologically diverse as Donald Trump’s cabinet. He’s got Tea Party veterans mingling with a Kennedy, a Teamsters ally, George Soros’s “protege”, and the former vice-chair of the Democratic Party.

And, yet, on the surface at least, D.C. is uncharacteristically calm. Some anti-abortion groups are agitating about Trump’s decision to nominate Robert F. Kennedy Jr to head up the Department of Health and Human Services, but on the Right, nothing inside the conservative movement resembles a “freak out” at all right now.

“It’s the end of Trump Derangement Syndrome,” says one insider, reflecting on the feverish resistance movement that sprang into action after the President-elect’s 2016 win, creating an arms race for anti-Trump donor cash and media attention. While there’s some “grumbling” about Kennedy and Trump’s pro-union pick for Labor Secretary, nobody wants to “step on the vibes”, one senior activist tells me.

The threat to K Street lobbyists is more obvious, but you wouldn’t know it from the outside. The Chamber of Commerce put out a polite statement congratulating Trump on his victory — after which the incoming President immediately started filling top posts with sworn enemies of the special interests the chamber represents. One long-time lobbyist I spoke with on Monday afternoon said K Street is “scared to death and not saying anything” for fear of retribution.

“The angel of death is hovering and they just want fucking lamb’s blood on their door,” the person added. Everyone is hoping the incoming administration “has bigger fish to fry” than their particular industry.

“Trump’s pledge to ‘drain the swamp’ of his enemies is more serious than ever before.”

There is no modern precedent for these nominees. Trump’s first cabinet ruffled no feathers in the Republican Party as he surrounded himself with known quantities with conventional worldviews. Remember Tom Price? Alexander Acosta? How about David Shulkin and Sonny Perdue? Most people certainly don’t, though it’s hard to imagine anyone will have forgotten about RFK Jr in 10 years’ time.

Even Trump’s more disruptive picks in 2016 were solidly on the Right, from the longtime donor and activist Betsy DeVos to Rex Tillerson, who was first recommended to Trump by Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates. Tillerson’s nomination even drew support from Dick Cheney.

But with a win in the popular vote and demographic winds shifting in his favour, Trump did the unthinkable this time around. This cabinet is a mix of bomb-throwers and GOP foot soldiers — slotting a fierce critic of government surveillance like Tulsi Gabbard next to John Ratcliffe, who is a staunch defender of controversial spy powers. If confirmed, Kennedy will rub elbows with Russell Vought, a longtime proponent of deregulation and cultural conservatism, and Chris Wright, a fracking executive.

Gabbard herself has said that Marco Rubio — nominated to lead the State Department — represents “the neocon, warmongering establishment of Washington, D.C.” As Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard’s sphere of influence would overlap significantly with Rubio’s. While Trump’s prior disagreements with his own nominees have been hashed out — and this is good enough for the GOP base — their disagreements with one another have not. How long the collective bunch will hold the peace is anyone’s guess.

But there is one thing that knits these characters together: their loyalty to Trump. It would be foolish to assume this will necessarily prevent discord and chaos. But perhaps these aren’t obstacles to success. During his first term, Trump openly said internal conflict was “the best way to go”, as news of fights between advisers such as John Bolton and John Kelly leaked into the press.

“It’s tough,” Trump said. “I like conflict, I like having two people with different points of view, and I certainly have that. And then I make a decision. But I like watching it, I like seeing it, and I think it’s the best way to go.”

This is not the way either major party has viewed presidential cabinets in the past; they were always considered places to park supportive ideologues. Even Barack Obama, elected on the mandate of “hope and change”, shied away from nominating Kennedy to head up the Environmental Protection Agency in 2008. Described by Politico at the time as a “well-respected climate lawyer”, a Chamber of Commerce lobbyist told the outlet that “a Kennedy appointment is as liberal as you can possibly get. There is no one [candidate] based firmer in extremes.”

Trump’s Republican Party today, in contrast, is one where Russia hawks Rubio and Michael Walz will have to share the stage with Moscow-friendly Kennedy and Gabbard. Pete Hegseth, a decorated veteran, activist, and Fox News host, will oversee the gargantuan Pentagon budget if he’s confirmed as Defense Secretary. He is a bitter opponent of the department’s bureaucracy who would gladly wave a wand and clean house. He will sit alongside Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Trump’s Teamsters-friendly Labor pick who is one of the only Republicans to have co-sponsored sweeping pro-union legislation and Kennedy and Gabbard, lifelong Democrats.

It’s hard to exaggerate how unusual it is for Democrats to find their way into a Republican cabinet, accept nominations alongside GOP ideologues, and be met with such little protest by most of the conservative movement. In the case of Kennedy and Gabbard, both were invited into Trump world not despite their unorthodox politics but because of them.

Not all of Kennedy, Gabbard, Chavez-DeRemer, and Hegseth’s views are truly subversive, though, and most of Trump’s nominees are ho-hum conservative standardbearers flavoured with a dash of MAGA. Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi followed Matt Gaetz as nominee to head up the Department of Justice. Former GOP Reps. Sean Duffy and Doug Collins were tapped to lead the Departments of Transportation and Veterans Affairs respectively along with a handful of other Republican loyalists. Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick will be familiar faces to Wall Street at Treasury and the Commerce Department.

But if Trump is their unifying belief, Trumpism will be defined by their clashing ideas. For outsiders, that’s an exciting prospect. For insiders, who’ve spent decades building the system and building their livelihoods around it, the prospect is deeply unsettling.

They fear that Trump and his deputies are plotting “retribution” and “mass” layoffs across the federal workforce. Brian Stelter reported this week that some journalists are genuinely anxious “about newsrooms being raided and media owners being audited”. At a recent gala for the Committee to Protect Journalists, Stelter notes one media CEO said, “journalists are being forced to hire their own security, for themselves and their families. And publications are setting aside massive legal budgets for the challenges we know are to come. It’s chilling.”

Journalists may not need private security, but legal protection could be critical. Trump has a long history of calling for leaders to pull the broadcast licenses of outlets that, as he sees it, report egregiously false information. Brendan Carr, Trump’s pick to head up the Federal Communications Commission, tweeted shortly after the announcement to say: “Broadcast media have had the privilege of using a scarce and valuable public resource — our airwaves. In turn, they are required by law to operate in the public interest. When the transition is complete, the FCC will enforce this public interest obligation.”

Trump, it is clear, has remade the GOP in his image, priming the party institutions to absorb “climate lunatics” such as RFK Jr — as one nonprofit leader told me this week — and to make peace with the politics of revenge. The transformation took eight years of pressure from the man and his voters. If anything, that level of compliance coupled with the utter demoralisation of the Democrats suggests Trump’s pledge to “drain the swamp” of his enemies is more serious than ever before.


Emily Jashinsky is UnHerd‘s Washington D.C. Correspondent.

emilyjashinsky

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
9 days ago

“Trump’s pledge to “drain the swamp” of his enemies is more serious than ever before.”
Slight correction: His pledge is to drain the swamp of OUR enemies, the forever-government apparats using the state as their own private fiefdoms.

AC Harper
AC Harper
9 days ago

‘Drain the swamp’ sounds less damaging than ‘Derail the gravy train’. But either is well overdue in my opinion. The only question is whether it has to be brutal or more measured.
Whatever happened to David Cameron’s ‘Bonfires’?

RR RR
RR RR
9 days ago
Reply to  AC Harper

Grenfell

AC Harper
AC Harper
9 days ago
Reply to  RR RR

A fair point – except it is far from clear that the presence or absence of regulation would have had a significant effect. My sour opinion is that no matter how many regulations are in place there will always be a few people willing to ignore them or the ignorant to dismiss them as too onerous.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
9 days ago
Reply to  RR RR

Grenfell occurred because noone understood the mathematics of the chimney effect. There was not a single engineer who understood combustion.

Anna Bramwell
Anna Bramwell
5 days ago
Reply to  RR RR

Diversity hire for the Lindon Fire Brigade, whose head told people living at the top floors of a building with no fire escapes to stay put: and was obliged to get a tall ladder from Surrey, hardly home of tower blocks.

Chipoko
Chipoko
9 days ago
Reply to  AC Harper

David Cameron was one of the worst Prime Ministers and Conservative Party Leaders we’ve had the misfortune to suffer in the UK. Whatever happened to his ‘bonfires’? Good question!

Mind you, as PM he was no worse than Major, May, Truss or Sunak. They together created the grave mess we are in today.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
9 days ago
Reply to  Chipoko

But be honest it was Blair that started it all and those idiots just carried it all on. He is the worst thing that ever happened to our country

Chipoko
Chipoko
6 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

I wholly concur. Blair was a posh, rich, private-schooled, Oxbridge cynic who took Britain to war with Iraq on the basis of a lie. His domestic policies created the solid framework for the horrendous Woke era, implemented with enthusiasm by Cameron and his numerous Tory successors; though the original foundations were laid by John Major, who instrodued political correctness into the UK.

Anna Bramwell
Anna Bramwell
5 days ago
Reply to  Chipoko

Certainly Truss did not.

Katharine Eyre
Katharine Eyre
9 days ago

Have somehow got sucked into a fascination with US politics and Emily and Megyn Kelly are my go-tos. Great work, ladies!
Watching Megyn get her potty-mouth on and take apart the mainstream media’s reporting on Pete Hegseth gives me hope that journalism (as opposed to the transparent activism dressed up as journalism that we’ve been fed for the last few years) isn’t dead.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
9 days ago

if nothing changes, then nothing changes. People can’t have it both ways – you cannot whine about the status quo and then whine some more that this bunch deviates from the status quo.
Also, can we please stop with the idiocy of RFK2 or Tulsi or whoever else being Russian agents.

Cecil Skell
Cecil Skell
9 days ago

“This is not the way either major party has viewed presidential cabinets in the past; they were always considered places to park supportive ideologues.”
But it served Lincoln–no slouch in the office–quite well. Doris Kearns Goodwin wrote a whole book on it.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
9 days ago
Reply to  Cecil Skell

Lincoln, Trump. I like it!

Ben Jones
Ben Jones
9 days ago

I’m just buying an epic quantity of popcorn.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
9 days ago

When people are facing execution, many, if not most, just quietly walk up to the gallows, or the chair, or w/e other method. They know it’s coming. They know they can’t escape. They no there’s no point in struggling or begging for mercy at this stage, so they simply quietly await their fate. I wonder if there isn’t an element of that attitude present in these suddenly quiet bureaucrats. Making a fuss can’t change what’s coming. It can only possibly make things worse. When people can’t salvage anything else, they can still keep their dignity.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
9 days ago

Please watch your spellings of proper names. WALZ was the surname of the Democratic vice-presidential candidate, the Republican/Trumpist prospect for his cabinet is Michael WALTZ.

Studio Largo
Studio Largo
9 days ago

I’m reminded of the famous baptism/settling scores sequence near the end of ‘The Godfather’. Tremble, little rats.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
9 days ago
Evan Heneghan
Evan Heneghan
9 days ago

God speed.

Mark epperson
Mark epperson
5 days ago

Three points:
-Seltzer and his ilk are finding out what Karma really means and it could be argued that he is beyond the bend mentally with these fearmongering accusations.
-The Cabinet, like Trump, actually loves America and Americans, and it is reflected in a diverse (the real meaning) selection of views and ways to help Americans, not only a select few. It will be interesting.
-DC is not a swamp, but a sewer, and has been for fifteen to twenty years. I really hope he can rid the system of the rats, which include politicians, almost all senior bureaucrats, seedy lobbyists, and the tech oligarchies power to censure.
Then, we can start rebuilding a country for all Americans, not the sleazebags that have been in power and care nothing for Americans, just themselves and their agendas
What are the odds?

Last edited 5 days ago by Mark epperson
Mark Kennedy
Mark Kennedy
5 days ago

Fortunately for people like Brian Stelter there’s no law against stupidity, hypocrisy, obstinate prejudice, and pathological inability to revise first opinions, nor against continually announcing these things to the world. One could almost wish that there were.

Katalin Kish
Katalin Kish
5 days ago

How very refreshing, how unexpected!
I can’t get enough of the energy this (almost) octogenarian orange man brought to the world! You might need to go on Twitter though, to really feel it.

Liakoura
Liakoura
9 days ago

“But there is one thing that knits these characters together: their loyalty to Trump. It would be foolish to assume this will necessarily prevent discord and chaos”.
Well it didn’t last time when Trump headed the league table by a country mile of his selected cabinet who were either fired or resigned.
Summary and analysis of “A Team” turnover in the Trump administration
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration/

michael harris
michael harris
9 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

Last time few or none of the recommended Washington ‘adults’ he hired had the slightest loyalty to him or any support for his policies or sympathy with his supporters.

Liakoura
Liakoura
9 days ago

“Rex Tillerson, who was first recommended to Trump by Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates. Tillerson’s nomination even drew support from d**k Cheney”.
After working for Trump and being fired by him, Rex Tillerson called Trump a “f*****g moron”
Donald Trump claimed to have an IQ a few points higher than Einstein.
“Virtually everyone who has worked with Trump has said that Trump was not only stupid but knows very little about anything! Gary Cohen, seen as one of the smartest guys on Wall Street, was, for a short time, one of Trump’s top advisors, said that “Trump had the IQ of a tanning bed” and that “he had never met anyone who knew so little about virtually everything”. Cohen ended up saying that “Trump was the stupidest man that he had ever encountered”!
Those closest to Trump had similar views, Rex Tillerson called him a “f*****g moron”, John Kelly called him “an idiot”, and “the most flawed person that he had ever met,” and his friend Steve Bannon said that Trump was, ”like an 11-year-old child”. By the way, one of the markers of intelligent people is their vocabulary, a fact that led one psychologist who tests students to claim that Trump’s vocabulary was at a grade 6 or 7 level.
Trump had his older sister do his homework, paid to have someone take his tests to get into college and then had his brother, who was friendly with the Admissions Officer petition him to get Donald into the University of Pennsylvania.
Trump paid a proxy to take the college entrance exam for him”
Trump’s niece Mary Trump, stated that Trump paid someone to take the SAT, an entrance exam used by most U.S. universities, in his place. The high score by the proxy who wrote the SATs got him into Fordham University. Yet, those who were in class with him said he was a slacker and a dummy, and he was anything but the brilliant student he claimed to be!
Trump is a guy who doesn’t read, has no interest in any type of intellectual pursuits of any kind, and was rated as really dumb by one of his profs; “William T. Kelley, who taught Trump at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed that “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had.”

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
9 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

twice elected president and built a multi-billion dollar company. But, sure, stupid. Seek help for your TDS.

Michael McCabe
Michael McCabe
9 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

Vocabulary should be appropriate to the audience. Trump has mastered that. He also plays 4D chess with imbeciles like you. He uses misdirection to divert their attention from what he needs to do. Sun Tzu and many other great strategists advised never to underestimate your opponent; the Democrats and pseudo-intellectuals did that, and here we are. All the people you mentioned have axes to grind or opposing views. Wind your neck in and watch the team he has assembled turn civilization away from the edge of the abyss.

Rocky Martiano
Rocky Martiano
9 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

So in your view anyone who hasn’t been educated at Oxbridge or Harvard shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near government. Your argument might have some merit if those well-educated elites who have been in power for decades on both sides of the pond hadn’t got us into the mess we’re in today.

Dave Canuck
Dave Canuck
8 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity, the US government will be taken over by the billionaire con men, they will drain the swamp and milk the system dry. And they will enrich themselves and leave most of the population hung to dry, the greatest con show in history is about to begin.

R.I. Loquitur
R.I. Loquitur
8 days ago
Reply to  Dave Canuck

“the greatest con show in history is about to begin.”

You’re wrong, it’s about to end. Thankfully.

John Galt
John Galt
6 days ago
Reply to  Liakoura

Wow it must really have sucked for the Democrats to have lost to the stupidest person to ever run for office. Twice.