Such storylines not only sidestep scrutiny of the failed policies of the past decade, but obscure a more vibrant history than these one-dimensional identity politics might suggest. The Mission’s past is rich with cycles of migration and economic growth.
Once home to indigenous communities, the land next saw the arrival of Spanish missionary explorers who gave the neighbourhood its name with the first Catholic church. The gold rush brought waves of Scottish, German, Italian, English and Scandinavian arrivals, migrants who built the ornately decorated Victorians that line the main boulevards. Successful merchants and traders constructed stately homes, while the business corridors of Mission were self-sufficient centres of commerce. Following the 1906 fire, the neighbourhood swelled with those displaced by the disaster.
The Irish arrived in large numbers by the turn of the century, filling its eastern factories and warehouses with working-class labour. St. Peter’s Church in the Mission — now one of the largest Spanish-speaking congregations in the Bay Area — was once a bastion of the strong Irish majority.
It was not until after the Second World War that many residents of European descent began moving out to be replaced by immigrants from Latin American countries. The Latino migration has its own storied and fascinating history, one that is vital to the Mission’s identity. It is a community that has welcomed asylum seekers and those displaced by foreign conflict, and produced wonderful Mission-centric food and music inspired by far-flung cultures. The Chipotle burrito is said to have been inspired by local taquerias.
Hernandez, to his credit, has helped organise the widely attended Carnival, a daylong parade displaying the many cultures that make up Latin America, an event that has become a signature festival of the community. And he has pushed for vital job training and arts programmes for Mission youth, efforts that should be applauded. Yet he myopically views the neighbourhood as a territory claimed by one racial group, to the exclusion of all else. The post-dot-com arrival of Asian and young entrepreneurs as well as artists of every ethnic background should be welcomed equally. The stubborn rejection of new housing and business is a race to the bottom, ignoring credible economic research which shows that depressing the housing supply actually raises housing costs.
Many fear that any new influx of residents might threaten the neighbourhood’s character. But such anxiety is fuelled by the same concerns over any ethnic change. For an ultra-progressive sector of San Francisco, the mindset is downright reactionary.
The mix and blend of cultures and backgrounds is what makes the neighbourhood unique. The grand Lutheran church on 22nd Street and the breweries on Potrero Hill were built by 19th-century German immigrants. Now, the church is a Buddhist temple and nunnery, and the largest local brewery was recently purchased by a yoghurt billionaire of Kurdish ancestry. The most popular Mission burritos now include a Filipino fusion variety. Among the most generous donors to philanthropy in the neighbourhood are software developers born to Taiwanese and Indian immigrants, as well as white Americans born in New Jersey and Illinois who now call San Francisco home.
The anger at the arrival of white neighbours is misplaced. Decades ago, the inverse arguments were made to denounce “white flight”. Such double-standards only serve to create a nasty racial barrier, where superficial differences take precedence over behaviour.
At a forum earlier this month, taking place at the Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts, the progressive candidates jostled for racial authenticity points, repeatedly reminding the audience of their Latino heritage and competing to fight the influence of outsiders, especially housing speculators and landlords. Hernandez opened his remarks with a nod to the venue, noting that he helped open this institution, a testament to his ethnic appeal.
Left unmentioned, though, were the venue’s humble roots. A century ago, it was Shaff’s Furniture Company, a small business run by German-Jewish immigrants who were known in the community for their relief efforts directed towards refugees fleeing pogroms in Eastern Europe. And here is the irony at the heart of the Mission’s politics. For a community so transfixed on identity, its representatives fail to appreciate the actual history and diversity of the neighbourhood. Focusing on ethnic scapegoats and powered by racial chauvinism, it is fiddling while the Mission burns.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIsn’t multiculturalism lovely?
Remember diversity is our strength
Bwaahahahaha!!!
It must be true. our cretin of a King and his son said so
If diversity was a strength Yugoslavia would still be a country.
And there would still be Greeks in Turkey, Christians in the Middle East and Germans in Eastern Europe
Hmm. I’m not sure mass ethnic cleansing, not to mention slaughter in many cases, has actually been preferable to the old Austro-Hungarian Empire!
The vast majority of countries in the world are in fact ethnically diverse, and every Empire has been. Of course Germany, Britain etc have chosen to be so much more recently, but for better or worse, there is no going back now.
If you think ethnic cleansing began with the end of Empire you need to read up on the 30 Years War.
‘The ugly xenophobia that has cropped up in certain corners of the GOP’ – What is he on about. Wanting a border, not wanting mass migration and recognising the need for social cohesion…is not ugly nor xenophobic. China is xenophobic. Western countries are the most open and welcoming socioeties in history.
Most naive you mean?
Yes …that’s what I mean
“depressing the housing supply actually raises housing costs”
Well, duh! Who’d have thought that the law of supply and demand was actually true!
and ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into failed homeless assistance programmes.
Why have these programmes failed?
Typically such programmes are at best well-meaning but hopeless and at worst a grift by ideologues intent at bolstering their own rewards, status and influence.
“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.”― Albert Camus
One can take a man out of a slum but not the slum out of a man; unless the man wants to change.
They always do. Why do you think?
and ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into failed homeless assistance programmes.
Why have these programmes failed?
“Because for the first time in recent memory, moderate liberals seeking pro-growth policies, less bureaucratic obstacles, and commonsense policing have organised and are pushing back.”
One of the most astonishing stories of the last few decades is how “moderate liberals”, and their rough UK equivalents the centre left, could not see that identitarianism would sooner rather than later come for them.
Too high on their own self-congratulatory sense of virtue, I expect.
It’s Alexander Kerensky all over again.
What breweries on Potrero Hill? I grew up on Carolina St south of 20th circa the late ’50s and early ’60sand there were no breweries. There was a cement plant, a cannery, and Projects on both the North and the South slopes of the Hill (O.J. Simpson lived in the South Hill Projects) but absolutely no breweries that I recall.
Racial differences aren’t ‘superficial’ and demography certainly matters greatly as we are seeing in Europe with The Great Replacement.
The reality of course is selective diversity, and the biases, of whichever identity group is in control, determine who passes the “diversity” test. White males need not apply.
‘The ugly xenophobia that has cropped up in certain corners of the GOP has an unusual cousin in an unexpected place.’ No not “an unexpected place” at all. Trendy Leftism has always been ugly, small-minded spite dressed up as “Love” and San Francisco has always been its epicentre. Its Lefty liberals ‘love’ everyone – all 8 billion of them – but with exceptions of course. Exceptions might be white people or males or the so-called ‘cis- gendered’. https://grahamcunningham.substack.com/p/love-of-the-people
So opposing unfettered immigration is instantly racism and xenophobia? Good lord. When a piece makes you defend San Francisco, that’s new ground.
People moving in and buying homes and businesses in an area is not “immigration”.
Right. “Immigrants” definitely don’t do anything that useful.
Progressives as reactionaries. Part of the global phenomenon of Left and Right swapping places.
Conquest’s 2nd Law of Politics, sc. any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing, could felicitously be generalised to state that any organisation avowedly dedicated to a set of principles P sooner or later dedicates itself to P’s opposites.
By way of examples, “conservatives” become radical, “liberals” become authoritarian, “anti-racists” become anti-White racists and outright Nartsies, “gay rights activists” coerce lesbians into having sex with men, and social workers, paediatricians and school teachers become advocates of sadistic paedophilia.
I lived in San Francisco from 1982 to 1989, and the Mission District was not Latino at all back then. Mission was largely empty with a lot of boarded up stores. I remember a pretty large and extremely beautiful old department store with very few customers.It was mainly white and black drug addicts. The Tenderloin was the really scary area. I got lost on Turk Street, one of the most dangerous street back then, and I managed to get lost on it. I was crying when two very scary punks rescued me . Anyway, I think most Latinos probably lived in the outskirts of San Francisco, which was working class back then. Also, since when is an Indigenous Latina named Jackie Fielder?
This racisssm — it goin round pretty good.
Scratch a revolutionary leftie’s surface, reveal a reactionary bully. S’always been the same.
I think Michelle Obama summed up demographic change in her autobiography, and how white people are to blame for changes to an area.
At an Obama Foundation Summit in October 2019, she spoke about how “upstanding families” like hers moved in, while “white folks moved out”.
She expressed a sense of injustice, stating that white families left “because they were afraid of what our families represented”.
In Chicago South Side, all the evil racist white people moved out and all the upstanding Black families moved in.
And then the place fell apart.
Baffling!
Ew, nasty comment.
What was it about Michelle Obama’s comments that you found so nasty?
‘ “I want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us.” And “you’re still running.”’
She went on to say that when white families moved out of Chicago South Shore , they ‘disinvested’….
Obviously, they should have left all their money back in South Shore for the incoming upstanding Black families to benefit from….
In Michelle Obama’s view, the bad people left and the good people moved in, which is why South Shore went into decline.
It was your response that I found nasty.
edited
“Racist!” It’s YOUR response to truth that repulses me.
How exactly?
Nasty or true, nasty and true, nasty and untrue? Be a little more specific Clare. There is a sociological reality there which black conservatives recognize – and there are answers….which mostly involve putting the black (and poor white) family back together and getting men to be husbands….. But its so much easier to hit out at whites…White flight? racist? Whites sticking around? RACIST!!! (because black Americans need their own space, safe spaces, graduation ceremonies, segregated dorms/sororities …don’t you know)….Whites moving in? RACISMMMMMMMM White supremacy….duhhh According to the Obamas and race-baiting democrats pretty much the only thing that whites can do to avoid being RACISSSSSST is to not exist…..to commit suicide….Even intermarrying to destroy any ethnically European (or which every of its national variants) ….that’s also RACISSSSST….. I’m a colour blind civic nationalist and a Catholic – the original and only true form of universalism…the one legitimate form of internationalism….. none of the above is a ‘black problem’. It is a leftism problem…a feminist problem…a woke problem….a Jacobin iconoclasm problem …a problem of secular materialism….a Labour problem….a Democrat problem. And it’s DEFINITELY an Obama problem, They did more damage to America than anything in the last 50 years…..singlehandedly re-racializing a society that was just about coming to terms with itself.
How I hate the word ” racism” ! Define this word?- What does it actually mean? I am an Italian Irish first generation born in England ” immigrant”… I am not as clever and talented as many Hindu and Jewish people.. doe this make me ” racist?” Just because I have a British Passport am I English? No, I am not, I am a product of my breeding….Being born in a stable does not make one a horse…
America is obsessed with racism at the moment. That means we in the UK have to be obsessed with it too. America needs a whole dictionary dedicated just to different genders now apparently, so I dread to think what their racism definition dictionary looks like.
I think we are pretty good at not lynching people based on race in the UK, better at it than America anyway. I feel like they could keep their issues to themselves better. For some reason their political clap trap crosses the Atlantic very quickly and gets rammed down our throats too.
Give me a name: Who was lynched in the US based on race? Other than white people in the wrong neighborhood.
It takes three generations to make a gentleman as the saying goes. To be a landed gentry one has to own a 1000 acres for a hundred years.
It is said that only true nobles are those entitled on the battlefield or in England pre 1485- nobility of the sword.
What made England, The Low Countries and Florence unusual was that there was far more upward social mobility than in other countries. Napoleon banned serfdom in the countries he ruled. Russia did not ban serfdom until 1860.
There used to be a monastery in Austria where one had to prove 200 years of nobility on both sides of ones parents to be a monk.
Progressives by defining a person based upon race, sexual orientation, etc are changing what made upward mobility possible; judging people on their achievements and rewarding accordingly.
If you are not careful we are going to return to the situation one is categorised by one’s ancestors or the Biblical saying , the sins of the father will pass to their children and their childrens children.
Irish Jockeys, Finnish and Swedish Rally drivers, East African marathon runners, New Zealand rugby players ( until recently), Different peoples are clearly good at different things…
Australian lovers.
‘Civilisation is incommunicable’ – Arthur De Gobineau.
The melting pot eventually becomes a melted country.
The elites set about turning the heat down on melting pot and ending assimilation decades ago. God forbid they have to deal with a unified, educated, motivated,working class brought up on the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and personal responsibility. If you want it to, it can work.
–
In San Francisco The Mission is a No-Go Zone. Residents stay in their “bubbles” which are highly diversified unconsciously and reflexively. These beloved neighborhoods are very copacetic, low/no crime, and well-maintained.
The victims of Mission’s intractable high crime, hatred, racism, gangs, prostitution, and insularity are always other Latinos. Could it be that SF’s ruinous Progressives have discovered Common Sense?
Keep your own people down. Always the outcome of lefty self-styled saviors. Instead of making it about race, call it what it is, class war. Now confront your moneyed lefty fellow travelers to get scraps from your elitist comrades. At the same time build up your selves and your children. Earn it. Then, in a generation or so you can buy or inherit the land and power from an effete, childless ruling class. But then, you’d be MAGA.
The ‘latinoism’ my be incoherent as it relates historically to this neighbourhood but the idea of sticking with your own is neither incoherent nor foolish. There is more to life than economic growth.
I lived in the mission district for 30 years and I still miss the monster $4 burritos that would last for 2 days. What I don’t miss are the drug addicts on the streets. I got mugged a couple of times in my neighborhood in broad daylight, and riding the always packed buses meant dealing with the inevitable hostility from stressed out passengers. For anyone to resist improving the mission district seems incredibly short-sighted.
I have heard similar comments made by left wing people. They ignore the fact that bad schools and street crime have the biggest adverse impact on the poor who cannot move out.
That sounds a bit snotty. I would have thought improvements would help everyone. As a member of the North Mission Association I Planted trees that are now as high as the rooftops and got a huge Mural painted on an old mission theater that probably doesn’t exit anymore. I wrote for the North Mission News, a small but powerful progressive neighborhood newspaper, and had a talk show on KPOO community radio that allowed me a platform for underserved voices. I lost my rent-controlled apartment and being homeless and unable to pay the highest rents in America, I was forced to find a home in another state that had affordable housing. While in San Francisco I worked as an undercover agent for Fair Housing, so please don’t assume that as a left-leaning woman I am elitist. Far from it.
So you were a pest to property owners until your ability to suck value out of their pockets ran out. Naturally you think YOU were the ones “underserved”.
I was astonishd when I have listened to left wing middle class people oppose improving a run down area and saying they like it ” Gritty “. I have also seen left wing councillors try to destroy an environmental charity which had improved an area. I have seen left wing councillors support planning for a fast food takeaway which dealt in drugs when it was opposed by the Police and the owners had threatened a woman resident.
Is that your response to all the personal facts that I shared?
I applaud the improvements you made and wish more people acted acted as you did. My experience is the improvements are often made by a very small proportion of the people living in the area.
When I lived in San Francisco, there were very few people with Spanish names. The Mission was not Hispanic. Massive Latin American immigration should not have been allowed. All illegal immigration should have been stopped in the 1950s
The Mission district was a lovely neighborhood with a Latin flavor and a very strong Americano mix of cultures and characters up until 2000. Sort of an artsy district. By 2010 it had drastically changed, post Kamala and George Gascón, now in LA.The number of Poles, Germans, Irish, Russians or even Chinese immigrants are now negligible when one considers the Mexifornization of the state and then the country. Some people think is a great demographical event others don’t.
Well, that same situation in every Mexican neighborhood in America. No progress, chronic underdevelopment, picturesque decay, four or five whites open little bars and antique shops without really changing anything, even I, a Hispanic not aboriginal, felt there like an ousider. By comparison Chinese neighborhoods are booming with banks, hotels, good schools, low crime and development. Why is this? Go ask a sociologist, a freethinker or an unbiased observer. Not a politician.
This author’s first sentence, stated matter-of-factly without backing, sourcing, or examples, turned me off of the rest of his “analysis”. Also, like unto other Unherd authors, he substitutes big words for big ideas; his vocabulary is too advanced for his topic, but by using words with 4-6 syllables, he snowballs his reader into thinking he is more clever than he really is.
My partisan knowledge of San Francisco is of its history as a Lesbian and gay homeland from the 60s onwards.Harvey Milk as an openly gay mayor, the changes that followed from that, the legal precedents being set… No mention of any of that here. Have they all gone?
What on earth are you talking about? Milk was never Mayor and there was no “legal precedent” preventing him from being one. Moscone was Mayor when the two were shot by Dan White. Milk was a Supervisor. Before Moscone was Alioto.
From 6000 miles and 50 years away, so sorry to have misremembered the nuances of municipal titles and processes.
Can you name who ran the GLC before Comrade Ken?