Jimmy Donaldson dropped out of a community college near his home in North Carolina at the age of 18 to crack one of the mysteries of modern life: what makes a video become a viral sensation on social media? Together with four similarly obsessed friends, he spent up to 20 hours a day studying the secrets of YouTube hits after becoming hooked posting footage playing games. The nerds analysed everything intensively: the algorithms, camera angles, lighting, pacing, thumbnails, viewer drop-off data. And clearly, the efforts paid off: today, eight years later, Donaldson’s MrBeast brand is the biggest star on the medium with 318 million subscribers. He is five times bigger than Taylor Swift on YouTube.
Take-off began with daft endurance videos, such as spending 40 hours counting to 100,000 and watching a bad rap video repeatedly for 10 hours. As his audience grew, so did the scale and vision of his videos: crashing a train into a pit, stranding himself on a raft at sea for seven days, surviving for 50 hours in Antarctica. Then he began making serious money from advertisers and sponsors, finding the appeal of spraying around cash after handing $10,000 to “a random homeless guy” while insisting “this is not clickbait”. The latest MrBeast video features 100 identical twins competing for $250,000. It has had 53 million hits in two days.
Donaldson’s videos are slick and his success has made him rich. Forbes estimated he earned $54 million in 2022 — and his numbers have kept on surging. His burgeoning media empire, reportedly worth $700 million, shows the rising significance of YouTube, now the most popular source of content for television viewers in the United States. But in recent weeks he has been buffeted by controversies with revelations of racist comments made as a teenager, teen grooming allegations involving a transgender (now dismissed) co-host, and the launch of a lawsuit by five women against his production company and Amazon over claims they “systematically fostered a culture of misogyny and sexism” during filming of the world’s biggest reality show contest with 1,000 people competing for $5 million.
This is damaging — and not just because it might hinder the Amazon tie-up that lifts Donaldson to another level. MrBeast is built on his brand of benevolent niceness, with profits supposedly going “towards making the world a better place”. Having started out as a typical YouTube goofball, he became an internet superstar with acts of outlandish altruism. He doles out cars, houses, islands and yachts as well as cash. His videos boast of adopting a South African orphanage, helping paralysed dogs run, building 100 wells in Africa, feeding 10,000 people for Thanksgiving, paying a salary to everyone in a Ugandan village for a year. They have eye-catching titles such as: “1,000 Blind People See For The First Time” and “We Brought Water to Kenya”.
This is performative philanthropy at its most cynical, glib and patronising, using disability and poverty as a platform to boost Donaldson’s own celebrity and wealth. His stunts promote the concept of simplistic solutions to challenging problems, wrapping the munificent American donor in a warm glow of benevolence as he drops in to spread a little of his MrBeast largesse to some lucky recipients. Inevitably, some charities have jumped on board — including, bizarrely, GiveDirectly, started by US economists to focus on data-driven interventions rather than more random MrBeast ideas such as “Giving 20,000 Shoes to Kids in Africa”.
Yet consider some of those stunts. Few things appeal more to well-meaning Westerners than needy orphans, so there is a boom business in unregulated and fake orphanages in poorer nations. Some are squalid, others fronts for abuse. Children are often lured from families with false promises of money, schooling or security. One recent Australian study examined this phenomenon of “orphanage trafficking” that “fabricated narratives” to attract funds from donors. Such concerns were raised by Lumos — a group founded by J.K. Rowling to end institutionalisation — with statements addressing MrBeast’s counterproductive focus: “Many orphanages across the world are set up to exploit children for profit, exposing children to harm and abuse. By promoting orphanages, even well-intentioned ones, we promote the work of those that are not, continuing the cycle of exploitation.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeInteresting and important essay IMO. I have much more contempt for the institutionalized NGOs that benefit from taxpayer money, and whose existence depends on preserving the problems they pretend to be solving. Mr. Beast sounds like a grifter, but at least he’s not employing an army of activists lobbying govt and institutionalizing the grift.
The faux charity is that practiced by the majority of NGOs. This article is enabling that on going many – $billions industrial grift. The author is blaming a guy who actually dies what he says, without government money, while ignoring the insane bs of the NGO industry.
He isn’t ignoring it actually – but it’s buried carefully away at the very end of the article here:
“Yet at the same time, Donaldson is exploiting less fortunate people’s problems to shape his image of decency, while reinforcing the aid illusion that has blown so much money and achieved so little over the past half century.”
OK, he doesn’t directly address the details of NGO and charity failures in the aid illusion.
But he does hit the bullseye on the NGOs:
“And these sorts of strategies paid off: former foreign secretary David Miliband pockets £1 million a year running the International Rescue Committee, which has recruited a stellar list of “ambassadors” and was handed at least £33 million from Britain last year.”
Let’s rephrase that another way: David Miliband takes £1m a year from money that should go to needy refugees.
Yes, a true socialist.
Nothing lies beyond the reach of its abuse.
Of course he’s being accused of racism and misogyny. That’s what happens to everyone in the US who gets too successful.
Very interesting article
“stunt philanthropy” and “aid illusion”. Sums it up perfectly.
It’s quite something that the former deputy editor on the Independent is apparently calling time on the aid industry.
That’s not to say that Mr. Beast may not be doing some good – and even have good intentions. But “stunt philanthropy” it still is.
This might indeed be better and more cost effective than some of the stuff NGOs and charities are doing.
But there are presumably better ways of getting the money, technology, skills and resources to places in Africa than through PR events. The real solution is when the Africans can – and do – do all this stuff for themselves. I can’t help feeling that every time we help out (and we’ve been trying for well over 60 years), we’re not really building up local skills and initiative.
So much about Mr. Beast and his appeal to children is super creepy. His best friend and costar was a young guy with a wife and child, UNTIL he decided he was a woman, abandoning his family. Then multiple young people accused him/her of grooming them through private chats, having inappropriate conversations, etc. YouTube for Kids is DANGEROUS.
Celebrities are self-serving sociopathic tw*ts. All of them.
Thankfully the Age of Fame is almost over.