A team member equally stays in touch with the deserter throughout their journey, guiding and advising them on safe paths. The route itself is mapped out in advance, assessing any potential risks and encompassing backup plans. In some cases, false identities are used to protect deserters.
This comprehensive approach is clearly popular. Within 48 hours of launching, Idite Lesom had over a hundred requests, with the first tangible success coming a day later. “We helped a person to leave the military office,”Chuviliaev recalls. “The police had forced him to report to them. He didn’t do it and contacted us instead, and we helped him escape.”
That was two years ago. Since then, the group has helped over 3,000 Russian soldiers escape the frontlines, and another 39,000 avoid conscription by offering legal, logistical and even psychological assistance. “If the war is to end,” Chuviliaev argues, “[the] Ukrainian army needs to be given all the support it can from the world, while the Russian army needs to weakened as much as possible.”
“The group has helped over 3,000 Russian soldiers escape the frontlines, and another 39,000 avoid conscription.”
Even without Idite Lesom, the Russian army faces a human resources problem. Despite a larger army than Ukraine’s, Russia’s war losses are significantly higher. Though Moscow has done its best to keep casualty figures secret, Ukrainian military sources estimate that at least 592,000 Russians soldiers have been “lost” as of mid-August 2024, even as some 120,000 may have died since the war began.
Sergei, like thousands of others, was conscripted by his country’s Ministry of Defence. He received his papers in early 2023, right out of prison, where he was awaiting trial on drug smuggling charges. “I was being framed,” he claims. In 2021, the erstwhile mechanic was picked up for allegedly carrying drugs for an acquaintance.
Detained and put in pre-trial detention, Sergei says he was interrogated for almost four months. Sometimes, his captors would beat him all night. “I would cry a lot, but I refused to testify,” he says, adamant that he wasn’t involved in distributing narcotics, a charge that threatened to destroy not just him but his family.
After his first court hearing, Sergei was visited by an investigator. “At first they tried to persuade me that if I [pleaded] guilty, I would receive a lighter punishment,” he says. Sergei refused the deal and was given a 15-year sentence in a penal colony.
In the meantime, as Sergei was coming to terms with his fate, his country’s president had begun his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Sergei watched in horror from his cell, as Russian troops marched into Ukrainian territory, laying siege to cities and burning settlements to the ground.
Sergei was opposed to the invasion: Ukraine was not Russia’s to take. But as Putin’s three-day operation quickly spilled over into weeks and then months, men in suits showed up at Sergei’s penal colony, offering contracts for military service in return for lighter sentences. Yet if it was packaged as a reasonable offer, Sergei said he and his fellow prisoners weren’t really given an option. In the end, he was recruited into a unit known as Storm Z, where Z is a reference to the first letter of the Russian word Zaklyucheny – inmate.
It is estimated that Russia has recruited over 100,000 convicts from across its penal colonies to fight in Ukraine. It is an accessible, often willing, pool of fighters, with prisoners ready to join Putin’s war in exchange for their freedom.
But it is not the only source that the Russians are recruiting from. Idite Lesom has received evacuation requests from soldiers representing a cross-section of society, notably political opponents.
“Sometimes they force the individual to sign the contracts, other times they sign it themselves, cheating them into joining,” says Chuviliaev. “Once, a journalist was offered a job with a local government agency writing press releases, but when he signed the contract, it was with the Ministry of Defence recruiting him to the frontline. They pull a lot of such tricks on people.”
Refusing to report to the frontlines after being conscripted can often bring serious charges — even for people with genuine excuses. Among the cases that Idite Lesom received, there have been people suffering from serious medical conditions like AIDS and cancer.
There have also been cases of foreigners who were deceived or otherwise forced to join the war. Chuviliaev describes the case of someone from Afghanistan, a student at the military academy when the Taliban took over. The man’s association with the previous government meant that he could not return to his native land for fear of persecution. “Unfortunately,” explains Chuviliaev, “he spoke poor Russian and when he graduated he was made to sign a contract with the Russian Ministry of Defence, and was sent to the front.”
He’s far from the only foreigner caught up in the fighting. Russia, after all, has been accused of recruiting nationals from a range of countries to fill its manpower gap. That spans everywhere from Cuba to Japan — even if, like the Afghan example, not every soldier is willing. In several cases, Indian conscripts have reported that they were lured to Russia on the false pretext of a job, with dozens of foreigners apparently dying in Putin’s army.
For Sergei, the lessons of his wartime experiences are clear: “We are disposable.” As part of an assault brigade, he was sent to an active minefield. “We were called the ‘openers’ — a reference to bottle openers — because we were sent ahead of other units to paint the exact routes without mines, and we did it with our bodies,” he remembers, the anger still clear in voice.
“Behind us,” he adds, “were ordinary men, civilians who were mobilised or radicalised to believe an agenda that this was right.” It’s no surprise, then, that Sergei felt lucky to have been injured — a small price to pay to escape the Ukrainian meatgrinder. All the same, his future remains unclear. He has two children back in Russia and yearns to be reunited with them. “I am a deserter and I have very few options [to work and live] available to me,” he concedes. “Right now, I am trying to earn enough money to send to my family back home.”
While Sergei managed to leave Russia, not everyone who ditches the army can flee. As Chuviliaev says, only 20% of people in Russia have foreign passports, and there are only three countries — Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan — they can visit without one. Of these, Belarus is a strong Russian ally and would therefore not welcome deserters, leaving only Armenia and Kazakhstan as viable alternatives. But the closeness of both these nations to Moscow means they could yet expel any exiled Russian guests. “And so,” Chuviliaev says, “many decide to stay inside Russia.”
Idite Lesom provides some deserters, notably those at higher risk of persecution, support with making applications for visas in safer countries. Unfortunately, the organisation hasn’t yet seen success on that front, though Chuviliaev is hopeful that some cases will be decided soon.
In the meantime, Chuviliaev says, deserters need continued help to avoid being caught, punished and sent to the frontlines as cannon fodder. “When we started our work,” he says, “the word ‘deserter’ was seen as something bad and dangerous. It was a slur or swear word to many. But now, more people see value in our efforts — it is a chance to fight Putin’s dictatorship.”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeGood to see someone in Russia is doing something useful.
“Negotiation depends on goodwill on both sides. I doubt the Russians as a people are capable of that.”
So not all Russians, right?
There are 144 million people in Russia. I am prepared to concede that there are a couple of hundred good ones (and I have always spoken well of the Late Mr Gorbachev).
Am I the only one who questions some of the casualty figures in this conflict?
592,000 Russian casualties.
120,000 Russian dead.
Really?
Ukrainian military sources. I’m sure the Russians will claim different, but why quote figures supplied by one side with an obvious, and not unexpected, bias?
What do you say the actual figures are?
I have no idea.
So the above figures could be broadly accurate then?
Or complete whack.
Obviously the Ukrainians have an incentive to exaggerate Russian losses.
The BBC/Mediazona effort typically found Russian casualties to be much, much lower than the numbers claimed by the Ukrainians.
“Among the troops, 106,000 were land forces, with the remainder comprising naval and air forces. In addition, 35,000 Russian-backed separatist forces and another 3,000 Russian forces were reported to be present in rebel-held eastern Ukraine.”
Above is from a quick search on Google. Now, the above figures could also be complete rubbbish and are taken from the start of the invasion.
But if these figures are even close then the figures quoted in the copy really make no sense at all.
Casualties can include wounded, not just killed
8.7 million battle casualties out of 27 million Russian dead in 1941-5. What makes anyone think 150,000 will make Putin change tack? They lost twice that the last time they fought over Kursk.
Oh for goodness sake… they were fighting tooth and nail to protect their homeland from being invaded by a (different) totalitarian regime. Now, they’re the regime doing the invading.
Try thinking before posting.
What makes anyone think that? Perhaps the fact that much lower casualties in Afghanistan contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, in part by producing opposition at home among the survivors (notably mothers). In general modern societies are far more willing to sustain casualties when acting in self-defense than when projecting force for any other national goal.
Putin’s biggest problem is not the odd deserter (every army has deserters) but, like the US in the Vietnam War and more or less everywhere else in the developed or semi-developed world since the 1960s, the middle class are opting out of wars. Zelenskyy has the same problem (about 1.5m Ukrainian males have either left the country or are refusing to serve).
Those sorts of issues are probably worse for the invaders than the invaded though.
It makes me happy to see someone doing the hard work to bring stories like this to light.
I don’t like having to admit it, but a few years ago I thought Vladimir Putin was a strong statesman who was leading his country through a successful national revival.
He had a lot in common with American right-wingers like me – he recognized that a country needs families and children more than it needs just about anything else, he clamped down on LGBTs in public life, he supported the Christian church as best he could, he was against globalization, and he had a pragmatic Middle East policy that focused on keeping his country safe while steering clear of the nonsense about spreading democracy. It seemed that the guy had his head screwed on tight, like he was the kind of leader we Americans could use more of… and yet at the end of it all, Putin failed to win the confidence of his people, or even to build governing institutions that could show basic competence in a time of crisis. Instead the corruption in Russia is so rampant and the morale is so bad that he’s spent two and a half years so far fighting this war that was supposed to be over in a matter of weeks.
I still see Putin as a tragic figure though – not a pure villain through and through, just a man not up to the challenges of his time. Putin’s criticisms of the west are mostly accurate – he was just too obsessed with the vices of his enemies to do the hard work of building up his own side into something that people would sacrifice for. It’s something I’ve written about a few times before, like in this piece:
https://twilightpatriot.substack.com/p/a-failed-bismarck-and-his-barbarians
If you look closely at the corruption in Russia, you might find Putin’s own fingerprints over at least some of it.