Yesterday, as the dust settled on another regional election in East Germany, commentators were quick to highlight yet another strong performance by the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW). In Brandenburg, the Left-populist upstart secured 13% of the vote — which was less than the Social Democrats (on 31%) and AfD (29%), but more than the Christian Democrats (12%). Not a bad result for a party that was founded exactly a year ago. But will its success turn into something more tangible?
In Brandenburg, the SPD won largely because its leader Dietmar Woidke, who is also the state’s governor, has very high favourability ratings. Woidke also bet everything on one hand: he announced ahead of the vote his intention to resign from office if the AfD won more votes than the SPD. He succeeded in turning the election into a binary choice, with most supporters of the CDU, Greens and others casting their lot with the SPD to defeat the AfD. But even so, the SPD only won decisively among the elderly, according to exit polls. All other demographics, most notably the youngest voters and those from a working-class background, broke clearly for the AfD.
Today, with the AfD out of the question as a coalition partner, Woidke’s SPD will now have to choose between securing a majority with the help of the CDU or the BSW. And immediately after the polls closed on Sunday, Woidke stated his preference for the CDU. The problem, however, is that the combined seats of the SPD and CDU are short of an absolute majority. In the end, it might be the BSW that will govern with Woidke — just as it may have to do in Thuringia following its election earlier this month, where secretive talks are being held between the CDU, SPD and BSW. Thus, Wagenknecht’s BSW might find itself in power in two of Germany’s 16 states less than a year after its official founding.
To many, this is a stunning result; after all, in its first year, the AfD didn’t even cross the 5% threshold in the Bundestag elections. But the BSW has something unique: the media-savvy Wagenknecht, who is the party’s main draw and regularly polls among Germany’s most popular politicians. The BSW’s co-chair Amira Mohamed Ali said on Sunday that the party would eventually get “a more neutral name” — but not until after next year’s federal elections which will determine the national government. Indeed, why rush it?
Exit polls in Brandenburg, Thuringia and Saxony showed that more than half of BSW voters cast their ballot for the party because of Wagenknecht personally. And her appeal is far from superficial. She shares with many Western populists a compelling rejection of the dying neoliberal order and all that it represents today: Nato expansion, censorship, open borders, transgenderism, and public health authoritarianism. And crucially, she has managed to maintain this platform while continuing to win voters from the Left.
Yet even so, the expectation when it launched last year was that the BSW’s ranks would swell far more than it has for now. Some polls suggested that enough voters found a Wagenknecht party appealing enough to catapult it into second place; instead, it now polls nationally in the low double digits. Has it reached its ceiling?
Interestingly, the BSW has not drawn as many voters away from the AfD as was once expected. Indeed, in the most recent state exit polls, only around a quarter to a third of BSW voters stated that the AfD may have been their alternative choice. This raises a question: could it be that populist voters, especially the deeply independent-minded ones of the former GDR, see through the move and just opt to vote for the original? After all, on immigration, Ukraine and identity politics, the AfD had taken similar stances — and years before the BSW came into existence. What, in the eyes of voters, does the BSW add there that’s new?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeSo to conclude, the centre parties stand for no change – more woke attitudes. (Can you say ‘woker’?) The Right and the Left stand for roughly the same things – reduce the Wokicity Index, control immigration, etc. There are only two differences – the Left wants more welfare spending and the Right less welfare spending and the Left has a big advantage in the appeal of the leader, Wagenknecht.
Because of the welfare spending and the appeal of the leader, the Left carries more Salonfähigkeit meaning, I think, that it is more fashionable at the moment with the educated middle classes. Also, I would say that those middle classes would shudder at the idea of being labelled ‘Right’. So what is new? Fashion changes quickly, the Salonfähigkeit will move to something else and the Centre Woke Parties will reign supreme.
Making deals with communists is like making deals with wolves, thinking that the wolves ate ok because they sort of look like dogs.
Has Sahra Wagenknecht already peaked? Only if she underplays her hand in negotiations with the legacy parties. .
Interesting piece coming on top of yesterday’s on Blue Labour. Of course, things are completely different under FPTP but if only we could speed things up a bit.
Sarah Wagenknecht’s BSW fits in a more general pattern on the left, To view her as a one off, a personality show of a somewhat more “Salonfaehige” AFD (=extreme right) is missing the bigger picture:
There are the “progressives” who believe in DEI/Woke/identity politics and climatism and appeal to academics in big cities and all kind of minorities: young, green, people of colour etc. This brand was first embraced by Obama.
But there still are the socioculturally conservatives and anti big capital lefts appealing to people far from the cities and also to small business owners. Jeremy Corbyn in the UK, Syriza in Greece, Podemos in Spain and also Bernie Sanders tried that. I would also classify Robert Kennedy in that camp.
In Germany the Linke was founded on that model but switched sides to the Wokies. So there is an open space left in Germany: conservative on questions of immigration and gender, less is more for supranational Europe, critical on NATO and the new German bellicism, climate pragmatism, uncompromising on freedom of speech, and critical of the neoliberal coalition of big business and bueraucrats. Why not? This is a legitimate position to take.
The answer to the question that forms the title of this article is ‘No’. Sahra Wagenknecht has high recognition, presents her arguments clearly, is good at sound-bites, is personable and smart (uncommon for politicians especially those on the left) and says a lot of what ordinary voters are thinking. No need to change the party’s name yet.
I would like to point out that it is precisely Salonfähigkeit that is clearly felt in the editorial policy of UnHerd and it is this that made me cancel my subscription to this site. I am not very fond of salon rebels. In Russian, this style is called “fig in the pocket”
PS. “Its Brandenburg party chief Robert Crumbach is now demanding that the Social Democrats come out in no unclear terms against the stationing of US long-range missiles on German soil if they want the BSW as partners” – In World War II, the Germans definitely had their balls cut off and forgot to sew them back on.
Does anyone here remember the story of the Pershing II?