They stand in a desert and call it levelling up. Credit: OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images
![](https://unherd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/guy-4-100x100.jpg)
It’s Saturday night on Middlesbrough High Street and a lager-soaked man called Dave is calling the Mayor of Teesside “a fucking wanker”. It’s not an unusual sentiment in these parts, where political apathy is particularly pervasive. Dave intervention, however, has a personal touch. For two months he worked for a company launched by Ben Houchen — a sportswear outfit called BLK that went under in 2018 with £3 million of debt.
Now, the Financial Times, Private Eye, The Yorkshire Post and many in Westminster have joined Dave in expressing concern about the character, business dealings and ability of a man once deemed the “rising star” of levelling up. Last week, their scepticism appeared vindicated when Michael Gove ordered a review into corruption allegations around one of the set pieces of post-Brexit Britain: the Teesworks development containing the country’s largest freeport.
Levelling up, like so many of the political visions of the last decade, appears to be dead. Once upon a time, before the ravages of inflation, pandemic and his own fall, Boris Johnson dreamt of a post-Brexit healing period driven by an era of high spending and devolution — a social transformation on the scale of the reunification of Germany. The rhetoric was always ambitious. But estimated costs ranged from £30 billion to £2 trillion — figures that never quite matched the Government’s own levelling-up budget of £11 billion, of which Labour claim 90% has not been spent, and from which seven in ten Conservative councillors say they have not seen any “tangible benefits”. And with this week’s revelation of another controversial “secret deal”, concerning Houchen and the transfer of public assets in Hartlepool, the events on Teesside now resemble a tragicomic final act for a British political era defined by exhausted ideas.
As in Nostromo, Joseph Conrad’s great saga of failed political idealism centring around a South American silver mine, the goal was to “bring this corner of the world into the new”. And Houchen’s vision is on a similar scale: to create a hub for global trade and the green energy revolution within one of Britain’s most neglected regions. In similarly Conradian fashion, the first sign of trouble on Teesside came in the form of epic metaphor. Two years ago, overnight like a biblical reckoning, a “Lobstercaust” of dead crustaceans washed up on its beaches. Immediately, this midden of rotting shell and claw was connected with Houchen’s project, rumoured to be the result of the poisonous chemical pyridine dredged up from the old steelworks. Concerns were waved away by Defra who judged the link “exceptionally unlikely”. Despite the portent, work on the site would go on.
The freeport, having replaced the second-largest blast furnace in Europe, is expected to make amends for decades of deindustrialisation, as well as provide up to 18,000 jobs. But further development on the old steelworks — now Europe’s largest brownfield site — has been suspiciously slow, and contains a toxic wasteland the size of Gibraltar. Until the £500 million clean-up costs are paid for, the development is worthless. Perhaps it’s unsurprising, then, that the deal that placed most of the site in the hands of two local businessmen — Chris Musgrave and Martin Corney — has become mired in controversy.
So far, they have made a profit of £45 million over the past three years, and there appears to be no evidence that they have invested back into the project. One green steel investor told the FT he had already walked away from the “amateur hour” project. And speak to enough people on Teesside and you can sense the frustration of a place seduced and betrayed by a decade of failed political visions. Brexit, on the terms of its chief visionaries, has failed. Levelling up has, too. Now the last outlet of hope gifted to the area in this strange era of failed politics is the freeport.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWhat is it about the top right section of England that leads to article after article appearing in Unherd where individuals are asked their opinion, like the cheap MSM way of doing “news” these days, whilst hand-wringing for Britain on their sense of loss and ennui?
In the past few months, we’ve had Newcastle, Durham and now Teesside trashed, and for good measure a bit further south, Boston.
Many areas in this part of the country are thriving and their inhabitants cheerful and optimistic. Others aren’t, and their inhabitants a bit despondent and pessimistic; rather like everywhere else then. Would it kill journalists and writers to at least try to provide some balance?
Despite knowing that town centre retail is dead, taking the High Street to the grave with it, they persist in hanging about the High Street and talking to the clueless and lost as if they know something.
Despite knowing that town centre retail is dead, taking the High Street to the grave with it, they persist in hanging about the High Street and talking to the clueless and lost as if they know something.
What is it about the top right section of England that leads to article after article appearing in Unherd where individuals are asked their opinion, like the cheap MSM way of doing “news” these days, whilst hand-wringing for Britain on their sense of loss and ennui?
In the past few months, we’ve had Newcastle, Durham and now Teesside trashed, and for good measure a bit further south, Boston.
Many areas in this part of the country are thriving and their inhabitants cheerful and optimistic. Others aren’t, and their inhabitants a bit despondent and pessimistic; rather like everywhere else then. Would it kill journalists and writers to at least try to provide some balance?
Freeports connected to a good national road/rail network (and roads are the more important part) can work well, but governments insist on tying the Green albatross around their necks, so they are doomed from the start.
Agreed, but when the main thrust of government policy is towards the effective de-industrialisation of the entire economy, successes will be few and far between.
Agreed, but when the main thrust of government policy is towards the effective de-industrialisation of the entire economy, successes will be few and far between.
Freeports connected to a good national road/rail network (and roads are the more important part) can work well, but governments insist on tying the Green albatross around their necks, so they are doomed from the start.
Some rando on the street purportedly calls his hapless mayor a “pound shop Trump” who has “delivered no jobs”. Yeeeeeeah. What would some guy in Northern England know about President Trump’s record on employment (which was at all-time highs, particularly for blacks and Hispanics)? I suspect the writer shoehorned in that little comment because one can’t engage in journalism without the requisite Trump dig. But, if the guy actually did say it, his ignorance can be blamed on the journalists required to produce Trump digs.
Quite right.
President Trump helped America build its strongest economy in history. Median household incomes rose to their highest level ever in 2019, while the poverty rate hit an all-time low. Under the Trump Administration, more Americans were employed than ever before-160 million-and the unemployment rate fell to a 50-year low. The unemployment rates for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and Americans without a high-school diploma all hit record lows, while the Trump “Blue-Collar Boom” saw wages grow faster for workers than for managers or supervisors.
We could do a lot worse than having our own Trump steering the economy.
Quite right.
President Trump helped America build its strongest economy in history. Median household incomes rose to their highest level ever in 2019, while the poverty rate hit an all-time low. Under the Trump Administration, more Americans were employed than ever before-160 million-and the unemployment rate fell to a 50-year low. The unemployment rates for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and Americans without a high-school diploma all hit record lows, while the Trump “Blue-Collar Boom” saw wages grow faster for workers than for managers or supervisors.
We could do a lot worse than having our own Trump steering the economy.
Some rando on the street purportedly calls his hapless mayor a “pound shop Trump” who has “delivered no jobs”. Yeeeeeeah. What would some guy in Northern England know about President Trump’s record on employment (which was at all-time highs, particularly for blacks and Hispanics)? I suspect the writer shoehorned in that little comment because one can’t engage in journalism without the requisite Trump dig. But, if the guy actually did say it, his ignorance can be blamed on the journalists required to produce Trump digs.
£500 million to develop the largest brownfield site in Europe sounds like a bargain compared to HS2.
And what we need is Enterprise Zones, not freeports. A freeport can be a small part of an Enterprise Zone, but an enterprise zone will never be part of a freeport.
£500 million to develop the largest brownfield site in Europe sounds like a bargain compared to HS2.
And what we need is Enterprise Zones, not freeports. A freeport can be a small part of an Enterprise Zone, but an enterprise zone will never be part of a freeport.
As Ronald Reagan used to say, “The most frightening words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.'”
Boris quite fancied himself as a messiah-figure, didn’t he? Full of bonhomie and vague promises, he left it to someone else to do the thinking and the organising to make good the promises.
Does anyone remember Heseltine on Merseyside? Heseltine made promises, but he put in the graft to make it happen – and that included knocking local heads together, to make them work as a team. Did it work? Up to a point. Liverpool is hardly a shining beacon of prosperity, but it’s not a basket-case either.
Are there any examples, anywhere in the world, of successful regeneration of a city or a region?
“Are there any examples, anywhere in the world, of successful regeneration of a city or a region?”
East Germany springs to mind, although admittedly, that’s a bit of a special case.
“Are there any examples, anywhere in the world, of successful regeneration of a city or a region?”
East Germany springs to mind, although admittedly, that’s a bit of a special case.
As Ronald Reagan used to say, “The most frightening words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.'”
Boris quite fancied himself as a messiah-figure, didn’t he? Full of bonhomie and vague promises, he left it to someone else to do the thinking and the organising to make good the promises.
Does anyone remember Heseltine on Merseyside? Heseltine made promises, but he put in the graft to make it happen – and that included knocking local heads together, to make them work as a team. Did it work? Up to a point. Liverpool is hardly a shining beacon of prosperity, but it’s not a basket-case either.
Are there any examples, anywhere in the world, of successful regeneration of a city or a region?
Freeports have been around, in one form or another, for years. The UK had them when we were in the EU, as recently as 2012, but the issue with them is there is no real evidence that they do any more than displace investment from one area to another, rather than encourage wider growth.
With this particular example, Private Eye has run a whole series of articles pointing out the crony capitalism element of it; enriching a few well connected people at public expense. A scam on the taxpayer.
The wider issue, though, is the model, the idea of ‘leave it to the market’ and a thousand flowers will bloom. The 2008 crash should have disabused us of this, but apparently not.
The state of our seas and rivers, where holidaymakers are noticing that they would be swimming in their own waste if they want to bathe has brought put the water companies under the spotlight, but also the question of whether privatisation delivered the better, cheaper service that was promised. With water, the involvement of private equity and foreign ownership has meant that billions of pounds has left the country in dividends, debt has been loaded on some companies while investment in infrastructure has suffered.
With the major economic powerhouses, US, EU, China, starting programmes of heavy investment, and changing the rules on state aid, the UK risks being left behind if we don’t at the very least question whether continuing with this economic model is the way to a better future.
Freeports have been around, in one form or another, for years. The UK had them when we were in the EU, as recently as 2012, but the issue with them is there is no real evidence that they do any more than displace investment from one area to another, rather than encourage wider growth.
With this particular example, Private Eye has run a whole series of articles pointing out the crony capitalism element of it; enriching a few well connected people at public expense. A scam on the taxpayer.
The wider issue, though, is the model, the idea of ‘leave it to the market’ and a thousand flowers will bloom. The 2008 crash should have disabused us of this, but apparently not.
The state of our seas and rivers, where holidaymakers are noticing that they would be swimming in their own waste if they want to bathe has brought put the water companies under the spotlight, but also the question of whether privatisation delivered the better, cheaper service that was promised. With water, the involvement of private equity and foreign ownership has meant that billions of pounds has left the country in dividends, debt has been loaded on some companies while investment in infrastructure has suffered.
With the major economic powerhouses, US, EU, China, starting programmes of heavy investment, and changing the rules on state aid, the UK risks being left behind if we don’t at the very least question whether continuing with this economic model is the way to a better future.
Dreadful attempt at a hatchet job from an obviously biased ‘writer’. Houchen still commands huge support from swathes of Teessiders, which is why Labour drones are doing all they can to discredit him.
Dreadful attempt at a hatchet job from an obviously biased ‘writer’. Houchen still commands huge support from swathes of Teessiders, which is why Labour drones are doing all they can to discredit him.
Levelling up was meaningless. All that could be done was to take money from the successful part of the economy and give to the weakest. End result would be more decline as the successful see their efforts being taken away and stop bothering..
Levelling up was meaningless. All that could be done was to take money from the successful part of the economy and give to the weakest. End result would be more decline as the successful see their efforts being taken away and stop bothering..
The mistake that people make is thinking the government actually cares and will follow through to make the project a success. Strong local mayors who are accountable to local voters and have control of their own revenue stream have to assume responsibility. Unfortunately, democratic structures in Britain offer no help as they often hinder, rather than help this process. Until this democratic deficit is corrected very little will improve.
The UK government could help with road and rail infrastructure investments but doesn’t; instead sinking huge sums into the essentially useless HS2 project.
The mistake that people make is thinking the government actually cares and will follow through to make the project a success. Strong local mayors who are accountable to local voters and have control of their own revenue stream have to assume responsibility. Unfortunately, democratic structures in Britain offer no help as they often hinder, rather than help this process. Until this democratic deficit is corrected very little will improve.
The UK government could help with road and rail infrastructure investments but doesn’t; instead sinking huge sums into the essentially useless HS2 project.
I would so love the ghastly lower middle class Tory MPs to endure a pub outing in this part of England where so many great, tough, noble Coldstream Guardsmen whom I was so priveliged to know, come from and face them after a few pints……and just wait for the ambulances to turn up and port the politicians to the nearest casualty department… actually no, that is unfair…. to the furthest possible casualty department.
“Nulli Secundus!”
“Nulli Secundus!”
I would so love the ghastly lower middle class Tory MPs to endure a pub outing in this part of England where so many great, tough, noble Coldstream Guardsmen whom I was so priveliged to know, come from and face them after a few pints……and just wait for the ambulances to turn up and port the politicians to the nearest casualty department… actually no, that is unfair…. to the furthest possible casualty department.