“The anti-American obsession: it’s all in me, I confess. America is terrifying. Its internal unbalances appear extreme (economic, cultural, racial), an unimaginable fragility. It concerns us closely as a mirror of the future — our future, if we still have one.”
Thus ran the closing paragraph of a letter the Belgian Sinologist Pierre Ryckmans — known under the pen name “Simon Leys” — wrote to his French friend Pierre Boncenne in 2008. As Leys admitted, French interest in the United States had an old lineage. Since the 1770s, thinkers such Alexis de Tocqueville, Joseph de Maistre, and Hector de Crèvecoeur had both been repulsed and attracted by the exploits of the post-revolutionary US. “America is often cited to us,” de Maistre exclaimed in the 1790s, but “I know nothing so provoking as the praise showered on this babe-in-arms. Let it grow”.
De Maistre’s coordinates began to shift towards the close of the 20th century. In the Eighties, French sub-intellectuals such as Bernard-Henri Lévy followed Tocqueville with immemorable memoirs such as American Vertigo. As an anti-Gaullist, Lévy clearly took a much softer stance on American civilisation than many of his countrymen. In the Forties, French novelist George Bernanos still saw the utopia imagined by Americans as “little more than some little Yankee boot-black eating his sugared peanuts — a half-Saxon, half-Jew, rat-faced prairie-dog with who-knows-what negro ancestor at the core of his itching marrow”. The only hero the Americans were capable of producing was the “future king of Steel, Rubber, Oil, the Truster of Trusts, the future master of a standardised planet, that god which the universe is awaiting, the god of the Godless universe”. Here was the American dream — a crazed nightmare from which France should wake up as soon as possible.
Today, this rabid anti-Americanism has given way to a more complex pattern of exchange. On top of its dollar stream and Hollywood movies, the US has been busily exporting its culture wars, from gender to racial justice to abortion debates. As Daniel Zamora has noted, these have redrawn cleavages along the way. The result has been a silent Americanisation on both sides of the political spectrum: Le Pen followers import Republican culture language about the dangers of “wokeness”, while Macron followers take their cues from Clintonism. After the Second World War, European reactionaries such as Bernanos worried that everyone would become American in a “positive” sense. Today, Americanisation continues through anti-Americanism: a “negative Americanisation”, where even the most rabid anti-Americans are as American as can be.
Jean Baudrillard’s America (1986) — a travelogue the philosopher compiled after a series of stays in the country in the late Seventies and early Eighties, spanning the end of the Carter presidency and the start of the Reagan years — does not stray in either direction. Instead of adulation, Baudrillard took a more forensic approach. He wanted to understand the US on its own terms. French resistance to Americanisation was not only futile, in his view, but also actively harmful. It delayed a reckoning with a distant mirror: like Tocqueville, one had to treat America as a sign of things to come, evincing a high tolerance of ambiguity without ever falling into declinism. Rather than allergically rejecting the US, Baudrillard asked: what is America the name of? What made this necessary?
Baudrillard drew on a much older tradition of French moralism with this approach. Since Montaigne, French philosophers have used the New World to relativise the prejudices of their own societies, but also to assert superiority. Patrician to the core, this latter attitude approached the US much like the Comte de Bouffon approached 18th-century America — a continent in which a humid climate induced permanent nervosity, an argument about New World degeneracy which motivated Thomas Jefferson to write his Notes on the State of Virginia (1785). France and America might have been twins, but they were not of the same age.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI’d say that the way to understand Yank-ology right now is to understand that we are going through a reign of terror / great purge / cultural revolution for the same reason as the French, Bolshevik and Maoist revolutions.
When the revolutions runs aground and Make Things Worse, the revolutionaries start searching everywhere for the dastardly enemy that wrecked the revolution.
That is what is happening here in the US in our cancel culture as the wokies search high and low for the enemies that are killing the climate and systematizing racism. Because, as you sophisticated Euros well know, there is no politics without an enemy.
See you all after the show.
I agree that there are parallels to the Reign of Terror in leftist corners, but in a rather mild way compared to 1790s France. There are also rising strains of hardcore ethno-nationalism on the American far right. But none of this bares more than a remote connection to any of the actual, full-scale revolutions/purges you cited, nor the fascist ones you overlooked.
How can a revolution that has never happened and remains aspirational among would-be revolutionaries already have moved into post-revolutionary aftermath?
Even so, I acknowledge that we’re in a overheated climate of vilification and outrage here, and that both ideological zealots and those who oppose them behave in ways that can mirror major violent conflict. I’m still hopeful the temperature can be lowered before real American carnage is ramped up to a far bloodier level, with many of the surviving losers nursing a bloodthirsty grudge for ages.
Two points:
1. It is not the first time America moved from phase one to phase three, missing out the important middle bit (full scale revolution). Gandhi regarded America as the only major nation that moved from savagery to decadence without the customary period of civilization on the middle!
2. American carnage is everywhere (except for the US itself) with a death toll in the many mllions all around, not unlike ancient Rome’s bloodthirsty campaigns in Gall, Spain, Cartage etc.
1) A clever quip that dismisses all Indigenous Americans as savages and ignores the rude civilization of early European refugees to these shores–not all were brutal or stupid.
2) Anti-American Exceptionalism on steroids: not only is the influence of American a complex net-positive or net-negative, but the world would be some kind of comparative wonderland if it went away or had never existed. And Gaul and Carthage…really?! The U.S. is not in a period of territorial expansion and has done very little of that (across seas) in its history, unlike Rome or Britain at its height.
We export our largely garbage culture and intervene elsewhere almost at will, true, but those intrusions are often requested or agreed to. In other words, even anti-Americans often welcome military aid in an existential crisis, and no one is required by law to consume our junk food and crass entertainment.
That said, I get that there’s a lot that’s contemptible and repugnant about the country I live in, sometimes to an exceptional degree. Here’s where I mention my Canadian young-childhood years and dual-citizenship and try to seem different or special in a good way.
If people want US help, that’s fine. If they get threatened if they refuse it, that’s when it’s time for that bunch of global bullies to have Operation Shock N Awe take place in their own homeland.
You lot need to learn what being bombed repeatedly feels like.
You had national hysterics post 9-11.
You don’t really have very big Cojones, do you?
Nice job to reduce a nation to a set of nuts, refer to 330 million people as “you” and “you lot”, regard them as interchangeable with the national government, and recommended that we need to get bombed into our senses.
Do You have any more lessons in manhood or good-faith argumentation to share? Enjoy your Sunday evening.
I guess the kicking you got in Vietnam (despite the 3,000,000 mostly innocent Vietnames deaths) was a good enough lesson.. though I’m still not convinced you learned from it. A further million annihilated in Iraq to rid it of nonexistent WMDs and your expeditions in Libya, Somalia.
Maybe Rhys Jagger is right? If you were to be incessantly bombed like you do all around the world you might behave differently?
What if I held you individually responsible for every Sinn Fein bombing, priestly abuse, and stereotypical Irish drunkard? I wouldn’t, but that’s a lot like the way you rant away and point your digital fingers at me man. Troll-like and unhinged in tone.
My last response to you is this: the Vietnam War was a tragic mistake with massive repercussions including an accelerated breakdown of the social order (such as it was) in the US–it couldn’t hold and had to change but it happened too fast.
But was the US involvement and body count in both World Wars something you have any respect for, at least to feed your seeming appetite for American deaths?
They are behaving differently: they’re not bombing Russia.
What if I held you individually responsible for every Sinn Fein bombing, priestly abuse, and stereotypical Irish drunkard? I wouldn’t, but that’s a lot like the way you rant away and point your digital fingers at me man. Troll-like and unhinged in tone.
My last response to you is this: the Vietnam War was a tragic mistake with massive repercussions including an accelerated breakdown of the social order (such as it was) in the US–it couldn’t hold and had to change but it happened too fast.
But was the US involvement and body count in both World Wars something you have any respect for, at least to feed your seeming appetite for American deaths?
They are behaving differently: they’re not bombing Russia.
I guess the kicking you got in Vietnam (despite the 3,000,000 mostly innocent Vietnames deaths) was a good enough lesson.. though I’m still not convinced you learned from it. A further million annihilated in Iraq to rid it of nonexistent WMDs and your expeditions in Libya, Somalia.
Maybe Rhys Jagger is right? If you were to be incessantly bombed like you do all around the world you might behave differently?
Huh? Huh? Huh?
Nice job to reduce a nation to a set of nuts, refer to 330 million people as “you” and “you lot”, regard them as interchangeable with the national government, and recommended that we need to get bombed into our senses.
Do You have any more lessons in manhood or good-faith argumentation to share? Enjoy your Sunday evening.
Huh? Huh? Huh?
I agree with much of what you say, but wonder about the significance of territorial expansion in the modern world. Has the US ceded such ambitions to China in favour of other forms of dominance? After all, in today’s world, space on the map is secondary to other forms of domination (and is more politically acceptable). The US government doesn’t even need to win space on its own map, much less outside its borders. I’m open to being convinced otherwise.
I suspect you know more about geo-politics than I do (I might be pretty tuned-in for an American–a very low bar). I certainly don’t think the US should try to get away with territorial expansion, either from an ethical or strategic standpoint.
We need to get along with one another much better here in the US instead of trying to export our self-vaunted aspirations and systems around the globe. And if we do manage to fall less short of our ideals here at home, we should still learn to “play well with others” around the world, which is something I think we deserve low marks for on the whole.
Sorry; no marks.. in fact a negative score. Your exploitation, murder, mayhem, regime toppling, installation of corrupt regimes and cruel sanctions etc is so reprehensible it fully deserves the term Great Satan.. no matter how sanitised and MSM-supported it is. Happily it’s over, or almost.
Sorry; no marks.. in fact a negative score. Your exploitation, murder, mayhem, regime toppling, installation of corrupt regimes and cruel sanctions etc is so reprehensible it fully deserves the term Great Satan.. no matter how sanitised and MSM-supported it is. Happily it’s over, or almost.
You people need to get out more. Really! Where to start? The US controls NATO, which gives it immense influence over Western Europe, with military bases holding around 60 thousand active-duty US troops in Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Then there are multiple bases in Japan, South Korea, Australia (my country, which is currently being pressured to cede more of its sovereignty by housing increasing numbers of US troops and aircraft, buying US nuclear-powered submarines and integrating itself into US military forces, doubtless under US military direction), and the Pacific and Indian Oceans with another 100 thousand or so troops, not to mention Bahrain and UAE with 8 thousand troops, plus scattered garrisons throughout the world. Then there are the extensive covert forces that exist to pressure, interfere with and even topple governments – democratic or otherwise – that don’t quite see the US point of view as clearly as they could. Add to this military might US cultural industries and continuing economic influence through the globally dominant US dollar, and you see US imperial power, or, as it’s rather cutely called, “the rules-based international order”. While US democracy might be in decline, it clearly has no intention of ceding territory, which may end up being a chilling formulation for the rest of the world.
You put it perfectly!
Germans campaigned vehemently against the removal of American troops from its soil, when Trump suggested it. There has to be agreements from governments to be occupied. It seems to take two to tango.
Oh, Tony Walker! As a fellow Australian I suggest that you pull your head in. I find your anti-American clap-trap quite repugnant. Tell us how you feel about the United States making war on Ukraine, or reclaiming shallow reefs in international waters to set up military bases? Oh, I forgot. That is not the U.S. it is other countries!
You put it perfectly!
Germans campaigned vehemently against the removal of American troops from its soil, when Trump suggested it. There has to be agreements from governments to be occupied. It seems to take two to tango.
Oh, Tony Walker! As a fellow Australian I suggest that you pull your head in. I find your anti-American clap-trap quite repugnant. Tell us how you feel about the United States making war on Ukraine, or reclaiming shallow reefs in international waters to set up military bases? Oh, I forgot. That is not the U.S. it is other countries!
I suspect you know more about geo-politics than I do (I might be pretty tuned-in for an American–a very low bar). I certainly don’t think the US should try to get away with territorial expansion, either from an ethical or strategic standpoint.
We need to get along with one another much better here in the US instead of trying to export our self-vaunted aspirations and systems around the globe. And if we do manage to fall less short of our ideals here at home, we should still learn to “play well with others” around the world, which is something I think we deserve low marks for on the whole.
You people need to get out more. Really! Where to start? The US controls NATO, which gives it immense influence over Western Europe, with military bases holding around 60 thousand active-duty US troops in Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Then there are multiple bases in Japan, South Korea, Australia (my country, which is currently being pressured to cede more of its sovereignty by housing increasing numbers of US troops and aircraft, buying US nuclear-powered submarines and integrating itself into US military forces, doubtless under US military direction), and the Pacific and Indian Oceans with another 100 thousand or so troops, not to mention Bahrain and UAE with 8 thousand troops, plus scattered garrisons throughout the world. Then there are the extensive covert forces that exist to pressure, interfere with and even topple governments – democratic or otherwise – that don’t quite see the US point of view as clearly as they could. Add to this military might US cultural industries and continuing economic influence through the globally dominant US dollar, and you see US imperial power, or, as it’s rather cutely called, “the rules-based international order”. While US democracy might be in decline, it clearly has no intention of ceding territory, which may end up being a chilling formulation for the rest of the world.
1. I do not regard Native Americans as savages at all! Mostly highly civilised peoples. It is the genocidal settlers and slavers that were the savages!
2. America’s imperialism is far greater than any other imperialist nation in world history. Yes, very few military conquests but these are unnecessary in the 20/21st centuries. It is easier to control vassal states in other ways, eg by toppling democratically elected govts, installing corrupt puppet regimes all over the world and imposing sanctions are any that don’t toe the line. Exploitation of those corrupt regimes is easy; you only have to enrich the top 0.1% and supply sophicated weapons to ensure the general population is crushed into poverty. The British have been doing this via neo colonialism ever since its colonies gained apparent independence.
The US has almost 1,000 military bases all over the world to enforce its hegemony. Only naive, brainwashed Americans could possibly think otherwise.
3. Any nation unwilling to consume American garbage and give up its resources is invaded or bombed into the stone age! Iraq is one but not the only example. A million dead including half a million children.. all worth it according to Madeline Albright.
4. Gaddafi was deposed because he started a Pan-African currency to rival the global dollar.. and Libya bombed and destabilised to drive home the message.
5. Now the BRICS+ nations have to be brought to heel for the same reason starting with Russia (Ukraine is just canon fodder) and China is to follow because they too are sick of the US’s greedy Unipolar world system of US hegemony.
6. But the US’s “America first”, near civil war, corrupted ¹democracy and hollowed out production capability (except for military hardware and computer technology) will probably see the decline of the US Empire quite soon..
7. To prevent that happening the US 0.1% are planning a nuclear war which they are convinced they can survive while the 99.9% (that’s all you naive, gullible idiots and us innocents btw) will all be toast.. that is regarded as preferable to the US losing its world dominance. No point in trying to explain that to you though is there?
That was a nice fantasy. No truth to it, though.
Haha! Yes, you really should retire from trying to convert me to your lunatic perspective. Rest content in your certainty that even the most misinformed Irishman has a better understanding of America than any American does–with the charitable exception of perhaps one in ten million.
You’re delusional. And incurable.
Liam O’Mahony: See my reply to Tony Walker. I put you both in the same boat with your ant-American views. Far from toppling governments, the U.S. handed back control of Afghanistan to the Taliban (stupid move), and could not even change the government of Venezuela which is virtually in its back yard. Nor was it the U.S. that toppled Gaddafi; indeed Obama the U.S. president at the time was stupidly approving of the “Arab Spring” uprisings against Gaddafi and other Arab despots. (That went well in Syria, did it not?)
That was a nice fantasy. No truth to it, though.
Haha! Yes, you really should retire from trying to convert me to your lunatic perspective. Rest content in your certainty that even the most misinformed Irishman has a better understanding of America than any American does–with the charitable exception of perhaps one in ten million.
You’re delusional. And incurable.
Liam O’Mahony: See my reply to Tony Walker. I put you both in the same boat with your ant-American views. Far from toppling governments, the U.S. handed back control of Afghanistan to the Taliban (stupid move), and could not even change the government of Venezuela which is virtually in its back yard. Nor was it the U.S. that toppled Gaddafi; indeed Obama the U.S. president at the time was stupidly approving of the “Arab Spring” uprisings against Gaddafi and other Arab despots. (That went well in Syria, did it not?)
Overseas is doing a lot of work there.
The US is a world empire. Pelosi going to Taiwan is a claim on Taiwan. The hysteria on Ukraine shows that the US feels itself being invaded by Russia though Ukraine was not an ally of the US, or in NATO. The hysteria is because the US firmly believes that everywhere is a vassal state of the US. The monroe doctrine explicitly states that for South America.
The big problem though is American ideology, which wants the world to look exactly like the US, neoliberal and multicultural. Hence the anger with socialist Venezuela and “whites supremacist” Hungary. Both are in opposition to the global American empire.
If people want US help, that’s fine. If they get threatened if they refuse it, that’s when it’s time for that bunch of global bullies to have Operation Shock N Awe take place in their own homeland.
You lot need to learn what being bombed repeatedly feels like.
You had national hysterics post 9-11.
You don’t really have very big Cojones, do you?
I agree with much of what you say, but wonder about the significance of territorial expansion in the modern world. Has the US ceded such ambitions to China in favour of other forms of dominance? After all, in today’s world, space on the map is secondary to other forms of domination (and is more politically acceptable). The US government doesn’t even need to win space on its own map, much less outside its borders. I’m open to being convinced otherwise.
1. I do not regard Native Americans as savages at all! Mostly highly civilised peoples. It is the genocidal settlers and slavers that were the savages!
2. America’s imperialism is far greater than any other imperialist nation in world history. Yes, very few military conquests but these are unnecessary in the 20/21st centuries. It is easier to control vassal states in other ways, eg by toppling democratically elected govts, installing corrupt puppet regimes all over the world and imposing sanctions are any that don’t toe the line. Exploitation of those corrupt regimes is easy; you only have to enrich the top 0.1% and supply sophicated weapons to ensure the general population is crushed into poverty. The British have been doing this via neo colonialism ever since its colonies gained apparent independence.
The US has almost 1,000 military bases all over the world to enforce its hegemony. Only naive, brainwashed Americans could possibly think otherwise.
3. Any nation unwilling to consume American garbage and give up its resources is invaded or bombed into the stone age! Iraq is one but not the only example. A million dead including half a million children.. all worth it according to Madeline Albright.
4. Gaddafi was deposed because he started a Pan-African currency to rival the global dollar.. and Libya bombed and destabilised to drive home the message.
5. Now the BRICS+ nations have to be brought to heel for the same reason starting with Russia (Ukraine is just canon fodder) and China is to follow because they too are sick of the US’s greedy Unipolar world system of US hegemony.
6. But the US’s “America first”, near civil war, corrupted ¹democracy and hollowed out production capability (except for military hardware and computer technology) will probably see the decline of the US Empire quite soon..
7. To prevent that happening the US 0.1% are planning a nuclear war which they are convinced they can survive while the 99.9% (that’s all you naive, gullible idiots and us innocents btw) will all be toast.. that is regarded as preferable to the US losing its world dominance. No point in trying to explain that to you though is there?
Overseas is doing a lot of work there.
The US is a world empire. Pelosi going to Taiwan is a claim on Taiwan. The hysteria on Ukraine shows that the US feels itself being invaded by Russia though Ukraine was not an ally of the US, or in NATO. The hysteria is because the US firmly believes that everywhere is a vassal state of the US. The monroe doctrine explicitly states that for South America.
The big problem though is American ideology, which wants the world to look exactly like the US, neoliberal and multicultural. Hence the anger with socialist Venezuela and “whites supremacist” Hungary. Both are in opposition to the global American empire.
Christ! Where did you go to school Liam, you silly old Commie?
Gall? Cartage???.
Incidentally it was Georges Clemenceau who made that observation about the US, sometime before that ridiculous old pervert Gandhi.
Otherwise how is Lusitania?
Jeez I’m upvoting Charles….better go and lie down.
Shut up Charlie..
Jeez I’m upvoting Charles….better go and lie down.
Shut up Charlie..
That quote is also attributed to Oscar Wilde.
In that case all three of them got it right. I add myself to make it 4!
In that case all three of them got it right. I add myself to make it 4!
1) A clever quip that dismisses all Indigenous Americans as savages and ignores the rude civilization of early European refugees to these shores–not all were brutal or stupid.
2) Anti-American Exceptionalism on steroids: not only is the influence of American a complex net-positive or net-negative, but the world would be some kind of comparative wonderland if it went away or had never existed. And Gaul and Carthage…really?! The U.S. is not in a period of territorial expansion and has done very little of that (across seas) in its history, unlike Rome or Britain at its height.
We export our largely garbage culture and intervene elsewhere almost at will, true, but those intrusions are often requested or agreed to. In other words, even anti-Americans often welcome military aid in an existential crisis, and no one is required by law to consume our junk food and crass entertainment.
That said, I get that there’s a lot that’s contemptible and repugnant about the country I live in, sometimes to an exceptional degree. Here’s where I mention my Canadian young-childhood years and dual-citizenship and try to seem different or special in a good way.
Christ! Where did you go to school Liam, you silly old Commie?
Gall? Cartage???.
Incidentally it was Georges Clemenceau who made that observation about the US, sometime before that ridiculous old pervert Gandhi.
Otherwise how is Lusitania?
That quote is also attributed to Oscar Wilde.
Two points:
1. It is not the first time America moved from phase one to phase three, missing out the important middle bit (full scale revolution). Gandhi regarded America as the only major nation that moved from savagery to decadence without the customary period of civilization on the middle!
2. American carnage is everywhere (except for the US itself) with a death toll in the many mllions all around, not unlike ancient Rome’s bloodthirsty campaigns in Gall, Spain, Cartage etc.
I think a better way to describe this is to say that, thanks to digital media, US elites have lost their monopoly on mass communication and therefore their ability to create consensus without coercion.
The choice now – and it’s the same across the West – is starkly between democracy and totalitarianism. What happens in the US over the next few years will decide the outcome for all of us.
Isn’t that overblown, not to say simplistic? Firstly, the idea of democracy itself is hardly an uncontested one. What happens when there is a clash between representative democratic institutions and a referendum result, such as Brexit? In Britain we usually have the concept of untrammelled parliamentary sovereignty, so this eventuality was always going to pose huge difficulties. Those politicians setting up the referendum thought they would win it; otherwise they probably wouldn’t!
Then we have the rather obvious fact in the US that losers increasingly call foul on the system when they lose, eg Trump. By the way, in a pure numerical democracy, Trump would have not come close to winning (the popular vote) in either 2016 or 2020. But of course the (very conservative) Founding Fathers were very suspicious of democracy and ‘mob rule’ and quite deliberately introduced non-democratic elements introduced into the Constitution. We have the increasing phenomenon of ‘democracy’ being shouted entirely transactionally when it happens to suit a particular political side. This even gets extended to a faintly ludicrous demand for ‘internal party democracy’ so that the wider electorate gets foisted with patently useless candidates such as Jeremy Corbyn or Liz Truss chosen by unrepresentative political activists. We don’t run every business, research institution or hospital as a ‘democracy’ so we need to understand when it is important democratic principles should apply, and when not.
As to living under totalitarianism, well, I would say that no one who actually had had any experience of doing so, with the horrors that entailed, would agree. It seems to be quite easy to find any number of ‘anti-woke’ commentators for example out there. Governing, academic and even business institutions have certainly been putting their thumbs on the scales, but that falls well short of ‘totalitarianism’. Of course some political systems, such as Singapore’s, explicitly do tilt the scales, but they aren’t usually described as ‘totalitarian’.
There is undoubtedly a dominant and rather illiberal ‘woke’ ideology now being strongly promoted in the US and elsewhere. But it isn’t mainly the government. Big Tech has a lot of power and it will fight like anything to hold onto it, including what looks rather like joining a Faustian pact to promote woke while the Left ceases to threaten it by breaking it up. It seems to me that something like that seems to have happened since the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement – where did that go?!
The most frietening words ever spoken are “we’re from America and we’re here to help”. Just tell them thanks but no thanks!
Nice take on Reagan’s quote. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” If Germany hadn’t eviscerated their domestic energy supply and dismantled their military then maybe Europe could have deterred a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Western Europe under Herr Merkel seemed to think there were no longer any security threats left in the world.
Yes, to a large extent that is probably true. She thought mankind had evolved beyond barbarism, silly woman. A glance at American aggression all over the world should have taught her different! But being white, Christian and devoid of oil she may have thought Germany (and the EU) were immune?
Europe would have not had to deter any invasion by Russia, because Russia wouldn’t have the resources to finance any conflict – if it wasn’t for the Germans paying for the invasion through cheap energy supplies contracts that is…
Yes, to a large extent that is probably true. She thought mankind had evolved beyond barbarism, silly woman. A glance at American aggression all over the world should have taught her different! But being white, Christian and devoid of oil she may have thought Germany (and the EU) were immune?
Europe would have not had to deter any invasion by Russia, because Russia wouldn’t have the resources to finance any conflict – if it wasn’t for the Germans paying for the invasion through cheap energy supplies contracts that is…
You just cribbed Reagan’s ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.
Many have tried to their cost! Look at Cuba!
So can we be reimbursed for the Marshall Plan? And while you’re at it can you tack on the $100 Billion dollars American taxpayers are forking over to the Ukraine….yet, another European war….jeeshh
Nice take on Reagan’s quote. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” If Germany hadn’t eviscerated their domestic energy supply and dismantled their military then maybe Europe could have deterred a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Western Europe under Herr Merkel seemed to think there were no longer any security threats left in the world.
You just cribbed Reagan’s ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.
Many have tried to their cost! Look at Cuba!
So can we be reimbursed for the Marshall Plan? And while you’re at it can you tack on the $100 Billion dollars American taxpayers are forking over to the Ukraine….yet, another European war….jeeshh
Another example of malleable democracy is to be seen in NI.. Unionists were 100% in favour of majority rule (with scant regard further 49%) when they, had 51% of the vote but that all faded when the more fertile RC nationalists became the 51%. Suddenly democracy is no longer valid!
The Catholics of NI are:- “Dediticii”.
Shut tf up Charlie!
Shut tf up Charlie!
The Catholics of NI are:- “Dediticii”.
Just a note that losers have been claiming fraudulent presidential elections in the US since 2000. Gore, Kerry and Hillary in 2016. Trump was the illegitimate president, elected by Russian intelligence. Sadly for her the world now knows that her campaign funded Steele dossier and the “Russian-collusion” that paralyzed Congress for 3 years
I applaud this forceful yet nuanced reply.
A small point. Organisations are rarely run on aurthorative (totalitarian) lines these days. Instead a general consensus between the various “stakeholders” (owners, managers, unions, contractors and customers; and sometimes govt) exists.
And so consultative and even consensus models appy instead; in other words firms ARE far more “democratic” than you might imagine. The armed forces are exceptions of course.
The most frietening words ever spoken are “we’re from America and we’re here to help”. Just tell them thanks but no thanks!
Another example of malleable democracy is to be seen in NI.. Unionists were 100% in favour of majority rule (with scant regard further 49%) when they, had 51% of the vote but that all faded when the more fertile RC nationalists became the 51%. Suddenly democracy is no longer valid!
Just a note that losers have been claiming fraudulent presidential elections in the US since 2000. Gore, Kerry and Hillary in 2016. Trump was the illegitimate president, elected by Russian intelligence. Sadly for her the world now knows that her campaign funded Steele dossier and the “Russian-collusion” that paralyzed Congress for 3 years
I applaud this forceful yet nuanced reply.
A small point. Organisations are rarely run on aurthorative (totalitarian) lines these days. Instead a general consensus between the various “stakeholders” (owners, managers, unions, contractors and customers; and sometimes govt) exists.
And so consultative and even consensus models appy instead; in other words firms ARE far more “democratic” than you might imagine. The armed forces are exceptions of course.
You can hardly describe the 2 party Teedledum : Tweedledee political arrangement in the US as a “democracy” surely? It is clearly government of the people by the WEF oligarchs via bought and paid for puppet politicians. Other ‘Western’ countries are perhaps closer to democracy but none is fully worthy of the name. The people’s needs are of secondary consideration at best another only to provide bread and circuses!
I’d change “democracy” to “self-government” but otherwise I agree.
My recollection is that February 2014 was Europe’s last clear chance to maintain the boundaries between Brussels and Langley. The EU went all in with Langley.
There will be no revolution in the US just collapse along the lines present by Kenneth Clarke in the first episode of Civilization.
No, it won’t. Everyone outside the USA has the absolute right to expel all US citizens and all US diplomatic representation from their country if they so wish. They can cleanse their entire nation from US presence.
If 50 nations did that in a co-ordinated manner, I’m telling you now that the USA isn’t going to bomb all of them.
They only bomb defenceless nations that can’t fight back.
‘Only’? You haven’t been paying attention.
They would probably use neighbouring countries to do the bombing for them after they supply the necessary bombs.. I’m trying to think of an example where that kind of war by proxy is operated by the US? Anyone know of a good example?
‘Only’? You haven’t been paying attention.
They would probably use neighbouring countries to do the bombing for them after they supply the necessary bombs.. I’m trying to think of an example where that kind of war by proxy is operated by the US? Anyone know of a good example?
America will soon collapse in a civil war, caused due to it being the World’s most corrupt (set of) nations.
That will not be the cause! If anything that will hold it together (as it has done for decades). Rather it will be the revolution to counter that corruption that will contribute to the civil war; that and rampant racism, and wokism and Qanon and the lizards and the paedophile baby eating and stuff like that!
Best comment ever. That sounds pretty close to me.
Best comment ever. That sounds pretty close to me.
That will not be the cause! If anything that will hold it together (as it has done for decades). Rather it will be the revolution to counter that corruption that will contribute to the civil war; that and rampant racism, and wokism and Qanon and the lizards and the paedophile baby eating and stuff like that!
Scarily true!
I don’t disagree ..fundamentally. However you use the term “democracy” loosely I fear. A two party, Tweedledum-Tweedledee state with gross gerrymandering, vote denial and twisting of the popular vote hardly counts as a democracy does it? ..especially when both parties are in the pay and so under the thumb of big business and the military industrial alliance!
Isn’t that overblown, not to say simplistic? Firstly, the idea of democracy itself is hardly an uncontested one. What happens when there is a clash between representative democratic institutions and a referendum result, such as Brexit? In Britain we usually have the concept of untrammelled parliamentary sovereignty, so this eventuality was always going to pose huge difficulties. Those politicians setting up the referendum thought they would win it; otherwise they probably wouldn’t!
Then we have the rather obvious fact in the US that losers increasingly call foul on the system when they lose, eg Trump. By the way, in a pure numerical democracy, Trump would have not come close to winning (the popular vote) in either 2016 or 2020. But of course the (very conservative) Founding Fathers were very suspicious of democracy and ‘mob rule’ and quite deliberately introduced non-democratic elements introduced into the Constitution. We have the increasing phenomenon of ‘democracy’ being shouted entirely transactionally when it happens to suit a particular political side. This even gets extended to a faintly ludicrous demand for ‘internal party democracy’ so that the wider electorate gets foisted with patently useless candidates such as Jeremy Corbyn or Liz Truss chosen by unrepresentative political activists. We don’t run every business, research institution or hospital as a ‘democracy’ so we need to understand when it is important democratic principles should apply, and when not.
As to living under totalitarianism, well, I would say that no one who actually had had any experience of doing so, with the horrors that entailed, would agree. It seems to be quite easy to find any number of ‘anti-woke’ commentators for example out there. Governing, academic and even business institutions have certainly been putting their thumbs on the scales, but that falls well short of ‘totalitarianism’. Of course some political systems, such as Singapore’s, explicitly do tilt the scales, but they aren’t usually described as ‘totalitarian’.
There is undoubtedly a dominant and rather illiberal ‘woke’ ideology now being strongly promoted in the US and elsewhere. But it isn’t mainly the government. Big Tech has a lot of power and it will fight like anything to hold onto it, including what looks rather like joining a Faustian pact to promote woke while the Left ceases to threaten it by breaking it up. It seems to me that something like that seems to have happened since the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement – where did that go?!
You can hardly describe the 2 party Teedledum : Tweedledee political arrangement in the US as a “democracy” surely? It is clearly government of the people by the WEF oligarchs via bought and paid for puppet politicians. Other ‘Western’ countries are perhaps closer to democracy but none is fully worthy of the name. The people’s needs are of secondary consideration at best another only to provide bread and circuses!
I’d change “democracy” to “self-government” but otherwise I agree.
My recollection is that February 2014 was Europe’s last clear chance to maintain the boundaries between Brussels and Langley. The EU went all in with Langley.
There will be no revolution in the US just collapse along the lines present by Kenneth Clarke in the first episode of Civilization.
No, it won’t. Everyone outside the USA has the absolute right to expel all US citizens and all US diplomatic representation from their country if they so wish. They can cleanse their entire nation from US presence.
If 50 nations did that in a co-ordinated manner, I’m telling you now that the USA isn’t going to bomb all of them.
They only bomb defenceless nations that can’t fight back.
America will soon collapse in a civil war, caused due to it being the World’s most corrupt (set of) nations.
Scarily true!
I don’t disagree ..fundamentally. However you use the term “democracy” loosely I fear. A two party, Tweedledum-Tweedledee state with gross gerrymandering, vote denial and twisting of the popular vote hardly counts as a democracy does it? ..especially when both parties are in the pay and so under the thumb of big business and the military industrial alliance!
Let’s hope so!
Identity politics was a diversion from the Occupy Wall Street campaign. Its origins were orchestrated by those who wanted to hide how Obama’s 2008 campaign was financed by Wall Street and on whose behalf Obama agreed to kick millions and disproportionately African-Americans out of their homes on behalf of his paymasters in the financial industry. BLM came to the fore as an attempt to shore up the A-A vote for an old, white woman who had learnt her politics sitting at the feet of a former KKK recruiter. It was then re-energised to return the White House to the Democrats in 2020. No prizes for guessing when it will peak again. The so-called Culture Wars are an attempt by the elite to distract the American people from the realisation that they are living under a military dictatorship which can ‘lose’ $2trillion of arms and no one in the MSM mentions it.
I dont believe the $2trn is lost. It’s just too embarrassing to say where the weapons went. Probability to both sides in ever conflict the world over? They gotta be tested right? And I dare say every sick, degenerate, corrupt regime is also a recipient. To be fair probably a lot was sold the blackmarket to augment military salaries? All in all a paper trail would be a no-no right?
I dont believe the $2trn is lost. It’s just too embarrassing to say where the weapons went. Probability to both sides in ever conflict the world over? They gotta be tested right? And I dare say every sick, degenerate, corrupt regime is also a recipient. To be fair probably a lot was sold the blackmarket to augment military salaries? All in all a paper trail would be a no-no right?
As fantastical & hyperbolic as this essay comes across, the current ‘cancel’ culture & wokeism in the USA has been fueled by French philosophers, Michel Foucault & Jaques Derrida. Rather funny that. Moreover, the writer describes Europe as if it has had no will of its own (the ‘Prince Harry Syndrome’), yet it was Germany who inadvisedly shut down its nuclear reactors in reaction to its own home-grown green movement, creating its own energy problems. You never hear them tapping Norway for oil; EU officials would rather deal with Qatar in corrupt fashion. It was Europe that had the utopian vision of creating a United States of Europe – the ‘EU’ – in reaction to its two world wars (which the USA helped it win…). How’s that working out? Brexit anyone? Don’t get me going about Merkel’s “Wir Schafflen Das!”, letting millions of immigrants into EU – many of them Muslims, who will never integrate into a Christian society – it’s more likely that they will take over the region by a higher birthrate. And it’s Ireland and Holland who are shutting down farms and killing off livestock, while a number of Dutch farmers have made their way to the USA to begin again. I could go on and on – but it seems like Europe has created its own brand of crazy.
Surely the Muslims (you seem to dislike so much) have already taken over in the UK? Have you looked at the government faces recently? It seems they’re a good deal smarter and more successful than the lazy, work shy white Christian natives?
FYI Ireland has a much higher % immigrant population than the UK.. and like you we owe much of our prosperity to them; unlike you we welcome them and they do assimilate. Their religious faith is a private matter.
How many British immigrants are there is other countries who refuse to assimilate? They don’t even learn the language fgs! Yes I know, you call them expats but technically they are all immigrants.
Well said. And as to Merkel – I’ve long had a sneaking suspicion she was really working for Putin. These are the major indicators: Grew up in communist East Germany, spoke Russian, got along well with Putin, shut down Germany’s nuclear reactors for no discernible reason (Fukushima had no chance of occurring there), then made the country and its industry utterly dependent on Russian gas; I wonder if the Germans have heard of an offense called TREASON?
Surely the Muslims (you seem to dislike so much) have already taken over in the UK? Have you looked at the government faces recently? It seems they’re a good deal smarter and more successful than the lazy, work shy white Christian natives?
FYI Ireland has a much higher % immigrant population than the UK.. and like you we owe much of our prosperity to them; unlike you we welcome them and they do assimilate. Their religious faith is a private matter.
How many British immigrants are there is other countries who refuse to assimilate? They don’t even learn the language fgs! Yes I know, you call them expats but technically they are all immigrants.
Well said. And as to Merkel – I’ve long had a sneaking suspicion she was really working for Putin. These are the major indicators: Grew up in communist East Germany, spoke Russian, got along well with Putin, shut down Germany’s nuclear reactors for no discernible reason (Fukushima had no chance of occurring there), then made the country and its industry utterly dependent on Russian gas; I wonder if the Germans have heard of an offense called TREASON?
Nice comment.
The enemy is us. The enema is the cure!
I agree that there are parallels to the Reign of Terror in leftist corners, but in a rather mild way compared to 1790s France. There are also rising strains of hardcore ethno-nationalism on the American far right. But none of this bares more than a remote connection to any of the actual, full-scale revolutions/purges you cited, nor the fascist ones you overlooked.
How can a revolution that has never happened and remains aspirational among would-be revolutionaries already have moved into post-revolutionary aftermath?
Even so, I acknowledge that we’re in a overheated climate of vilification and outrage here, and that both ideological zealots and those who oppose them behave in ways that can mirror major violent conflict. I’m still hopeful the temperature can be lowered before real American carnage is ramped up to a far bloodier level, with many of the surviving losers nursing a bloodthirsty grudge for ages.
I think a better way to describe this is to say that, thanks to digital media, US elites have lost their monopoly on mass communication and therefore their ability to create consensus without coercion.
The choice now – and it’s the same across the West – is starkly between democracy and totalitarianism. What happens in the US over the next few years will decide the outcome for all of us.
Let’s hope so!
Identity politics was a diversion from the Occupy Wall Street campaign. Its origins were orchestrated by those who wanted to hide how Obama’s 2008 campaign was financed by Wall Street and on whose behalf Obama agreed to kick millions and disproportionately African-Americans out of their homes on behalf of his paymasters in the financial industry. BLM came to the fore as an attempt to shore up the A-A vote for an old, white woman who had learnt her politics sitting at the feet of a former KKK recruiter. It was then re-energised to return the White House to the Democrats in 2020. No prizes for guessing when it will peak again. The so-called Culture Wars are an attempt by the elite to distract the American people from the realisation that they are living under a military dictatorship which can ‘lose’ $2trillion of arms and no one in the MSM mentions it.
As fantastical & hyperbolic as this essay comes across, the current ‘cancel’ culture & wokeism in the USA has been fueled by French philosophers, Michel Foucault & Jaques Derrida. Rather funny that. Moreover, the writer describes Europe as if it has had no will of its own (the ‘Prince Harry Syndrome’), yet it was Germany who inadvisedly shut down its nuclear reactors in reaction to its own home-grown green movement, creating its own energy problems. You never hear them tapping Norway for oil; EU officials would rather deal with Qatar in corrupt fashion. It was Europe that had the utopian vision of creating a United States of Europe – the ‘EU’ – in reaction to its two world wars (which the USA helped it win…). How’s that working out? Brexit anyone? Don’t get me going about Merkel’s “Wir Schafflen Das!”, letting millions of immigrants into EU – many of them Muslims, who will never integrate into a Christian society – it’s more likely that they will take over the region by a higher birthrate. And it’s Ireland and Holland who are shutting down farms and killing off livestock, while a number of Dutch farmers have made their way to the USA to begin again. I could go on and on – but it seems like Europe has created its own brand of crazy.
Nice comment.
The enemy is us. The enema is the cure!
I’d say that the way to understand Yank-ology right now is to understand that we are going through a reign of terror / great purge / cultural revolution for the same reason as the French, Bolshevik and Maoist revolutions.
When the revolutions runs aground and Make Things Worse, the revolutionaries start searching everywhere for the dastardly enemy that wrecked the revolution.
That is what is happening here in the US in our cancel culture as the wokies search high and low for the enemies that are killing the climate and systematizing racism. Because, as you sophisticated Euros well know, there is no politics without an enemy.
See you all after the show.
Is the United States some vulgar wasteland of gleaming emptiness? Sure, but not only. It’s a physically vast and culturally varied place, a series of places really. To view America through a prism of lurid symbolism, even from the posture of “sovereign indifference” that Jager celebrates in Baudrillard, both underestimates and unduly mystifies the nation.
Has Jager spent much time in the United States? If not, he’s a bit like the all-too-common sort of American who shouts “USA #1!” when he’s never left the country. Of course this author’s brand of superior-mindedness would still be less benighted than the Yankee yokel version, but a bit ignorant and arrogant nonetheless–we Americans haven’t monopolized those traits yet.
If anti-Americanism is regarded as a likely moral imperative, which likely hegemonic replacement would be better: a much stronger alliance between Russia and China?
“not a single person — is watching, and that he is accorded only indifference and derision as he passes. But he would tell you that was exactly how it was 2,000 years ago”
No, not exactly. There were always some who paid close attention and revered him, from the moment he took up his ministry until his violent death, and ever since.
I agree that the American zeitgeist feels within a few degrees of hell on many days, but is that so rare on our globe right now, or something best understood from a place of hyper-intellectual detachment? In other words: We are people, not animals or pathological specimens–at least not only.
“I agree that the American zeitgeist feels within a few degrees of hell on many days”
I think we’re all going through that, but each country has its own cultural interpretation of hell and how to act it out. Like they say: when America sneezes the world catches a cold. By which I mean America can’t do anything quietly, not because it’s necessarily their way but because we’re always watching and waiting.
…watching, waiting and grabbing power wherever you can!
If you’re going to be vacuous, be brief. Well done, sir.
I might be wrong but it appears that you think I’m American. When I said “we’re” I meant the rest of the world.
Apologies.. that makes much more sense. Your contribution did sound like it was from an American..
Wow. It’s hard to fathom your willingness to be such a publicly poisonous bigot.
Wow. It’s hard to fathom your willingness to be such a publicly poisonous bigot.
Apologies.. that makes much more sense. Your contribution did sound like it was from an American..
If you’re going to be vacuous, be brief. Well done, sir.
I might be wrong but it appears that you think I’m American. When I said “we’re” I meant the rest of the world.
…watching, waiting and grabbing power wherever you can!
I’m just as anti the EU as I am anti-American. It doesn’t make me Putin’s emissary, nor Xi’s, it just means I don’t listen to Washington diatribe and swallow it whole.
We’re all sick and tired of the US trying to claim that ‘their sports’ are the biggest on earth. Even the most ignorant cretin knows that 400% more people watch the World Cup Final than watch the Superbowl.
Being anti-American is just telling Yanks to face up to the fact that we don’t think they are superior in every way. We can learn a lot from them about corruption, about genocides, about mass propaganda and about closed cartels operating in closed market places. Not to mention the most corrupt industry in the world being the US Military Industrial Complex.
The USA state is completely insolvent. So is Wall Street in the main. Their fiscal rectitude is glaring by its absence.
One day soon, the Ponzi scheme is going to collapse. And the Land of the Free is going to become a place resembling Civil War….
That’s a pretty heartsick and conveniently simple worldview, in my opinion. If your predictions come to pass, you’ll have your bloodthirsty schadenfreude.
I don’t think Americans are superior, nor exceptional in any way, and I despise such notions in my fellow citizens. But we’re not sub-human either, more like all-too-human. You’ve made the U.S. into a Great Satan when we’re only a pretty good one at best, and the good side of our national character also does exist, at least in certain hearts.
So it goes there across the pond too, though Britain has retired from the Great Colonial Oppressor game. Or perhaps you don’t like to have your home turf reduced to a caricature of itself either.
Well put.. and I agree, many in fact most, Americans are decent enough people; if only you weren’t so naive and gullible? If only you could see what the evil Military Industrial Complex is doing all other the world. That is the Great Satan, not the poor unfortunate people whose government is bought and paid for and no more governs for the people than Putin or Xi.. indeed, there is a good case to be made that those two have their people’s need much higher up the priority list than yours does. If it did you’d have universal health care, zero poverty and a much better educational system.
I can see a valid dimension in the point of view you express, and I’ve encountered very similar opinions on visits to Canada, where my dad’s from and where I lived until age 7.
I still perceive your anti-Americanism as somewhat extreme and unwarranted in degree, though I appreciate your not casting out the people with the government bathwater.
On the so-called Great Satan front: Should the United States have stayed out of the Russia-Ukraine War, not getting involved (for a change) and resting content in whatever Europe was or wasn’t willing to do?
That’s a genuine question by the way. While I have an opinion, I don’t imagine I have an incontrovertible, correct answer myself.
I can see a valid dimension in the point of view you express, and I’ve encountered very similar opinions on visits to Canada, where my dad’s from and where I lived until age 7.
I still perceive your anti-Americanism as somewhat extreme and unwarranted in degree, though I appreciate your not casting out the people with the government bathwater.
On the so-called Great Satan front: Should the United States have stayed out of the Russia-Ukraine War, not getting involved (for a change) and resting content in whatever Europe was or wasn’t willing to do?
That’s a genuine question by the way. While I have an opinion, I don’t imagine I have an incontrovertible, correct answer myself.
Well put.. and I agree, many in fact most, Americans are decent enough people; if only you weren’t so naive and gullible? If only you could see what the evil Military Industrial Complex is doing all other the world. That is the Great Satan, not the poor unfortunate people whose government is bought and paid for and no more governs for the people than Putin or Xi.. indeed, there is a good case to be made that those two have their people’s need much higher up the priority list than yours does. If it did you’d have universal health care, zero poverty and a much better educational system.
I find it funny that every anti-American comment I see is laden with jealousy and contempt, covered in a veil of superiority
You really think so? Think again..
America is a braindead shithole. I lived there for over a decade, and can make a subjective experiential analysis. Some great people there, and some lovely scenery, but apart from that, flush it, and their “This is the Greatest Country In The World” (TM) shite. America is hilariously appalling, really.
They have an inferiority complex (fun to mess with, cos you can make them bend over and lube up, playing on their parochial self-loathing, with barely any trouble at all), believing that Europeans are more cultured, which, as a general truism, is correct, if also fatuous. This makes them contemptuous of culture and history and intelligence, because they have none; as the American writer Harlan Ellison put it, “This has always been a fiercely, fiercely anti-intellectual nation.”
There is absolutely nothing to be jealous of in America (you can get anything there abroad, now, except for school shootings and some more obscure foodstuffs), whose constant mass shootings merely mirror and mimic its foreign policy. It’s tragic how many people round the world love the dogshit soft power crap of American popular culture, shit Netflix series and shit superhero films and shit fast food and shit music but, well, if that’s really all you get pumped and pimped at you, what else are you going to consume?
If you removed America’s mass popular culture shield, basically the thing that endears the country to the world, binds them emotionally, and let people see what the place is really like…as more and more people are, the scales falling from their eyes…you wouldn’t even spit on the place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJWpR1mGoJw
I’m amazed that you were able to endure ten minutes, let alone ten years among such inferior excuses for people.
What are your favorite types of music, literature, or other high/non-crap culture…or are you against Americans but not for anything?
I’m amazed that you were able to endure ten minutes, let alone ten years among such inferior excuses for people.
What are your favorite types of music, literature, or other high/non-crap culture…or are you against Americans but not for anything?
You really think so? Think again..
America is a braindead shithole. I lived there for over a decade, and can make a subjective experiential analysis. Some great people there, and some lovely scenery, but apart from that, flush it, and their “This is the Greatest Country In The World” (TM) shite. America is hilariously appalling, really.
They have an inferiority complex (fun to mess with, cos you can make them bend over and lube up, playing on their parochial self-loathing, with barely any trouble at all), believing that Europeans are more cultured, which, as a general truism, is correct, if also fatuous. This makes them contemptuous of culture and history and intelligence, because they have none; as the American writer Harlan Ellison put it, “This has always been a fiercely, fiercely anti-intellectual nation.”
There is absolutely nothing to be jealous of in America (you can get anything there abroad, now, except for school shootings and some more obscure foodstuffs), whose constant mass shootings merely mirror and mimic its foreign policy. It’s tragic how many people round the world love the dogshit soft power crap of American popular culture, shit Netflix series and shit superhero films and shit fast food and shit music but, well, if that’s really all you get pumped and pimped at you, what else are you going to consume?
If you removed America’s mass popular culture shield, basically the thing that endears the country to the world, binds them emotionally, and let people see what the place is really like…as more and more people are, the scales falling from their eyes…you wouldn’t even spit on the place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJWpR1mGoJw
It had never occurred to me that Americans feel superior! How could they, realistically? That America as a country is superior okay; that is up for debate.. but when you exploit an entire planet with massive military might it’s hard to see your country as other than superior I guess. Look at GB and its empire.. long gone of course but the superiority complex remains..
Americans feel VERY superior! I am European. I once said something negative about America, when I lived there, at work. My braindead supervisor jumped in: “Europeans think they’re better than everybody else! This is the greatest country in the world!” If the halfwit had even understood the concept of irony, I could have pointed out how stupid what she had sad was, but you can’t teach a dog quantum physics.
In 1945 America WAS the greatest country in the world, because without its immense industrial capacity Europe today would be run by Hitler’s successors, and East Asia by Tojo’s.
I agree that since then America has developed a bad habit of militarily intervening in various places that were no real threat to the US as such, but the reality was that after WWII the country decided to be the world’s peacekeeper, and by dominating the oceans (and the air) it would guarantee safe passage for global business of all nationalities. Depending on your love of socialism you can denigrate that all you want as another name for corporate greed, but the plain fact is that the world has benefited immensely by improved nutrition, better sanitation, longer lifespans, lower child mortality, and more. Study the statistics; there is no comparison; and all this through greater economic integration, thanks to Pax Americana with a dozen aircraft carrier groups. Has all of this been impeccable or nice? I’m not fond of finding MacDonald’s arches wherever I go either, but you’ve got to take the bad with the good. And some people — quite a few, in fact, love MacDonald’s.
And with regard to the Ukrainian war, we see once again that the US carries the heaviest burden by far, although finally, finally Europe seems to have awakened to the Russian threat,as it should. It’s obvious except to the willfully deaf and blind that Putin dreams of re-establishing Russian hegemony over central Europe, and will lie and murder to achieve it; he has made no bones about calling the dissolution of the USSR a great tragedy.
Aside from that, you have depicted yourself as an insufferable snob.
In 1945 America WAS the greatest country in the world, because without its immense industrial capacity Europe today would be run by Hitler’s successors, and East Asia by Tojo’s.
I agree that since then America has developed a bad habit of militarily intervening in various places that were no real threat to the US as such, but the reality was that after WWII the country decided to be the world’s peacekeeper, and by dominating the oceans (and the air) it would guarantee safe passage for global business of all nationalities. Depending on your love of socialism you can denigrate that all you want as another name for corporate greed, but the plain fact is that the world has benefited immensely by improved nutrition, better sanitation, longer lifespans, lower child mortality, and more. Study the statistics; there is no comparison; and all this through greater economic integration, thanks to Pax Americana with a dozen aircraft carrier groups. Has all of this been impeccable or nice? I’m not fond of finding MacDonald’s arches wherever I go either, but you’ve got to take the bad with the good. And some people — quite a few, in fact, love MacDonald’s.
And with regard to the Ukrainian war, we see once again that the US carries the heaviest burden by far, although finally, finally Europe seems to have awakened to the Russian threat,as it should. It’s obvious except to the willfully deaf and blind that Putin dreams of re-establishing Russian hegemony over central Europe, and will lie and murder to achieve it; he has made no bones about calling the dissolution of the USSR a great tragedy.
Aside from that, you have depicted yourself as an insufferable snob.
Americans feel VERY superior! I am European. I once said something negative about America, when I lived there, at work. My braindead supervisor jumped in: “Europeans think they’re better than everybody else! This is the greatest country in the world!” If the halfwit had even understood the concept of irony, I could have pointed out how stupid what she had sad was, but you can’t teach a dog quantum physics.
That’s a pretty heartsick and conveniently simple worldview, in my opinion. If your predictions come to pass, you’ll have your bloodthirsty schadenfreude.
I don’t think Americans are superior, nor exceptional in any way, and I despise such notions in my fellow citizens. But we’re not sub-human either, more like all-too-human. You’ve made the U.S. into a Great Satan when we’re only a pretty good one at best, and the good side of our national character also does exist, at least in certain hearts.
So it goes there across the pond too, though Britain has retired from the Great Colonial Oppressor game. Or perhaps you don’t like to have your home turf reduced to a caricature of itself either.
I find it funny that every anti-American comment I see is laden with jealousy and contempt, covered in a veil of superiority
It had never occurred to me that Americans feel superior! How could they, realistically? That America as a country is superior okay; that is up for debate.. but when you exploit an entire planet with massive military might it’s hard to see your country as other than superior I guess. Look at GB and its empire.. long gone of course but the superiority complex remains..
“I agree that the American zeitgeist feels within a few degrees of hell on many days”
I think we’re all going through that, but each country has its own cultural interpretation of hell and how to act it out. Like they say: when America sneezes the world catches a cold. By which I mean America can’t do anything quietly, not because it’s necessarily their way but because we’re always watching and waiting.
I’m just as anti the EU as I am anti-American. It doesn’t make me Putin’s emissary, nor Xi’s, it just means I don’t listen to Washington diatribe and swallow it whole.
We’re all sick and tired of the US trying to claim that ‘their sports’ are the biggest on earth. Even the most ignorant cretin knows that 400% more people watch the World Cup Final than watch the Superbowl.
Being anti-American is just telling Yanks to face up to the fact that we don’t think they are superior in every way. We can learn a lot from them about corruption, about genocides, about mass propaganda and about closed cartels operating in closed market places. Not to mention the most corrupt industry in the world being the US Military Industrial Complex.
The USA state is completely insolvent. So is Wall Street in the main. Their fiscal rectitude is glaring by its absence.
One day soon, the Ponzi scheme is going to collapse. And the Land of the Free is going to become a place resembling Civil War….
Is the United States some vulgar wasteland of gleaming emptiness? Sure, but not only. It’s a physically vast and culturally varied place, a series of places really. To view America through a prism of lurid symbolism, even from the posture of “sovereign indifference” that Jager celebrates in Baudrillard, both underestimates and unduly mystifies the nation.
Has Jager spent much time in the United States? If not, he’s a bit like the all-too-common sort of American who shouts “USA #1!” when he’s never left the country. Of course this author’s brand of superior-mindedness would still be less benighted than the Yankee yokel version, but a bit ignorant and arrogant nonetheless–we Americans haven’t monopolized those traits yet.
If anti-Americanism is regarded as a likely moral imperative, which likely hegemonic replacement would be better: a much stronger alliance between Russia and China?
“not a single person — is watching, and that he is accorded only indifference and derision as he passes. But he would tell you that was exactly how it was 2,000 years ago”
No, not exactly. There were always some who paid close attention and revered him, from the moment he took up his ministry until his violent death, and ever since.
I agree that the American zeitgeist feels within a few degrees of hell on many days, but is that so rare on our globe right now, or something best understood from a place of hyper-intellectual detachment? In other words: We are people, not animals or pathological specimens–at least not only.
I am repelled by the suggestion that Anti-Americanism is a moral imperative. What sort of morality is that? It’s a morality based on hatred. Perhaps we can attempt to rehabilitate this hatred with vague notions like cultural snobbery or social justice, but it is hatred all the same. Why not base a moral imperative on some good that is deficient in America and abundant in Europe? Something like social solidarity, perhaps.
It’s not possible to be pro-something the Americans will oppose without being concomitantly anti-American.
As a smaller nation, we aren’t going to be able to project our positive beliefs onto the USA, so what we have to do is stop them projecting their unwanted values onto us.
Rubbish, Rhys. The US doesn’t project anything onto you. You – and your compatriots – reach out for it.
Your countrymen look at them and can’t help being influenced and attracted by a smarter, more energetic, more dynamic, more entertaining, more ALIVE, more promising culture for most people.
Europeans are fascinated by the way the US is so much like Europe – from which it derived – but better. All the intellectuals in the article went to the US to work out what it had that was so attractive but really hard to define. Not attractive to them personally (so they said) but what drives them mad is that, in general, the US and its culture are extraordinarily attractive to the non-intellectual mass of Europeans. American domination of Europe took place by invitation. It was welcomed – fashion, film, mores, music, even their soldiers – almost every aspect of the USA.
The US doesn’t attract opprobrium because it “bombs defenceless nations”. Its so-called imperialism isn’t nation-conquering like many European nations were. It’s such an attractive culture that it conquers with charm which attracts chagrin from the pygmy gatekeepers like yourself in Europe and much of the rest of the world. That’s how I read many of the comments here.
If a world-wide poll was taken asking where people would prefer to live, the US would win by billions of votes. And everyone bad-mouthing the US here knows this to be true.
Have a nice day!
Eh? Would you say all those desirable attributes apply in the case of Cuba? No? How about Vietnam? Iraq? Libya? Palestine? China? Russia? Iran? …of course some of the subculture garbage is popular among the great unwashed of Europe.
To be fair you have some great people but it’s like 0.00001% of the population.. really clever and very well educated people whom we in Europe greatly admire. Sadly 99.9% of Americans ignore them at best or deride them or even ‘cancel’ them at worst.
Or course you know your numbers are off since point-quadruple-zero-percent equates to one in ten million (33 people nationwide) and it’s silly to suggest that only one in a thousand Americans admire the best sort of fellow American, whilst all of “we Europeans” supposedly do. Not to quibble over hyperbole.
I wish you’d put more of your comments in the sensible terms you’re capable of, unlike when you suggest a dark equivalency between the Chinese, Russian, and American governments above. I can tell you’re mostly sincere and as someone who estimates my ancestry to be 5/8ths Irish and 7/8th Celtic, I don’t regard you as quite foreign, so to speak.
Yes, many politicians are bought off here–is that something unknown in Ireland? The profit motive of many hospitals and even prisons here is a moral and social disaster and the economy and culture are way too corporatized and acquisitive as a whole. But I don’t think the society is as corrupt or stupid as you claim, and things aren’t hopeless from “sea to shining sea”.
Given your violent contempt for US politics and society, I assume you’ve travelled here. If so, what was you experience?
Or course you know your numbers are off since point-quadruple-zero-percent equates to one in ten million (33 people nationwide) and it’s silly to suggest that only one in a thousand Americans admire the best sort of fellow American, whilst all of “we Europeans” supposedly do. Not to quibble over hyperbole.
I wish you’d put more of your comments in the sensible terms you’re capable of, unlike when you suggest a dark equivalency between the Chinese, Russian, and American governments above. I can tell you’re mostly sincere and as someone who estimates my ancestry to be 5/8ths Irish and 7/8th Celtic, I don’t regard you as quite foreign, so to speak.
Yes, many politicians are bought off here–is that something unknown in Ireland? The profit motive of many hospitals and even prisons here is a moral and social disaster and the economy and culture are way too corporatized and acquisitive as a whole. But I don’t think the society is as corrupt or stupid as you claim, and things aren’t hopeless from “sea to shining sea”.
Given your violent contempt for US politics and society, I assume you’ve travelled here. If so, what was you experience?
‘Your countrymen look at them and can’t help being influenced and attracted by a smarter, more energetic, more dynamic, more entertaining, more ALIVE, more promising culture for most people.’
As a European who unfortunately lived in Chimpland for over a decade, I would have to say that’s one of the most hilariously stupid things I have ever seen said; it genuinely made me laugh out loud. A perfect example of ill-informed, self-righteous, pompous American exceptionalism. Just cos somebody told you you’re the greatest country in the world…doesn’t mean you are. NOBODY is. We’re all crabs in a bucket.
Eh? Would you say all those desirable attributes apply in the case of Cuba? No? How about Vietnam? Iraq? Libya? Palestine? China? Russia? Iran? …of course some of the subculture garbage is popular among the great unwashed of Europe.
To be fair you have some great people but it’s like 0.00001% of the population.. really clever and very well educated people whom we in Europe greatly admire. Sadly 99.9% of Americans ignore them at best or deride them or even ‘cancel’ them at worst.
‘Your countrymen look at them and can’t help being influenced and attracted by a smarter, more energetic, more dynamic, more entertaining, more ALIVE, more promising culture for most people.’
As a European who unfortunately lived in Chimpland for over a decade, I would have to say that’s one of the most hilariously stupid things I have ever seen said; it genuinely made me laugh out loud. A perfect example of ill-informed, self-righteous, pompous American exceptionalism. Just cos somebody told you you’re the greatest country in the world…doesn’t mean you are. NOBODY is. We’re all crabs in a bucket.
That seems fair.. I do however think we Irish have a considerable influence on America since 1st, 2nd and 3rd generations still call themselves “Irish” there. Probably 40 million of us..
Nothing more vomitous than an ill-informed ‘Irish’-American, trust me. All boils down to fighting and drinking with them, trust me, and they know nothing else whatsoever about being Irish.
Nothing more vomitous than an ill-informed ‘Irish’-American, trust me. All boils down to fighting and drinking with them, trust me, and they know nothing else whatsoever about being Irish.
Rubbish, Rhys. The US doesn’t project anything onto you. You – and your compatriots – reach out for it.
Your countrymen look at them and can’t help being influenced and attracted by a smarter, more energetic, more dynamic, more entertaining, more ALIVE, more promising culture for most people.
Europeans are fascinated by the way the US is so much like Europe – from which it derived – but better. All the intellectuals in the article went to the US to work out what it had that was so attractive but really hard to define. Not attractive to them personally (so they said) but what drives them mad is that, in general, the US and its culture are extraordinarily attractive to the non-intellectual mass of Europeans. American domination of Europe took place by invitation. It was welcomed – fashion, film, mores, music, even their soldiers – almost every aspect of the USA.
The US doesn’t attract opprobrium because it “bombs defenceless nations”. Its so-called imperialism isn’t nation-conquering like many European nations were. It’s such an attractive culture that it conquers with charm which attracts chagrin from the pygmy gatekeepers like yourself in Europe and much of the rest of the world. That’s how I read many of the comments here.
If a world-wide poll was taken asking where people would prefer to live, the US would win by billions of votes. And everyone bad-mouthing the US here knows this to be true.
Have a nice day!
That seems fair.. I do however think we Irish have a considerable influence on America since 1st, 2nd and 3rd generations still call themselves “Irish” there. Probably 40 million of us..
A question: would you regard anti fascism as a moral imperative? How about anti Naziism? Okay anti-totalitarianism? ..just asking is all.
It’s not possible to be pro-something the Americans will oppose without being concomitantly anti-American.
As a smaller nation, we aren’t going to be able to project our positive beliefs onto the USA, so what we have to do is stop them projecting their unwanted values onto us.
A question: would you regard anti fascism as a moral imperative? How about anti Naziism? Okay anti-totalitarianism? ..just asking is all.
I am repelled by the suggestion that Anti-Americanism is a moral imperative. What sort of morality is that? It’s a morality based on hatred. Perhaps we can attempt to rehabilitate this hatred with vague notions like cultural snobbery or social justice, but it is hatred all the same. Why not base a moral imperative on some good that is deficient in America and abundant in Europe? Something like social solidarity, perhaps.
I tried to run the article through google Translate to see what it said, but it came back even more chaotic and disjointed and through an even even darker and wavier looking glass.
Anyone who can condense this into 3 short paragraphs with a thesis, an argument in support, and a conclusion, please do, and post it below.
To be fair to the author, compared to Baidrillard’s writing (over which I scratched my head at university), the article is extremely clear.
My favourite take-away was:
“…French sub-intellectuals such as Bernard-Henri Lévy…”
Ouch!!
Agreed. The author is either very brave or very foolish. Either way he’s right!
Agreed. The author is either very brave or very foolish. Either way he’s right!
My favourite take-away was:
“…French sub-intellectuals such as Bernard-Henri Lévy…”
Ouch!!
The US is still a young society. An appropriate metaphor would be a teenager, subject to frequent wild mood swings, lacking maturity and depth of insight. Throw in the teenager’s superficial understanding of complex problems and accompanying tendency to approach every issue with brute force, as well as their susceptibility to slick sales pitches, and escalate up to a national character.
As evidence, one could look at the strategic incomprehensibility of most recent wars, including that on drugs and the one not being waged against the invasion on the southern border. Add in how easily the bizarre woke nonsense, spewing from all its institutions, has been swallowed to complete the metaphor.
In conclusion, the rest of the world is in the position of the parents of a bi polar teenage boy with Khal Drogo’s physique. Wishing everyday it had turned out differently but now fearful of ever taking their eyes off him.
Just need a Frenchman now to turn it into a couple of books
I’ve always found it helpful to think of the USA as the largest emerging market
The USA isn’t a teenager, it’s a psychotic 2 year old throwing tantrums in the global supermarket.You’ve all seen embarrassed mothers having to ride out the storms, well the world has had to do likewise since 1948.
Actually, since 1916.
So… the US intervention in the Great War was a 2-year-old’s tantrum in the global supermarket.
Interesting description of what definitely looked like being dragged unwillingly into deciding who would claim an indecisive victory in that episode of Europe’s thousand-year long recurrent internecine frenzies of self-destruction.
Nope; back the the US was a totally different country with a totally different set of values..
Nope; back the the US was a totally different country with a totally different set of values..
So… the US intervention in the Great War was a 2-year-old’s tantrum in the global supermarket.
Interesting description of what definitely looked like being dragged unwillingly into deciding who would claim an indecisive victory in that episode of Europe’s thousand-year long recurrent internecine frenzies of self-destruction.
Please, keep going 🙂
Actually, since 1916.
Please, keep going 🙂
Better a teenager that can become a better adult, than adults that have become complacent to the ways of the medieval times. Europeans love to point out the inequality found in the USA, but I prefer that to the equality in poverty found in the EU. All I see in Europe are young professionals in profitable fields stuck on tiny apartments, without any chance of social mobility
I’ve always found it helpful to think of the USA as the largest emerging market
The USA isn’t a teenager, it’s a psychotic 2 year old throwing tantrums in the global supermarket.You’ve all seen embarrassed mothers having to ride out the storms, well the world has had to do likewise since 1948.
Better a teenager that can become a better adult, than adults that have become complacent to the ways of the medieval times. Europeans love to point out the inequality found in the USA, but I prefer that to the equality in poverty found in the EU. All I see in Europe are young professionals in profitable fields stuck on tiny apartments, without any chance of social mobility
So only ideas that can be expressed in three short paragraphs are worth reading and thinking about? That is the intellectual and aesthetic attitude of the Twitter age and, ironically, evidence of the accuracy of Baudrillard’s (and the author’s) analysis.
I’m hopeful that the above three lines are even better than the requested three short paragraphs …
No, but when you’re trying to make a point, unnecessary self-indulgent verbiage only gets in the way.
“Unnecessary self-indulgent” – it sounds like you have quite rigid and pre-conceived notions of what forms of expression qualify as necessary and non-indulgent. Luckily, writers like Baudrillard aren’t afraid of nuance and subtlety and the writer of this article reflects that well rather than seeking to act as the vocabulary and expression police. If it wasn’t full of unnecessarily flowery language, I’d suggest you check out Alexander Pope’s “The Dunciad”.
“Unnecessary self-indulgent” – it sounds like you have quite rigid and pre-conceived notions of what forms of expression qualify as necessary and non-indulgent. Luckily, writers like Baudrillard aren’t afraid of nuance and subtlety and the writer of this article reflects that well rather than seeking to act as the vocabulary and expression police. If it wasn’t full of unnecessarily flowery language, I’d suggest you check out Alexander Pope’s “The Dunciad”.
You are not Theodor Adorno. But if, by freakish gift, you are indeed his reborn spirit better you go away and play piano.
I’ll tinkle the ivories if you go away and scrub yer Nan.
I’ll tinkle the ivories if you go away and scrub yer Nan.
No, but when you’re trying to make a point, unnecessary self-indulgent verbiage only gets in the way.
You are not Theodor Adorno. But if, by freakish gift, you are indeed his reborn spirit better you go away and play piano.
To be fair to the author, compared to Baidrillard’s writing (over which I scratched my head at university), the article is extremely clear.
The US is still a young society. An appropriate metaphor would be a teenager, subject to frequent wild mood swings, lacking maturity and depth of insight. Throw in the teenager’s superficial understanding of complex problems and accompanying tendency to approach every issue with brute force, as well as their susceptibility to slick sales pitches, and escalate up to a national character.
As evidence, one could look at the strategic incomprehensibility of most recent wars, including that on drugs and the one not being waged against the invasion on the southern border. Add in how easily the bizarre woke nonsense, spewing from all its institutions, has been swallowed to complete the metaphor.
In conclusion, the rest of the world is in the position of the parents of a bi polar teenage boy with Khal Drogo’s physique. Wishing everyday it had turned out differently but now fearful of ever taking their eyes off him.
Just need a Frenchman now to turn it into a couple of books
So only ideas that can be expressed in three short paragraphs are worth reading and thinking about? That is the intellectual and aesthetic attitude of the Twitter age and, ironically, evidence of the accuracy of Baudrillard’s (and the author’s) analysis.
I’m hopeful that the above three lines are even better than the requested three short paragraphs …
I tried to run the article through google Translate to see what it said, but it came back even more chaotic and disjointed and through an even even darker and wavier looking glass.
Anyone who can condense this into 3 short paragraphs with a thesis, an argument in support, and a conclusion, please do, and post it below.
I love my weird, wonderful, warm, awful, brutal, dynamic, heroic, cynical, naive, villainous, selfish, generous, stupid, brilliant country, the United States. I don’t want it to become more European, nor do I want Europe to become more like the US. I would miss them both.
For Europe’s sake, I mostly don’t want the disease of left-wing race and gender obsession to seep abroad. To hear intelligent liberal European discussion about the proper conception and appreciation of these innate characteristics is so refreshing to an American who, by default, can only be subject to harangues by college kids or radical chic academics. Or virtue signaling scoldings from “look at me!” mainstream liberals.
Please, Europe: fight the American disease of wokeness with everything you’ve got.
I think, if you go back a little in history, you’ll find that the current leftist lunacy has its roots in European philosophers like Foucault, Barthes, Derrida, Lacan and others.
I think, if you go back a little in history, you’ll find that the current leftist lunacy has its roots in European philosophers like Foucault, Barthes, Derrida, Lacan and others.
I love my weird, wonderful, warm, awful, brutal, dynamic, heroic, cynical, naive, villainous, selfish, generous, stupid, brilliant country, the United States. I don’t want it to become more European, nor do I want Europe to become more like the US. I would miss them both.
For Europe’s sake, I mostly don’t want the disease of left-wing race and gender obsession to seep abroad. To hear intelligent liberal European discussion about the proper conception and appreciation of these innate characteristics is so refreshing to an American who, by default, can only be subject to harangues by college kids or radical chic academics. Or virtue signaling scoldings from “look at me!” mainstream liberals.
Please, Europe: fight the American disease of wokeness with everything you’ve got.
The widespread rioting of Moroccan “fans” in cities across France and Belgium, whether their “national team” lost, won, or didn’t even play, sheds an up to the moment light on the writer’s analysis. Are the ills of America imported, as he suggests, or are they home-grown in Europe?
I’m inclined to agree. For all this hot air, i suspect Europeans assume too much interference in their affairs (not confined to the French, btw!) by the US, whilst conveniently being able to blame it for many of the ills in their societies which they don’t know how to deal with.
Of course, as the major partner in NATO there’s a concomitant influence in the conduct of the war in Ukraine, but what the author is more concerned with is, i think, soft power. To call it “culture” would be to misuse the word, unless one regards Disneyland as a cultural attraction.
NATO is now merely a protection racket where US mafias go round European capitals threatening to beat up any small proprietor that doesn’t spend 2% of GDP on over-priced, under-performing US weaponry.
Go try selling that idea in Kyiv.
Go try selling that idea in Kyiv.
NATO is now merely a protection racket where US mafias go round European capitals threatening to beat up any small proprietor that doesn’t spend 2% of GDP on over-priced, under-performing US weaponry.
The idea of Europe as a home of immigrants is driven by US ideology.
It has been driven since the 1950’s chiefly by the need for low-skilled labour to rebuild industries and public works devastated by war, and then over time to fill roles abandoned by the indigenous working class, as they aspired to white collar positions.
You fall into the trap cited by the author of ascribing societal problems to America as a way for elites to avoid taking responsibility for their failed policies – though imported American ideology did provide a rationale for elites to justify mass immigration.
Absolutely true. So, if you don’t like it, don’t import it. Make up your own ideology. Persuade your fellow-countrymen to reject these terrible US imports.
The problem is that European ideas don’t hack it in the international marketplace.
We pioneered the international market place. America is destroying it.
We pioneered the international market place. America is destroying it.
It has been driven since the 1950’s chiefly by the need for low-skilled labour to rebuild industries and public works devastated by war, and then over time to fill roles abandoned by the indigenous working class, as they aspired to white collar positions.
You fall into the trap cited by the author of ascribing societal problems to America as a way for elites to avoid taking responsibility for their failed policies – though imported American ideology did provide a rationale for elites to justify mass immigration.
Absolutely true. So, if you don’t like it, don’t import it. Make up your own ideology. Persuade your fellow-countrymen to reject these terrible US imports.
The problem is that European ideas don’t hack it in the international marketplace.
I’m inclined to agree. For all this hot air, i suspect Europeans assume too much interference in their affairs (not confined to the French, btw!) by the US, whilst conveniently being able to blame it for many of the ills in their societies which they don’t know how to deal with.
Of course, as the major partner in NATO there’s a concomitant influence in the conduct of the war in Ukraine, but what the author is more concerned with is, i think, soft power. To call it “culture” would be to misuse the word, unless one regards Disneyland as a cultural attraction.
The idea of Europe as a home of immigrants is driven by US ideology.
The widespread rioting of Moroccan “fans” in cities across France and Belgium, whether their “national team” lost, won, or didn’t even play, sheds an up to the moment light on the writer’s analysis. Are the ills of America imported, as he suggests, or are they home-grown in Europe?
It is always amusing to read an account of the U.S. from someone who obviously has not visited the place. Merely reciting what others have said over the centuries is like reviewing a restaurant from the other reviews rather than eating there yourself.
One example is from the author: …”while its sorrows, from extreme poverty to the marketisation of the self, stand out as ominous warnings.”
Having travelled to and within 49 of the 50 states during my life, I would wager that there is not a single example of “extreme poverty” to be found anywhere in the U.S., when compared to the extreme poverty that actually exists in most 2nd and 3rd world countries. The poorest of Americans possess smart phones, multiple TV’s in their dwelling, late model automobiles, running hot and cold water, indoor plumbing, food stamps and school breakfast and lunch programs. Tens of thousands of churches offer free meals and shelter nightly. Any person, regardless of citizenship or wealth can receive emergency treatment at a world-class hospital for free. Even the homeless can be seen surfing the web on their laptops! This can hardly be deemed “extreme poverty” when compared to the ghettos of Mumbai, Sao Paulo, Bangkok, Panama City or the countless other truly impoverished places on the planet.
I have encountered levels of poverty in the United States that I have not seen even in third world countries. It’s not financial poverty per se, but a kind of cultural poverty where people’s sense of worth is tied to the size of their house, the price of their sports car, the title of their job position, and other ostentatious displays of wealth. Even highly educated people believe that possessing a degree makes them morally and intellectually superior to those without.
Self-worth is highly externalized here. Young people are taught to value others by what they own rather than who they are which is the reason behind the grueling work culture. There is also a real tendency to look down on poor people here in the United States which is why victimhood aka woke culture is so prevalent in the US. It is rooted in resentment of the rich, who in all honesty, tend to be quite awful to those they deem below them. Wokeness is not at all about economic equality and people being nicer to each other, it’s merely pure unadulterated hatred toward those perceived as more successful than them, and yet secretly wanting to be one of them at the same time. This envious resentment stifles creativity and entrepreneurship, which is what we are now witnessing in America, a land once famed for its innovation and inventiveness, but now stewing in the poverty mentality of jealousy and victimhood.
Funny, a lot of Trump supporting ‘basket of deplorables’ types, sneered at and mocked by middle class liberal pricks, might disagree with your ‘punching upwards’ assertions.
Funny, a lot of Trump supporting ‘basket of deplorables’ types, sneered at and mocked by middle class liberal pricks, might disagree with your ‘punching upwards’ assertions.
It is because they don’t include the immigrants that live in their getthos as Europeans, so they can pretend Europe is this magical wonderland where everyone is middle class(this means not even being able to live in a house rather than a tiny apartment)
‘The poorest of Americans possess smart phones, multiple TV’s in their dwelling, late model automobiles, running hot and cold water, indoor plumbing, food stamps and school breakfast and lunch programs….Any person, regardless of citizenship or wealth can receive emergency treatment at a world-class hospital for free. Even the homeless can be seen surfing the web on their laptops!’
Are you on drugs?
I have encountered levels of poverty in the United States that I have not seen even in third world countries. It’s not financial poverty per se, but a kind of cultural poverty where people’s sense of worth is tied to the size of their house, the price of their sports car, the title of their job position, and other ostentatious displays of wealth. Even highly educated people believe that possessing a degree makes them morally and intellectually superior to those without.
Self-worth is highly externalized here. Young people are taught to value others by what they own rather than who they are which is the reason behind the grueling work culture. There is also a real tendency to look down on poor people here in the United States which is why victimhood aka woke culture is so prevalent in the US. It is rooted in resentment of the rich, who in all honesty, tend to be quite awful to those they deem below them. Wokeness is not at all about economic equality and people being nicer to each other, it’s merely pure unadulterated hatred toward those perceived as more successful than them, and yet secretly wanting to be one of them at the same time. This envious resentment stifles creativity and entrepreneurship, which is what we are now witnessing in America, a land once famed for its innovation and inventiveness, but now stewing in the poverty mentality of jealousy and victimhood.
It is because they don’t include the immigrants that live in their getthos as Europeans, so they can pretend Europe is this magical wonderland where everyone is middle class(this means not even being able to live in a house rather than a tiny apartment)
‘The poorest of Americans possess smart phones, multiple TV’s in their dwelling, late model automobiles, running hot and cold water, indoor plumbing, food stamps and school breakfast and lunch programs….Any person, regardless of citizenship or wealth can receive emergency treatment at a world-class hospital for free. Even the homeless can be seen surfing the web on their laptops!’
Are you on drugs?
It is always amusing to read an account of the U.S. from someone who obviously has not visited the place. Merely reciting what others have said over the centuries is like reviewing a restaurant from the other reviews rather than eating there yourself.
One example is from the author: …”while its sorrows, from extreme poverty to the marketisation of the self, stand out as ominous warnings.”
Having travelled to and within 49 of the 50 states during my life, I would wager that there is not a single example of “extreme poverty” to be found anywhere in the U.S., when compared to the extreme poverty that actually exists in most 2nd and 3rd world countries. The poorest of Americans possess smart phones, multiple TV’s in their dwelling, late model automobiles, running hot and cold water, indoor plumbing, food stamps and school breakfast and lunch programs. Tens of thousands of churches offer free meals and shelter nightly. Any person, regardless of citizenship or wealth can receive emergency treatment at a world-class hospital for free. Even the homeless can be seen surfing the web on their laptops! This can hardly be deemed “extreme poverty” when compared to the ghettos of Mumbai, Sao Paulo, Bangkok, Panama City or the countless other truly impoverished places on the planet.
I read as far as “sub intellectuals”. I can’t read shit from someone who uses terms like that.
Agreed. Arrogant nonsense from someone who clearly considers himself a ‘superior intellectual’.
Levy is indeed “sub intellectual.” He was espousing marxist-leninist ideology in France when it was clearly past its sell-by date in practice, but still all the rage in intellectual circles.
Agreed. Arrogant nonsense from someone who clearly considers himself a ‘superior intellectual’.
Levy is indeed “sub intellectual.” He was espousing marxist-leninist ideology in France when it was clearly past its sell-by date in practice, but still all the rage in intellectual circles.
I read as far as “sub intellectuals”. I can’t read shit from someone who uses terms like that.
Very good article, I’m going off to find some of those books.
While I appreciate the conclusion that we have to work through American politics here, I do wish they would stop funding this stuff abroad, I would rather they kept it to themselves, as would most of Europe I imagine.
This part: ‘The only hero the Americans were capable of producing was the “future king of Steel, Rubber, Oil, the Truster of Trusts, the future master of a standardised planet, that god which the universe is awaiting, the god of the Godless universe”. Here was the American dream — a crazed nightmare from which France should wake up as soon as possible’ – Amazing, I feel the UK should do the same, it might be too late.
And this: ‘To some Europeanists, it feels as if the EU is effectively run from Langley, Virginia…. The biggest army in human history is now trying to reshore its industry. Liquid gas supplies find their way to Stuttgart. The result is a dazzling compound: late imperial Rome with a stock exchange and nuclear weapons’ – Brilliant, that’s exactly how it feels to me.
I think I’d rather live the fall of imperial Rome, at least there were no nukes.
Last bit: ‘ But a disinterest in the US is hard to justify politically, let alone strategically expedient.’
Are we sure? Maybe if we just ignore them they’ll leave us alone? I’m thinking it would be strategically expedient to leave them to it at this point.
If you’re white skinned, Christian (in name), quasi democratic and have no oil/gas* you should be okay.. on the other hand if you don’t tick any of those boxes (especially the last) look out! Happily we in Ireland tick all those boxes and also have big political clout in the US.
* other mineral resources might be even more relevant these days.. eg lithium, cobalt etc.
The use of white skinned here shows how Liam is controlled by an American ideology.
He also over estimates the Irish lobby, as we brits over estimate the suppose special relationship.
NORAID trumps any ‘special relationship’ we think we MAY have, and has done for at least a century.
Yes, I can’t see Ireland being immune to the swamping by us politics, I’m not very well informed about Irish politics tbh but I doubt they have much influence over the enormous US government machine in reality?
I can’t remember speaking to a single UK citizen the past 15 years that believes that the SR is anything but a one-way street for the USA.
It doesn’t even exist. It’s something American-arselicking English politicians try to pretend does.
It doesn’t even exist. It’s something American-arselicking English politicians try to pretend does.
NORAID trumps any ‘special relationship’ we think we MAY have, and has done for at least a century.
Yes, I can’t see Ireland being immune to the swamping by us politics, I’m not very well informed about Irish politics tbh but I doubt they have much influence over the enormous US government machine in reality?
I can’t remember speaking to a single UK citizen the past 15 years that believes that the SR is anything but a one-way street for the USA.
Always appreciate the stir you cause Mr Mahony, even if I don’t always agree with you.
‘Happily we in Ireland tick all those boxes and also have big political clout in the US’ – any chance of petitioning the Irish government – get them to ask America to dial back the crazy? Or ask them to keep their politics on their side of the Atlantic? Please?
It’s probably raining in Lusitania or his Camper Van has broken down or got a puncture.
Maybe he’s back in Ireland and realised its just as shit as everywhere else – to make himself feel better, he’s on here extolling the influence of the Irish government, bless him.
Maybe he’s back in Ireland and realised its just as shit as everywhere else – to make himself feel better, he’s on here extolling the influence of the Irish government, bless him.
It’s probably raining in Lusitania or his Camper Van has broken down or got a puncture.
No country in the world except the USA has ‘big political clout’ in the USA, trust me.
The use of white skinned here shows how Liam is controlled by an American ideology.
He also over estimates the Irish lobby, as we brits over estimate the suppose special relationship.
Always appreciate the stir you cause Mr Mahony, even if I don’t always agree with you.
‘Happily we in Ireland tick all those boxes and also have big political clout in the US’ – any chance of petitioning the Irish government – get them to ask America to dial back the crazy? Or ask them to keep their politics on their side of the Atlantic? Please?
No country in the world except the USA has ‘big political clout’ in the USA, trust me.
Miss Emery, you made the correct choice, Ancient Rome, every time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc7HmhrgTuQ
Brilliant clip Mr Stanhope, thank you 🙂
Brilliant clip Mr Stanhope, thank you 🙂
If you’re white skinned, Christian (in name), quasi democratic and have no oil/gas* you should be okay.. on the other hand if you don’t tick any of those boxes (especially the last) look out! Happily we in Ireland tick all those boxes and also have big political clout in the US.
* other mineral resources might be even more relevant these days.. eg lithium, cobalt etc.
Miss Emery, you made the correct choice, Ancient Rome, every time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc7HmhrgTuQ
Very good article, I’m going off to find some of those books.
While I appreciate the conclusion that we have to work through American politics here, I do wish they would stop funding this stuff abroad, I would rather they kept it to themselves, as would most of Europe I imagine.
This part: ‘The only hero the Americans were capable of producing was the “future king of Steel, Rubber, Oil, the Truster of Trusts, the future master of a standardised planet, that god which the universe is awaiting, the god of the Godless universe”. Here was the American dream — a crazed nightmare from which France should wake up as soon as possible’ – Amazing, I feel the UK should do the same, it might be too late.
And this: ‘To some Europeanists, it feels as if the EU is effectively run from Langley, Virginia…. The biggest army in human history is now trying to reshore its industry. Liquid gas supplies find their way to Stuttgart. The result is a dazzling compound: late imperial Rome with a stock exchange and nuclear weapons’ – Brilliant, that’s exactly how it feels to me.
I think I’d rather live the fall of imperial Rome, at least there were no nukes.
Last bit: ‘ But a disinterest in the US is hard to justify politically, let alone strategically expedient.’
Are we sure? Maybe if we just ignore them they’ll leave us alone? I’m thinking it would be strategically expedient to leave them to it at this point.
Refreshing, a French/Belgian perspective. Can’t we add some German voices as well here. It will broaden Unherd.
When will Germany move on from its “war guilt” and realize that the world would benefit from them growing a backbone?
If they grow a backbone and somebody doesn’t like the backbone the accusations of naziism will amplify.
So what? Grow a backbone and ignore the accusations. Stare them down.
So what? Grow a backbone and ignore the accusations. Stare them down.
If they grow a backbone and somebody doesn’t like the backbone the accusations of naziism will amplify.
Anton Jäger is hardly a typical Belgian name. It is typically German, Swiss or Austrian.
In France, Belgium, the Netherlands and other European countries you will find a fair number of people with German surnames — whose families have been there for generations, so that tells you nothing about their expertise in anything. Besides, Belgium has a mix of languages inside its borders. In the southern, often called the Walloon region, the language is French, as it is in Brussels. In the northern Flemish region it’s Dutch. And there is a small area on the eastern border where German is spoken. Then, too, there may be French speaking Belgians who have Flemish or German names, and so on. Drawing big conclusions merely from names is unsound.
In France, Belgium, the Netherlands and other European countries you will find a fair number of people with German surnames — whose families have been there for generations, so that tells you nothing about their expertise in anything. Besides, Belgium has a mix of languages inside its borders. In the southern, often called the Walloon region, the language is French, as it is in Brussels. In the northern Flemish region it’s Dutch. And there is a small area on the eastern border where German is spoken. Then, too, there may be French speaking Belgians who have Flemish or German names, and so on. Drawing big conclusions merely from names is unsound.
When will Germany move on from its “war guilt” and realize that the world would benefit from them growing a backbone?
Anton Jäger is hardly a typical Belgian name. It is typically German, Swiss or Austrian.
Refreshing, a French/Belgian perspective. Can’t we add some German voices as well here. It will broaden Unherd.
“Rhythmicity”? No such word. The word you need is “rhythm”.
Like so much of the verbiage in this article, it suffers from imposition of French vocabulary into an English translation, resulting in a loss of original meaning.
Philosophers have always coined their own words to express concepts akin to but not identical in meaning to, other words. It’s a kind of poetic licence..
Don’t they have copy editors at UnHerd? Crepuscules,indeed.
Like so much of the verbiage in this article, it suffers from imposition of French vocabulary into an English translation, resulting in a loss of original meaning.
Philosophers have always coined their own words to express concepts akin to but not identical in meaning to, other words. It’s a kind of poetic licence..
Don’t they have copy editors at UnHerd? Crepuscules,indeed.
“Rhythmicity”? No such word. The word you need is “rhythm”.
Was this essay computer-generated? Or is this just the schlock that only the people who think they’re sophisticated can generate?
“It’s not even wrong.”
It is typical of French academic pedantry, churned out for the consumption of readers of Le Monde, who take as an article of faith that the cancer of American culture is at the root of France’s ills. Curiously, it provides a common ground for intellectuals of both left and right who would normally disagree on most matters on principle.
It is typical of French academic pedantry, churned out for the consumption of readers of Le Monde, who take as an article of faith that the cancer of American culture is at the root of France’s ills. Curiously, it provides a common ground for intellectuals of both left and right who would normally disagree on most matters on principle.
Was this essay computer-generated? Or is this just the schlock that only the people who think they’re sophisticated can generate?
“It’s not even wrong.”
We Americans cant wait to get to go to Europe and fight in your wars or anyplace else on the earth for that matter,its the only way we can keep from fighting amongst ourselves!As history has shown when we fight among ourselves we get way more bloody than when we fight someone else so its about time for another world war Eastern Europe will be the epicenter!
Maybe if you can’t get your water usage in balance, you’ll all be going to war amongst yourselves anyway over droughts? Colorado River is in crisis and far, far too many people try to live in California based on how much precipitation it actually enjoys…
California’s water situation is mostly due to its incompetent, ideologically-driven politicians. For example, years ago they decided there was no point in building any more dams to store water, because climate change had caused a permanent drought. The next thing you know they had torrential rains, and a major disaster was avoided by a hair because a poorly maintained dam failed.
California’s water situation is mostly due to its incompetent, ideologically-driven politicians. For example, years ago they decided there was no point in building any more dams to store water, because climate change had caused a permanent drought. The next thing you know they had torrential rains, and a major disaster was avoided by a hair because a poorly maintained dam failed.
Maybe if you can’t get your water usage in balance, you’ll all be going to war amongst yourselves anyway over droughts? Colorado River is in crisis and far, far too many people try to live in California based on how much precipitation it actually enjoys…
We Americans cant wait to get to go to Europe and fight in your wars or anyplace else on the earth for that matter,its the only way we can keep from fighting amongst ourselves!As history has shown when we fight among ourselves we get way more bloody than when we fight someone else so its about time for another world war Eastern Europe will be the epicenter!
Why does this brand of pedantry always – when they run out of five syllable adjectives, I presume – resort to collectivist b***s***?
I think the paragraph sets it out very nicely!
I think the paragraph sets it out very nicely!
Why does this brand of pedantry always – when they run out of five syllable adjectives, I presume – resort to collectivist b***s***?
Que de français!
Que de français!
“As Adam Tooze has argued, the US has clung on to external power while continuing to manage internal decline — a tree growing despite fungi hollowing out its trunk.”
I’m becoming more and more conviced this internal US rot can only be managed from hereon in with the political fungicide of Congressional term limits.
“As Adam Tooze has argued, the US has clung on to external power while continuing to manage internal decline — a tree growing despite fungi hollowing out its trunk.”
I’m becoming more and more conviced this internal US rot can only be managed from hereon in with the political fungicide of Congressional term limits.
Baudrillard!! What an eye! … My favorite quote of his? … “Americans have no culture. They do however have wonderful teeth.”
Baudrillard!! What an eye! … My favorite quote of his? … “Americans have no culture. They do however have wonderful teeth.”
When you look for signs of an empire failing, what struck me is the wisdom of a comment which a witness of the Capitol Riots made to a journalist: you ask if there will be civil war? We are already in the middle of it. Perhaps war has shifted its shape, and its weapons have changed. What is for certain, is that the powers that be are no longer centralized and the people can no longer overthrow a king.
Because now money is power and nowhere is it so intertwined with the political system as in the US.
I believe the US already is a feudal system with democratic facade. The victims of this new economic feudal state and warfare between its factions show in a different way. Neglected and disadvantaged, but just sedated enough with entertainment and addictive habits. America has become so rich that not many people hunger and therefore revolt in large numbers. Even if they did, they wouldn’t know who to topple. For me this is post-democracy.
When you look for signs of an empire failing, what struck me is the wisdom of a comment which a witness of the Capitol Riots made to a journalist: you ask if there will be civil war? We are already in the middle of it. Perhaps war has shifted its shape, and its weapons have changed. What is for certain, is that the powers that be are no longer centralized and the people can no longer overthrow a king.
Because now money is power and nowhere is it so intertwined with the political system as in the US.
I believe the US already is a feudal system with democratic facade. The victims of this new economic feudal state and warfare between its factions show in a different way. Neglected and disadvantaged, but just sedated enough with entertainment and addictive habits. America has become so rich that not many people hunger and therefore revolt in large numbers. Even if they did, they wouldn’t know who to topple. For me this is post-democracy.
The thing people don’t understand about America is there is not that much to understand. That’s why we go round and round without any advance in ‘understanding’ about the Americans, along with the various critiques so ably mentioned in this excellent piece.
They’re the wealthy patriarch or matriarch that everyone dislikes, but tries to please so they’re not cut out of the will. The only three things to understand are that for the Americans everything in life is a transaction, that narcissists don’t care about the rest of the world, and that they aren’t that deep.
Personable, likeable, good in business, great company, but no reason to search for deeper meaning.
Fairly accurate summation. Why look for meaning or depths in clouds floating across the sky on vagrant breezes?
“America is a large. friendly dog in a small room. Every time it wags its tail, it knocks over a chair.”
I believe Toynbee said that.
Fairly accurate summation. Why look for meaning or depths in clouds floating across the sky on vagrant breezes?
“America is a large. friendly dog in a small room. Every time it wags its tail, it knocks over a chair.”
I believe Toynbee said that.
The thing people don’t understand about America is there is not that much to understand. That’s why we go round and round without any advance in ‘understanding’ about the Americans, along with the various critiques so ably mentioned in this excellent piece.
They’re the wealthy patriarch or matriarch that everyone dislikes, but tries to please so they’re not cut out of the will. The only three things to understand are that for the Americans everything in life is a transaction, that narcissists don’t care about the rest of the world, and that they aren’t that deep.
Personable, likeable, good in business, great company, but no reason to search for deeper meaning.
Thanks for this review of the relevance of an old book – sounds interesting.
It’s certainly triggered a lot of anti-American sentiments in the comments.
Thanks for this review of the relevance of an old book – sounds interesting.
It’s certainly triggered a lot of anti-American sentiments in the comments.
“ Thus ran the closing paragraph of a letter the Belgian Sinologist Pierre Ryckmans — known under the pen name “Simon Leys” — wrote to his French friend Pierre Boncenne in 2008”
I wouldn’t have believed that then but I believe it now.
“ Thus ran the closing paragraph of a letter the Belgian Sinologist Pierre Ryckmans — known under the pen name “Simon Leys” — wrote to his French friend Pierre Boncenne in 2008”
I wouldn’t have believed that then but I believe it now.
It’s taken as a given that proponents of degeneracy theory such as the Compte de Buffon were reacting to politics, but are we certain of this? What was it that these naturalists perceived as lesser or wretched in the American wilderness? Are we certain we have not got something wrong?
It’s taken as a given that proponents of degeneracy theory such as the Compte de Buffon were reacting to politics, but are we certain of this? What was it that these naturalists perceived as lesser or wretched in the American wilderness? Are we certain we have not got something wrong?
I am not an “Anti-American”, but Heidegger was 100% right here:
“We know today that the Anglo-Saxon world of Americanism has resolved to annihilate [zu vernichten] Europe, that is, the homeland, and that means: the inception of the Western world.”
Yanks don’t like being reminded of where they came from, or that there are actually other countries in the world.
I think this analysis is mistaken. Those in America of European origin are surprisingly attached to mythic roots, and often refer to themselves as e.g. “Italian-American.” “Irish,” or “German.” Latinos refer to them collectively as “Anglos.” However tenuous these identities are, they do serve as the basis of identity for many, though increasingly not amongst under 50’s.
Americans have been taught to see themselves as part of a great “exceptional” experiment, but most are aware that something is amiss, or badly misguided, in the transactional nature of the culture.
Furthermore, intervention on the part of American young men in past disastrous European conflicts has been internalised in their understanding of Europe as a flawed place prone to imperial and ideological adventures that end badly. Heidegger was wrong: Americans don’t seek to “annihilate” (not the same as “zu vernichten” in any case) Europe, but certainly the elites do seek to manage and control it.
I think this analysis is mistaken. Those in America of European origin are surprisingly attached to mythic roots, and often refer to themselves as e.g. “Italian-American.” “Irish,” or “German.” Latinos refer to them collectively as “Anglos.” However tenuous these identities are, they do serve as the basis of identity for many, though increasingly not amongst under 50’s.
Americans have been taught to see themselves as part of a great “exceptional” experiment, but most are aware that something is amiss, or badly misguided, in the transactional nature of the culture.
Furthermore, intervention on the part of American young men in past disastrous European conflicts has been internalised in their understanding of Europe as a flawed place prone to imperial and ideological adventures that end badly. Heidegger was wrong: Americans don’t seek to “annihilate” (not the same as “zu vernichten” in any case) Europe, but certainly the elites do seek to manage and control it.
Oh tut-tut, Heidegger was an incurable Nazi. Joined the party in 1933, the year Hitler came to power, and remained a member until the end of the war. And claims like this, that America wants to destroy Europe, are right out of Hitler’s playbook.
Unless, course, if by the destruction of Europe you mean the quite voluntary assumption by the European elites of all kinds of American social fads, which is an unquestionable fact; Wokeness, Climate Change, the Black Lives Matter scam, extreme feminism, and so on. But the Europeans have done those things to themselves.
Yanks don’t like being reminded of where they came from, or that there are actually other countries in the world.
Oh tut-tut, Heidegger was an incurable Nazi. Joined the party in 1933, the year Hitler came to power, and remained a member until the end of the war. And claims like this, that America wants to destroy Europe, are right out of Hitler’s playbook.
Unless, course, if by the destruction of Europe you mean the quite voluntary assumption by the European elites of all kinds of American social fads, which is an unquestionable fact; Wokeness, Climate Change, the Black Lives Matter scam, extreme feminism, and so on. But the Europeans have done those things to themselves.
I am not an “Anti-American”, but Heidegger was 100% right here:
“We know today that the Anglo-Saxon world of Americanism has resolved to annihilate [zu vernichten] Europe, that is, the homeland, and that means: the inception of the Western world.”
I think that the mission of the today’s America is cutting the roots of its orign, therefore to get rid off “old Europe” as Rumsfeld would put it. Because Europe reminds the US that there is a “western world” outside (or before) liberal modernity. America is a “young culture” who is fighting the inceptional.
Maybe but I doubt it.. like Gamdhi said: the US moved from savagery to decadence without the customary period of culture in between!
Maybe but I doubt it.. like Gamdhi said: the US moved from savagery to decadence without the customary period of culture in between!
I think that the mission of the today’s America is cutting the roots of its orign, therefore to get rid off “old Europe” as Rumsfeld would put it. Because Europe reminds the US that there is a “western world” outside (or before) liberal modernity. America is a “young culture” who is fighting the inceptional.
Wonderful piece. Entertaining. Arrogant in some ways. Halfway through, I wonder, “What’s the point?” Usually, the point is provided in the last two paragraphs, and in desperation, the last paragraph should suffice.
The world has a love-hate relationship with the United States. Why?
Consider this: What does France think of Quebec… or Canada in connection with the United States? Think about it. Did the Seven Years’ War truly wipe Quebec from France’s memory? Didn’t it exist when France used the American War of Independence to draw vital English resources as a second front when the primary intent was to subdue Great Britain in the Anglo-French war of 1778? Along with their friends, the Dutch and Spaniards? Why couldn’t the hawkish Americans march and take Canada in the war of 1812? Isn’t early American history Canadian history? What would have happened if the American cousins held off for eighty years and formed a confederation with Canada? What would British North America look like today?
Google this: The best country in the world. Or, The best country quality of life.
In every category, Canada trumps the United States. Why? Canada with its French and English heritage. I, an Anglophone living in Quebec and the United States, much prefer Canada. But where is Canada in all this talk of American imperialism and Trumpism? Why does America so stigmatize you people?
Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police led the Queen’s funeral procession mounted on RCMP-gifted horses. Where was America?
ANTON JAGER seems to hint that America is the fortune teller of future things for the rest of the world. I would say take a close look at those two countries. What differentiates them? Why do they take different paths? A Dickens’ Christmas Carole. Take note and walk your own path.
An obvious difference is that when Russia knocks on their eastern most door, Euroland nations won’t be calling the Canadian army, the Royal Canadian Police or Justin Trudeau. Their love hate stigmatization by the US is easy to explain. They cannot defend themselves nor do they trust one another to do so. Dependency often involves irrationally mixed emotions.
An obvious difference is that when Russia knocks on their eastern most door, Euroland nations won’t be calling the Canadian army, the Royal Canadian Police or Justin Trudeau. Their love hate stigmatization by the US is easy to explain. They cannot defend themselves nor do they trust one another to do so. Dependency often involves irrationally mixed emotions.
Wonderful piece. Entertaining. Arrogant in some ways. Halfway through, I wonder, “What’s the point?” Usually, the point is provided in the last two paragraphs, and in desperation, the last paragraph should suffice.
The world has a love-hate relationship with the United States. Why?
Consider this: What does France think of Quebec… or Canada in connection with the United States? Think about it. Did the Seven Years’ War truly wipe Quebec from France’s memory? Didn’t it exist when France used the American War of Independence to draw vital English resources as a second front when the primary intent was to subdue Great Britain in the Anglo-French war of 1778? Along with their friends, the Dutch and Spaniards? Why couldn’t the hawkish Americans march and take Canada in the war of 1812? Isn’t early American history Canadian history? What would have happened if the American cousins held off for eighty years and formed a confederation with Canada? What would British North America look like today?
Google this: The best country in the world. Or, The best country quality of life.
In every category, Canada trumps the United States. Why? Canada with its French and English heritage. I, an Anglophone living in Quebec and the United States, much prefer Canada. But where is Canada in all this talk of American imperialism and Trumpism? Why does America so stigmatize you people?
Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police led the Queen’s funeral procession mounted on RCMP-gifted horses. Where was America?
ANTON JAGER seems to hint that America is the fortune teller of future things for the rest of the world. I would say take a close look at those two countries. What differentiates them? Why do they take different paths? A Dickens’ Christmas Carole. Take note and walk your own path.
It’s not ‘rabid anti-Americanism’ to hold the USA and its people to unpleasant account for the litany of evil they have committed, condoned, turned-a-blind-eye-to, swept under the carpet and plain bragged about.
I am sick and tired of the UK saying that we have to be sycophantic fellaters of all things American.
If you think the USA is such a wonderful place, go live there and become a citizen.
Don’t tell the rest of us that we have to be American serfs in our own country.
It’s not ‘rabid anti-Americanism’ to hold the USA and its people to unpleasant account for the litany of evil they have committed, condoned, turned-a-blind-eye-to, swept under the carpet and plain bragged about.
I am sick and tired of the UK saying that we have to be sycophantic fellaters of all things American.
If you think the USA is such a wonderful place, go live there and become a citizen.
Don’t tell the rest of us that we have to be American serfs in our own country.
If you watch the Yuri Bezmenov videos it’s clear the Soviet Union won the Cold War. Unfortunately they didn’t manage to stick around long enough to enjoy the fruits of their labour.
If you watch the Yuri Bezmenov videos it’s clear the Soviet Union won the Cold War. Unfortunately they didn’t manage to stick around long enough to enjoy the fruits of their labour.
”American” deemed an offensive word by woke cognescenti at Stanford. A measure of the moralizing cesspool we live in.
America is a watered down version of Europe. A country run by juveniles for juveniles and it is becoming even more childish over time. God help us because the Americans won’t.
Biden, Pelosi, Trump, and McConnell are hardly juveniles by the calendar, although their behavior is certainly juvenile.
Many Americans see our crowning moral achievement as going from enslaving blacks to having a black President, and are trying to portray all sorts of causes as similar moral battles, such as climate change, LGBTQRX, diversity, equity, inclusion, immigration, hate speech, etc, but none of these is legitimate. Hence the paroxysms are displayed for all the world to see. Perhaps you should have import tariffs on these?
Quite right. To prevent EU-Russian cooperation the US (using its lapdog UK) blew up the German- Russian Nordstream2 pipeline.. and then charged the EU 4x the US price for LNG!
With friends like these who needs enemies? It’s well past time the EU broke all ties with the US, starting with NATO.. With its 600m population and immense wealth there’s no reason why we cannot have an fully independent EU superpower.
EU countries simply don’t spend anything like as much on defense as the US.
When Ursula von der Leyen was German defence minister she couldn’t even give her soldiers enough rifles that worked. Look up H&K G36 if you can’t believe me. That’s the level of incompetence that gets you to President of the Commission, apparently.
Why are Finland and Sweden reconsidering their traditional neutrality and looking to join NATO? Is it because Vladimir has never invaded a NATO member?
Finns and Swedes want a US defense guarantee. In fact, NATO is really the Hotel California for Euro landers. You check in but you can never leave.The Russians just reminded everyone. Only Macron thinks the EU can mount a defense force – led by France! Let that silly notion bring you cheer – as the US country song reminds us.
Just a reminder that Finland escaped from a century of Russian rule in 1917, and barely escaped the clutches again of Stalin after invasion in 1938. Sweden as well suffered Russian invasion repeatedly in the 18th and 19th centuries. Their wariness/fear is real now that the current Czar has embarked on an imperialist course once again. To imagine they would rely on any sort of EU defense force is hallucinogenic; US-led NATO is their only option.
I was aware of their past conflicts with Russia. That is one reason both have stronger indigenous defense forces than most EU states. It is worth noting that Kaliningrad is a serious Russian naval/ground threat right in their backyard.
Indeed. And Viborg, in former Finnish/Swedish Karelia just across the border, is heavily militarised to protect the source of the Nordstream pipeline.
Indeed. And Viborg, in former Finnish/Swedish Karelia just across the border, is heavily militarised to protect the source of the Nordstream pipeline.
I was aware of their past conflicts with Russia. That is one reason both have stronger indigenous defense forces than most EU states. It is worth noting that Kaliningrad is a serious Russian naval/ground threat right in their backyard.
The EU is not just France.. would the EU be better off with a French led military force or should we continue to rely on old allies that
1. Blew up Nordstream2 and then
2. Charge us 4x the US price for their LNG
With friends like these who needs enemies? Vive la France! Vive la UE!
Just a reminder that Finland escaped from a century of Russian rule in 1917, and barely escaped the clutches again of Stalin after invasion in 1938. Sweden as well suffered Russian invasion repeatedly in the 18th and 19th centuries. Their wariness/fear is real now that the current Czar has embarked on an imperialist course once again. To imagine they would rely on any sort of EU defense force is hallucinogenic; US-led NATO is their only option.
The EU is not just France.. would the EU be better off with a French led military force or should we continue to rely on old allies that
1. Blew up Nordstream2 and then
2. Charge us 4x the US price for their LNG
With friends like these who needs enemies? Vive la France! Vive la UE!
I’m aware of the lack of military spending in the EU (largely due to the EU’s anti war stance) but that is now over, thanks to Putin’s aggression.. the money, technology and population are all there for EU to stand alone now that we know our enemies are not just East of us but also West of us: old allieswecan no-one rely on.
From the totality of Liam O’ Mahony comments that I’ve subjected myself to: You sure have a lot of enemies, including the British. But I suppose you’ll learn to stand and march alongside them to create the utopia that’ll take shape once Europeans refuse US aid, reject all global involvement, and become a walled-off continental fiefdom, on the side of the righteous and dispossessed of course.
From the totality of Liam O’ Mahony comments that I’ve subjected myself to: You sure have a lot of enemies, including the British. But I suppose you’ll learn to stand and march alongside them to create the utopia that’ll take shape once Europeans refuse US aid, reject all global involvement, and become a walled-off continental fiefdom, on the side of the righteous and dispossessed of course.
Finns and Swedes want a US defense guarantee. In fact, NATO is really the Hotel California for Euro landers. You check in but you can never leave.The Russians just reminded everyone. Only Macron thinks the EU can mount a defense force – led by France! Let that silly notion bring you cheer – as the US country song reminds us.
I’m aware of the lack of military spending in the EU (largely due to the EU’s anti war stance) but that is now over, thanks to Putin’s aggression.. the money, technology and population are all there for EU to stand alone now that we know our enemies are not just East of us but also West of us: old allieswecan no-one rely on.
Except you will never want to pay for it.
Except you will never want to pay for it.
Smoted by down votes but it does stink like that the nord stream business, I agree.
There is a reason, Liam. Europe is not as rich, clever, innovative and entrepreneurial as the US. The EU cannot even democratically govern itself. Even with 600,000,000 (an exaggeration but we’ll let that pass) the EU has not the capacity to become a superpower.
There was disruption in the US because of disagreement about the result of the 2020 US Presidential election. ONE election since 1776. How many European elections over that period have been overthrown by military juntas, totalitarian dictatorships and other forms of undemocratic governance? The EU isn’t democratic even in 2022.
Go away!
‘How many European elections over that period have been overthrown by military juntas, totalitarian dictatorships and other forms of undemocratic governance?’
How many of them were American-backed? 😉
‘How many European elections over that period have been overthrown by military juntas, totalitarian dictatorships and other forms of undemocratic governance?’
How many of them were American-backed? 😉
EU countries simply don’t spend anything like as much on defense as the US.
When Ursula von der Leyen was German defence minister she couldn’t even give her soldiers enough rifles that worked. Look up H&K G36 if you can’t believe me. That’s the level of incompetence that gets you to President of the Commission, apparently.
Why are Finland and Sweden reconsidering their traditional neutrality and looking to join NATO? Is it because Vladimir has never invaded a NATO member?
Except you will never want to pay for it.
Except you will never want to pay for it.
Smoted by down votes but it does stink like that the nord stream business, I agree.
There is a reason, Liam. Europe is not as rich, clever, innovative and entrepreneurial as the US. The EU cannot even democratically govern itself. Even with 600,000,000 (an exaggeration but we’ll let that pass) the EU has not the capacity to become a superpower.
There was disruption in the US because of disagreement about the result of the 2020 US Presidential election. ONE election since 1776. How many European elections over that period have been overthrown by military juntas, totalitarian dictatorships and other forms of undemocratic governance? The EU isn’t democratic even in 2022.
Go away!
Biden, Pelosi, Trump, and McConnell are hardly juveniles by the calendar, although their behavior is certainly juvenile.
Many Americans see our crowning moral achievement as going from enslaving blacks to having a black President, and are trying to portray all sorts of causes as similar moral battles, such as climate change, LGBTQRX, diversity, equity, inclusion, immigration, hate speech, etc, but none of these is legitimate. Hence the paroxysms are displayed for all the world to see. Perhaps you should have import tariffs on these?
Quite right. To prevent EU-Russian cooperation the US (using its lapdog UK) blew up the German- Russian Nordstream2 pipeline.. and then charged the EU 4x the US price for LNG!
With friends like these who needs enemies? It’s well past time the EU broke all ties with the US, starting with NATO.. With its 600m population and immense wealth there’s no reason why we cannot have an fully independent EU superpower.
America is a watered down version of Europe. A country run by juveniles for juveniles and it is becoming even more childish over time. God help us because the Americans won’t.
Search for M e g h a n M and the uncomfortable truth about Britain, and It is time to jail Jeremy C. Will flesh out my last comment, which I cannot edit, since my comment is in limbo.
Search for M e g h a n M and the uncomfortable truth about Britain, and It is time to jail Jeremy C. Will flesh out my last comment, which I cannot edit, since my comment is in limbo.
Crediting Baudrillard from 1986 is as absurd as crediting Godard. “The Children of Marx and Coca Cola”, was a truism in 1966. William Thomas Stead published “The Americanization of the World” in 1901, but why credit him? After the end of fascism and communism the only utopia left is academia. Jäger wallows in the aestheticized politics of Weimar, and now that he’s discovered “populism” he’s publishing on a site founded by the author of “The Strange Death of Europe”, blaming swarthy-hook nosed Muslims this time and not swarthy hook-nosed Jews, their kin.
20 years ago I said that that secularizing Islam might help to civilize Europe as secularizing Judaism once did. The Protestant liberalism of the elite and Jäger’s academy is a disaster. The vulgarity of the Protestant street, topsy-turvy, was never strong enough to win out over technocrats, Oxbridge philosophers and Oxbridge bankers. The fascism of reactionary Catholics will fail only because the deeply self-loathing will always be a small minority. It’s a rare thing when ressentiment drives the population of an entire country. It’s happening again in Israel.
“Anti-Americanism might be a moral imperative for Europeans. It certainly is satisfying. But a disinterest in the US is hard to justify politically, let alone strategically expedient. As Nick Burns noted in a reflection on America, Baudrillard’s real message is that “we have to perform American experiments on ourselves”.
Anti-Americanism is the opposite of disinterest. And quoting Nick Burns, a booster who thinks New York is the center of the universe, when the only people who think that now are Americans. Immigrants know it’s provincial.
American individualism is a lie. That’s why the the biggest global trend is the fantasy of the hive. Individualism ends in its opposite. Jäger and his club kid friends should look in the mirror and watch how their tics and tropes, physical and intellectual, are effect and not cause. Then maybe they’ll be able to change their behavior.
Mistakes and contradictions I wish I could edit out: “The fascism of reactionary Catholics will fail…” It’s succeeded many times. But ressentiment is the founding principle of fascism, and it exists as a psychology whether or not it becomes the psychology of a mass. Fascism will fail in the US for the same reason it failed in Russia: the inability to get anything done. But all that’s another argument.
Mistakes and contradictions I wish I could edit out: “The fascism of reactionary Catholics will fail…” It’s succeeded many times. But ressentiment is the founding principle of fascism, and it exists as a psychology whether or not it becomes the psychology of a mass. Fascism will fail in the US for the same reason it failed in Russia: the inability to get anything done. But all that’s another argument.
Crediting Baudrillard from 1986 is as absurd as crediting Godard. “The Children of Marx and Coca Cola”, was a truism in 1966. William Thomas Stead published “The Americanization of the World” in 1901, but why credit him? After the end of fascism and communism the only utopia left is academia. Jäger wallows in the aestheticized politics of Weimar, and now that he’s discovered “populism” he’s publishing on a site founded by the author of “The Strange Death of Europe”, blaming swarthy-hook nosed Muslims this time and not swarthy hook-nosed Jews, their kin.
20 years ago I said that that secularizing Islam might help to civilize Europe as secularizing Judaism once did. The Protestant liberalism of the elite and Jäger’s academy is a disaster. The vulgarity of the Protestant street, topsy-turvy, was never strong enough to win out over technocrats, Oxbridge philosophers and Oxbridge bankers. The fascism of reactionary Catholics will fail only because the deeply self-loathing will always be a small minority. It’s a rare thing when ressentiment drives the population of an entire country. It’s happening again in Israel.
“Anti-Americanism might be a moral imperative for Europeans. It certainly is satisfying. But a disinterest in the US is hard to justify politically, let alone strategically expedient. As Nick Burns noted in a reflection on America, Baudrillard’s real message is that “we have to perform American experiments on ourselves”.
Anti-Americanism is the opposite of disinterest. And quoting Nick Burns, a booster who thinks New York is the center of the universe, when the only people who think that now are Americans. Immigrants know it’s provincial.
American individualism is a lie. That’s why the the biggest global trend is the fantasy of the hive. Individualism ends in its opposite. Jäger and his club kid friends should look in the mirror and watch how their tics and tropes, physical and intellectual, are effect and not cause. Then maybe they’ll be able to change their behavior.
Yes indeed, there are no sovereign states in Europe – merely pathetic vassals to the Yankee hegemon. The vassals are ordered to destroy their own wealth producing capacity with the mind bogglingly stupid sanctions ‘against’ Russia. They meekly comply.
The most servile vassal is Britain -embarrassingly craven, the most desperate for praise from the overlord with that ‘special relationship’. The more Britain is treated like a ‘has been’, the more they crave the crumbs of praise from the hegemon.
Europeans no longer have any dignity – and only servitude lies ahead.
The future is in Asia.
You underestimate the British capacity for dirty tricks which the relatively naive US envies and works very closely with.. eg Britain’s destruction of Nordstream2 was not a servile action at the behest of the US but rather a joint effort. The US destroys EU-Russia economic cooperation (as promised by Nuland and Biden himself) and GB gets its revenge against the EU! A deal made in Hell by two of the world’s most Hellish states!
“…only servitude lies ahead.”
True. And the worst of it is (from your point of view) that you sold yourselves willingly!
Luckily, I think your view is a stupid distortion of reality. The US is only as influential as your people let it be.
We are resisting. The resistant voices keep getting down voted though, this place is awash with Americans, seems even on a website that professes to be for Britain, is centred in London and is supposedly discussing our politics, we are swamped by American idealogy.
Above you told Mr Mahony to go away, well excuse me but Ireland is considerably closer to us than America, Northern Ireland is still part of the UK. So you go away. Go and spout on a forum for American politics sort your own issues out that for some reason you feel the need to impose upon the rest of us and b****r off.
Should this apply to all articles here, or just those whose subject is America?
Obviously not, that would take the fun out of it wouldn’t it?
Original American commenter was telling the Irish to go away, I was pointing out how ridiculous that is by turning it round on them.
You are slow. I’m sorry I had to explain that for you.
Obviously not, that would take the fun out of it wouldn’t it?
Original American commenter was telling the Irish to go away, I was pointing out how ridiculous that is by turning it round on them.
You are slow. I’m sorry I had to explain that for you.
Should this apply to all articles here, or just those whose subject is America?
We are resisting. The resistant voices keep getting down voted though, this place is awash with Americans, seems even on a website that professes to be for Britain, is centred in London and is supposedly discussing our politics, we are swamped by American idealogy.
Above you told Mr Mahony to go away, well excuse me but Ireland is considerably closer to us than America, Northern Ireland is still part of the UK. So you go away. Go and spout on a forum for American politics sort your own issues out that for some reason you feel the need to impose upon the rest of us and b****r off.
You underestimate the British capacity for dirty tricks which the relatively naive US envies and works very closely with.. eg Britain’s destruction of Nordstream2 was not a servile action at the behest of the US but rather a joint effort. The US destroys EU-Russia economic cooperation (as promised by Nuland and Biden himself) and GB gets its revenge against the EU! A deal made in Hell by two of the world’s most Hellish states!
“…only servitude lies ahead.”
True. And the worst of it is (from your point of view) that you sold yourselves willingly!
Luckily, I think your view is a stupid distortion of reality. The US is only as influential as your people let it be.
Yes indeed, there are no sovereign states in Europe – merely pathetic vassals to the Yankee hegemon. The vassals are ordered to destroy their own wealth producing capacity with the mind bogglingly stupid sanctions ‘against’ Russia. They meekly comply.
The most servile vassal is Britain -embarrassingly craven, the most desperate for praise from the overlord with that ‘special relationship’. The more Britain is treated like a ‘has been’, the more they crave the crumbs of praise from the hegemon.
Europeans no longer have any dignity – and only servitude lies ahead.
The future is in Asia.