Most modern Christmas “classics” look and feel as fake as a tinsel-draped plastic fir-tree. Though streaming services and Hollywood studios try to persuade us that their latest twist on the Elf who saved Christmas from the Grinch while Santa had a Holiday Romance will snare our affections forever, almost all of this formulaic fare has the shelf-life of tissue wrapping-paper. How curious, then, to watch what seems to be the emergence of a genuinely beloved seasonal story, with strong prospects of enduring fame, from that most marginal corner of the culture industries: literary fiction.
The Irish writer Claire Keegan published her fourth book, Small Things Like These, in late October 2021. This short novel (110 pages) rapidly won plenty of warm reviews and, this year, prizes too: the Kerry Group Irish Novel of the Year Award and — significantly — the Orwell Prize for Political Fiction.1 This autumn it reached the Booker Prize shortlist, and easily outsold the eventual winner. Just as noteworthy, Small Things Like These has been talked about, shared and given with the sort of spontaneous enthusiasm that publishers — who love to fabricate a bottom-up, word-of-mouth sensation — want to stimulate but seldom can.
Yes, this is a Christmas tale complete with fairy-lights, snowfalls, cribs, cakes, puddings, berries; even “a boy’s tall, unbroken voice” singing “O holy night, the stars are brightly shining”. Yet Keegan’s bleak midwinter fable offers the opposite of consensual uplift and cosy togetherness. Her wavering protagonist asks, in standard seasonal fashion, “was there any point in being alive without helping one another?”, but knows that the help he foresees may wreck his own and his family’s contentment. She enlists an array of tropes and accessories from the traditional Yuletide yarn, but turns them upside down: in some ways, Small Things Like These is Dickens’s A Christmas Carol in reverse. The widespread appreciation — indeed, love — it has garnered suggests not just a proper acknowledgement of its author’s gifts but a broader mood that its ambiguities have tapped. Here, after all, is an implicit denunciation of supposedly Christian institutions launched in the name of persistent Christian ideals. Keegan has spoken of her story as “a portrait of how difficult it was to practise being a good Christian in Catholic Ireland”.
In Ireland, in Britain, in the world at large, debates about the decay of religious allegiance and the march of “secularisation” often fail to ask what happens to the emotional legacy of faith when it fades, or else walks away from hypocritical and abusive institutions. The unforced success of Keegan’s book suggests that many readers crave a path through that inner limbo that tick-box surveys of religious attitudes and affiliations will never wholly recognise. Small Things Like These shows how much there was to fear, even to hate, among the Ghosts of Christmas Past; but equally, how hard it can be to recognise and follow more hopeful Ghosts of Christmas Yet to Come.
If you know the plot already, forgive me for a brief catch-up. (If you don’t, this paragraph ends with a spoiler.) In December 1985, Bill Furlong works as a thriving coal and timber merchant in the Co. Wexford town of New Ross, which straddles the River Barrow. With his wife, Eileen, and five daughters at home, he toils with some success to keep them while fellow-citizens grapple with recession-induced poverty and despair. Bill was born illegitimate and raised by a kindly, comparatively well-off Protestant widow, Mrs Wilson, after she took in his pregnant mother. Now, as Christmas nears, he visits the “powerful-looking” convent that looms over the town and finds, in a coal-shed, an imprisoned and maltreated girl. She labours in the mysterious “training school” and laundry run by the nuns and has had a new-born baby seized from her, its fate unknown. Although warned off by Mother Superior, wife and neighbours, Bill returns to the convent during a Christmas Eve snowstorm. He plans to undertake an act of rescue proving him “brave enough to go against what was there”. Keegan leaves the reader to imagine the outcomes of this deed as Bill leads the barefoot girl — “not one of his own” — home past aghast townsfolk through snow-bound streets under coloured lights. He feels, though, “the best bit of him was shining forth, and surfacing”.
Keegan dedicates the book to “the women and children who suffered time in Ireland’s mother and baby homes and Magdalene laundries”. The latter, dumping-grounds for pregnant, rebellious or simply wilful young women, were managed in Ireland by four religious orders both as punitive slave-labour workhouses and valuable commercial enterprises. They incarcerated and exploited perhaps 30,000 women. Many young women died; so did uncounted babies. Other infants were taken to be put up for adoption, in Ireland or abroad. As Keegan writes in a note, “Some or most” inmates, both parents and children, “lost the lives they could have had”. State and Church authorities colluded for decades in the impunity and secrecy of the laundries. After revelations about their cruelties added to a swelling tide of protest against institutional abuse in Ireland, an 18-month official enquiry led to the McAleese Report of 2013 — challenged as evasive and inadequate by survivor groups — and an apology from the then Taoiseach, Enda Kenny.
However, Small Things Like These is not a slice of angry agitprop or a semi-documentary exposé; New Ross itself did have a Magdalene Laundry — but it had closed by 1967 (the last one in Ireland shut in 1996). It reads more like a story-book fable, a ballad, a fireside yarn studded with eerie, folkloric touches, from the birds who refuse to touch “a single berry on the holly bushes” around the accursed convent to the uncanny old man “in a waistcoat with a billhook” met on a lonely byway. He tells Bill that “This road will take you wherever you want to go, son”. For all its mid-Eighties allusions, the New Ross townscape seems marooned (like the Republic itself) in a retro dream, or nightmare. Keegan’s chiselled prose doubles down on this timeless, even archaic, flavour. Reviewers have likened the story to Chekhov’s short fiction but — in an Irish context — it’s impossible not to think of the style of “scrupulous meanness”, blending naturalism and symbolism, that James Joyce sought for the stories of Dubliners. The collection, remember, closes with a sort of Christmas tale, “The Dead”, in which a prosperous but uneasy man of forty-odd finally grasps the enduring grief and loss of a bereaved countrywoman — his wife, in this case — while the snow that “was general all over Ireland” falls quietly on the living and the dead.
Keegan is a meticulous stylist, but her book has surely ridden on non-literary currents that flow as strong and deep as the swollen waters of the Barrow that Bill crosses. It grows out of the Irish repudiation of Catholic social power that began around 1985, when a Dáil vote made non-prescription contraceptives legally available, and gathered force over the next three decades. Buttressed by secrecy and lies, the Church of Keegan’s New Ross still runs a closed shop that dictates and directs all aspects of life. Eileen warns Bill to “just mind what we have here and stay on the right side of people and soldier on”; their daughters, after all, need places at the high-achieving Catholic high school. Mrs Kehoe, the café proprietor who has heard gossip about about Bill’s “run-in with herself above at the convent”, likewise advises him to “keep the enemy close, the bad dog with you and the good dog will not bite”. As for “herself above”, the creepy Mother Superior, she hints, flatters and bribes Bill with all the sinister finesse of some top-flight secret-service chief. Indeed, Keegan’s vision of an all-encompassing Catholic gulag oddly resembles Warsaw Pact societies such as Hungary, Czechoslovakia and East Germany at exactly this period. Few believed any more in the ideology of the ruling elite, but a comfortable life might be secured by prudent, silent obedience.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI grew up in Ireland in the 70s and 80s in a non-religious (even anti-religious) family and it was nothing like the priestly terror state of the official narrative now. It was certainly a poorer place but it was a kind and gentle little country. You could believe and say what you wanted without getting destroyed or even imprisoned. Very different now
I agree!
Agreed
I agree!
Agreed
I grew up in Ireland in the 70s and 80s in a non-religious (even anti-religious) family and it was nothing like the priestly terror state of the official narrative now. It was certainly a poorer place but it was a kind and gentle little country. You could believe and say what you wanted without getting destroyed or even imprisoned. Very different now
After seeing the result of millions of single women rearing their unplanned children on western society at large, think I’ll give this one a hard pass.
After seeing the result of millions of single women rearing their unplanned children on western society at large, think I’ll give this one a hard pass.
A very fine essay. I’ll look for the book in the local library.
“Rather, the receding “sea of faith” that Matthew Arnold lamented as early as 1851 has left a homeless feeling filled with nostalgia, thwarted idealism, and unfocused goodwill.”
We read so much about the God-shaped hole in society these days, and how progressives have created a pseudo-religion to fill it, but I wonder if the above quotation might be a more generous way of describing their (largely subconscious?) motivations.
I’m convinced that those who endorse a God-shaped hole (the GK Chesterton-quoters, for instance) simply lack imagination. Those who pursue pseudo-religions are equally lacking, and the quotation you cite is a very useful attempt to move the debate forward in a positive manner.
You might be disappointed, if you are familiar with the situation the book describes. If I like a book I pass it on to family or friends; that book went straight into the Save the Children Booksale box.
I don’t feel that moving on from the Catholic Church needs to lead to nostalgia, thwarted idealism or unfocused goodwill. If you want the world to be better then you need to make it better, which you can do by volunteering, donating and contributing in other ways – you can focus your goodwill into practical good works. As for nostalgia, be realistic about the past – the best of it was fellowship & community, which can be found in other places, or with fellow ‘survivors’.
Well said. I agree with you and upticked you.
Well said. I agree with you and upticked you.
The quote is about Arnold’s “liberal” Christianity that he sees receding in front of Conservative evangelicalism. Ironic how conservatives that have never read Arnold use it as a reference to the decline of Conservative Christianity.
I don’t think that’s accurate. The source poem, “Dover Beach”, expresses a societal and personal loss of faith brought on in large part by the contemporary increase in scientific knowledge and the schools of cold rationalism that were correlated with that increase. Arnold laments a (seemingly) godless universe, not any particular branch of Christianity. Here are the concluding lines:
“[…] for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.”
What sort of faith do those lines express?
I don’t think that’s accurate. The source poem, “Dover Beach”, expresses a societal and personal loss of faith brought on in large part by the contemporary increase in scientific knowledge and the schools of cold rationalism that were correlated with that increase. Arnold laments a (seemingly) godless universe, not any particular branch of Christianity. Here are the concluding lines:
“[…] for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.”
What sort of faith do those lines express?
I’m convinced that those who endorse a God-shaped hole (the GK Chesterton-quoters, for instance) simply lack imagination. Those who pursue pseudo-religions are equally lacking, and the quotation you cite is a very useful attempt to move the debate forward in a positive manner.
You might be disappointed, if you are familiar with the situation the book describes. If I like a book I pass it on to family or friends; that book went straight into the Save the Children Booksale box.
I don’t feel that moving on from the Catholic Church needs to lead to nostalgia, thwarted idealism or unfocused goodwill. If you want the world to be better then you need to make it better, which you can do by volunteering, donating and contributing in other ways – you can focus your goodwill into practical good works. As for nostalgia, be realistic about the past – the best of it was fellowship & community, which can be found in other places, or with fellow ‘survivors’.
The quote is about Arnold’s “liberal” Christianity that he sees receding in front of Conservative evangelicalism. Ironic how conservatives that have never read Arnold use it as a reference to the decline of Conservative Christianity.
A very fine essay. I’ll look for the book in the local library.
“Rather, the receding “sea of faith” that Matthew Arnold lamented as early as 1851 has left a homeless feeling filled with nostalgia, thwarted idealism, and unfocused goodwill.”
We read so much about the God-shaped hole in society these days, and how progressives have created a pseudo-religion to fill it, but I wonder if the above quotation might be a more generous way of describing their (largely subconscious?) motivations.
Why is the painting that illustrates this article not attributed? The painting is Hunters in the Snow by Pieter Bruegel the Elder.
it’s attributed – top right corner
it’s attributed – top right corner
Why is the painting that illustrates this article not attributed? The painting is Hunters in the Snow by Pieter Bruegel the Elder.
My sister just recommended this book to me at the weekend – so I will definitely read it this Christmas. Claire Keegan’s Foster forms the basis of the film ‘An Cailín Ciúin’ (the Quiet Girl), which is also winning all kinds of prizes.
My sister just recommended this book to me at the weekend – so I will definitely read it this Christmas. Claire Keegan’s Foster forms the basis of the film ‘An Cailín Ciúin’ (the Quiet Girl), which is also winning all kinds of prizes.