What will he think of the Night of the Long Ibérico Ham Knives?(Chan Long Hei/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The most damaging political scandals are simple at heart. They involve basic human sins. We all understand stories about greed or sex or hypocrisy because they are such universal human failings. Which is why stories about lockdown parties in Downing Street get noticed by the public.
Something similar applies to a story unfolding here in Hong Kong. It too involves dozens of senior officials ignoring the advice of their own government by going to a party — although many of the details reveal the differences between the two approaches to Covid.
The basic facts are straightforward. With Hong Kong on the brink of its fifth Covid wave, the Government this month advised people to avoid large gatherings. Yet last week, dozens of government officials and politicians instead went to a birthday party in a tapas restaurant, hosted by Witman Hung, Hong Kong’s delegate to the National People’s Congress. Estimates of the number of people present vary — and indeed, keep climbing as more information seeps out — but more than 200 seem to have been involved at various points in the evening.
A few days later, one of the women at the party then tested positive for Covid.
If you are a close contact of a known Covid case in Hong Kong, you don’t get pinged and asked to stay at home for a bit. Instead, you are taken off to a room in a quarantine centre for up to three weeks. It is common to see these rooms described as spartan or like being in prison, albeit by people who have never been to prison and wouldn’t have lasted long in Sparta — but they are not the Mandarin Oriental and three weeks stuck in a single room is far from pleasant.
This policy is stern and unbending. Currently sitting in quarantine, for example, are a class of kindergarten kids, aged three and four. Even contacts of close contacts have found themselves locked up, albeit it for shorter periods, while they are tested.
The result is that multiple members of the Government, including the home affairs secretary, the head of immigration chief, and the secretary for financial services, now find themselves in quarantine. Others escaped by being able to prove they left the party before the Covid case turned up — although at one point, when a second case was identified, it looked as everyone might get locked up, only for the second case to turn out to be a false positive.
A key difference between the stories in the UK and Hong Kong is that the Chief Executive Carrie Lam wasn’t at this party and moved swiftly to distance herself from those present, in an event one Hong Kong observer referred to as the Night of the Long Ibérico Ham Knives. To paraphrase Jeremy Thorpe, when Harold Macmillan defenestrated multiple colleagues in an attempt to save his own political skin: greater love hath no woman than this, that she lay down her friends for her life.
It is not that those attending Witman’s party had necessarily broken any laws, although things are a bit murky as to whether everyone had been entirely on it when it came to using the tracing app required to enter restaurants. But they had all gone against their own government’s clear advice.
And then there’s the public reaction. The overwhelming response of the public to the various Downing Street beanos has been anger at the hypocrisy of politicians who appear to have been behaving in a way that they were preventing others from doing. All those people who couldn’t visit a dying parent — and, as one of this group, here I declare an interest — look askance at politicians going on the razz.
In Hong Kong, there is anger at the behaviour of their politicians, but it is mixed with massive dollops of schadenfreude. By European standards, Hong Kong’s fifth ‘wave’ is less of a wave and more of a millpond. It has involved fewer than 50 cases thus far. In a territory of more than seven million people, one of them just happened to attend a party containing many of its most senior political figures; of all the tapas restaurants in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine.
Depending on your point of view this is either a sign of how unlucky the politicos were or, and this seems to be the view taken by many of the people I speak to, it proves that that there is indeed a God. Because it is, bluntly, hugely enjoyable to see people who have inflicted such heavy-handed measures on the population hoist by their own petard like this, especially when not all of them have handled their incarceration with grace and dignity.
As an example of how heavy handed it is, consider this. At the same time as the Witman story unfolded, a four-year old girl tested positive for Covid — and was put on her own in an isolation room in hospital, with a bell to ring should she need anything. Somehow, and because she was bored or terrified or lonely, she managed to escape. When she was spotted, maskless, outside of her room, she was sent back in, for what could be weeks of isolation, while the two staff who found her were themselves carted off to quarantine. In almost any other place in the world, isolating children like this would be a huge story; in Hong Kong it has somehow become accepted as normal. It, and the many other restrictions in place here, are not normal.
The flipside of how easily we understand some scandals is that sometimes we fail to comprehend the more complicated, duller, but maybe more serious issues. And however enjoyable the Witman scandal is, there is a danger that it all distracts from the broader points about Hong Kong’s record of dealing with Covid.
The cautious approach that initially served it well is now crippling it. The death rate remains staggeringly low relative to the rest of the world; per capita, the UK’s death rate is 78 times higher. But this policy is becoming increasingly unsustainable, the measures required increasingly harsh. What once advertised itself as ‘Asia’s global city’ is becoming ever more isolated. Multiple travels bans are in place; even of those who can fly in, most have to spend three weeks in quarantine. Hong Kong’s airport is now a ghost town, save for the families leaving. The goal of reopening the border with the mainland — which Lam and others see as their priority — appears no closer to fruition either.
The vaccination programme has been a disaster. Despite ample resourcing and availability, fewer than a fifth of the over-80s are vaccinated. The Government’s approach to driving up the vaccination rate has been woefully hands-off, wasting months when the city was effectively Covid-free which could have been used for a vaccination drive.
The result has been that the handful of cases seen since January have led to a widespread reintroduction of restrictions, including, as I write this, the suspension of face-to-face teaching in primary schools. This will be the third time since Covid began that primary teaching will have been suspended. (All local schools, including secondaries, were anyway still not back to full face-to-face teaching anyway, even two years into the pandemic.) Announcing the closure of schools, Lam said that she didn’t want to see young children sent into quarantine; that there may be other ways of dealing with this appears not to have occurred to anyone.
The inter-generational tensions caused by Covid are evident all around the globe, with the young, mostly safe, forced to undergo restrictions to protect the more elderly. But nowhere is this issue starker than in Hong Kong, where the youngest are again being punished to protect an elderly population that has done next to nothing to protect themselves — and by a government that has also done next to nothing to make them protect themselves. This, rather than a piss-up in a tapas restaurant, is the real scandal.
Philip Cowley is professor of politics at Queen Mary University of London. His books include volumes on each of the last three elections.
philipjcowley 
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe“At the same time as the Witman story unfolded, a four-year old girl tested positive for Covid — and was put on her own in an isolation room in hospital, with a bell to ring should she need anything. Somehow, and because she was bored or terrified or lonely, she managed to escape. When she was spotted, maskless, outside of her room, she was sent back in, for what could be weeks of isolation, while the two staff who found her were themselves carted off to quarantine.”
It’s hard to know what to say about this incident. Of course the immediate impulse is to rant and rage but that seems insufficient and pointless.
I’d like to blame the heartless quarantine staff but they would doubtless have been hauled off by the authorities if they didn’t lock the child away. Carrie Lam and her fellow leaders are also obvious objects of blame but she’s a stooge of the CCP.
Many years from now all sorts of records relating to covid responses throughout the world will finally be released (although I’m sure some will be destroyed long before then). A measure of objectivity might prevail; the most culpable people will be dead or no longer important enough to wield much influence. We’ll hear the stories of those who witnessed, first hand, how decisions such as locking up young children were made. We’ll hear the stories of those grown children. We’ll see the economic and social effects wrought by the covid restrictions. We might finally be able to reach a level-headed assessment of this pandemic and the various national responses to it.
But what will we really have learned? If SARS-cov-3 comes along after we’ve objectively analyzed the response to SARS-cov-2, and if the new virus is not much more virulent than the current iteration, will we respond differently, more intelligently? Or will we learn the terrible lesson that the neocortex really is little more than a thin layer of tissue grafted onto the much larger limbic system–the emotion-driven ‘primitive’ brain? Is the neocortex a fair weather accretion useful only in times of plenty and ease? When real danger arrives is it inevitably pushed aside by the lizard brain and its desperate, frenzied attempts to achieve security at all costs?
That depends on if, until then, we have replaced our media and political systems with some who are more honest, wise and conscientious.
I’ll give you an example: one of the major issues with COVID is people sitting at home and unknowingly losing lung function. Ultimately they get really close to death, and are hauled off to a hospital when in critical condition. Had those people been given pulse-oximeters, and/or gotten a check-up call, they could have been brought to the hospital early enough. The COVID infection in the lungs would have been addressed by laying them down for a few days (or even hours) in a position that opens the lungs, or they could have been given low-dose, non-invasive oxygen. In most cases, this would have been enough to avoid the progression to a critical state. I have had countless frontline doctors confirm this, and have read about it (very!) occasionally in the news.
And now show me one politician or “expert” who has recommended this strategy. I’m not aware of a single one. It was the job of the media to empower people thusly, and at least discuss the possibility of supplementing vitamin D to improve immune function.
Instead, what they did was cause fear and confusion, and paint a picture of the all-powerful COVID disease that kills you from the shadows, so that people would become gullible, scared sheep, and believe everything they are told. Sex sells, yes, but so does fear, unfortunately. That the neocortex shuts off is a natural and necessary function, because you can’t think a tiger away if it attacks you. In a situation like that, you need raw strength and quick movements.
However, knowing that people only try to instill fear in you, and accepting the fact that life is ultimately a lethal endeavour, can help to de-escalate such situations, in order to possibly defuse danger with rational thought. The problem is, most people did not expect medical experts, politicians and news outlets to simultaneously lie to them.
“Had those people been given pulse-oximeters, and/or gotten a check-up call, they could have been brought to the hospital early enough. The COVID infection in the lungs would have been addressed by laying them down for a few days”
The proper way is to keep people OUT of hospitals altogether. Governments intentionally blocked any early treatments and protocols to create the fear needed to force their 100% vaccination plan. The government Wanted loads of deaths, they made their policies to cause exactly that. ‘Operation Fear’ was planned, and worked in conjunction with MSM, Education heads, Social Media censoring/propaganda, and making all the treatments which work at early intervention – either hidden, outlawed, or studies done to intentionally show failure.
Watch this interview with one of the worlds top research doctors, Dr McCullough – just google him he is everywhere – with Dr Malone, are the voices telling of this insane and super destructive covid response.
https://odysee.com/@jackspirko:a/rogan-mccullough:6?r=flcv7ablmyytd2wkzfqcxvwidxeynpbp
hear hear
It hypocrisy every where , here, there and elsewhere.
We were not given a crisis, yet we chose to make it so and then even those who chose it, made the rules with such fervidity cannot remember to follow them. That is because the rules are not realistic, inhumane and based on totalitarianism. Eventually there will be gaffes. The ruling class has become a joke. Like the pigs in “Animal Farm”.
Really fascinating article and would love to hear his thoughts on the real scandal of the UK response, maybe allowing Sage to dictate strategy rather than broader considerations by the cabinet.
Sage and Fauci – monsters.
I love this clever kind of writing
“It is common to see these rooms described as spartan or like being in prison, albeit by people who have never been to prison and wouldn’t have lasted long in Sparta”
The content is also great, I hope to see lots more of this writer.
If I lived in Hong Kong, my main concern wouldn’t be the restrictions.
It would be how to go from the restrictions to “something normal”. What is the exit strategy, or is Hong Kong going to be locked down for ever?