Sir Keir Starmer’s keynote address at the Labour conference was described as the “last chance” to save his leadership.
Sir Keir Starmer, from autocue:
Comrade delegates. Fellow Knights of the Realm. Common folk. Ladies. Gentlemen. Old, young, happy, sad. People with an important sexual or gender disposition we absolutely need to know about. Everybody in this fantastic, broad, inclusive, tolerant, united, forward-looking, secular church of ours – thanks for another brilliant Conference. Wow. Amazing. No, thank you.
I have a very important announcement to make. But first I ask Conference for your forbearance as I attempt the customary humorous preamble. Ha ha. Yes. Yeah.
Older comrade delegates may remember the American pop songster Roger Miller. And his fantastic hit record, England Swings. Way back in the 1960s, when the internet was still only science fiction. You madam — in the front row there. You remember him, I bet. You look as though you were a bit of a swinger yourself, eh! Oh, it’s Harriet Harman. I rest my case! As I used to say! Fantastic.
“Ingerland swings…” went the refrain. “Like a pendulum do”. Ingerland swings. Like a pendulum do. And in post-war Britain, politics did indeed swing like a pendulum do. The Tories got in for a couple of terms, people got bored with them, voted us in and so on ad infinitum. Well, comrade delegates. Look where we are now. The political pendulum swings still. It do, it does. But entirely within the Labour Party. The Government blunders from strength to strength, stumbling towards their goal of running a one-party state. Meanwhile, Labour’s trapped, padding from left to right and back again like a mangy old tiger in some unremembered cage. I don’t know if you’ve seen that Netflix series about a zookeeper guy called Joe Exotic, fantastic watch, really takes your mind off things.
But seriously, again. Apart from the BBC, no institution does self-loathing quite like the Labour Party Conference does it, comrade delegates? Oh, we all pretended as usual to enjoy a coming-together, a renewal of purpose. Statements were made and listened to solemnly. Consensus was declared, as is customary, on the badness and wrongness of Toryism. Speakers have emphasised Labour’s unique contract with working people. Now everything will be packed up for another year, nothing will have changed, and that’s the bloody problem. Isn’t it? ISN’T IT?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI’m not really sure what that was. Or who the person writing it is. Or why he was writing it.
Labour supporter who’s angry that the buffoons are no longer lying effectively and are therefore out of power.
The thing is, the canonical Labour luvvie who’s in meeja or the law or the public sector is sanguine about all the punitive taxes Labour always brings in, and the economic damage they always wreak, because they don’t suffer any of these costs themselves. They’re either on gilt-edged public sector salaries with no performance appraisals to worry about, or they’re self employed with personal service companies so they earn £10k salary and take out £300k a year in dividends.
As a meeja luvvie we can be quite sure that Mr Martin doesn’t pay anything like as much tax as a PAYE private sector worker on the same wedge, despite which it’s the latter’s salary these people envy so much.
As a humble private sector employee myself I’ve never been rich enough to afford to vote Labour.
Sir Keir’s problem is that not everyone can do as well as he and his cabal have done out of the public trough, particularly those of us who have to fill it.
In fact if any of them had had to work for a living and earn what they are paid they would not be voting labour
It was simply brilliant. It is surprising how humour eludes so many people. It also explains the BBC.
Arguably Sir Ikea was put in as a nightwatchman to hold the Party together until a new Glorious Leader was found. He has managed to hold the party together so far but there is no Glorious Leader in view. He cannot resign yet.
Everyone else in the PLP is a lunatic, an anti-Semite, a Stalinist, a envious little chav, or just a common or garden utter, utter plonker.
He was elected because even the Marxist bigots of his party couldn’t imagine Rebecca Long-Bailey “leading” it. He’s there just to get gloriously expended at the next nailed-on election defeat before quitting his seat and bu99ering off to private practice to get rich.
Jon I’m intrigued by your pathological hatred of the Labour Party. Since they have only been in power for 13 of the last 42 years, and those years under a centrist neo-con leadership, what exactly in those 13 did years did they do to you, Jon?
I find much much of what the tories do and have done distinctly unpalatable, but I don’t see the point or need to spew forth bile about them on daily basis. Do you find it helps at all? Perhaps a different hobby would be better for you? This doesn’t seem to be helping at all.
Take care.
under corbyn labour became basically a radical extremist party, full of frothing fanatics, and many people find that more unpalatable than a bland, mediocre centrist liberal party like the Tories. As flawed as they might be, and as fashionable as it might be to criticize them, and ‘sPeaK tRuTH tO pOWeR’, they are not as bad as Labour
On that basis you must be fine with the Khmer Rouge, am I right? Never did you any harm?
Very good, Ian Martin. Made me chuckle.
More in sorrow than in scorn, I am sensing.
This is a very funny article. The old problem with Socialism is highlighted – good idea, impossible in practice.
Systems like Socialism put forward an attractive idea of fairness. Everybody is equal and no one person can boss another about. You are free to do as you want, when you want. The two obvious problems are that people will be lazy and spend time solely on enjoyment and that physical strength (youth, guns, etc) will win over physical weakness.
Cuba is the best example of Socialism. People are full of fun in Cuba, everybody seems to be free but they have no medicines. So the fit and healthy are OK but…This is why Socialists have to be part of something big, like the EU. In theory, if we become too poor under Socialism we can be helped by the EU. (See the article on Cuba today).
It is not even a good idea. It is fodder for the simple minded
Great piece of satire! Looking forward to the TV series…
This feels like something Matt Chorley would write. And no, that isn’t an endorsement.
This is what he’d actually say if he were speaking off the cuff.
Always nice to check in on the Britpoppers to see how they’re doing on the definitely, absolutely not in any way even slightly running out of ideas front.
Try capitalising words and throwing in hilarious neologisms like ‘Fuckjumbo’ mate, that’s definitely a rich vein of political relevance you’re mining there. They’ll be coming back in droves.
‘Satire’