Meet the new boss, same as the boss before the old boss. Photo by Leigh Vogel/WireImage

āAmerica is back.ā So President-electĀ Biden declared after announcing his cabinet nominations last week, and after the Trump presidency many around the world will at least be relieved that normality has returned. But global joy might be short-lived, because with the new White House appointments, there is no longer any mistaking what we are in for these next four years. Joe Biden is a restorationist, evidently intent on giving America and the rest of the world as faithful a copy of the Obama administration as he can conjure. It might be truer to say that American exceptionalism is back.
All was well before Donald Trump came along and all shall be well again now he is gone. This is the product Biden has on offer, but it is shoddy goods on two counts: all was not well before Trump took the White House, and all will not be well if, as Bidenās appointments indicate rather clearly, our forty-sixth president insists on pretending our forty-fourth had it all right.
Diversity is de rigueur as Biden shapes his administration. He promises āthe most diverse cabinet in history,ā and his nominees so far are indeed dense with women and people of colour, just as former Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton played the diversity card during her 2016 campaign, naming women, black people, Asian-Americans, Hispanics and others to high office.
But now as then, it is diversity of identity that is supposed to count, not diversity of thought, of which one finds none among Bidenās newly-named people. This is a sales job, just as Barack Obama was a salesman ā window dressing for an un-pretty foreign policy regime.
And there shall be no diversity among nations, either, as Joe Biden fashions his post-Trump idea of Americaās proper place in the world. On this side of the pond, there are headlines about Team Bidenās abiding intention to use foreign policy to reconnect with the global community. āBiden Picks Team Set on Fortifying World Alliances,ā The New York Times announced atop page one last week while Democracy Now!, a Democratic Party-aligned radio programme, puts it this way: āBidenās National Security Appointments Focus on Multilateralism, International Cooperation.ā
We Americans love these multisyllabic words. And we love making them mean other than what one finds in our MerriamāWebster dictionary.
The lately prevailing theme ā multipolarity, alliances, partnerships, shared responsibilities ā is also to be traced back to the earliest days of the Obama administration. The most important of Bidenās newly-announced cabinet and advisory appointments ā respectively Antony Blinken to State, Jake Sullivan as national security adviser ā sound it routinely: We cannot solve the worldās problems alone, they say with solemn conviction.
It is an excellent thought, as it was first time round. But we had better look carefully at who these people are ā both Obama administration holdovers ā and listen carefully to what they say. The alliances-and-partnerships bit did not turn out well when Obama tried it, and there is nothing to suggest that, four years on, it will work this time round.
The first thing to note about the administration Biden is introducing to the world is never mentioned in the American press, and certainly not among the foreign policy cliques. Bidenās people are to a man and woman American exceptionalists ā true believers in the countryās providentially-conferred destiny to light humanityās way. There is nothing new or remarkable in this: our chosen-people consciousness goes back to Winthropās āCity on a Hillā sermon, delivered before the celebrated Puritan set out from Southampton for these parts in 1630.
But as long as this credenda goes unquestioned, nobody is going to change the direction of American foreign policy in a way that responds imaginatively to the realities of the 21st century. Chief among these is parity among nations, notably those of the West and nonāWest.
To put this question in a useful context, one of Donald Trumpās supposed original sins, committed during his presidential campaign in 2016, was his full-frontal disavowal of our exceptionalist ideology. āI donāt like the term, Iāll be honest with you,ā he told a Texas audience. āI donāt think itās a very nice term: āWeāre exceptional, youāre not.āā Three years later, when the fight to defeat Trumpās re-election bid was fully joined, the man now named Bidenās national security adviser published a spirited argument āfor rescuing the idea of American exceptionalismā in The Atlantic. Jake Sullivanās was āa case for a new American exceptionalism⦠as the basis for American leadership in the twenty-first centuryā.
All that flows from the White House, the State Department, the Pentagon and the national security apparatus over the next four years will reflect this belief. But how does one reconcile all the talk of partnerships and common cause with āglobal leadership,ā another of the Biden peopleās running themes? When the next president declares that āAmerica is back,ā you have to read into the statement to grasp the true meaning: āItās a team that reflects the fact that America is back. Ready to lead the world, not retreat from it. Once again, sit at the head of the table.ā
America has long required enemies to maintain its spot at the āhead of the tableā, the Cold War being the case nearest to hand. So far as one can make out, China and Russia, Americaās twin Beelzebubs, are to serve as the Biden administrationās primary organising principles. To be noted in this connection: Strategic rivalries with the Chinese and Russians were the primary topic at a NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels this week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeoās last before Blinken replaces him.
Blinken and Sullivan are now preparing to enlist the Europeans, India and numerous East Asian nations as the U.S. conjures a new and dangerous Cold War with China. This is, of course, a straight-out continuation of the ultra-hawkish Pompeoās cause. But Pompeo hasnāt got very far and neither will Team Biden. None of the Asians, not even the ever-loyal Japanese and certainly not congenitally non-aligned India, wants anything to do with an animated antiāChinese coalition. Even Taiwan does not want confrontation; it wants protection. None of these countries desire to turn the region into another decades-long flashpoint.
It is now confirmed that Biden will extend the new START accord with Russia, due to expire early next year. This is wise, and one hopes Biden will go further on nuclear-arms reductions. But to the president-electās people this is an arms-control question, not a matter of U.SāRussian relations. These will not improve because Bidenās national security team are packed with Russophobes (including Joe himself). Antony Blinken, whose father was a noted advocate of dĆ©tente, is vigorously of the view that ties with Russia can be repaired only if Moscow accepts unequal relations in which Washington sets the terms. Bill Clinton tried the same thing to no avail. Ditto Barack Obama.
Will the Europeans re-enlist in this front in the new Cold War? One seriously doubts it. If Trumpās four years made anything clear in transāAtlantic relations, it is that the continent no longer wishes to be force-marched into another of Washingtonās antiāRussian crusades. Emmanuel Macron has been consistently outspoken on this point over the past couple of years. It is true the French president nurses a de Gaulle complex, but he is simply more forthright than others in expressing what is on a lot of European minds.
It was commonly assumed until last week that, along with the Paris climate pact and the WHO, Biden would also bring America back into the many-sided accord governing Iranās nuclear programs. The assassination last Friday of Dr. Mohsen Fakhrizadeh complicates things, but it was highly questionable whether Biden and Blinken would have made the move even if Iranās top nuclear researcher hadnāt been murdered (almost certainly by Mossad). Biden, like almost all other American pols, is simply too close to Israel, which has made its objections to the nuclear agreement abundantly, belligerently clear.
So weāve now got Sullivan sayingĀ āyes, weāll get back in with other signatories ā providing Tehran meets āthese follow-on agreementsāā ā which are understood to be an awful lot like Pompeoās preconditions, please note. This is an intended-to-fail position ā and an easy way out for Biden. Net outcome: hostile stalemate in the Persian Gulf, continuing alienation from the European signatories to the accord, more transāAtlantic drift.
If only Americaās leaders understood that, with the emergence of new powers such as China and India and a new generation of postāCold War leaders in Europe, ours is an age that requires us to accept ā no, embrace ā a diversity of perspectives. But our policy cliques, lost in nostalgia, travelling on presumption, and with no decisions to make for the past 75 years, simply cannot read the hands on the clock.
Bidenās āglobal leadershipā will be the same as all previous versions ā a polite term for American hegemony. Sullivan, Blinken and Bidenās other national security nominees may put themselves forward as vigorous proponents of partnerships, but look closely: they expect Americaās allies to fall in line behind Americaās we-know-best dictates. Apostles of exceptionalism can think no other way.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe