45 years after Roe v. Wade the culture war over abortion rages on in America (Credit Image: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

If youāre an avid watcher ofĀ French crime dramaĀ Spiral, youāll knowĀ that detective Laure Berthaud had an unexpected pregnancy and found that, at 15 weeks, she wasnāt permitted under French law toĀ have an abortion. Before deciding to go ahead with the pregnancy, sheĀ considered travelling to another country in Europe for a termination,Ā because the rules are different in each place.
Thatās part of the problem, when it comes to trying to establish what people really think about abortion.Ā The variance in term limits from country to country1 means that isĀ difficult to decide what is meant when the legality of abortion isĀ discussed. It effectively means different things in different places āĀ and without a level playing field itās impossible to compare levels ofĀ public support. The debate is further complicated by people voting with their feet: expressing their disapproval of a strict legislative regime by travelling elsewhere.
At a federal level, theĀ Roe vs Wade rulingĀ ā 45 years agoĀ this week ā was intended to put an end to the debate by makingĀ abortion legal throughout the United States.
It didnāt work. Availability of abortion in the US ā along with requirements for counselling and ultrasound, and access to public funding āĀ varies from state to state, creating at national level the situation Europeans find themselves in across the continent.
And while the AmericanĀ public is marginally more supportive than not of abortionās legality, with 57 % in favour, 40 % still think it should be illegal. DataĀ gathered by Pew Research Center shows thatĀ many religious groups stillĀ feel strongly that it should be mostly illegal. The more evangelicalĀ groups,Ā many of whose members voted Trump into office, are more likelyĀ to say that abortion should not be legally available.
But members ofĀ the Episcopal Church and United Church of Christ would support it, asĀ would 83 % of American Jews, according to the Religious Landscape studyĀ of 2014. There may be official doctrines held by religious groups, but that doesnāt mean all believers will subscribe to them. And this disparity was writ large when it came to the 2016 Presidential election: a vacancy on the Supreme Court focused much of the electoral campaigns onto the issue, andĀ it became a deal-breaker for many people.

So, the debate rages on.Ā The Atlanticās Emma Green reported last week thatĀ many in the anti-abortion movement claim that science is on their side. MedicalĀ advances, they say, have improved viability outside the womb ā an argument they have used to draw attention to the debate about termĀ limits. Science is drafted in to support a point of view, and to propagate a particular moral argument.
In Britain, our debate is in a very different place, and thatās reflected in research: ComRes research found thatĀ 72%Ā of adults say that the practice of abortion should be governed by law, so we appear to have consensus that this procedure is different to most other medical interventions and requires legal scrutiny.
But when presented with the difference in term limits between GreatĀ Britain (24 weeks) and most other EU countries (12 weeks or lower),Ā 60% said that term limits in Britain should be reduced. We donāt appear to be keen on the issue Berthaud faced, and would rather have some consistency with our global neighbours.
Yet if we look at informal barometers of public opinion ā take middle-class popular culture, for example ā we seem to accept that abortion is a reality in family life. In the last six months, queen of womenās fiction Marian Keyesā published her latest novel The Break, and the UKās TV drama Cold Feet broadcast its seventh series. BothĀ carried storylines of teenage women beingĀ supported by their parents and (although somewhat reluctantly, in ColdĀ Feet) their boyfriends to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Both areĀ written in a style which celebrates human relationship and supportiveĀ families. Itās seen as sad, but acceptable, in a āwe can get through thisā way.
By way of contrast, back in the US, the culture wars rage on. American novelist Leni Zumas hasĀ just published aĀ dystopian novel, Red Clocks, in which abortion is criminalisedĀ and aĀ Pink Wall prevents women from travelling to Canada to terminate a pregnancy. Roe vs Wade may have attempted to close the issue in theĀ US, but itās as polarising as it ever was.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe