X Close

Trump campaign attacks neocons in final days of race 

The former president is mocking John Bolton and the Cheneys. Credit: Getty

November 2, 2024 - 5:00pm

In the final days of the presidential election, Donald Trump and his running mate are launching public attacks on the foreign policy hawks who have opposed his candidacy.

At a Thursday campaign event, the former president called former Congresswoman Liz Cheney a “radical war hawk” and suggested that, as a supporter of foreign wars, she should serve in one. “Let’s see how she feels about it when the guns are trained on her face,” he said. “You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh, gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.”

In response, Cheney characterised the comments as a death threat, writing, “This is how dictators destroy free nations.” Cheney, a former Republican, has been a fixture in Kamala Harris’ campaign.

Trump also mentioned Cheney’s father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who recently endorsed Kamala Harris alongside his daughter. “I don’t blame him for sticking with his daughter, but his daughter is a very dumb individual,” Trump said.

Some of Trump’s most prominent allies-turned-enemies have been Republicans, and former Republicans, who oppose his foreign policy. As a candidate in 2016, Trump became one of the first national Republicans to express that the Iraq war was a mistake, and he frequently touts the fact that there were no new wars involving the US started while he was in office. Since Trump left office, the GOP has been divided over US support for the war in Ukraine and, to a lesser extent, the war in Gaza.

At the same Thursday event, Trump mocked John Bolton, the former national security advisor who has become a vocal critic of the former president. “If somebody shot down a little, tiny, crappy drone that cost about $15, he’d want to go to war with Russia,” Trump said. “He was great for me though for a period… I took this moron with me and he never said anything, but when Kim Jong Un saw him, he said, ‘Oh shit, I think the guy wants to go to war.'”

Trump’s vice presidential pick has been making similar arguments, and addressing the pushback from the more hawkish representatives of the pre-2016 GOP. In an interview with Joe Rogan published the same day, JD Vance argued that there are three issues on which one is “not allowed to question the establishment”.  These include free trade, immigration, and foreign policy, the latter of which is driven both by politicians’ financial interests and by an enduring belief in “the post World War II American consensus” that the US can “remake the entire world in America’s image”.

Vance, too, criticised the Cheney family for their support for various wars. He suggested Liz Cheney was supporting the war in Ukraine in anticipation of a lucrative job on the board of a defence contractor, and brought up her father’s widely scrutinised relationship with Halliburton, a defence contractor that received federal funding during the Iraq war while Cheney was receiving deferred compensation from the company. “I think they’re much better at rationalising their financial motivation as somehow good,” Vance said.

In Trump’s own camp, there’s been a push for more hawkish foreign policy. He has stated on the campaign trail that his policy is “peace through strength”. He told conservative commentator Ben Shapiro last month that he’s “not an isolationist”, adding, “I helped a lot of countries. I kept countries out of war.” Weeks later, Shapiro claimed that he had privileged knowledge of Trump’s plans for the coming administration, and that Trump would likely bring Mike Pompeo or David Friedman onto his team.

But the distance between Trump and the hawks is apparent, and growing. Nikki Haley, a vocal supporter of US involvement in Israel and Ukraine, has been largely absent from the Trump campaign, and took to television last week to criticise Trump on unrelated issues, saying the campaign’s appeals to young men were “going to make women uncomfortable”.

While the foreign policy realignment has splintered the Republican Party and pushed prominent hawks toward the Democrats, it’s also won over a new type of GOP voter who’s sceptical of foreign entanglements, who helped Trump win midwestern swing states in 2016. With polls showing a tie between Harris and Trump in the final days of the race, the fomer President’s attacks on the hawkish former establishment may be an appeal to those very same pivotal voters.


is UnHerd’s US correspondent.

laureldugg

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

23 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
1 month ago

There are a few people in politics I just cannot stand. Hillary Clinton is one. Liz Cheney is another. Their politics is part of it, but not all of it. The part that bothers me most is that they profit so directly off of their politicking. It’s a disgrace.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
1 month ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

This coming from a Trump cult member is highly amusing!

Brett H
Brett H
1 month ago

If you can actually break down the above comment and look at each individual sentence then I’d like to know why CDs comment on Cheney and Clinton is so amusing. Leave out your dragging Trump into it and explain why CD is “highly amusing”. Don’t mention Trump in your reply, just address the Cheney Clinton part.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
1 month ago
Reply to  Brett H

It is even more amusing that you seem to think that you can tell me how to comment!

Liam F
Liam F
1 month ago
Reply to  Brett H

Don’t waste your breath replying my friend. It’s a notoriously vapid chatbot who hates everything

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
1 month ago
Reply to  Liam F

That an insult to the Vapid Chatbot Community!

Brett H
Brett H
1 month ago
Reply to  Liam F

Yes, I know you’re right, It would easier to accept if they weren’t human

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
1 month ago
Reply to  Liam F

Empty vessel.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
1 month ago

The Champagne Socialist Fan Club are out in force today!

Muiris de Bhulbh
Muiris de Bhulbh
1 month ago

For once I (almost) agree with Trump. Both the US & the world would be far better off if the US had kept it’s guns silent since WW2. I except the Korean War, and I believe that strongly supporting Ukraine is a no-brainer from a Western point of view.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
1 month ago

The question about Ukraine is not whether we strongly support the country or not, but how strong and how long. The war in Ukraine has been going on for over 10 years, from Barack Obama’s presidency to Donald Trump’s to Joe Biden’s and next to Kamala Harris’s.

No end is in sight. Ukraine is getting weaker, not stronger. Ukraine is losing ground, not gaining it. Does the US continue to be a bystander funding the war without trying to negotiate its end?

Warren Trees
Warren Trees
1 month ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

That is precisely what the Cheney family wishes for. Which is why they would sell their souls and support a vacuous candidate like Harris.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
1 month ago

…..

Nik Jewell
Nik Jewell
1 month ago

That was yesterday; it’s Peanut the Squirrel today.

Right-Wing Hippie
Right-Wing Hippie
1 month ago
Reply to  Nik Jewell

“This is Kent Brockman with a special bulletin. The Lincoln squirrel has been assassinated. We’ll stay with the story all night if we have to.”

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
1 month ago
Reply to  Nik Jewell

This is the most widely reported story on X in the past few days. Reported on by Elon Musk and an official statement put out by Trump. It is not just about the putting to death of Peanut (and Fred the raccoon), it is about so much more. This was an orphan squirrel pet of 7 years with a huge instagram following. The NY government OVERREACH saw fit to raid the people’s house on an anonymous tip off and seize the pets. NYC cannot even protect their own people yet they see fit to spend hours on this investigation and the action and killing that followed.

laurence scaduto
laurence scaduto
1 month ago

I heard they “trashed” the guy’s home. The cops; not the varmints.

Lesley van Reenen
Lesley van Reenen
1 month ago

Small consolation is the anonymous tipster has been outed, as has the main official involved. They have both closed down all their social media accounts.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
1 month ago

The two issues on which American presidents have the most power are judicial nominations and foreign policy. (They’re constantly getting blamed for stuff like inflation and GDP numbers and the crime rate but in practice they have very little control over those.)

Donald Trump performed very well – indeed he performed better than I (a Trump voter) expected him to – on both foreign policy and judicial nominations.

I think that a gradual shift toward isolationism by the US will make the world safer, since stirring up conflicts abroad while at the same tims encouraging small countries to rely on America for their defense, to the neglect of their own militaries, only to get all hesitant when a war actually happens (which is what Biden did in Ukraine) is a policy that needs to end, as I’ve written about in detail here: https://twilightpatriot.substack.com/p/the-poland-paradox

I’m happy to see Donald Trump moving in that direction. And also that so many neocons like Bolton, who influenced him way too much in his first administration, aren’t getting hired again if he wins this time.

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
1 month ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

But Bolton and Pompeo also rubberstamped the Abraham Accords, sensing that the Middle East was moving towards a consenus of tackling the Iran problem more aggressively. Look at the bonfires that the Democrats have lit since by dumping those articles of understanding between the key Arab and Jewish states.

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
1 month ago

Neocon is the word which is left otherwise unspoken everywhere in the British media and their political class, doubtlessly owing to their support for the woeful military campaign in the Ukrained. Not least in The Spectator too, so it’s gratifying to see it used here.
In terms of my own distinctive, I patently do not see American support of Netanyahu’s Israel as a neoconservative position but could not say the same of the project of regime change in Tehran. While I support it whole-heartedly, this was Richard Cheney’s original plan to invade Iran through Iraq.

Jerry Carroll
Jerry Carroll
1 month ago

Why must serious issues rise or fall on how “uncomfortable” they make women? Nikki Haley, who has profited enormously from her ties to the military-industrial complex, has been trying to sneak back into Trump’s good graces, but he’s having none of it. So she’s back to being a harpy on his back.

Martin Johnson
Martin Johnson
1 month ago

In considering Trump’s comments on the Cheneys and neocons in their orbit, it may matter that the head of the Secret Service at the time of the many security “lapses” that facilitated the July 13 shooting of Trump was a Cheney protege, Cheatle.