X Close

Anjem Choudary is only the tip of Britain’s Islamism problem

Anjem Choudary was a comfortable target for the British press. Credit: Getty

July 31, 2024 - 3:00pm

Yesterday, without ever having directed or plotted — much less committed — an act of violence, Anjem Choudary was jailed for a minimum of 28 years for terrorism offences. He was found guilty of continuing to direct the proscribed organisation, al-Muhajiroun (ALM).

Pointing out that Choudary himself has never been involved in anything resembling actual terrorism is not to downplay or deny the fact that in Britain, perhaps no single figure has done as much to spread the ideology of Salafi jihadism. It is this doctrine to which very real terror groups such as al-Qaeda, Islamic State and al-Shabaab belong. And all of these groups have recruited British extremists, many of whom would have once been in Choudary’s orbit.

In fact, hundreds — if not thousands — of those who travelled to Syria to join jihadist groups came through ALM or one of the various “Sharia4” copycat organisations in Europe: such as “Sharia4Belgium”, “Sharia4Holland” or Danish group “Call to Islam”.

These branches very much worked from the Choudary playbook: a demanding existence trying to follow sharia away from the cameras, and incendiary provocation in front of them. ALM, for example, burned poppies, while Forsane Alizza (Knights of Pride) threw stones at McDonalds in France to protest against Jewish influence and “Satanic” laïcité. Similarly, Sharia4Belgium warned that when the country becomes an Islamic state, landmarks such as the Atomium would be destroyed — just as the Taliban had blown up the Bamiyan Buddhas. As one member put it, they wanted to “make unbelievers a bit angry”.

The provocation strategy turned off the majority but it also artificially inflated the influence of what were in reality small cadres of activists, and put the ideology of Salafi jihadism in front of more eyeballs than would have ever been possible through proselytism alone. All along, Choudary was more than happy to play up to his cartoon villain persona, appearing on mainstream news channels with a cheeky grin while cracking jokes about 9/11.

The view of Choudary as something of a novelty truly crumbled in 2013, after soldier Lee Rigby was murdered in plain sight in London by two former ALM followers. The following year, Islamic State declared itself a “Caliphate” and it became abundantly clear in the West that carving out territory to rule according to 7th century sensibilities was not, in fact, so much of a joke.

Since then, Choudary’s influence has been asphyxiated by social media bans, bail conditions and the fact that large numbers of his former followers who left for the Levant are now dead or locked up — either in Britain or in the makeshift Kurdish-run prisons of Northern Syria. Despite this latest conviction, to a large extent the damage has already been done: by ALM’s activism in the 2000s and 2010s, but even going back to the arrival of Islamist exiles in the Britain and the West during the middle of last century.

To this end, given his unapologetically incendiary activism, Choudary has been a more comfortable target for the state and commentariat to pursue and condemn than much of the wider Islamist landscape. So provocative were his public statements, even other Islamist groups normally quick to run interference and allege Islamophobia when the state acts against extremists have been keen to keep their distance. While there can be no doubting Choudary’s influence over the years, the challenge posed by both Salafi jihadism and the broader Islamist movement to Britain is, and always has been, much more than just the antics of ALM.

While the state has been pursuing Choudary, Britain’s various other Islamist currents have continued their work more or less unmolested by either authorities or a civil society largely paralysed in the face of this theocratic challenge. ALM and the Salafi jihadist movement may be in a diminished state, depleted by deaths and arrests, but the bigger and more worrying question for British democracy is whether or not this activism has simply been rendered irrelevant by the increasing influence and mainstream appeal of other manifestations of Islamist ideology. If this is indeed the case, tackling Choudary will have been the easy part.


Liam Duffy is a researcher, speaker and trainer in counter-terrorism based in London.

LiamSD12

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

28 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
4 months ago

The very obvious fact that Choudary has only just been sentenced, decades into his very open activism, tells the story of how “civil society” has utterly neglected to maintain the essential ability to defend itself. I think we know which sections of the political class, legal and media establishments the author refers to when using that term.
Meanwhile, rioting springs up in Southport, of all places, in response to an unchallenged narrative regarding the motivations of an attack on innocents. “Civil society” is culpable for these events.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
4 months ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

The only people culpable for the lawlessness in Southport are the braindead far right morons who chose to attack a mosque.
Why am I not surprised that our kid would stick up for them?

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
4 months ago

the braindead far right morons who chose to attack a mosque
Yes. Why a mosque? Surely the Norwegian embassy would be a more relevant target?

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Bryant

Equally relevant.
Unless you are an irredeemable bigot of course.

Dylan Blackhurst
Dylan Blackhurst
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Bryant

Yeah Norwegians… who needs them! With their love of fishing and patterned sweaters….

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
4 months ago

Yeah, that Anders Brevik was a real peacenik….
Oh wait, he was one of your guys and he loved murdering children! Weird how you forgot about him!!!

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
4 months ago

he loved murdering children
No, that’s your chums. Brevik loved murdering socialists.

Champagne Socialist
Champagne Socialist
4 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Bryant

And that makes it all OK for you, doesn’t it Hugh? Even though most of those “socialists” were children.
Even when I don’t think you scum can get any lower you manage to surprise me…

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
4 months ago

Did you actually read what i’d written? And/or comprehend it?
I seriously think your issue is an inability to process complex ideas. I kid you not.

Katja Sipple
Katja Sipple
4 months ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

His issue is that he is a troll. One must never feed trolls; in other words, don’t engage and ignore.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 months ago

Braindead? Well if that ain’t the kettle…

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
4 months ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

The very obvious fact that Choudary has only just been sentenced, decades into his very open activism,
Not sure, but wasn’t he also jailed between 2016 and 2018?

A D Kent
A D Kent
4 months ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

No it is not our ‘civil society’ that is to blame here – our ‘civil society’ would have seen Blair, Bush and Cameron rightly prosecuted for destroying the secular states where these jihadis went, fought and returned with their blowback. Our ‘civil society ‘would have cut the legs from the arguments of Choudary and his like, by not acting with such egregious, cynical, murderous hypocrisy when it came to anything we did in the Middle East.

It’s our Establishment who are responsible for this, not us.

John Tyler
John Tyler
4 months ago

Choudary is the tip of an iceberg; UK is the Titanic.

Victor James
Victor James
4 months ago

…is only the tip of Europes Islamification problem.

Europe’s Islamification problem, at least at this point, actually a leftist problem.

Dr E C
Dr E C
4 months ago
Reply to  Victor James

Exactly. It’s the Champagne Socialists who cry ‘far right’ and ‘bigot’ about anyone trying to resist Britain being the ‘house of war’. They are all accessories to each new bloodbath

Kiddo Cook
Kiddo Cook
4 months ago

too little too late, this man has been spewing bile from his HQ in Ilford at his little clubs and mosques for decades with impunity. Seems only with the tacit support of US security forces that the UK finally has the courage to charge him. Same story with the 7/7 attack, he was linked to this too and, despite tracking the terrorists responsible (buying industrial quantities of hydrogen peroxide without question) MI5 still didn’t have sufficient evidence to call a halt to their plans. Same with Abu Hamza, UK didn’t have the stomach to prosecute him either without US support. So, yes, this man is history, it’s his legacy of evil that needs confronting.

Sam Brown
Sam Brown
4 months ago
Reply to  Kiddo Cook

There are Imam’s up and down the country preaching hate and jihad every day who are allowed to go unchallenged. One must ask the questions, why does the state not act and why, given that we are told the majority of Muslims are moderate in their view, do the latter not denounce them and show that they really are moderate which would do much to counter the “Islamophobia” they claim to suffer.

elaine chambers
elaine chambers
4 months ago
Reply to  Sam Brown

Sam, Absolutely. I can’t understand why Britain and the West won’t respond. Tommy Robinson is not the bogyman the state should be chasing. Have I missed something? Have we all missed something? And now we have a Labour government which is going to crack down on….The Far Right thought to be EDL who cause less trouble than EDF! What is this guilt trip the Left seem to embrace? It looks very much like the Far White are going to be silenced and for why? I’m baffled.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 months ago

Why doesn’t Britain just refuse to allow immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa? Muslims in America have assimilated and are proud Americans. The exception is the large population of Somalis in Minnesota and Michigan. They refuse to assimilate. ( Ilhan Omar, the Squad member, is Somali.) Sweden has received thousands of Somalis in the past seven to five years, and they have terrorized the the Swedes. I think Britain and Europe need to slam the door shut and throw out the radical Islamists. I know. Not practical.

Katja Sipple
Katja Sipple
4 months ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

“Muslims in America have assimilated and are proud Americans.”
I cannot agree with that statement. The majority of Arabs who immigrated early on (first part of the 20th century) did assimilate, but they were mostly Christians. Have you been to Dearborn, Michigan? That place is a nightmare, and the residents are not Somalis, but Arabs from the Middle East and North Africa. Dearborn is the US Jihad Capital, an unpleasant distinction, where Hamas support is rampant, and people were cheering and dancing in the streets on 7. Many current or one-time Dearborn residents have been convicted of terror-related crimes, and support for terrorism has been a problem for decades. I would not call that assimilation; quite the contrary.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 months ago
Reply to  Katja Sipple

You’re right. I shouldn’t have said the Somalis were in Michigan. Dearborn is represented by Congresswoman Rashid (can’t remember her first name), who is Palestinian. She has told Arabs that they shouldn’t vote in the presidential election unless Biden and Harris say they stand with the Palestinians and quit supporting Israel. That could mean that Harris would lose Michigan.

Seb Dakin
Seb Dakin
4 months ago

And meantime some nutter of similar ilk has a training center for would-be jihadis going on in Buckinghamshire and is openly raising millions to buy an island to found what would presumably be another boot camp.
Nothing to see here, move on, move on.

A D Kent
A D Kent
4 months ago

Those Jihadi groups in Syria were the ones that the odious Hilary Benn wanted the RAF to ‘do our bit’ for in 2013. They were why David Cameron was unable during that debate to identify who the ‘moderate rebels’ were in the Syrian Civil War having just destroyed the Libyan state. Those Jihadi groups were the ones that Obama & Clinton’s CIA funneled billions of dollars to with their Operation Timber Sycamore. They are the jihadi groups who provided the evidence for the alleged Assad chemical weapons attacks that our entire media class declared so convincing that we absolutely had to intervene (they have now been comprehensively debunked by the heroic Ian Henderson and Brendan Whelan – the OPCW whistleblowers).

If our Establishment was in any way consistent in it’s punishment for supporting violent jihadi extremists the world over, Choudary would have been elevated to the House of Lords and spent the last couple of years as our Foreign Secretary.

Robert
Robert
4 months ago

“…even going back to the arrival of Islamist exiles in the Britain and the West during the middle of last century.”
It was important to note this fact. I wonder how many people remember or realize that Ayatollah Khomeini was living in exile (whatever that means) in France in 1979 before heading back to Iran to oversee the installation of the current islamic order we see there today.

Gordon Arta
Gordon Arta
4 months ago

Following the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, and the thousands of Muslims on the streets calling for murder, the reality of Islam was graphically exposed. The UK should immediately have launched a full open and public inquiry into the principles, preaching, practices, personalities, funding etc behind it. Instead we have the utterly ridiculous situation where ‘cherished religious beliefs’ are protected.

Walter Schimeck
Walter Schimeck
4 months ago
Reply to  Gordon Arta

Had such an inquiry taken place it would have found that Islam’s foundational texts all agree that a fully Muslim life, whatever that means, can only be lived in a fully Muslim state, i.e., one governed by Sharia. The degree to which Muslims assimilate in a secular society is proportional to the degree to which they are no longer devout Muslims.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
4 months ago

Problem is though, was he perceived as a clown by his intended audience? I wouldn’t think so. Hitler behaved like a clown in my opinion and yet he was idolised in the 1930’s Germany. This is a good sentence not only because he deserves it but also for the fact that it gives a warning to the would be soldiers of fortune inspired by the Islamist ideology.