by Tobias Phibbs
Friday, 15
July 2022
Reaction
21:45

Will we ever move on from George Osborne and Gordon Brown?

Tory leadership candidates are still feeding off ideas from 2010
by Tobias Phibbs
Stuck in a time capsule

At the first Conservative leadership debate, all the talk was of delivery. Spades in the ground. Practical solutions. Coming together. Getting things done. Delivery, delivery, delivery. Forward, not backward; upward, not forward; and always twirlingtwirling, twirling towards freedom.

It took half an hour to move on from abstraction — and from Boris Johnson, whose ungainly, blundering presence lurked over proceedings, and about whom Liz Truss, Penny Mordaunt and Rishi Sunak were incapable of constructing a coherent sentence. Truth be told he probably could have wiped the floor with all of them bar Tom Tugenhadt. At least he would have made the whole thing more watchable. Finally, after the brief and inevitable skirmish over gender self-identification, we got an acknowledgement of the dire economic situation we are in. 

The bare minimum we can ask for from a prospective political leader might be an analysis of the state of the country and a strategy to right the course. They might say something like this: growth, productivity and wages have been stagnant since 2008. The average Briton has gone from among the most prosperous in Europe to somewhere firmly stuck in the middle. The young are shut out of the housing market, and the costs of building infrastructure here are multiple times what they are on the continent. They might acknowledge that the cross-party consensus that supported the sell-off of our assets and the outsourcing of our state capacity has revealed our national vulnerability.

Instead, we were treated to a tedious rehashing of Gordon Brown and George Osborne back and forths over tax and spend. Kemi Badenoch briefly acknowledged things were not zero-sum, before reverting and invoking the spectre of the ‘magic money tree’. Sunak called out the ‘fairytale economics’ of borrowing. It was 2010 all over again and we the public had to be levelled with and told hard truths, like naughty schoolchildren.

A few marginal retail offers around energy bills were flirted with noncommittally, but nothing that grasped the scale of the crisis facing people this winter. Incapable of thinking about the national economy and how to strengthen its resilience for the era of competing global powers and competition over resources, all candidates seemed content to tinker at the margins. 

There was nothing on housing (earlier today, however, Tugenhadt — the Serious Centrist Candidate, remember — warned that Labour were going to concrete the country with “socialist homes”; the most promising announcement yet from the Starmer leadership). Nothing on immigration. Nothing on ownership. Nothing on wages. Even the war in Ukraine barely figured. The leadership contenders — and Channel 4 itself — seemed to exist in a different country altogether. It is no wonder the audience weren’t impressed.

The format didn’t help. Audience questions lent the debate the feel of daytime television. Our political class lacks stature and our media is determined to rub it in, placing them on a panel no more than a few inches high. 

The race feels open, and there is still time for one of the candidates to take up the mantle and emerge with a vision for these islands that will arrest our longstanding stagnation, but tonight was not that time.

Join the discussion


To join the discussion, get the free daily email and read more articles like this, sign up.

It's simple, quick and free.

Sign me up
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arkadian X
Arkadian X
1 month ago

The format and the questions certainly didn’t help.
Also, was the audience really made of swing voters? I mean, REALLY??

Dylan Regan
Dylan Regan
1 month ago
Reply to  Arkadian X

It was a channel 4 debate with a channel 4 audience with a channel 4 presenter obviously it was leftie. That explains why immigration wasn’t mentioned and they were obsessed with the NHS and trust

Tom Watson
Tom Watson
30 days ago

The only thing any of them had to say about housing was that Labour might build some.

They’re going to get pasted at the next election, and they’re going to deserve to.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
1 month ago

Superb obscure Simpsons reference at the start!

Arkadian X
Arkadian X
1 month ago
Reply to  Billy Bob

Do say, I missed it.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob
30 days ago
Reply to  Arkadian X
Arkadian X
Arkadian X
30 days ago
Reply to  Billy Bob

“excellent!”

Stephen Walsh
Stephen Walsh
1 month ago

It says a lot about the calibre and nous of the candidates that they all agreed to participate in a debate on that channel, with that presenter, and that demeaning format, designed to stitch them up.

Last edited 1 month ago by Stephen Walshe
R Wright
R Wright
1 month ago

We have become a nation of pygmies