Jerusalem
These are dramatic days in Israel, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forcibly pushes through his judicial overhaul plan to weaken the Supreme Court and empower the executive branch. This, despite the threat of economic collapse, as well as major military and foreign pressure. On Monday, the first piece of legislation making up the judicial overhaul passed a final vote. Known as the “reasonableness bill”, this legislation abolishes the ability of the High Court of Justice to block government decisions it deems unreasonable or implausible.
On Saturday, 10,000 reserve duty soldiers announced that they would stop showing up for duty if the legislation passed. This comes in addition to warnings by the heads of the Israeli security forces, business leaders, legal experts, and economists. Even US President Joe Biden issued a warning against hastily passing the legislation without consensus. Nevertheless, Netanyahu’s coalition raced ahead, plunging the country into a state of chaos.
As Monday’s vote took place, thousands of people carrying Israeli flags protested outside of the parliament building — seemingly unmoved by the burning summer heat, water cannons and police arrests. The sounds of the demonstration could be heard from far away: banging on blockades, whistle horns, drums and chanting. The bill passed 64-0, with the opposition boycotting the final vote after attempts to reach a compromise failed. Israel now finds itself submerged in the unknown: the Supreme Court may oppose the law but this will push the country into a constitutional crisis, forcing the military and security forces to choose who to obey between the courts and the government.
Protests against Israel’s long-time Prime Minister are not new. They have been ongoing for several years, especially since the Prime Minister’s indictment on charges of fraud, bribery and breach of trust in November 2019. However, they reached a new level in January of this year following the swearing in of Israel’s most Right-wing and fundamentalist government to date, as well as the announcement of the comprehensive judicial “reform” plan. Since then, hundreds of thousands of protesters have taken to the streets each week in more than 150 locations across the country.
There is a sense among them that the country they once knew is slipping away before their eyes. On Tuesday, in a last-ditch effort to stop the legislation, tens of thousands of protesters embarked on a five-day march to Jerusalem. The effort, which one protester described as a “secular pilgrimage”, ended outside the Israeli parliament. Protesters set up a “tent city”, preparing to camp out in the run-up to the final vote. Hundreds of silver tents sprinkled the grass divided by different protest groups, ranging from university students to reserve duty soldiers.
As Netanyahu races ahead with the legislation, there is a strong impression all around of the collapse of the country’s social contract. Some of the most sacred “myths” of Israeli society, including the importance of military service, have been slashed.
The night before the Knesset vote, the protest camp held a screening of the Israeli cult film Halfon Hill Doesn’t Answer, a satire of the Israeli Defense Force. The film follows the adventures of a reserve military unit stationed in the Sinai including a draft dodger, a term that has been used by Netanyahu’s coalition to describe reservists who refuse to continue volunteering if the legislation passes. At one point, the generator malfunctioned, and the screen went dark. One protestor saw the opportunity for a quip: “You see, this is what will happen to the country!”
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeIt’s just a pity that it has to go so far before people start to wake up and realise that such patently bad ideas will have consequences.
It is a bit like alcohol. A few Democratic ideas make the public feel fuzzy and warm and benevolent but too much extreme Democratic ideas makes for a non-functioning addict that upsets all their old friends and only hitting rock-bottom sets the road back to sense and sobriety. Unfortunately, like alcoholics the answer is to avoid alcohol altogether and avoid voting Democrat however much it just appears a nice sociable and friendly activity.
Yes, but can we agree that it is more like a cheap pint of Carlsberg brewed under license, rather than like one of my lovely Westmalle Tripels?
Winsome Sears is the best political figure of 2022, an absolutely amazing speaker and persona. Born in Jamaica, come to USA in the 1960s as a young child, worked hard at school, became a US Marine. She talks of being a leader, how leaders must have the trust of their troops so they fallow, and that means integrity. A US Marine – a fantastic quality for a politician, real world lessons, and now Lieutenant Governor of Virgina with Youngkin as Governor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-YUYX33VsM
If you do not know her, she is the absolute antithesis of the Squad – she gives me great hope when ever I see her. USA is not done yet.
Interesting. I will watch out for her
yes yes yes – superb! what a role model!
Thank you, what a lady!
Seriously. People act like this is some kind of victory – but how did these people get elected in the first place? Their platforms and rhetoric are literally deranged. Who voted for them. What were they thinking. I would love to see an interview with a middle class Democratic voter where they honestly explain how they thought voting for these people was a good idea.
Short answer: tribal voting. It was bad in my home area when I was young, but faded in time. Eventually the party that felt it owned everyone’s votes angered the voters to the point it ceased to be able to win elections at all. I doubt this vote in SF was a turn of the tide, but it at least showed the people there can vote non-tribally when they actually pay attention to the issues. Although it should also be said, SF genuinely is the furthest left of anyplace in the US. So this won’t change its overall political makeup, but the voters are showing they have limits on what they will tolerate.
San Francisco is 6% Republican. That number is shocking. I moved out of S.F. 25 years ago, and now the city seems to be turning into a case study in disintegration and decay.
It’s impossible to convince most Democrats, especially older ones, that the party they are voting for is not the same one that it was 20 years ago (that’s what happened to me before I saw the light during the pandemic). They are trapped in a cult and refuse to come out. I’m on the verge of losing a friend of almost 40 years, who has become overtly hostile to any suggestion from me that goes against her core progressive beliefs.
Two brief examples: a link to Christopher Rufo explaining CRT was met with “I see he’s been on Tucker Carlson but not MSNBC” and a comment that CRT is “just trying to teach accurate history.” Within the last week, a suggestion to look at Viva Frei’s livestream of the truckers in Ottawa was met with derision regarding Frei’s being a lawyer (inherently suspicious character, apparently), and skepticism about why she should “trust some stranger on the Internet.” This statement was so irrational that I had no response. We can’t discuss politics at all at this point, and she is not coming out of the cult. To her consternation, her grandson just went through four years of college and came out a libertarian, which I think is a miracle.
“wrote a long Twitter thread accusing Asian Americans of using “white supremacist thinking to assimilate and ‘get ahead’,” and comparing them to a “house n****r”
Do these people actually believe what they write; or are they merely grandstanding for a social media gallery?
I think it’s a bit of both. In many ways, the more inflamatory the statements, the better they work, though this applies only to COWs (Citizens of Wakanda). The left echo chamber supports them no matter what.
Any idea how hard it is to get a recall on the ballot? VERY hard. This is a small step, but let’s see who the mayor appoints….
it would be a mistake to see the San Francisco vote as an isolated.
I am sorry but we have been hearing this stuff for the last 40 years and the march of the left seems to continue relentlessly, infiltrating and the corrupting our institutions and public services all at the public expense.
Nothing is going to change until there is a complete clear out .
“To be fair, the recalled board members were defeated not just for extreme politics, but for their reluctance to open schools during the pandemic.”
The reluctance to open schools IS extreme politics! Have you not been paying attention? Yes, there are other forms of extreme politics, but this is a huge one.
There is not much to this article, keeping in mind that the recall means that the extreme left nutter Mayor of SF will appoint their replacements. Do you think there will be any significant change? Certainly the people recalled are vile, disgusting, stupid people, but will their replacements be significantly better? I doubt it.
This article is far too optimistic. These are perhaps victories in some small skirmishes, but the institutional bureaucracy, the Deep State (yes, it’s a real thing) still exists, is thriving, and can’t be recalled. The author might have noted that the NEA, a nationwide union for teachers (and against students) has about 3mm members, and has taken the position that schools can only open when they are “safe.”
And what about Rick Caruso. I read this a few times, but how is LA developer Rick Caruso registering as a Democrat a big deal? I just don’t get it, and the article utterly failed to explain the significance. Because he wants to win? Because it’s virtually impossible for Republicans to win? How is that news? How does that relate to the story?
If the author’s prediction for the improvement of America’s great cities is to come true–no sure thing– it will take decades or generations. The damage is far too deep, and control is held by institutions–such as teachers unions, police unions, corrections officers (prison guards) that have too much skin in the game and are far too powerful. Because government unions are seen as largely COW (Citizens of Wakanda) organizations, they are untouchable lest the race card be played.
And sadly, many teachers, especially in California where liability insurance is as expensive as it is necessary, are captives of their unions. The unions pick up the liability insurance, so they function as a protection racket. Having been one, I’d say many,many teachers would much rather just teach their subjects, and deconstruct “Social Studies”, a bogus cross-curricular subject to begin with. I can’t say if the laboring unions (SEIU etc.) are the same. I suspect they use their protection of illegals as a leverage. Unions no longer seem to function as delegates of their workers, they have become parasitic and their mission has crept to prioritize their own administrative self-interest. (Come to think of it, this could describe the trajectory of some Western “democracies” I could name …)
Thanks, Liz. You should write an article about this, I’d be interested in hearing more about the corruption of the teachers’ unions .
BTW The Tablet recently ran a long article on how large-scale illegal immigration helps employers to keep the workforce under control
It’s rather funny that we have to rely on the hatred for Asians of white ‘progressives’ and activist left blacks to stop woke policies. They obsess about anti racism and then find ‘acceptably woke’ excuses to be racist against Asians.
It may be racially stereotypical to say it – but like the Jews, I’m thankful that many Asians work so hard to integrate culturally (whilst maintaining valued aspects of their cultures) and be successful.
Which is why the U.K. will benefit from immigrants from Hong Kong.
This is good news but my sense is the triumphalist tone of the article is premature. It’s only when woke policies touch the lives of otherwise woke middle class urbanites that they rebel. Once the kids are safely back in school and teachers tone down the race rhetoric that negatively affects any minority, notably asians, we might go back to progressive politics as usual. Of course it will still be ok to target whites.
The real test will be the midterms. If covid is less of a threat, kids are returning to school and life is more or less normal, the Democrats might yet do well. Let’s hope a majority of people have fully internalized the long-term danger of the Democrats’ agenda.
A realist is a lefty who’s been mugged! Messing with one’s children’s education gets real, fast. (Never forget Mrs. Thatcher’s start as Minister of Education) As for what I, a Bay Area native by birth, regard as the tipping point, the planned degradation of Lowell High — though the Board did not stint in proposed changes offensive in part to all — the shining summit of many Asian-American aspirations — a Spanish dicho says it best: :Find out whose dog it is, before you beat it.” Ambitious, taxpaying Asian parents who are made to feel disenfranchised, especially in the matter of their progeny, were the wrong sleeping tiger to poke.
I am going to steal that expression – cultural appropriation be damned!
And again: “most insanely progressive”
What does progressive mean??
Usually people from the extreme left who believe that revolution must be a continuous process. Often inventing enemy (Recidivists/ Backsliders?) among their own collegues and supporters..
It’s a term socialists have been using since the late 1800s. Then as now, the ones who identify with that term are more focused on the cultural aspects of socialism, but that doesn’t imply a rejection of the economic aspect. They just believe you change the culture first to prepare it for the economic platform of socialism. The reason they worry me so much is I think they grasped the better solution than what the socialists across most of Europe were thinking at the time– though it should also be noted a lot of the current progressive platform– the so- called woke ideology– was actually brought over by Weimar academics in the 1920s following progressivism’s collapse after the Wilson administration and his authoritarianism.