July 20, 2021 - 11:05am
Recently Pfizer and Moderna regulators announced that they would be adding heart inflammation as a potential side effect of their Covid vaccines. The European Medicines Agency found 145 cases of myocarditis and 138 cases of pericarditis out of 177m doses given of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and 19 cases of myocarditis and 19 cases of pericarditis out of 20 million doses given of the Moderna vaccine.
This is an important update, but it raises another question: why haven’t menstrual cycle changes been listed as a potential side effect too, given that over 13,000 women in the UK have reported this, and the true number is likely to be much higher?
Period changes may be a less dangerous side-effect, but it is nonetheless an important one. Firstly, misinformation about vaccines and fertility is rife (Google searches for infertility relating to Covid vaccines recently increased by 34,000% after anti-vaxxers spread false information from a petition by physicians questioning its safety), and not pre-warning women that they could experience menstrual changes only adds fuel to that fire.
Secondly, there has been a notable slow-down in the vaccine roll-out, especially amongst young people, and research shows that women are less likely to take up the vaccine than men. Thirdly, and most importantly, this is yet another example of society overlooking female health because we do not take into account the unique biological factors affecting women.
We know that Covid affects men and women differently, and yet neither the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine trials disaggregated data on adverse side effects by sex, and less than 0.2% of Covid clinical trials even mention sex as a recruitment criterion, according to the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Interestingly, a study back in March also reported that nearly all anaphylactic reactions to the Covid vaccines occurred in women, and almost all cases of blood clots caused by the Astra-Zeneca vaccine occurred in women under 55, and yet still the European Medicines Agency did not find any basis for reviewing sex as a specific risk factor.
We have known for years that women respond differently to vaccines than men; we tend to have stronger immune responses, both from antibodies and T-cells, and research on the flu vaccine suggests that women can produce the same immunological response to a half-dose vaccine as men do to a full dose. Surely this explains why women are so much more likely to experience adverse side effects (in Norway, 83% of reported side effects have come from women), and therefore makes this oversight even more bizarre.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeGood article. However, I notice that nowadays the accepted bona fides in almost everything about the vaccines is the phrase “I had my second jab last week” or “my second jab is next week”. The standard used to be an anti-Trump comment thrown in for good measure regardless of the topic, but now it’s an assurance that jabs have been had.
Sigh.
I think you can be a good and intelligent person with valid points to make regardless of your political or immunological status.
I have no doubt that this is a real issue. Perhaps key is that dosage of the mRNA and DNA-based vaccines has not been properly assessed. In contrast to a regular vaccine in which a known amount of antigen, inactivated or attenuated virus is injected, the link between amount of DNA-based (adenovirus vector) or mRNA-based vaccines injected and the amount and duration of spike protein actually produced has perhaps not been thoroughly investigated and I would expect variations of over an order of magnitude, especially between the young and the old, and even between men and women, but for that matter just between individuals.
We are told that the spike protein is innocuous and not pathogenic in its own right but that simply can’t be true. There has to be an ED50 and an LD50 for the spike protein and the safety margin may be quite narrow. (After all even the margin of safety for an OTC drug such as tylenol/paracetamol is relatively narrow). Indeed, one might speculate that those experiencing serious side effects, including life threatening ones such as coagulation with concomitant thrombocyopenia (very rare under normal conditions and unlikely for a physician to ever see this during his/her career) and myocarditis in the young and healthy, may in fact be associated with high production of spike protein.
Isn’t it time for the powers in charge to get off their high horse and actually start investigating the nature and causes of these untoward side effects. Just anecdotally, I know that many of my friends and acquaintances have experienced really bad (but not life threatening) side effects after their second shot (especially of the Moderna version of the mRNA vaccine) to the extent that they have never felt so bad before in their lives. This is worrying because the incidence of side effects is so much larger than for any other regular vaccine on the market, and the powers that be simply to want or refuse to com to terms with that little pesky fact.
I read this twice, and excuse male ignorance, but I’m still not clear about what the purported ‘changes’ are. Delayed or missed periods? Heavier ones? More painful ones? I don’t doubt that there’s a problem here, but apart from registering the usual moan about the uncaring patriarchy (are there no women in medicine?), I’m none the wiser.
Kristina Murkett is absolutely right in saying that breaking down trial data by sex is long overdue. She should be thanked for acknowledging that this is a problem that affects women and only women because of the very basic facts of female biology. Sex matters.
The New York Times and The Guardian covered this story earlier in the spring. Both reports avoided using the word ‘woman’, e.g. “people who had menstrual cycles or a uterus reported menstrual irregularities after reporting exposure to tear gas”, “people who are pregnant”, “respondents who potentially menstruate.”
nytimes.com/2021/05/01/us/period-tear-gas-study-portland.html
theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/29/teargas-protest-menstrual-cycles-health-impact
What else would you expect from the NYT and The Guardian. They have become laughable.
Some women do not have a uterus. Some do not have menstrual cycles. Some (even many) are not pregnant. Some women, as all men, fall into all three categories. It must be concluded, then, that writers who use the word “people” when they refer only to women do not consider men to be people.
As a physician who works in a province of Canada with less than 1 million people, I personally know of or have looked after 3 myocarditis patients, 3 Guillain-Barre, 1 severe VITP, several cases of serious blood clots, as well as 3 cases of “COVID-arm” (a real thing, not a colloquial or hysterical description). It is nearly impossible to report a vaccine AE here, FB groups that tried to have people come together to share AE experience have been purged, and speaking at least for Canada, the message continues from “the authorities” that “vaccines are safe and everyone should get one”. Tell that to the 20-something healthy thin guy whose heart will never work the same, and whose risk for serious outcomes from COVID was essentially zero.
I’m not an anti-vaxxer (I got mine), but I am pro-science.