September 5, 2022 - 4:21pm
There’s a moment in the opening five minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Munich that always turns my stomach. An Israeli wrestling coach is woken up in the middle of the night by a noise at the door. He goes to investigate and sees a group of armed men peek around the corner. Instead of running, instead of hiding, he throws his weight against the door, to allow his teammates time to escape. They charge in anyway. He’s killed in cold blood on the floor of the Olympic village.
Over the next few days, as the West German police bungled their way through misstep after misstep as 11 Jewish athletes were beaten, castrated, stabbed, shot and eventually massacred. Once again, just 30 years after the Holocaust, unarmed Jews were being killed in Germany, just because they were Jewish.
But unlike the aftermath of WW2, what happened next was different. This time, Jews had a country, an army, and a Prime Minister in Golda Meir that would stop at nothing to ensure justice was done.
The understatedly-named Operation Wrath of God began in earnest in October of the same year. Wael Zwaiter, who Israel considered to be an architect of the attacks, was shot 12 times on the way back from dinner in Rome. Mahmoud Hamshari was blown up in his Paris apartment and across Europe over the next decade, slowly, methodically, Israel took revenge.
Revenge, although technically speaking prohibited by Jewish law, became an Israeli value. The myth of Jewish weakness, the image of being innocent victims of hate, of being a scrappy underdog state surrounded by enemies began to erode with every killer eliminated in Wrath of God.
Israel in 1972 could still conceivably claim to be fighting for its survival. It was barely five years since Jerusalem was retaken and the Sinai held, it was a year before the Yom Kippur war, the last existential conflict Israel faced.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWhat a remarkably superficial article. Without constant vigilance Israel could be wiped off the map even faster, and killing a higher proportion of the world’s Jews, than ever seemed possible 50 years ago. Most of its neighbours would be delighted, and no other country would do anything about it. There have been millions of people in Gaza and the West Bank “growing angrier by the day” for as long as anyone can remember. Making concessions, in a inevitably fruitless attempt to impress an international community who will never lift a finger to help Israel, would just weaken the security of the Israeli people without reducing that hatred in the slightest. Israel, then as now, is fighting for the survival of the Jewish people. If they ever get bored with that task, they will not survive.
Very well said! We’re we to learn from Israel we would have reduced the likelihood of the Ukraine war, the Iranian nuclear threat etc. But no! we wend our merry way choosing to believe that all will be well, everyone is as peace-loving as ourselves and everything can be sorted out by talking. Wake up, the West! Israel, as it has been before, is a beacon.
Israel is watching carefully as the US weakens in its power to ensure its enemies don’t take advantage of that fact by building up more internal strength (including nuclear weapons) and new allies. That is the great threat Israel faces now
Can we really call this an article, when all it does is ask a question then walk away? Is this what journalism is today?
“…the last existential conflict …”? Everyday is an existential conflict for Israel. 100,000 missiles in Southern Lebanon. Hamas in the South is as ruthless to its own as it is to Israel. Jordan to the East is between a rock and a hard place with Shiites to its East planning invasion of Israel.
Spielberg’s t*t for tat movie denigrates righteous retribution portraying Israel as equal to blood thirsty terrorists. He like this author like the West in general doesn’t understand brutal strength is the best deterrence to a never ending obviously ubiquitous Islamic onslaught.
I find defending extrajudicial murder across national borders slightly stomach churning, but then that’s just me. Is it OK only when Jewish people do it? How many more decades can the Shoah be used as a shield?
Across borders? Such as firing countless rockets at Israel with the sole intention of murder? Such as attempting to murder Rushdie and anyone, anywhere who offends Islam. And it’s not just you. It’s all the other hand-wringing lefties who secretly do so love a Muslim terrorist. How many more decades? Let’s hope it’s forever.