by Paul Embery
Thursday, 2
July 2020
Reaction
11:37

Dear Harry, maybe go back to ribbon-cutting?

by Paul Embery
Prince Harry was “sorry that we haven’t got the world to the place that you deserve it to be”

It wasn’t dissimilar to a hostage video. Back pressed to a bare wall, no giveaway landmarks or objects within camera shot, reading from a script (the identity of whose author we can only guess), Prince Harry trotted out a stream of platitudes designed to convince us that, you know, racism is a bad thing and the world would be better off without it.

He even said sorry. Not, mind, for that Nazi uniform thing, or the time when he referred to army comrades as ‘Paki’ and ‘raghead’ — youthful indiscretions for which we should of course forgive him. (Let’s be frank, if these things had happened today, the prince would be condemned to live out his existence on Saint Helena). No, Harry was “sorry that we haven’t got the world to the place that you deserve it to be”. Well, I guess we can forgive him for that, too.

I have nothing against the chap, and I’m sure he means well, but the prince’s conversion from most popular royal and all-round ‘bit of a lad’ to high priest of wokeness is all a bit nauseating. Yes, Harry, we know racism is bad, and we know there is still too much of it in the world. But we are also a little concerned that some people appear intent on exacerbating existing divisions with their degrading self-flagellation, constant demands for atonement, and insistence that the rest of us become as hyper-aware of race as they seem to be. And, frankly, your lecturing ordinary Britons about ‘institutional racism’ and ‘unconscious bias’ and the need to ‘right the wrongs of the past’ from the luxury of your swanky LA mansion will go down like a cup of cold sick across a country that is still struggling to escape from a national crisis.

Even the republicans among us (in my case a pretty unenthusiastic one) know that monarchy is defined by certain things: tradition, duty, restraint, loyalty to the nation and the avoidance of political bandwagons. If Harry and his wife wish to continue trading off the Windsor brand — as they clearly do — then, as much as they would like to do so, they cannot simply abandon those responsibilities that come with it. Perhaps the country will start listening to them only when they start cutting ribbons again.

Comment


  • July 31, 2020
    I feel sorry for Harry. He's lived his whole life in this constricting goldfish bowl, that killed his mother. Hrs never had a the kind of choice over his life that most of us do. He can never be anonymous. Imagine trying to find some kind of purpose in peace amongst all that if you're 'not quite... Read more

  • July 31, 2020
    I find it bizarre this idea we have to correct history in any way. It was what it was. I'm just happy that after centuries, if not millennia, of people thinking slavery was normal that enough enlightened people got us to a place where we no longer do. That is something to be celebrated, surely????? Read more

  • July 21, 2020
    David - why should Harry "apologise to all of us" for things he didn't do hundreds of years ago to people who didn't suffer hundreds of years ago? Maybe his great-great-great-great-grandmother (Victoria) should be dug up and made to apologise for the poverty of Victorian society? (Ignoring of... Read more

To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, join UnHerd.

It's simple, quick and free.

Sign me up