Watching yesterday’s presidential debate stage occupied by two ageing men — tired-looking, ersatz “tough guys” in their mid-70s — many viewers might have found themselves wondering: what will come next? As 74-year-old Donald Trump and 77-year-old Joe Biden traded barbs and interrupted each other, the question loomed large and unanswered, as both candidates failed to outline a bold vision for the next generation. It felt like a tacit acknowledgement of a nation in decline.
On the subject of decline, much of the speculation surrounding the first presidential debate centred on Biden’s alleged cognitive decline, rather than the nation’s.
The speculation came to nought. Biden stood in front of harried moderator Chris Wallace for 90 minutes and answered the questions put to him, sometimes hesitatingly but occasionally with poise or swagger not seen in his earlier Democratic primary debate performances — and perhaps not even since his unfortunate 1988 presidential campaign in which he plagiarised speeches and misstated his academic record.
Equally, concerns over the debate as a tool of legitimising Trump were overstated, particularly in the context of American presidential debates more akin to popularity or personality contests than formal displays of forensic derring-do in the Oxford Union tradition.
Viewers were given the impression of a belligerent Trump attempting to invigorate his base even as he angered or demoralised Biden’s supporters. Meanwhile, Biden sought to position himself as a caretaker with a steady hand, a moderate who emphasised that he had beaten left-leaning rival Bernie Sanders “by a hell of a lot” and as the nominee stood for “the Democratic Party right now”.
Trump chose to root himself firmly in the present moment, providing a simple enough basis for supporting him: he and the Republican-controlled Senate have the necessary votes for confirming Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett; for enforcing “law and order” and standing with law enforcement against Antifa and the “radical Left”; for continuing to advocate reopening the country’s schools and businesses in spite of a rising Covid-19 death toll; and for achieving a number of vague and as-yet unfulfilled America First objectives dating back to his 2016 campaign.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe