“The dream of the 90s is alive in Portland,” sang the protagonists of a US comedy series from a few years back, which mocked the city’s reputation as a haven for hipsters. However, it is not only hipsters that are seemingly stuck in the 1990s, but a good part of the UK political establishment as well.
Take William Hague’s editorial in The Telegraph today, in which the former leader of the Conservative party urges Boris Johnson to scrap his opposition to European state aid rules, which has apparently emerged as a key stumbling block over a new trade deal with the EU, raising once again the prospect of a no-deal outcome.
The UK’s negotiator, Lord David Frost, claims that such rules represent an “infringement on [British] sovereignty” and would prevent the country from adequately supporting its industries in the future, particularly in the high-tech sector. Hague dismisses such claims, arguing that Britain’s industries don’t require state support to remain competitive — all they need is for the government to “provide the funding for pure research, open their country to talented people, and keep a tax system that encourages risk-taking”.
Hague’s ideas come straight out of the neoliberal gospel of the 1990s: let the “animal spirits” of capitalism rein free, with minimal government interference, and the free market will deliver optimal outcomes for all.
Recent history, however, has proven this view to be tragically wrong. The financial crisis of 2007-9, and the subsequent recession, are clear evidence of the markets’ inability, if left to their own devices, to efficiently allocate resources between the various sectors of the economy. Indeed, the world’s most competitive economies — Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea and more recently, and most obviously, China — all rely on heavy state support (both direct and indirect) to their manufacturing sectors.
The EU itself is fully aware of this, as evidenced by its willingness to waver its state aid rules whenever it has been in the interest of its major players, most notably France and Germany, to do so (not to mention whenever banks have needed to get bailed out).
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe