X Close

Was the Fed’s interest rate cut ‘political’?

The spectre of a second Trump presidency. Credit: Getty

September 19, 2024 - 5:30pm

As she enters the home stretch of her campaign for the presidency, Kamala Harris is still dogged by two issues on which she’s seen to be weak: immigration and the economy.

Spreading the rumour of immigrants eating domestic pets was a clumsy attempt by Republicans at getting immigration back on the agenda. It has so far not worked in their favour. That leaves the economy, on which voters still narrowly favour Trump over Harris, blaming her administration for the soaring inflation of the last couple of years. On Wednesday, when the Federal Reserve cut interest rates by half a percent and signalled that the economy was in a good place, this no doubt hurt the GOP too.

Needless to say, the timing is unfortunate for Trump. It’s always possible that the prospects of a second Trump administration, whose inflationary policy proposals would make life difficult for the US central bank, weighed on the minds of Fed governors as they made their decision. Perhaps that is why the former president yesterday suggested the Fed’s decision was “political”. But a rate cut was imminent, and the timing of the move was not political.

It does, however, bolster Harris’s narrative — that she and Joe Biden inherited an economy in bad shape amid the Covid-19 pandemic, restored it to health, and can now look forward to better days. That, in short, was the message Fed chairman Jerome Powell delivered at his press conference immediately after the meeting that made the rate cut decision: that inflation has come down but the economy remains healthy.

There are two ways Trump can still try to spin this to his advantage — both of which he has tried, neither with much success. The first has been to say the Fed is working for Harris, an argument that resonates only with the most partisan backers who are already going to vote for him.

The second, potentially more effective line of attack has been to say that a half-point rate cut, which was deeper than many had been expecting, suggests the economy is in even worse shape than anyone thought. But both Powell’s favourable evaluation of the economy in his presser, and the strong rally in markets that followed the next day, made that claim look doubtful. For now, with investors in almost all asset classes growing richer by the hour and credit charges set to fall, Americans might be persuaded that better days are coming.

There are still risks for Harris in the Fed decision. In particular, if the Fed’s judgement about inflation turns out to be wrong and inflation turns back up, it could lead to a rocky autumn in the markets. But with less than seven weeks to go before the election, the odds that any panic would break out first are diminishing.

A sharp turn back up in interest rates — and an attendant fall in stock markets — would be a problem for a Harris presidency. But it might not be a problem for the Harris candidacy.


John Rapley is an author and academic who divides his time between London, Johannesburg and Ottawa. His books include Why Empires Fall: Rome, America and the Future of the West (with Peter Heather, Penguin, 2023) and Twilight of the Money Gods: Economics as a religion (Simon & Schuster, 2017).

jarapley

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
4 hours ago

All of this is nonsense and demonstrates the author’s profound disconnect with voters. No one is reading the Wall Street Journal today and jumping for joy about rate cuts. People care about the impact rate cuts have on their personal lives. Any benefits or drawbacks from rate cuts won’t have an impact until after the election. It will have zero impact on voting intentions.

Same thing with cat eating and immigration. No one gives a crap about people eating cats. If you love Trump, you agree with him. If you hate Trump, you think he’s racist. Meh. By now, the issue does more to accentuate the histrionic hatred the regime media has for Trump.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Jim Veenbaas
UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
2 hours ago

Ah come on, another ho hum mindless economic article from unherd. Dont have time to explain thst asset inflation is inflation, the underestination of inflation undermines gdp , forcing house prices higher is bad for family formation. Come on…jesus, think outside the box a bit

Last edited 2 hours ago by UnHerd Reader