Yes, there’s a great deal we don’t know about the candidates. We can hear what they say on these staged occasions, but we cannot see how they run a department, how they respond to events, routine and unexpected, how they relate to colleagues and others. For this, and for everything else relevant to how the candidates might perform as prime minister, we have to rely on the judgement of those who know them better than we ever can.
And their political thinking, anyway, may count for little. Look at Johnson. He was down, as a journalist, for his laissez-faire approach to issues, but when PM he was faced with circumstances (the pandemic) which forced him to be the most prescriptive PM ever.
Nicky Samengo-Turner
1 year ago
The rest of the world, not least India, but crucially including the US and the EU will see Rishi as the single most highly qualified, high acheiving country leader anywhere on the globe, who is immune from corruption, due to his wealth- what more do we want?!!!!!
clinging on to jobs in politics because the money is needed is corruption… and what about the 1960s award of road building to a Transport minister who was closing railways , Ernest Marples and his business Marples Ridgeway? … and who fled to Israel to avoid prosecution? All covered up by then PM. What about advisory jobs to MPs and ministers from vested interests?
I shall read up on the Marples case, sounds interesting.
But the misdemeanours of Tony Blair (holiday on a yacht) or Boris (borrowing some money to pay for No10 renovations, eating some non-work related cake ) would hardly count as corruption in most countries. Didn’t two recent French presidents get done for corruption? And the mysterious wealth of some US Members of Congress is notorious.
Sorry I meant recent, say post-war PMs. Yes there was a lot of corruption if you go back. In the eighteenth century the main way to succeed in life was through the perks of official office.
Recent? Ah! but I can almost recall Pitt the younger.
Dougie Undersub
1 year ago
“This makes it tricky for Conservative members to do a direct comparison on the issues. Which is, ultimately, their entire job.”
Wrong. This process is an extended job interview, not a policy development process. A commitment to delivering the 2019 manifesto is all that is required on that front.
Steve Murray
1 year ago
At least this article is a serious piece of journalism, and touches on a problem i referred to in commenting on the “Tory Clown Show” nonsense – the poverty of the questioning of politicians and the inability of questioners to allow them to either finish their answers or elucidate sufficiently to provide a meaningful insight. Or, perhaps to prove themselves lacking in it!
Tom Watson
1 year ago
There are going to be 11 more of these???
John Tyler
1 year ago
“ There is still a lot that we don’t know about the two candidates”. Apart from the fact they are both more of the same old political status quo. What a chance the conservative MPs have thrown away!
Yes, there’s a great deal we don’t know about the candidates. We can hear what they say on these staged occasions, but we cannot see how they run a department, how they respond to events, routine and unexpected, how they relate to colleagues and others. For this, and for everything else relevant to how the candidates might perform as prime minister, we have to rely on the judgement of those who know them better than we ever can.
And their political thinking, anyway, may count for little. Look at Johnson. He was down, as a journalist, for his laissez-faire approach to issues, but when PM he was faced with circumstances (the pandemic) which forced him to be the most prescriptive PM ever.
The rest of the world, not least India, but crucially including the US and the EU will see Rishi as the single most highly qualified, high acheiving country leader anywhere on the globe, who is immune from corruption, due to his wealth- what more do we want?!!!!!
I’ve never seen a British PM that was corrupt or accused of corruption. Possibly Lloyd George but that was over a century ago.
clinging on to jobs in politics because the money is needed is corruption… and what about the 1960s award of road building to a Transport minister who was closing railways , Ernest Marples and his business Marples Ridgeway? … and who fled to Israel to avoid prosecution? All covered up by then PM. What about advisory jobs to MPs and ministers from vested interests?
I shall read up on the Marples case, sounds interesting.
But the misdemeanours of Tony Blair (holiday on a yacht) or Boris (borrowing some money to pay for No10 renovations, eating some non-work related cake ) would hardly count as corruption in most countries. Didn’t two recent French presidents get done for corruption? And the mysterious wealth of some US Members of Congress is notorious.
History does not support you, but you have to go back to the nineteenth century (and further) for clear examples.
Sorry I meant recent, say post-war PMs. Yes there was a lot of corruption if you go back. In the eighteenth century the main way to succeed in life was through the perks of official office.
Recent? Ah! but I can almost recall Pitt the younger.
“This makes it tricky for Conservative members to do a direct comparison on the issues. Which is, ultimately, their entire job.”
Wrong. This process is an extended job interview, not a policy development process. A commitment to delivering the 2019 manifesto is all that is required on that front.
At least this article is a serious piece of journalism, and touches on a problem i referred to in commenting on the “Tory Clown Show” nonsense – the poverty of the questioning of politicians and the inability of questioners to allow them to either finish their answers or elucidate sufficiently to provide a meaningful insight. Or, perhaps to prove themselves lacking in it!
There are going to be 11 more of these???
“ There is still a lot that we don’t know about the two candidates”. Apart from the fact they are both more of the same old political status quo. What a chance the conservative MPs have thrown away!