August 17, 2023 - 7:00am
On Sunday, a single by a 23-year-old TikTok singer called Baby Storme, “This City is a Graveyard”, went viral after she and her amateur production crew tried to film a flash mob in a branch of the American retailer Target. They didn’t have permission, and so violated the store’s safety guidelines. In response, Baby Storme took to social media and accused the Target employee who threatened to call the police of being a “racist”.
The footage does nothing to back up her accusation and, judging from the responses, public opinion is not on her side. Interestingly, however, Baby Storme and her legion of fans remain defiant. Why? An interview given by the singer a few years ago may hold the answer: “It’s crazy but you have to keep trying and keep going,” she said of her numerous efforts at going viral. “I’m going to get the song out there and I don’t care what I have to do, end of story.”
This statement gives some indication of Baby Storme’s preoccupation with fame at all costs. It also provides an insight into the growing division between the traditional working class and the new class of political TikTok warriors and influencers. This group is typically enamoured with the aesthetic of fighting back against capitalism and social injustice and its online presence centres around turning identity politics into a narrative of personal struggle.
Take, for example, ContraPoints, a talented Left-wing YouTuber, political commentator, and cultural critic who has made several videos on the problems with capitalism. Despite the fact that her brand has made exorbitant amounts of money from this very structure, online audiences don’t seem to care about potential inconsistencies between her online content and her lived reality.
TikTok warriors and influencers tend to be online personalities whose activism revolves around using their platforms to reduce all the ills of the world — or, rather, their world — to “cis white men”, “the patriarchy” and “Karens”. They base their entire identity on “going viral” with a cause, and moralising against what are most often traditional working-class values and people.
This is because this virtual struggle has a different agenda to actual workers. Two months ago, “Citi Bike Karen”, a nurse profiled by the New York Times for risking her life during the pandemic, had just finished a 12-hour shift when she became the subject of viral content for being “racist” and a “suspected white supremacist”. That is, until video evidence exonerated her, in much the same way as the Target employee who was, no doubt, in the midst of an equally thankless shift.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThe narcissism is breathtaking. This person actually thinks she can waltz onto private property and shoot a video without permission from said property owner – and if the property owner objects they are racist. It’s all a stunt of course. She doesn’t believe any of this garbage. It’s just a marketing ploy to go viral beyond her little niche on social media. And she succeeded. If Target really wants to inflict pain, sue her butt off for for using its property in a commercial endeavor. Hit her where it really hurts – the pocketbook.
You make good points, but I have some sympathy for her due to the fact that if she were actually looting the store, Target employees would probably leave her alone….
Are you suggesting that low paid store workers should now be acting as the police putting themselves at risk?
Are you suggesting that low paid store workers should now be acting as the police putting themselves at risk?
You make good points, but I have some sympathy for her due to the fact that if she were actually looting the store, Target employees would probably leave her alone….
The narcissism is breathtaking. This person actually thinks she can waltz onto private property and shoot a video without permission from said property owner – and if the property owner objects they are racist. It’s all a stunt of course. She doesn’t believe any of this garbage. It’s just a marketing ploy to go viral beyond her little niche on social media. And she succeeded. If Target really wants to inflict pain, sue her butt off for for using its property in a commercial endeavor. Hit her where it really hurts – the pocketbook.
I have to say Feminists that women use these tactics way more often than men. There’s a particularly nasty version where women in gyms wearing porno-type gear do hit pieces on men who they claim are leering at them as they ‘just try to do their gym routine’ (while filming themselves obvs for their loving fans).
Do Feminists support these individuals?
That’s because it’s passive-aggression, our evolutionary speciality probably, because we’d usually lose against men in a contest of active aggression.
Er, is that from your own experience?
Nothing feminist about such tactics. Please stop blaming feminism for behaviours from certain women and girls who have been caught up in the pseudo, self-referencing ‘girl power’ promoted by glossy magazines, Youtube so-called influencers, TikTok narcissists and corporate interests.
Do Feminists support these individuals?
That’s because it’s passive-aggression, our evolutionary speciality probably, because we’d usually lose against men in a contest of active aggression.
Er, is that from your own experience?
Nothing feminist about such tactics. Please stop blaming feminism for behaviours from certain women and girls who have been caught up in the pseudo, self-referencing ‘girl power’ promoted by glossy magazines, Youtube so-called influencers, TikTok narcissists and corporate interests.
I have to say Feminists that women use these tactics way more often than men. There’s a particularly nasty version where women in gyms wearing porno-type gear do hit pieces on men who they claim are leering at them as they ‘just try to do their gym routine’ (while filming themselves obvs for their loving fans).
“Imagine no possessions” sang a multimillionaire, then went on to making more millions from that very song, a few decades ago. I still remember the teary-eyed admiration my friends and I were feeling as we were singing the lyrics of that song together…
People have been able to make a very nice living in capitalist countries from singing about the evils of capitalism, for a long time.
Are they to blame, really? No, clearly there is a great societal interest in hearing the message. But that’s where it ends. It stays on the level of titillation, like paying for an entry to a haunted house to get scared.
Neither the singers nor the singees actually try to do anything once the song is over, except maybe a few crazies who make bombs in their basements.
I agree. I have no issue with artists railing about race or capitalism. That’s their business. Many of them are probably grifters, but the world is full of grifters of every race, religion and ideology. Imposing your viewpoint on others is another matter of course.
It’s worse, I’m afraid, as plenty of people who have been influenced by the supposed idealism of those facile and hypocritical lyrics (I don’t blame teenagers for dreaming along for a bit, like I did) now actively push “ideals” like completely open borders (“imagine there’re no countries”) which, other than grossly empowering ruthless cartels and smugglers, is a policy clearly of, by, and for not only global capital, but also the status-conscious, superficially globalized PMC who love to virtue signal while enjoying: cheap landscapers, nannies, etc, while not, personally or as class, being priced out of scarce housing, having to wait in endless lines at health clinics behind illegal immigrants who speak no English towing multiple children, or send their kids to overwhelmed, chaotic schools in which growing minorities of kids have arrived from very different cultures speaking no English and requiring remedial everything.
Meanwhile, every elite family from abroad of every background but one (even pale-skinned “Latinos” from Spain) has claimed and benefited from affirmative action in admissions, scholarships, hiring, and promotions, due to their “diversity”, for over two full generations. The children of a well remunerated banker with some continental Spanish heritage, whose wife worked with my mother, did this endlessly, while, as children of a single parent living near the poverty line, we simply did not qualify, categorically, due to skin color/Anglo ethnicity.
Perhaps Lennon could’ve added another dreamy lyric about industrial animal ag propping up the almost unfathomable cruelty and suffering in degree and scale inherent to its business model, by recruiting and trafficking migrant children to work in its slaughterhouses.
Not to blame? ‘Imagine’ is just an early example or the vacuous, preachy virtue signaling practiced by so many of the show biz elite. Love Lennon at his best but FFS.
I agree. I have no issue with artists railing about race or capitalism. That’s their business. Many of them are probably grifters, but the world is full of grifters of every race, religion and ideology. Imposing your viewpoint on others is another matter of course.
It’s worse, I’m afraid, as plenty of people who have been influenced by the supposed idealism of those facile and hypocritical lyrics (I don’t blame teenagers for dreaming along for a bit, like I did) now actively push “ideals” like completely open borders (“imagine there’re no countries”) which, other than grossly empowering ruthless cartels and smugglers, is a policy clearly of, by, and for not only global capital, but also the status-conscious, superficially globalized PMC who love to virtue signal while enjoying: cheap landscapers, nannies, etc, while not, personally or as class, being priced out of scarce housing, having to wait in endless lines at health clinics behind illegal immigrants who speak no English towing multiple children, or send their kids to overwhelmed, chaotic schools in which growing minorities of kids have arrived from very different cultures speaking no English and requiring remedial everything.
Meanwhile, every elite family from abroad of every background but one (even pale-skinned “Latinos” from Spain) has claimed and benefited from affirmative action in admissions, scholarships, hiring, and promotions, due to their “diversity”, for over two full generations. The children of a well remunerated banker with some continental Spanish heritage, whose wife worked with my mother, did this endlessly, while, as children of a single parent living near the poverty line, we simply did not qualify, categorically, due to skin color/Anglo ethnicity.
Perhaps Lennon could’ve added another dreamy lyric about industrial animal ag propping up the almost unfathomable cruelty and suffering in degree and scale inherent to its business model, by recruiting and trafficking migrant children to work in its slaughterhouses.
Not to blame? ‘Imagine’ is just an early example or the vacuous, preachy virtue signaling practiced by so many of the show biz elite. Love Lennon at his best but FFS.
“Imagine no possessions” sang a multimillionaire, then went on to making more millions from that very song, a few decades ago. I still remember the teary-eyed admiration my friends and I were feeling as we were singing the lyrics of that song together…
People have been able to make a very nice living in capitalist countries from singing about the evils of capitalism, for a long time.
Are they to blame, really? No, clearly there is a great societal interest in hearing the message. But that’s where it ends. It stays on the level of titillation, like paying for an entry to a haunted house to get scared.
Neither the singers nor the singees actually try to do anything once the song is over, except maybe a few crazies who make bombs in their basements.
Why do we insist on believing that these people are altruistic, and then complain when they all turn out to be money-grubbing frauds. Genuinely altruistic human beings are as rare as hen’s teeth and certainly not to be found on the Internet, and certainly not in Parliament or the media.
Why do we insist on believing that these people are altruistic, and then complain when they all turn out to be money-grubbing frauds. Genuinely altruistic human beings are as rare as hen’s teeth and certainly not to be found on the Internet, and certainly not in Parliament or the media.
In other words, this is a battle against concepts and archetypes, with little relation to what is actually going on on the ground.
Especially when this relates to ordinary people doing ordinary jobs, and trying, against the odds, to make their lives work.
In other words, this is a battle against concepts and archetypes, with little relation to what is actually going on on the ground.
Especially when this relates to ordinary people doing ordinary jobs, and trying, against the odds, to make their lives work.
“That, unfortunately, is a truth they will have to accept.”
Will they though?
Unfortunately I suspect Baby Storme is on to something: the operative currency of a social media-based culture is not truth but her truth – not virtue, but the appearance of virtue and so on,
As long as there are enough people who will view this event through the paradigm that attractive young black women trying to express themselves are pretty-well-automatically victims and burly middle-aged white men who are tasked with enforcing their employer’s policies are pretty-well-automatically oppressors, then she is going to cash in and just keep rolling.
“That, unfortunately, is a truth they will have to accept.”
Will they though?
Unfortunately I suspect Baby Storme is on to something: the operative currency of a social media-based culture is not truth but her truth – not virtue, but the appearance of virtue and so on,
As long as there are enough people who will view this event through the paradigm that attractive young black women trying to express themselves are pretty-well-automatically victims and burly middle-aged white men who are tasked with enforcing their employer’s policies are pretty-well-automatically oppressors, then she is going to cash in and just keep rolling.
Her actions are vile narcissism.
Not possible, there are no bad black people
Not possible, there are no bad black people
Her actions are vile narcissism.
Great piece, thank you.