If I were to think of epithets to describe O’Rourke, the first that would come to mind would be: “fake”, “devoid of self-awareness” and “unbearably awkward”. One of the last that would present itself is “intelligent”.
He postures so as to insinuate a working class, Latino heritage, when, as the author notes, he is actually a fourth generation Irish rich kid who spent a number of years doing nothing much but playing bass guitar, skateboarding and generally failing in various ventures. He then fell in to the world where you need no qualifications, no talent, and no intelligence to succeed: politics.
He’s gone along with the Democrats extremist positions: effectively open borders, unrestricted abortion rights – including full term abortion -, and all the hardcore woke stuff:
Latinos never fell for it. Not even his skateboarding antics on the campaign trail won them over. The fact that he is the descendent of slave owners probably didn’t help him with the black vote. Although it did show his family have a long history in the Democratic Party.
A fake, with extremist political positions, representing a party whose control of any state, city, town, guarantees its rapid descent in to lawlessness, insolvency, filth and decay; it’s hardy surprising he isn’t making much headway.
Under Abbot, Texas has been flourishing. Business and individual tax exiles are flooding in from the overtaxed Democrat cesspits such as California, and they will soon be followed by the tech industry now California can’t keep the lights on. With that success I’m bewildered why anyone would want to vote for a clown like O’Rourke and his destructive Democrat policies.
In 2021 the total state tax revenue collected for California was $248 billion. For Texas it was $65 billion.
Of course, California has a larger population at 39 million compared to Texas’s 29 million. But if we look at tax per capita, California comes out at of $6359 compared to $2,241.
Californians on average, then, pay around 3x in state taxes than Texans. Considering what Californians get back for their tax dollars in terms of public services and the infrastructure, it’s a double insult.
actually the middle 60% of Texas pay in state and local taxes 9.7% , in California the same group pays 8.9%, you forget the local taxes make up what the state doesn’t pay, try again
Mike. Marcus brought the numbers, Ok?
Maybe local taxes (read: property taxes) are higher in Texas (on average) than in California, and folding in the burden of local taxes would make tax burdens in Texas higher?
Feel free to look up property in localities situated in California and Texas. What do you think you’re going to see?
Overall taxes are higher in Texas, which include property tax and sales taxes, unlike an income tax, these taxes don’t go down if you are unemployed or underemployed
Let me help you.
Your initial assertion that: “Texans pay more in taxes than they do in California”, is clearly wrong.
What is true is that individuals may face higher a rate of tax in Texas than in California. It is also true that because Texas doesn’t have income tax, those individuals tend to be lower earners.
But the plain percentage tax rates can be deceptive. For example, the property tax in California is 0.73% compared to Texas at 1.69%.
On your figures the Californian is much better off However, the median house price of a family home in California is $816,804 compared to $314,718 in Texas That means the average Californian is paying $5 962 in property tax compared to $5 004 for the average Texan. California has a lower percentage tax rate, but on average Californians pay almost $1000 dollars more annually.
The tax structure in Texas has a number of benefits. Whereas in California people are punished with higher tax rates for increasing their income by advancing in their career, working harder or running a successful business, in Texas people get to keep more of the fruits of their labour. People are incentivised to better themselves. Californians, and particularly low earners, are disincentivised to progress.
Texas’s tax system draws wealth and businesses to the State, bringing a larger tax base and more jobs and opportunities. California drives them away.
The reality is revealed by where people choose to be, and it is California that is declining and Texas that is growing.
your calculations may be correct yet they omit the shadow taxes paid by Texans. Everything the State of Texas charges a fee for – professional licensing fees, driving license costs, hunting and fishing permits, building permits, even traffic fines have increased dramatically over the past couple dozen years. Saying that Texans shoulder a heavier tax burden may not be accurate, but I’d bet that all things considered, the overall financial burden is as high or higher than California.
Better to deal with specifics rather than guessing.
Attorney annual license fee. California $515. Texas $68- $235
Drivers license costs: California $3,300. Texas $2,500
Fishing permit. California $48.34. Texas $40
Hunting permit California $54. Texas $25.or $7 for over 65s.
really is that what you think? Do you pay rent? Who do think is paying the property taxes on your space? You are. You also pay sales taxes, you are taxed at a higher rate than in California overall. Lesson over
Awesome. And, of course, California goes for the hat trick: sales tax, income tax and property tax.
Meanwhile, in California, Proposition13 (1977) imposes a disproportionate property tax on new home owners.
“Schools have too many doors”. He was talking about the common, and effective, safety measure of having limited points of entry to better scrutinize people entering the building.
Agreed. Cruz was suggesting employing the same security that operates at federal buildings and courthouses. There is one point of entry, which is guarded by armed police officers, who can control who comes in and out.
Characterising a policy of controlled ingress and egress to schools, secured by armed guards, as blaming “too many doors”, is cheap and dishonest.
Incorrect
The official figures from 1982-2022 for mass shooters is: 70% white, 30% non-white, with 21% being black.
If we take the middle of that period, whites represented 75% of the US population Whites were therefore unrepresented in mass shootings. Blacks at 12.5 % of the population, were disproportionately over represented.
The ethnicity had nothing to do with it – we are reaping a pandemic of failed and invisible parenting. The shooter had a homelife that was unexplainable. Not excusing him, but it wasn’t cause he was Mexican.
And your country is not messed up? Just this week, in my country, a man (illegal migrant from Africa) was arrested for the rape of two elderly patients inside a hospital. We are all living in glass houses, sadly.
or maybe you could consider limiting the access to the AR-15 that the police are afraid to face, with good reason. After all, if the local pizza delivery kid shows up buys an AR-15, 54 clips and 3000 rounds of ammunition what is the worst that could happen. Try again, weak
Yeah, and Daniel Kalder (the author of this article) doesn’t seem to grasp that’s what Senator Cruz was saying.
Last edited 1 year ago by UNKNOWN PERSON
Matt Hindman
1 year ago
The man is a joke. He has flip flopped on guns, immigration, civility in politics, and numerous other issues multiple times! Beto might as well be a Twitter hot take with a mouth, and he forgets most people have a memory that goes back farther than a week. Also he is a white as they come but adopted “Beto” merely in the hope of increasing Hispanic support while running against an actual Hispanic named Ted Cruz (Cuban). There is nothing about this guy that is not superficial.
Beta is a joke, but that joke nearly bagged a Senate seat, and he remains on the periphery of viability in the gubernatorial campaign. He is a scary joke.
Excellent article. Clearly explains the complete phony and radical Liberal that Beto is. Fake news and national Libs may love him, but thankfully the majority of Texans know he is a fraud and radical Lib completely out of touch with Texas values.
David Lemoine
1 year ago
“Beto” is as fake as Gavin Newsom – funny the similar backgrounds…
You can include Pritzker (Illinois) in that crowd, too.
Sam McGowan
1 year ago
The comment about Ted Cruz being the most unpopular member of Congress is spot on. The ONLY reason O’Rourke came within three percentage points against Cruz is because Cruz is so disliked. I only voted for him as the lesser of two evils. Cruz’s comment that Texas schools have too many doors is not that far off, although he should have said too many are left unlocked, as was the case at Uvalde. Incidentally, Uvalde is the ONLY time a mass shooter in Texas targeted an elementary school. The only other Texas “mass shooting” was at the Santa Fe high school and it was prompted, at least to some extent, because a high school girl humiliated the shooter in public after he asked her out. O’Rourke and Wendy Davis need to go off somewhere and form their own colony.
UNKNOWN PERSON
1 year ago
I agree with Mayor McLaughlin.
rod tofino
1 year ago
I don’t agree with the view that O’Rourke is intelligent.He strikes me as being utterly vapid.
Alan Neuren
1 year ago
You think when he loses again, he might go out and find a real job?
Mike Bewley
1 year ago
Kalder clings to Abbott’s five point lead like his stuffed rabbit during a thunderstorm, hey Kalder sweetie guess what the polling was in 2018? Trafalgar Cruz plus 9, RCP average was 7, final result Cruz by 2.8, see ya in November for your column of sniffles
You won’t be capturing lightning in a bottle twice. The yard signs and bumper stickers aren’t there. Beto loses between 7-10. The momentum isn’t there so it’s best you accept reality for what it is. Beto is toast and Texas Democrats had back into the wilderness.
sorry sweetie, the signs that are lacking are Abbott signs, you can keep dreaming if you want, but it isn’t capturing lightening in a bottle it is the inevitable tide, smart people live in cities, smart people make money, smart people drive the economy and smart people vote Democratic. Of the top ten largest cities in the US, Texas has FOUR, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin, all blue getting bigger and bluer every year. So the reality that needs to be accepted is on your part. Get your crying towel from 2020, cleaned and ready
Yep, those smart people vote Democrat especially in large cities. And large cities are where most people want to live. They want to be right in the middle of the filth of San Fran, Portland, and Seattle. Right in the violence of Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit. Paying $500K minimum for a crappy starter house in a dangerous neighborhood.
So, yes, I agree the big cities are blue (not sure they are all getting bluer?)..I do not agree that those living there and voting D are smart, at least not when it comes to politics.
Last edited 1 year ago by Greg Eiden
George K
1 year ago
By “lightness”, they mean unencumbered by hostility to women, not loaded with hate, unweighted by pettiness and bigotry, and not feeding red meat to extremists.
this whole column is based on fear, the fear that Beto will win, they should be afraid
Mike Bewley
1 year ago
LOL, what a weak commentary. It sounds more like the author is trying to convince himself that Beto cannot win. The result of the 2018 race was that Democratic turnout surged by 600,000 votes and two Republican congressional districts turned blue and stayed blue in 2020. Abbott himself is underwater in polling and the majority in Texas feel that state in on the wrong track. While Beto has been busy registering new voters for the last two years, Abbott has been squandering state monies on performance theater designed to win approval from his masters at Fox News. Oh, and the Abbott campaign stated that the goal of the blockage was to drive up inflation to hurt Biden. Here is the real news, in 2012 Romney won Texas by 17 points, in 2020 Trump won Texas by 5.5 points. In 2022, Beto will garner more votes for a Democratic candidate in history and Abbott will not even begin to approach the totals for Trump. Polling in Texas is notoriously bad, in 2018 the Trafalgar group had Cruz up by 9, the RCP average was 7, and the final result was 2.6. So cling to your imaginary 5% lead Mr. Kalder if helps you sleep at night, but get your MAGA 2020 crying towel ready.
If I were to think of epithets to describe O’Rourke, the first that would come to mind would be: “fake”, “devoid of self-awareness” and “unbearably awkward”. One of the last that would present itself is “intelligent”.
He postures so as to insinuate a working class, Latino heritage, when, as the author notes, he is actually a fourth generation Irish rich kid who spent a number of years doing nothing much but playing bass guitar, skateboarding and generally failing in various ventures. He then fell in to the world where you need no qualifications, no talent, and no intelligence to succeed: politics.
He’s gone along with the Democrats extremist positions: effectively open borders, unrestricted abortion rights – including full term abortion -, and all the hardcore woke stuff:
Latinos never fell for it. Not even his skateboarding antics on the campaign trail won them over. The fact that he is the descendent of slave owners probably didn’t help him with the black vote. Although it did show his family have a long history in the Democratic Party.
A fake, with extremist political positions, representing a party whose control of any state, city, town, guarantees its rapid descent in to lawlessness, insolvency, filth and decay; it’s hardy surprising he isn’t making much headway.
Under Abbot, Texas has been flourishing. Business and individual tax exiles are flooding in from the overtaxed Democrat cesspits such as California, and they will soon be followed by the tech industry now California can’t keep the lights on. With that success I’m bewildered why anyone would want to vote for a clown like O’Rourke and his destructive Democrat policies.
the truth is the Texans pay more in taxes than they do in California, sorry to burst your bubble.
How so?
In 2021 the total state tax revenue collected for California was $248 billion. For Texas it was $65 billion.
Of course, California has a larger population at 39 million compared to Texas’s 29 million. But if we look at tax per capita, California comes out at of $6359 compared to $2,241.
Californians on average, then, pay around 3x in state taxes than Texans. Considering what Californians get back for their tax dollars in terms of public services and the infrastructure, it’s a double insult.
actually the middle 60% of Texas pay in state and local taxes 9.7% , in California the same group pays 8.9%, you forget the local taxes make up what the state doesn’t pay, try again
Mike. Marcus brought the numbers, Ok?
Maybe local taxes (read: property taxes) are higher in Texas (on average) than in California, and folding in the burden of local taxes would make tax burdens in Texas higher?
Feel free to look up property in localities situated in California and Texas. What do you think you’re going to see?
Overall taxes are higher in Texas, which include property tax and sales taxes, unlike an income tax, these taxes don’t go down if you are unemployed or underemployed
Property taxes in Texas dwarf California’s
Let me help you.
Your initial assertion that: “Texans pay more in taxes than they do in California”, is clearly wrong.
What is true is that individuals may face higher a rate of tax in Texas than in California. It is also true that because Texas doesn’t have income tax, those individuals tend to be lower earners.
But the plain percentage tax rates can be deceptive. For example, the property tax in California is 0.73% compared to Texas at 1.69%.
On your figures the Californian is much better off However, the median house price of a family home in California is $816,804 compared to $314,718 in Texas That means the average Californian is paying $5 962 in property tax compared to $5 004 for the average Texan. California has a lower percentage tax rate, but on average Californians pay almost $1000 dollars more annually.
The tax structure in Texas has a number of benefits. Whereas in California people are punished with higher tax rates for increasing their income by advancing in their career, working harder or running a successful business, in Texas people get to keep more of the fruits of their labour. People are incentivised to better themselves. Californians, and particularly low earners, are disincentivised to progress.
Texas’s tax system draws wealth and businesses to the State, bringing a larger tax base and more jobs and opportunities. California drives them away.
The reality is revealed by where people choose to be, and it is California that is declining and Texas that is growing.
your calculations may be correct yet they omit the shadow taxes paid by Texans. Everything the State of Texas charges a fee for – professional licensing fees, driving license costs, hunting and fishing permits, building permits, even traffic fines have increased dramatically over the past couple dozen years. Saying that Texans shoulder a heavier tax burden may not be accurate, but I’d bet that all things considered, the overall financial burden is as high or higher than California.
Better to deal with specifics rather than guessing.
Attorney annual license fee. California $515. Texas $68- $235
Drivers license costs: California $3,300. Texas $2,500
Fishing permit. California $48.34. Texas $40
Hunting permit California $54. Texas $25.or $7 for over 65s.
There is no income tax in Texas. We are only taxed on property and sales. Some Texans don’t pay property taxes – I’m one of them.
really is that what you think? Do you pay rent? Who do think is paying the property taxes on your space? You are. You also pay sales taxes, you are taxed at a higher rate than in California overall. Lesson over
Awesome. And, of course, California goes for the hat trick: sales tax, income tax and property tax.
Meanwhile, in California, Proposition13 (1977) imposes a disproportionate property tax on new home owners.
Beto is the original “fake Mexican.”
“playing bass guitar”, enough said.
“Schools have too many doors”. He was talking about the common, and effective, safety measure of having limited points of entry to better scrutinize people entering the building.
Agreed. Cruz was suggesting employing the same security that operates at federal buildings and courthouses. There is one point of entry, which is guarded by armed police officers, who can control who comes in and out.
Characterising a policy of controlled ingress and egress to schools, secured by armed guards, as blaming “too many doors”, is cheap and dishonest.
The fact you have to even consider that for schools just shows how messed up America is
The fact is that Uvalde is less than 100 kilometers from Mexico, a country with a murder rate six times higher than the United States.
Point being? what? the shooter was an American citizen, explain yourself, I will wait
An American citizen of Mexican descent.
uhh almost all shooters are white sweetie, now what
Incorrect
The official figures from 1982-2022 for mass shooters is: 70% white, 30% non-white, with 21% being black.
If we take the middle of that period, whites represented 75% of the US population Whites were therefore unrepresented in mass shootings. Blacks at 12.5 % of the population, were disproportionately over represented.
The ethnicity had nothing to do with it – we are reaping a pandemic of failed and invisible parenting. The shooter had a homelife that was unexplainable. Not excusing him, but it wasn’t cause he was Mexican.
Is that the problem in Mexico too?
And your country is not messed up? Just this week, in my country, a man (illegal migrant from Africa) was arrested for the rape of two elderly patients inside a hospital. We are all living in glass houses, sadly.
Diversity is our strength…
or maybe you could consider limiting the access to the AR-15 that the police are afraid to face, with good reason. After all, if the local pizza delivery kid shows up buys an AR-15, 54 clips and 3000 rounds of ammunition what is the worst that could happen. Try again, weak
How would you limit the access to criminals
Yeah, and Daniel Kalder (the author of this article) doesn’t seem to grasp that’s what Senator Cruz was saying.
The man is a joke. He has flip flopped on guns, immigration, civility in politics, and numerous other issues multiple times! Beto might as well be a Twitter hot take with a mouth, and he forgets most people have a memory that goes back farther than a week. Also he is a white as they come but adopted “Beto” merely in the hope of increasing Hispanic support while running against an actual Hispanic named Ted Cruz (Cuban). There is nothing about this guy that is not superficial.
Beta is a joke, but that joke nearly bagged a Senate seat, and he remains on the periphery of viability in the gubernatorial campaign. He is a scary joke.
Beto Pendejo es una mala broma.
Una mala broma que “Beto” nunca podría comprender
Excellent article. Clearly explains the complete phony and radical Liberal that Beto is. Fake news and national Libs may love him, but thankfully the majority of Texans know he is a fraud and radical Lib completely out of touch with Texas values.
“Beto” is as fake as Gavin Newsom – funny the similar backgrounds…
You can include Pritzker (Illinois) in that crowd, too.
The comment about Ted Cruz being the most unpopular member of Congress is spot on. The ONLY reason O’Rourke came within three percentage points against Cruz is because Cruz is so disliked. I only voted for him as the lesser of two evils. Cruz’s comment that Texas schools have too many doors is not that far off, although he should have said too many are left unlocked, as was the case at Uvalde. Incidentally, Uvalde is the ONLY time a mass shooter in Texas targeted an elementary school. The only other Texas “mass shooting” was at the Santa Fe high school and it was prompted, at least to some extent, because a high school girl humiliated the shooter in public after he asked her out. O’Rourke and Wendy Davis need to go off somewhere and form their own colony.
I agree with Mayor McLaughlin.
I don’t agree with the view that O’Rourke is intelligent.He strikes me as being utterly vapid.
You think when he loses again, he might go out and find a real job?
Kalder clings to Abbott’s five point lead like his stuffed rabbit during a thunderstorm, hey Kalder sweetie guess what the polling was in 2018? Trafalgar Cruz plus 9, RCP average was 7, final result Cruz by 2.8, see ya in November for your column of sniffles
You won’t be capturing lightning in a bottle twice. The yard signs and bumper stickers aren’t there. Beto loses between 7-10. The momentum isn’t there so it’s best you accept reality for what it is. Beto is toast and Texas Democrats had back into the wilderness.
sorry sweetie, the signs that are lacking are Abbott signs, you can keep dreaming if you want, but it isn’t capturing lightening in a bottle it is the inevitable tide, smart people live in cities, smart people make money, smart people drive the economy and smart people vote Democratic. Of the top ten largest cities in the US, Texas has FOUR, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin, all blue getting bigger and bluer every year. So the reality that needs to be accepted is on your part. Get your crying towel from 2020, cleaned and ready
Yep, those smart people vote Democrat especially in large cities. And large cities are where most people want to live. They want to be right in the middle of the filth of San Fran, Portland, and Seattle. Right in the violence of Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit. Paying $500K minimum for a crappy starter house in a dangerous neighborhood.
So, yes, I agree the big cities are blue (not sure they are all getting bluer?)..I do not agree that those living there and voting D are smart, at least not when it comes to politics.
By “lightness”, they mean unencumbered by hostility to women, not loaded with hate, unweighted by pettiness and bigotry, and not feeding red meat to extremists.
this whole column is based on fear, the fear that Beto will win, they should be afraid
LOL, what a weak commentary. It sounds more like the author is trying to convince himself that Beto cannot win. The result of the 2018 race was that Democratic turnout surged by 600,000 votes and two Republican congressional districts turned blue and stayed blue in 2020. Abbott himself is underwater in polling and the majority in Texas feel that state in on the wrong track. While Beto has been busy registering new voters for the last two years, Abbott has been squandering state monies on performance theater designed to win approval from his masters at Fox News. Oh, and the Abbott campaign stated that the goal of the blockage was to drive up inflation to hurt Biden. Here is the real news, in 2012 Romney won Texas by 17 points, in 2020 Trump won Texas by 5.5 points. In 2022, Beto will garner more votes for a Democratic candidate in history and Abbott will not even begin to approach the totals for Trump. Polling in Texas is notoriously bad, in 2018 the Trafalgar group had Cruz up by 9, the RCP average was 7, and the final result was 2.6. So cling to your imaginary 5% lead Mr. Kalder if helps you sleep at night, but get your MAGA 2020 crying towel ready.
Yikes! The “his masters at Fox News” trope.
it is a trope how so? prove me wrong, I will wait
no reply? awww shucks, lol, typical, sad