April 23, 2024 - 2:30pm
When the SNP-Scottish Green Party power-sharing deal was signed in 2021, it was supposed to herald a new era of cooperation in devolved politics. It was supposed to unite Scotland’s pro-independence parties and force the UK Government to deliver a second referendum on Scottish secession. It was supposed to ensure Scotland was a “world leader in confronting the climate emergency”.
Three years later, however, and not only have none of those lofty ambitions been realised, but the power-sharing deal itself is increasingly in jeopardy, as Green co-leader Patrick Harvie has conceded that the coalition between the two parties may not hold. Today, Alba MSP Ash Regan tabled a no-confidence motion in Harvie after he refused to accept the findings of the Cass Report on gender identity, which he denied was a “valid scientific document”.
The prospect of a second independence referendum did recede in late 2022, when the Supreme Court ruled the Scottish Government had no power to organise a vote of its own, and Westminster remained unwilling to grant one.
But the real pressure on the Bute House Agreement — as the SNP-Scottish Green power-sharing deal is grandly titled — began earlier this month. On 18 April, Scotland’s Net Zero Secretary, Maìri McAllan, confirmed the SNP-Green administration had been forced to drop its target to reduce carbon emissions by 75% before 2030, as well as abandon annual reporting on its progress towards reducing emissions. The announcement was a deep humiliation for the SNP, which had frequently boasted how Scotland had “the most stretching [emissions reduction] targets in the world”.
But it was more damaging still for the credibility of the Scottish Green Party, which — still an environmentalist party at heart, at least in theory — had supported an even more ambitious (and unfeasible) 80% reduction in emissions by 2030. Harvie admitted the failure to meet the 2030 target left him “angry and disappointed” but many grassroots activists feel this is not enough, and have forced an emergency vote, currently planned in May, on whether the power-sharing agreement itself should be scrapped.
The row over emissions targets in particular is reminiscent of when the Liberal Democrats — themselves in coalition after the 2010 election — broke their pledge not to raise tuition fees, with Harvie’s credibility among activists and voters at risk of being undermined just as Nick Clegg’s was.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeToo busy with trans ideology, no longer anything to do with the environment.
They probably won’t breed which is a goal of climate change alarmists.
Also better for the rest of us if the Greens don’t breed.
Also, still busy rejecting anything English (i.e. Dr Hillary Cass)
On 18 April, Scotland’s Net Zero Secretary, Maìri McAllan, confirmed the SNP-Green administration had been forced to drop its target to reduce carbon emissions by 75% before 2030, as well as abandon annual reporting on its progress towards reducing emissions.
The last clause is the most telling, of course.
Well spotted, but the quoted article does not mention it. The closes I could find is this:
“The Scottish government will also scrap its annual emissions reduction targets, which ministers have missed eight times in the last 12 years.”
The Greens went off the rails a long time ago…
Apart from Mr Youseless’ Hate Crime legislation and the embezzlement, all other major problems for the SNP/Green administration in Edinburgh have been a result of Green influence. Gender self-ID, the disastrous deposit return scheme, the delayed ferries fiasco (due to problems with the “green fuel” that they are supposed to use), all these are Green initiatives..
Before the SNP-Green coalition, the SNP magic formula was simple: (1) use up all the extra cash from the Barnet formula on give-aways, (2) do nothing in particular, policy-wise and (3) when anything goes wrong, blame it on Westminster. This approach to governance stood them in good stead for years. But then along came those pesky Greens.
Greens are just a bunch of extremists
the Scottish Green Party, which — still an environmentalist party at heart, at least in theory — had supported an even more ambitious (and unfeasible) 80% reduction in emissions by 2030.
Any idiot can pluck a “target” out of the air and call it a policy.Did they ever produce a written strategy by year detailing how this was to be achieved?
From the news at midday on the 25th, it seems that the SNP/Green coalition has ended. That is a great pity as the Greens were a great millstone/albatross around the neck of the SNP.
“SNP” no longer stands for “Snowflakes, Net Zero and Puberty Blockers”. So from now on, the SNP can revert to their pre-coalition approach to governance of (1) using spare Barnet formula cash for giveaways, (2) doing nothing in particular policy-wise and (3) blaming Westminster when things go wrong.