October 18, 2023 - 11:57am
The reaction to the killing of two Swedish football fans in Belgium has, in my home country, been rather curious.
Following the terrorist attack, Magdalena Andersson, leader of the Social Democrats and our former prime minister, urged Swedes to moderate their tone and to avoid expressing strong emotions. Ulf Kristersson, Prime Minister and leader of the Moderate Party, said that “one has to be very, very careful right now. Words that admittedly are legal can have consequences. All that is lawful is not appropriate.”
Leading social democratic and liberal pundits are now blaming the terror on Swedish freedom of expression. If only we could ban everything that is taboo in Islam, they wouldn’t want to kill us. We have to better ourselves so that they don’t want to kill us as much, apparently.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs now urges Swedes not to show any Swedish symbols when they are abroad. Jews in Sweden are advised to hide all signs of their Jewish identity. Why is it that the victims of Islamic terrorism have to hide? It’s unsustainable.
Three Swedes were shot because they are Swedes, but if you read what many intellectuals and politicians are saying, they were more outraged that a Member of Parliament from the Sweden Democrats posted an insensitive tweet immediately after the terror attack (the post was later deleted). One tweet is worse than Islamic terrorism, judging by the reactions of our noble intelligentsia.
In taking this stance, they illustrate why Sweden ended up in its current state: for both Left- and Right-wing governments, it has been more important to distance themselves from the Sweden Democrats (the immigration restrictionist party) than to deal with the consequences of mass migration.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeNo Jews running round beheading people who offend them in Sweden of course, nor here in the UK but we’re all expected to waffle about ‘restraint’ and hope for the best. Meanwhile the crybullies flex their muscles and dictate their terms for everybody else to live by.
When Jews were demonstrating about the BBC refusing to refer to the terrorists as ‘terrorists’ (they’re terrorists Jim, but not such as we know them) the crowd was 99% Jewish. Nobody is prepared to stand up for them as they get attacked, but the rentamob turns out for the beheaders and those who spit on naked (dead?) bodies in the name of their compassionate God.
There’s always plenty of willing idiots on that particular clown bus.
So was Michel Houllebeque right ? Are we just going to submit to the new proposed global Caliphate? Is that the future for us all ?
God help us.
I see it like this: ‘the white nations have ruled the world for hundreds of years; now is the time for the underclass to become the lords.’
This idea is so much part of our culture that we will never step back. We have to be taken over fully for a resistance to develop – perhaps two generations down the road. Unfortunately, we will have been so emasculated that the energy might not be there.
Sweden has reached the stage where nearly half their youth have a foreign-born parent. Soon the ethnic Swedes will be a minority.
There won’t be enough voters for the Sweden Democrats to stage a comeback. How does your resistance develop then?
As I said, they will be emasculated. There will be no resistance. I have to say that I don’t care because I won’t be around. My grandchildren will suffer but I can’t do anything about it. Certainly, moaning on UnHerd won’t do anything – definitely armchair politicians only.
Or in this instance, a case of Stockholm Syndrome.
It’s not just in Sweden though. Egregious examples such as the Islamic grooming gangs (almost all of Pakistani origin) continue to operate on the streets of the UK, perhaps less brazenly than before. The police and local authorities know this but continue in their state of culturally-based denial.
And yet Jewish organisations always demand continued mass migration to the UK, Sweden and elsewhere (except Israel obviously). You don’t have to go around beheading people to destroy a country
Sorry, I’m a bit slow. Can you spell this out for me? It’s not obvious to me that Jewish people have much influence on UK policy on immigration.
.
I’ve obviously missed this fact. Could you point me in the direction in which I could search to confirm this please?
As so often these days, it is useful to remember the words of George Orwell:
“There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe in them.”
In those days only a tiny proportion of the population were “intellectuals”. But as the number of university graduates has risen, so too has the level of popular idiocy.
A good education helps you understand how much you don’t know.
What I don’t know about mathematics is far more that most of you lot. 🙂
Indeed. The more you know, the more you realise how little you know …
Sweden has stumbled into one of the most disastrous state policies of the last 20 years, anywhere in the world. I hear they´ve just imported 20% of their total population from warzones.
In Germany and Sweden, where state control of the press is stronger than in the United States and Great Britain, it is illegal for a news report to mention the religion or nationality of someone arrested or accused of a crime, or to publish that person’s name if the name would identify them as a member of a particular nationality or religion. I don’t know about Great Britain, but here in the USA most of our mainstream news media, controlled by the corporate Far Left crowd, will not even publish a photo released by the police of an accused if that person is not White, Asian or Hispanic, if you know what I mean.
I’ve commented on another thread on this site about the recent murder in Hartlepool, NE England.
A 70 year old Englishman was fatally stabbed by a Moroccan refugee. The media response has been very quiet. The similar killings in France and Belgium have received more coverage in the GB press and TV.
The Tory MP for Hartlepool raised this murder at PMQs. The opposition benches tutted. We’re really not supposed to talk about these things.
I bet that rule doesn’t apply if the suspect’s name identifies him as Swedish.
What mainstream politicians, in Sweden and elsewhere, don’t seem to understand is that by denying a legitimate space in the public sphere for the airing of these issues, and by failing to address these issues in a meaningful and responsible manner, they cede these issues to the radical fringe. I would say that the inevitable backlash as the radicals take power would be unprecedented in its ferocity, but it’s absolutely precedented, because precisely the same dynamic played out in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s. Then as now, feckless elites failed to fulfill their obligations to their constituents, and when new regimes took over who did act on those concerns, they brought with them all the nastiness and brutality that characterized them when they were still on the fringe.
Beautifully articulated.
I have tried to point this out to friends and even local politicians of all stripes but in so doing it seems merely that you are labelled either a “xenophobe” or even “racist” in certain “polite” circles.
It’s cowardice not compassion motivating the Swedish government.
I would add to that “stupidity” too, particularly at the outset of their generous immigration policies.
Sadly, the populace reaps as the left wing government sowed.
The ultimate disastrous consequence of Sweden’s ruling elite being allowed to portray the country as a “Humanitarian Superpower”. Virtue signalling on a grand scale and a lot to live up to.
Violent actions by the third world underdogs (ie. The Wretched of the Earth) must now be excused and tolerated because the ruling elite of this Humanitarian Superpower cannot bear to see themselves showing aggression or (heaven forbid!) moral superiority. They have lost the ability to fight or even to assert themselves. If the West cannot establish a new intellectual and political class the levers of power will fall to third world immigrants and third world corruption.
Politicians and various “leaders” have no interest in doing boring stuff. You know, running a budget, making sure the toilets work, that the army has good boots. They want to save the world.
What saves the world is, amongst other things, bureaucrats being diligent and honest, schoolteachers explaining to children how to solve quadratic equations, doctors helping people to live healthy lives.
Dull, dull, dull.
“One wonders if we’ll ever be able to appease enough.”
No. You won’t.
The victims are the aggressors
The aggressors are the victims
You will believe I can fly.
You will become one of the WE or you will be labeled and destroyed.
Long live The State
Down with the individual
Same old same old
Sadly, the old saying is true… people tend to get the government they deserve.
No western country will stop immigration because it’s a Ponzi scheme. They rely on importing working age people from abroad in order to keep GDP rising (even if it’s falling per capita) and those extra workers pay the pensions of the current retirees. However importing more people means today to meet those needs means they’ll have to import even more in the future to pull off the same trick. Eventually the whole thing is going to collapse, we’re already seeing high rents and house prices, as well as overstretched public services and failing infrastructure, and it’s only going to get worse
Here’s a prediction. Some time in the future, Sweden will start to look a lot more like the American continent, a Brazil on snow, perhaps more like USA if they’re lucky. That’s the only way out save the country that I see. That’s except if they get some form of genocidal fascism which admittedly is a possibility given the continent’s history. Perhaps the mode operation of modern Europe is a cycle with lots of liberalism/leftism, beacon of humanity, followed by genocidal fascism.
Mention of future genocide prompts two questions;
Who?
Whom?
I’d assume the ones who did it last time would do it again. Against whatever the new minority of the day. The Muslim Question – is that catchy enough?
Sweden never did genocidal fascism. They were neutral throughout WW2, so I don’t understand your comment.
It’s too late to alter Sweden’s fatal trajectory toward being an Islamic country with Sharia law. The females running the government at the time followed Merkel’s soft-hearted but soft-headed policy of throwing open the door to the fertile Muslim population, with the inevitable servility we see today. But you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
‘Je ne suis pas Charlie, je suis Charlie Martel!’
When did Sweden stop selling iron ore to the Nazi regime in WW2? How much of the wealth of Sweden comes from selling iron ore to Nazis?
Sweden sold ball bearings to both sides. RAF pilots dressed in BOAC uniforms, and Luftwaffe pilots dressed in Lufthansa uniforms. Then they flew unarmed planes to Sweden to collect high value bearings.
Both sides knew what the other lot were doing.
Could the Nazi Regime have survived without Swedish iron ore and steel goods ?