So he’s pro climate change, anti-vaccine and defund the police. Sounds like a proper dog’s dinner – either that or he’ll say just about anything to get a vote.
He does not have a defund the police policy. That’s just plain lazy.
What’s interesting is that the biggest advertising spenders on TV/cable across CNN, CBS right through to FOX news are all big pharma dollars. So considering his stance on big pharma the hostility of all mainstream media to RFK might not be unrelated.
Even to call him ‘anti-vaccine’ is lazy. His views on vaccines are, in fact, much more nuanced.
He wants the schedule for kids’ vaccination reviewed – that means conducting double blinded randomised control trials on all vaccines currently being given to children. If they pass the requisite safety standard (we’ll know in 5 – 7 years after the trials), then he wants to see them rolled out again.
That is something that should have been done in the first place – the scandal is that it never was!
That’s true. All the more reason not to create viruses in labs in the first place. And if you do, why not use repurposed drugs with proven safety profiles, like Ivermectin or Plaquenil?
Just as, in 2016, every one of these outlets was owned by a corporation with big investments in China – which might not be unrelated to their hysterical opposition to Trump.
Ben M
3 months ago
RFK gives a detailed explanation of where he stands on all issues. Essentially he is against the public- private partnerships that dominate the Democrats now.
He is an old fashioned environmentalist who recognises that those who push the climate change-net zero narrative- global solution needed, are not interested in pollution of specific areas.
He sees big Pharma as having no concern about the health of the nation and the defence -industrial complex determined to push forever wars.
He is pro-free speech, anti divisive identity politics and wants to heal the nation by bringing everyone together.
Not sure why anyone would give you down votes- that certainly is an accurate description.
Jim Veenbaas
3 months ago
I like RFK. He’s well spoken, detailed oriented and intelligent. However, I think he has a massive blind spot on net zero. And this above everything else – DEI, CRT, vaccines et al – has the potential to destroy the prosperity and living standards we enjoy today.
Nik Jewell
3 months ago
He’s been up against the inevitable compromises that candidates have to make, and I am not with him on some issues, but compared to the alternatives, it is simply no contest. Please vote RFK Jr US readers for your sake and ours.
It was inevitable that the anti-vaxxers would be along sometime.
Andrew Boughton
3 months ago
I like him. He sounds like a leader. Sure there are issues, but on balance, strongly positive. If only Tulsi Gabbard could be his running mate.
Martin M
3 months ago
“.…and others believing he’d take the Kennedy name in a new direction“. Yes, he will take it in the direction of unhinged conspiracy theories. Still, I guess he is no madder than Trump.
So he’s pro climate change, anti-vaccine and defund the police. Sounds like a proper dog’s dinner – either that or he’ll say just about anything to get a vote.
Back to your homework Robbie!
He does not have a defund the police policy. That’s just plain lazy.
What’s interesting is that the biggest advertising spenders on TV/cable across CNN, CBS right through to FOX news are all big pharma dollars. So considering his stance on big pharma the hostility of all mainstream media to RFK might not be unrelated.
Even to call him ‘anti-vaccine’ is lazy. His views on vaccines are, in fact, much more nuanced.
He wants the schedule for kids’ vaccination reviewed – that means conducting double blinded randomised control trials on all vaccines currently being given to children. If they pass the requisite safety standard (we’ll know in 5 – 7 years after the trials), then he wants to see them rolled out again.
That is something that should have been done in the first place – the scandal is that it never was!
You can’t really do tests that take 5-7 years when a pandemic is raging.
That’s true. All the more reason not to create viruses in labs in the first place. And if you do, why not use repurposed drugs with proven safety profiles, like Ivermectin or Plaquenil?
Just as, in 2016, every one of these outlets was owned by a corporation with big investments in China – which might not be unrelated to their hysterical opposition to Trump.
RFK gives a detailed explanation of where he stands on all issues. Essentially he is against the public- private partnerships that dominate the Democrats now.
He is an old fashioned environmentalist who recognises that those who push the climate change-net zero narrative- global solution needed, are not interested in pollution of specific areas.
He sees big Pharma as having no concern about the health of the nation and the defence -industrial complex determined to push forever wars.
He is pro-free speech, anti divisive identity politics and wants to heal the nation by bringing everyone together.
Not sure why anyone would give you down votes- that certainly is an accurate description.
I like RFK. He’s well spoken, detailed oriented and intelligent. However, I think he has a massive blind spot on net zero. And this above everything else – DEI, CRT, vaccines et al – has the potential to destroy the prosperity and living standards we enjoy today.
He’s been up against the inevitable compromises that candidates have to make, and I am not with him on some issues, but compared to the alternatives, it is simply no contest. Please vote RFK Jr US readers for your sake and ours.
Seems the only reason you and others like him is because of his anti-vaccine stance.
The Pfizer ‘vaccine’ isn’t actually a vaccine at all. It’s an untested gene therapy.
It was inevitable that the anti-vaxxers would be along sometime.
I like him. He sounds like a leader. Sure there are issues, but on balance, strongly positive. If only Tulsi Gabbard could be his running mate.
“.…and others believing he’d take the Kennedy name in a new direction“. Yes, he will take it in the direction of unhinged conspiracy theories. Still, I guess he is no madder than Trump.