November 7, 2022 - 7:00am
It has been over eight months since the end of the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, events which resulted in Justin Trudeau’s government invoking Canada’s Emergencies Act, the closest legislation the country has to martial law. Following the invocation, freedom of movement and association were actively repressed within the protest area and effectively suspended across the nation. With a combination of coercion, threats and physical violence, the protestors were cleared from the scene. Trudeau then revoked the use of the Emergencies Act on February 23, 2022.
But the story didn’t end there.
As part of the Emergencies Act, it is required of the government to call an inquiry into the decision to use the legislation within 60 days of its revocation. After many delays, the inquiry finally commenced on October 23, 2022. So far, it has not painted the government in a good light.
For days Canadians were told by the Trudeau government, the media and a mass of other political commentators that the Freedom Convoy were, as a group, racist, violent and spreading “misinformation”. This was the reason why, we were told, they needed to be removed by any means necessary.
So far, the inquiry has revealed this “literal” violence was nowhere to be found. For example, the Ottawa Police Chief Steve Bell has admitted that there was no actual violence according to the technical definition in the Criminal Code of Canada. Instead, the atmosphere only “felt” violent due to the truckers using their horns.
An Ottawa City Council member, Catherine McKenney, publicly petitioned the Prime Minister to take steps against the Convoy. And yet, when questioned, it turns out that she neither witnessed nor experienced any violence at the hands of the protestors. The “terror” she experienced was due to uncorroborated second-hand accounts only. Hearsay isn’t admissible in court, but it seems to have been enough to warrant martial law.
It might seem that there was some massaging of the facts to create a narrative conducive to invoking the Emergencies Act. The inquiry proves this to have been the case. Texts between Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino’s team and Trudeau’s offices show staffers planning to “get in on this growing narrative of the truckers” and focus on the more extreme fringe participants in the Convoy in media appearances.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeCanadians should feel embarrassed.
Screw that Amber Crombie and Fitch little B&tch! Canadiens, get RID of Trudeau.
they only just voted him back in … that’s the bit I just don’t get!
I am just embarrassed that so many of my fellow Canadians supported this. I think as more and more negative information about the vaccine side effects and the mandates leaks into the mainstream media they are starting to realize they were wrong to side with Trudeau.
My op-ed piece in which I made the same arguments has led to personal attacks on my 32-years in Canadian intelligence and personal insults. Gurski: So far, nothing supports using the Emergencies Act last winter | Ottawa Citizen
I read the comments your piece received. Most commentators remain convinced that a far-right coup was about to take over the government and the EA was totally justified. I do wonder if they would feel the same way about the EA if it was used to quell a BLM riot or would they be rightly denouncing it as government overreach.
Good for you that you did something about it! And accolades to the Ottawa Citizen for publishing your opinion. (not sure if it is a typical left wing rag)
Great article and as a Canadian just further confirmation of deep trouble here in Canada. Trudeau was elected at somewhere between 20 and 30% of the population. He governs for his voters and those that don’t vote for him he leaves behind. We fervently hope to get rid of him as soon as possible but 3 cities can keep him in power indefinitely to the detriment of us all.
“Whereas far less serious scandals routinely cause British prime ministers to resign, Canadian leaders can apparently get away with lies of a different magnitude. ”
Is Canada the new Scotland? (Or should it be the other way around, perhaps… They seem to worthy of each other, for sure )
Canada is a white Africa
It was a genuine challenge to the C ovid Police state that they demonised from day one. A lot forget just how dark and grim it was when they took their stand now the Rona state has backed off a bit.
Canadians seem to LIKE tyranny. They vote for it repeatedly.
Justin Trudeau, a petty poseur has supporters and together they have taken over Canada. Why is this still happening? Who gains? Not the public it appears.
They don’t seem to care as long as they continue to get their “free” health care, which they wait months for.
Well – Ontario and Quebec do – and that is all you need to win Federal election.
Why are we not shocked about this? Duh!
The most salient point to learn is that we do not have a media anymore. The old media would have done reporting to reveal that there was no violence being committed, informing the public of what was really taking place. Today, they only report what is really taking place in their minds.
The irony is that Trudeau’s minority government is propped up by a ‘socialist’ NDP party who supported this attack on working people protesting an unjust law. The progressive left is morally bankrupt.
Was using the Emergencies Act a fearful over reaction or perhaps a reaction driven by embarrassment and spite? Either way the Canadian government doesn’t inspire confidence.
There’s a theory (Cliodynamics) that elites come and go with a period of chaos and confusion between the old elite and the new elite. I think embarrassment and spite of the old elite is more likely.
A more conspiratorial view would be that the global elite suddenly realized that an uprising of the little people was bad for their plans and had to make a show of force. I think overall this showed that the people can take back the government if they are provoked. It became clear that protesters could easily close every border crossing, highway and bridge in Canada if they chose to do so.
If you have been watching the inquiry, it’s quite evident that all levels of government were justifying their actions by inflating hearsay. The MSM played a big role in this. Their frustration at the lack of a way to dislodge the protest due to its physical size and significant public support (financial and moral) was evident. It may have been a minority that protested but it certainly wasn’t “fringe”.
That the charter rights of all Canadians were trampled upon by all levels of government to suppress a supposedly deadly virus was becoming, by then , two years later, a tired rationale. It is quite curious that immediately after the convoy, that most, if not all, provinces dropped mandates and passports. Most of the world had already done so. The federal government maintained them until June 22.
So just like the the reaction to the virus itself, the government’s hyperbolic response to the convoy was to invoke the emergency act and portray the truckers as, if not “granny killers”, then “insurrectionists”.
Unfortunately, with a government appointed commissioner of known liberal party connections, a fully funded government commission staff, lack of MSM balanced reporting and public apathy, the commission’s report will be put on a shelf for historians to read. It will still be “ sunny days” for Justinian. Well maybe partly cloudy.
Yes, it’s certain that there will be no accountability for this, not even disgrace. An authoritarian clampdown justified by a raft of lies. And to accuse the truckers of spreading misinformation– maybe the right wing doesn’t have the monopoly on post-truth politics that is so often suggested.
Compare and contrast the response to the Canadian protesters with their volunteers, food kitchens, portaloos, saunas, hairdressers, security and massage therapists to that of the truly mid-pandemic protests in the US. But the horns, the violence of the horns!
Well perhaps there will be accountability at the ballot box. This particular event just adds to a growing list of reasons why I will not be voting Liberal at the next election.
I see Trudeau is now claiming the Chinese are undermining Canadian democracy. The irony. The self satisfied lack of awareness. Or perhaps merely trying to distract attention?
Meanwhile here in the UK protestors gridlock cities by gluing themselves to trains and buses, chaining themselves together to block streets and major arteries, and playing high jinks climbing up bridges and motorway gantries. But they aren’t making a lot of noise so we’ll just give them a slap on the wrist!
We have entered a period of soft, bureaucratic despotism. It’s tyranny in slip-on loafers instead of jackboots.
Sounds like a done deal then. The Executive acts as its own court. Okay then.
Or, Parliament should see what laws they can affect against Executive overrun. If none, they should civilly disobey and cease their function. Except of course, they probably think their dictator supports the policies dear to their heart.
The Middle Classes think all they have to do is keep their noses clean and act like Canada is all that it ever was…surely it does not help them to doubt their pretty dictator.
Is anyone else sick of the utter transparency of the ‘misinformation’ dodge? We say someone is misinformed as a convenient shorthand for saying the information he’s been given is inaccurate or incomplete; but it doesn’t follow from this use of the ‘mis’ prefix that there’s such a thing as misinformation. Everything that impinges on our consciousness qualifies as information, whatever its accuracy, truth value or utility. Calling something ‘information’ doesn’t commit us to any claim about that something’s status as true or false, wise or foolish, helpful or unhelpful. Such status can only be established through patient evaluation of relevant evidence. In stark contrast, labeling something ‘misinformation’ is a deliberate attempt to prevent this kind of investigation from taking place.
Canadians seems to LIKE authoritarianism. Makes them feels safe and snuggly, I guess. Or something.
Canadians seems to LIKE authoritarianism. Makes them feels safe and snuggly, I guess. Or something.
Anyone believing any part of this article should be embarrassed.
These pages are full of people fulminating about a few oil protestor clowns messing up people’s days.
But when it comes out a bunch of trucker dupes
/ https://www.trucknews.com/blogs/the-so-called-freedom-convoy-was-never-about-truckers-or-border-mandates/
doing the same messing about, nothing but simpering excuses here.
The truckers are a bunch of dupes, indulging a taste for look-at-me melodrama:
https://ayenaw.com/2021/10/23/tyranny-tourism
Those freedom-loving boys want to fight tyranny? Off with them to Ukraine and put their money where their big mouths are.
Fat, and chance.
But now we’re talking about whether the emergencies act was warranted. There is no evidence that it was. If we are willing to accept non-sensical restrictions and government over reach – how far will it go?
What on Earth do Canadian truckers – or anyone else in the West – have to do with a civil war more than half a world away? Tyrannies exist all over the globe: fighting our own is our job.
It appears that Frank unglues himself/herself from CNN and MSNBC for an hour a day to rant on this platform.
Exactly. There seems to be total complacency in Canada despite all our charter rights being repeatedly violated during Covid. There doesn’t appear to be any recourse. When you finally get your case to trial 2 years later the courts won’t hear it because it is now moot. The real failure is the mainstream media who used to hold politicians accountable – now they cheer them on if the goal is a progressive one.